Clinical aspects and diagnostic relevance of neuroautonomic evaluation in patients with unexplained falls.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic relevance of neuroautonomic evaluation in patients with unexplained falls compared to those with a syncope etiologically unexplained after initial evaluation. METHODS: It is an observational study, comparing 298 patients with unexplained fall with 989 patients with unexplained syncope. Each patient underwent supine and upright blood pressure measurement, tilt testing (TT) and carotid sinus massage (CSM). RESULTS: Patients with unexplained falls were older (75.3 ± 11.1 vs. 63.2 ± 19.2 years, p < 0.001), were more frequently hypertensive (66.1 vs. 47.2 %, p < 0.001) and more frequently prescribed antihypertensive drugs (62.4 vs. 48.7 %, p < 0.001) or benzodiazepines (15.7 vs. 10.6 %, p = 0.01), and in a greater proportion they experienced major traumatic injuries (77.5 vs. 29.6 %, p < 0.001) as a consequence of falls. The TT was less frequently positive in patients with unexplained falls (36 vs. 51.3 %, p < 0.001), whereas a Carotid Sinus Syndrome as suggested by CSM had a similar prevalence in the two groups (14.3 vs. 10.5 %, p = 0.074). Overall, either TT or CSM were positive in 61 % of patients with unexplained falls, and in 64 % of those with syncope (p = 0.346). After matching by age 298 patients with falls (75.3 ± 11.1 years) and 298 patients with unexplained syncope (75.4 ± 11.1 years), we found that the positivity prevalence of TT and CSM were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The positivity prevalence of TT and CSM in patients with unexplained falls compared to patients with unexplained syncope is similar. Given its high diagnostic relevance, the neuroautonomic evaluation should be routinely performed in older patients with unexplained falls.

The management of syncope in older adults.

Syncope is a frequent symptom in older patients. The diagnostic and therapeutic management may be complex, particularly in older adults with syncope and comorbidities or cognitive impairment. Morbidity related to syncope is more common in older persons and ranges from loss of confidence, depressive illness and fear of falling, to fractures and consequent institutionalization. Moreover, advan-ced age is associated with short and long-term morbidity and mortality after syncope. A standardized approach may obtain a definite diagnosis in more than 90% of the older patients with syncope and may reduce diagnostic tools and hospitalizations. The initial evaluation, including anamnesis, medical examination, orthostatic hypotension test and electrocardiogram (ECG), may be more difficult in the elderly, specially for the limited value of medical history, particularly for the certain diagnosis of neuro-mediated syncope. For this reason neuroautonomic assessment is an essential step to confirm a suspect of neuromediated syncope. Orthostatic blood pressure measurement, head up tilt test, carotid sinus massage and insertable cardiac monitor are safe and useful investigations, particularly in older patients. The most common causes of syncope in the older adults are orthostatic hypotension, carotid sinus hypersensitivity, neuromediated syncope and cardiac arrhythmias. The diagnostic evaluation and the treatment of cardiac syncope are similar in older and young patients and for this reason will not be discussed. In older patients unexplained falls could be related to syncope, particularly in patients with retrograde amnesia. There are no consistent differences in the treatment of syncope between older and younger population, but a specific approach is necessary for orthostatic hypotension, drug therapy and pacemaker implantation.