Current use of simulation for EPA assessment in emergency medicine.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately five years ago, the Royal College emergency medicine programs in Canada implemented a competency-based paradigm and introduced the use of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for assessment of units of professional activity to assess trainees. Many competency-based medical education (CBME) based curricula, involve assessing for entrustment through observations of EPAs. While EPAs are frequently assessed in clinical settings, simulation is also used. This study aimed to characterize the use of simulation for EPA assessment. METHODS: A study interview guide was jointly developed by all study authors and followed best practices for survey development. A national interview was conducted with program directors or assistant program directors across all the Royal College emergency medicine programs across Canada. Interviews were conducted over Microsoft Teams, interviews were recorded and transcribed, using Microsoft Teams transcribing service. Sample transcripts were analyzed for theme development. Themes were then reviewed by co-authors to ensure they were representative of the participants' views. RESULTS: A 64.7% response rate was achieved. Simulation has been widely adopted by EM training programs. All interviewees demonstrated support for the use of simulation for EPA assessment for many reasons, however, PDs acknowledged limitations and thematic analysis revealed certain themes and tensions for using simulation for EPA assessment. Thematic analysis revealed six major themes: widespread support for the use of simulation for EPA assessment, concerns regarding the potential for EPA assessment to become a "tick- box" exercise, logistical barriers limiting the use of simulation for EPA assessment, varied perceptions about the authenticity of using simulation for EPA assessment, the potential for simulation for EPA assessment to compromise learner psychological safety, and suggestions for the optimization of use of simulation for EPA assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings offer insight for other programs and specialties on how simulation for EPA assessment can best be utilized. Programs should use these findings when considering using simulation for EPA assessment.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Il y a environ cinq ans, les programmes de médecine d'urgence du Collège royal au Canada ont mis en place un paradigme basé sur les compétences et ont introduit l'utilisation d'activités professionnelles confiables (APC) pour l'évaluation des unités d'activité professionnelle afin d'évaluer les stagiaires. De nombreux programmes d'enseignement médical basés sur les compétences (CBME) prévoient l'évaluation des compétences par l'observation des APC. Bien que les APC soient fréquemment évaluées en milieu clinique, la simulation est également utilisée. Cette étude visait à caractériser l'utilisation de la simulation pour l'évaluation de l'APC. MéTHODES: Un guide d'entretien d'étude a été élaboré conjointement par tous les auteurs de l'étude et a suivi les meilleures pratiques en matière d'élaboration d'enquêtes. Un entretien national a été réalisé avec les directeurs de programmes ou les directeurs adjoints de tous les programmes de médecine d'urgence du Collège royal au Canada. Les entretiens ont été menés sur Microsoft Teams, enregistrés et transcrits à l'aide du service de transcription de Microsoft Teams. Les transcriptions des échantillons ont été analysées pour développer des thèmes. Les thèmes ont ensuite été revus par les co-auteurs pour s'assurer qu'ils étaient représentatifs des points de vue des participants. RéSULTATS: Un taux de réponse de 64,7 % a été obtenu. La simulation a été largement adoptée par les programmes de formation en médecine d'urgence. Toutes les personnes interrogées se sont montrées favorables à l'utilisation de la simulation pour l'évaluation de l'APE pour de nombreuses raisons. Cependant, les DP ont reconnu des limites et l'analyse thématique a révélé certains thèmes et tensions liés à l'utilisation de la simulation pour l'évaluation de l'APC. L'analyse thématique a révélé six thèmes majeurs : un appui généralisé à l'utilisation de la simulation pour l'évaluation de l'APC, inquiétudes concernant la possibilité que l'évaluation de l'APC devienne un exercice de type « case à cocher ¼, des obstacles logistiques limitant l'utilisation de la simulation pour l'évaluation de l'APC, les perceptions variées quant à l'authenticité de l'utilisation de la simulation pour l'évaluation de l'APC, le potentiel de la simulation pour l'évaluation de l'APC de compromettre la sécurité psychologique des apprenants, et des suggestions pour l'optimisation de l'utilisation de la simulation pour l'évaluation de l'APC. CONCLUSIONS: Nos résultats offrent un aperçu à d'autres programmes et spécialités sur la meilleure façon d'utiliser la simulation pour l'évaluation de l'APC. Les programmes devraient utiliser ces résultats lorsqu'ils envisagent d'utiliser la simulation pour l'évaluation de l'APC.

ST Elevation in the COVID-19 Era: A Diagnostic Challenge.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 induces a marked prothrombotic state with varied clinical presentations, including acute coronary artery occlusions leading to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, while STEMI on electrocardiogram (ECG) is not always associated with acute coronary occlusion, this diagnostic uncertainty should not delay cardiac catheterization. CASE REPORTS: We present 2 cases of patients with COVID-19 that presented with STEMI on ECG. While both patients underwent cardiac catheterization, a delay in time to intervention in the patient found to have acute coronary artery occlusion may have contributed to a poor outcome. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: These cases highlight the fact that while not all COVID-19 patients with STEMI on ECG will have acute coronary artery occlusions, there is continued need for prompt percutaneous coronary intervention during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic.

2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a lifesaving technique for victims of sudden cardiac arrest. Despite advances in resuscitation science, basic life support remains a critical factor in determining outcomes. The American Heart Association recommendations for adult basic life support incorporate the most recently published evidence and serve as the basis for education and training for laypeople and healthcare providers who perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Accuracy of instructor assessment of chest compression quality during simulated resuscitation.

OBJECTIVES: The 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines stress the importance of high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as a predictor of survival from cardiac arrest. However, resuscitation training is often facilitated and evaluated by instructors without access to objective measures of CPR quality. This study aims to determine whether instructors experienced in the area of adult resuscitation (emergency department staff and senior residents) can accurately assess the quality of chest compressions as a component of their global assessment of a simulated resuscitation scenario. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study in which objective chest compression quality data (rate, depth, and fraction) were collected from the simulation manikin and compared to subjective instructor assessment. Data were collected during weekly simulation training sessions for residents, medical students, and nursing students. RESULTS: We included data from 24 simulated resuscitation scenarios assessed by 1 of 15 instructors. Subjective assessment of chest compression quality identified an adequate compression rate (100-120 compressions per minute) with a sensitivity of 0.17 (confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.32) and specificity of 0.06 (CI -0.04-0.15), adequate depth (>50 mm) with a sensitivity of 0 and specificity of 0.38 (CI 0.18-0.57), and adequate fraction (>80%) with a sensitivity of 1 and a specificity of 0.25 (CI 0.08-0.42). CONCLUSION: Instructor assessment of chest compression rate, depth, and fraction demonstrates poor sensitivity and specificity when compared to the data from the simulation manikin. These results support the use of objective and technologically supported measures of chest compression quality for feedback during resuscitation education using simulators.