Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(4)2024 Apr 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674277

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Symptomatic acute metastatic spinal epidural cord compression (MSCC) is an emergency that requires multimodal attention. However, there is no clear consensus on the appropriate timing for surgery. Therefore, to address this issue, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the outcomes of different surgery timings. Methods: We searched multiple databases for studies involving adult patients suffering from symptomatic MSCC who underwent decompression with or without fixation. We analyzed the data by stratifying them based on timing as emergent (≤24 h vs. >24 h) and urgent (≤48 h vs. >48 h). The analysis also considered adverse postoperative medical and surgical events. The rates of improved outcomes and adverse events were pooled through a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: We analyzed seven studies involving 538 patients and discovered that 83.0% (95% CI 59.0-98.2%) of those who underwent urgent decompression showed an improvement of ≥1 point in strength scores. Adverse events were reported in 21% (95% CI 1.8-51.4%) of cases. Patients who underwent emergent surgery had a 41.3% (95% CI 20.4-63.3%) improvement rate but a complication rate of 25.5% (95% CI 15.9-36.3%). Patients who underwent surgery after 48 h showed 36.8% (95% CI 12.2-65.4%) and 28.6% (95% CI 19.5-38.8%) complication rates, respectively. Conclusion: Our study highlights that a 48 h window may be the safest and most beneficial for patients presenting with acute MSCC and a life expectancy of over three months.


Subject(s)
Decompression, Surgical , Spinal Cord Compression , Humans , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Decompression, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Spinal Cord Compression/surgery , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Spinal Neoplasms/complications , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
Brain Sci ; 13(11)2023 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38002548

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Status epilepticus is a life-threatening condition that is defined as refractory (RSE) when the seizure activity continues despite treatment with benzodiazepine and a second appropriate treatment. Super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is an RSE that persists or recurs for ≥24 h. Few papers have reported the outcomes of pediatric patients affected by RSE and SRSE and treated with neuromodulation therapies. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an approved treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. We present our findings of pediatric patients treated with VNS for RSE/SRSE. METHODS: We present a case series of seven consecutive pediatric patients treated with VNS for SRSE since 2012 by a single surgeon in Monza and Padua. A rapid titration was started soon after implantation. We considered electroclinical data before and after VNS implantation and at the last follow-up. RESULTS: We achieved the resolution of SRSE in five out of seven patients in a mean time of two weeks. At the last follow-up, these patients had a significant reduction of seizure burden without any relapse of SE. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Based on our limited findings, we discuss the potential role of VNS therapy in similar but distinct clinical contexts. For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and RSE/SRSE, prompt VNS consideration is suggested, offering rapid responses and potentially reducing pharmacological load. Meanwhile, in NORSE/FIRES, we suggest early neuromodulation during the acute phase if standard treatments prove ineffective or not tolerated. This approach may leverage VNS's potential anti-inflammatory effects and neuromodulation, enhancing patient-specific treatments. Expanding case studies and prolonged follow-ups are recommended to strengthen these clinical insights.

3.
Epilepsy Behav ; 147: 109419, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37677901

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulation therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), refractory status epilepticus, and treatment-resistant depression. The lead is tunneled into the subcutaneous space and connected to the generator, which is usually implanted in a subcutaneous pocket below the clavicle. Surgical complications in the chest region include skin breakdown or infection. An alternative approach is to perform a subclavear subpectoral implantation. In our surgical series, we report a new aesthetic implantation method for VNS generators in children and young patients: the transaxillary subpectoral placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2021 to May 2023, 10 vagus nerve stimulation generators were placed subpectorally with a transaxillary approach by the authors. We considered operative time, surgical complications such as blood loss, infections, device migration, pain, and adverse events at follow-up. RESULTS: In this surgical series, we reviewed all cases of subpectoral implantation of VNS generators in children and young adults at our institution in the last 2 years. All patients were treated with subpectoral Sentiva 1000 (Livanova PLC) insertion with axillary access by a neurosurgeon and a pediatric surgeon. The operative time was slightly longer compared to the traditional subcutaneous implant. All generators reported impedances within the optimal range. Blood loss was not significant and no other perioperative complications were reported. Patients and families were highly satisfied with the outcomes in terms of comfort and aesthetic results after surgery and at the last follow-up. No cases of infection occurred, and no malfunctions or displacements of the generator were registered at clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION: The transaxillary subpectoral placement of theVNS generator is an aesthetic and anatomic approach, which provides several benefits to children and young adults.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Status Epilepticus , Vagus Nerve Stimulation , Child , Humans , Young Adult , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/surgery , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Status Epilepticus/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Vagus Nerve/physiology , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/methods
4.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 39(3): 577-581, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36637469

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In pediatric, head trauma acute hydrocephalus is an uncommon but possible complication. Association with a subarachnoid hemorrhage is poorly described. METHODS: We described a case of an 8-year-old girl with acute hydrocephalus secondary to peri-mesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage after mild head trauma resolved with external ventricular drainage. Furthermore, we have conducted a review of the literature about this complication in pediatric head trauma. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Acute hydrocephalus related to post-traumatic peri-mesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) is an unknown entity in pediatric head trauma. According to our experience, traumatic peri-mesencephalic SAH should be under close clinical monitoring to identify post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH), a potentially fatal complication in pediatric mild head trauma.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma , Hydrocephalus , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage , Female , Humans , Child , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/complications , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Hydrocephalus/diagnostic imaging , Hydrocephalus/etiology , Hydrocephalus/surgery , Craniocerebral Trauma/complications , Drainage/adverse effects
5.
J ECT ; 39(1): 23-27, 2023 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35815853

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been shown to be effective for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, long-term (>5 years) studies on the efficacy and tolerability of this treatment have been lacking. Here, we report a long-term clinical follow-up of 5 patients with severe and long-standing TRD, who received a VNS implant. METHODS: Of the initial 6 patients with TRD implanted with VNS at our center, 5 of them were followed for 6 to 12 years after implantation. Primary efficacy outcomes were clinical response and improved functioning at follow-up visits. The primary safety outcome was all-cause discontinuation, and the secondary safety outcomes were the number and the severity of adverse events. RESULTS: The VNS implant was associated with a sustained response (>10 years) in terms of clinical response and social, occupational, and psychological functioning in 3 patients. Two patients dropped out after 6 and 7 years of treatment, respectively. Vagus nerve stimulation was well tolerated by all patients, who reported only mild adverse effects. One patient, who discontinued concomitant drug treatment, had a hypomanic episode in the 10th year of treatment. The parameters of the VNS device were fine-tuned when life stressors or symptom exacerbation occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series showed that VNS can have long-term and durable effectiveness in patients with severe multiepisode chronic depression, and this could be associated with its neuroplastic effects in the hippocampus. In light of good general tolerability, our findings support VNS as a viable treatment option for TRD.


Subject(s)
Electroconvulsive Therapy , Vagus Nerve Stimulation , Humans , Depression , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vagus Nerve
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL