Considerations for future modification of The Association for the Study of Reproductive Biology embryo grading system incorporating time-lapse observations.

The Association for the Study of Reproductive Biology (ASEBIR) Interest Group in Embryology (in Spanish 'Grupo de Interés de Embriología') reviewed key morphokinetic parameters to assess the contribution of time-lapse technology (TLT) to the ASEBIR grading system. Embryo grading based on morphological characteristics is the most widely used method in human assisted reproduction laboratories. The introduction and implementation of TLT has provided a large amount of information that can be used as a complementary tool for morphological embryo evaluation and selection. As part of IVF treatments, embryologists grade embryos to decide which embryos to transfer or freeze. At the present, the embryo grading system developed by ASEBIR does not consider dynamic events observed through TLT. Laboratories that are using TLT consider those parameters as complementary data for embryo selection. The aim of this review was to evaluate review time-specific morphological changes during embryo development that are not included in the ASEBIR scoring system, and to consider them as candidates to add to the scoring system.

The efficacy of novel centrifugation-free sperm selection (Io-Lix) on sperm parameters and ICSI reproductive outcomes.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the effect of a novel non-centrifugation method (Io-Lix) of sperm selection on sperm parameters and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) reproductive outcomes? DESIGN: This pilot study elevated the capacity of the Io-Lix sperm selection protocol to improve sperm parameters (concentration, motility and sperm DNA fragmentation) of the neat ejaculate. Once established, the reproductive outcomes of Io-Lix selected spermatozoa were used for autologous and donor oocyte ICSI programmes and their efficacy compared with those using conventional swim-up. RESULTS: Io-Lix sperm selection resulted in lower sperm concentration yield (P < 0.001) and sperm DNA fragmentation (P < 0.001) but higher sperm motility (P < 0.001) when compared with spermatozoa in the neat ejaculate. When compared with swim-up sperm selection the Io-Lix protocol resulted in a 14.7% (P = 0.028) increase in pregnancy rate and 16.3% (P = 0.047) reduction in miscarriages in the autologous ICSI programme. A similar comparison of sperm selection procedures employed for a donor oocyte ICSI programme showed no difference in terms of their respective reproductive outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The Io-Lix sperm selection protocol resulted in improved pregnancy rate and reduction in miscarriage when applied to autologous ICSI, which was attributed to a reduction in the proportion of spermatozoa with DNA damage post-selection. A similar finding was not apparent in the donor oocyte programme, which may be associated with the capacity of the donor oocyte to repair sperm DNA post-syngamy.

Defining poor and optimum performance in an IVF programme.

BACKGROUND: At present there is considerable interest in healthcare administration, among professionals and among the general public concerning the quality of programmes of assisted reproduction. There exist various methods for comparing and analysing the results of clinical activity, with graphical methods being the most commonly used for this purpose. As yet, there is no general consensus as to how the poor performance (PP) or optimum performance (OP) of assisted reproductive technologies should be defined. METHODS: Data from the IVF/ICSI register of the Spanish Fertility Society were used to compare and analyse different definitions of PP or OP. The primary variable best reflecting the quality of an IVF/ICSI programme was taken to be the percentage of singleton births per IVF/ICSI cycle initiated. Of the 75 infertility clinics that took part in the SEF-2003 survey, data on births were provided by 58. A total of 25 462 cycles were analysed. The following graphical classification methods were used: ranking of the proportion of singleton births per cycles started in each centre (league table), Shewhart control charts, funnel plots, best and worst-case scenarios and state of the art methods. RESULTS: The clinics classified as producing PP or OP varied considerably depending on the classification method used. Only three were rated as providing 'PP' or 'OP' by all methods, unanimously. Another four clinics were classified as 'poor' or 'optimum' by all the methods except one. CONCLUSIONS: On interpreting the results derived from IVF/ICSI centres, it is essential to take into account the characteristics of the method used for this purpose.