Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Alternative Splicing , Collagen Type X/genetics , Esophageal Mucosa/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy , Carcinogenesis/genetics , Cell Movement/genetics , Datasets as Topic , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Gene Knockdown Techniques , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Protein Isoforms/genetics , RNA-SeqABSTRACT
Background: Surveillance of individuals at high risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its precursors might lead to better outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and outcomes of PDAC and high-risk neoplastic precursor lesions among such patients participating in surveillance programmes. Methods: A multicentre study was conducted through the International CAncer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium Registry to identify high-risk individuals who had undergone pancreatic resection or progressed to advanced PDAC while under surveillance. High-risk neoplastic precursor lesions were defined as: pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) 3, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) with high-grade dysplasia, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours at least 2 cm in diameter. Results: Of 76 high-risk individuals identified in 11 surveillance programmes, 71 had undergone surgery and five had been diagnosed with inoperable PDAC. Of the 71 patients who underwent resection, 32 (45 per cent) had PDAC or a high-risk precursor (19 PDAC, 4 main-duct IPMN, 4 branch-duct IPMN, 5 PanIN-3); the other 39 patients had lesions thought to be associated with a lower risk of neoplastic progression. Age at least 65 years, female sex, carriage of a gene mutation and location of a lesion in the head/uncinate region were associated with high-risk precursor lesions or PDAC. The survival of high-risk individuals with low-risk neoplastic lesions did not differ from that in those with high-risk precursor lesions. Survival was worse among patients with PDAC. There was no surgery-related mortality. Conclusion: A high proportion of high-risk individuals who had surgical resection for screening- or surveillance-detected pancreatic lesions had a high-risk neoplastic precursor lesion or PDAC at the time of surgery. Survival was better in high-risk individuals who had either low- or high-risk neoplastic precursor lesions compared with that in patients who developed PDAC.
Antecedentes: Se podrían obtener mejores resultados con el seguimiento de individuos de alto riesgo para adenocarcinoma ductal pancreático (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, PDAC) y lesiones precursoras. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la prevalencia y los resultados del PDAC y de las lesiones precursoras de alto riesgo neoplásico en pacientes que participaron en programas de seguimiento. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio multicéntrico a través del registro internacional del consorcio CAPS (Common Automotive Platform Standard) para identificar a las personas de alto riesgo que se habían sometido a una resección pancreática o habían progresado a PDAC avanzado mientras estaban en seguimiento. Se definieron como lesiones neoplásicas precursoras de alto riesgo la neoplasia intraepitelial pancreática de tipo 3 (PanIN3), la neoplasia papilar mucinosa intraductal (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, IPMN) con displasia de alto grado y los tumores neuroendocrinos pancreáticos (pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, PanNET) de ≥ 2 cm de diámetro. Resultados: De 76 individuos con lesiones de alto riesgo identificados en 11 programas de seguimiento, 71 fueron tratados quirúrgicamente y 5 fueron diagnosticados de un PDAC inoperable. De las 71 resecciones, 32 (45%) tenían PDAC o una lesión precursora de alto riesgo (19 PDAC, 4 IPMN de conducto principal, 4 IPMN de rama secundaria y 5 PanIN3). Los otros 39 pacientes tenían lesiones que se consideraron asociadas con un menor riesgo de progresión neoplásica. La edad ≥ 65 años, el sexo femenino, el ser portador de una mutación genética y la localización de la lesión en la cabeza/proceso uncinado fueron factores asociados a las lesiones precursoras de alto riesgo o al PDAC. No hubo diferencias en la supervivencia de individuos de alto riesgo con lesiones neoplásicas de bajo riesgo frente a aquellos que presentaron lesiones precursoras de alto riesgo. La supervivencia fue peor en los pacientes con PDAC. No hubo mortalidad relacionada con la cirugía. Conclusión: Un elevado porcentaje de individuos de alto riesgo que se sometieron a resección quirúrgica tras la detección de lesiones pancreáticas en el seguimiento tenían una lesión precursora neoplásica de alto riesgo o un PDAC. La supervivencia fue mejor en individuos de alto riesgo que tenían lesiones precursoras neoplásicas de bajo o alto riesgo en comparación con aquellos pacientes que habían desarrollado un PDAC.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics , Epidemiological Monitoring , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation/genetics , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Based on striking aggregation of breast cancer and BE/EAC within families as well as shared risk factors and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis, we hypothesized that BE may be associated with breast cancer. Pedigree analysis of families identified prospectively at multiple academic centers as part of the Familial Barrett's Esophagus Consortium (FBEC) was reviewed and families with aggregation of BE/EAC and breast cancer are reported. Additionally, using a matched case-control study design, we compared newly diagnosed BE cases in Caucasian females with breast cancer (cases) to Caucasian females without breast cancer (controls) who had undergone upper endoscopy (EGD). Two familial pedigrees, meeting a stringent inclusion criterion, manifested familial aggregation of BE/EAC and breast cancer in an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with incomplete penetrance. From January 2008 to October 2016, 2812 breast cancer patient charts were identified, of which 213 were Caucasian females who underwent EGD. Six of 213 (2.82%) patients with breast cancer had pathology-confirmed BE, compared to 1 of 241 (0.41%) controls (P-value < 0.05). Selected families with BE/EAC show segregation of breast cancer. A breast cancer diagnosis is marginally associated with BE. We postulate a common susceptibility between BE/EAC and breast cancer.
Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Humans , Middle Aged , Pedigree , Prospective Studies , White People/geneticsABSTRACT
The incidence of Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is increasing. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides an unprecedented opportunity to uncover genomic alterations during BE pathogenesis and progression to EAC, but treatment-naive surgical specimens are scarce. The objective of this study was to establish the feasibility of using widely available endoscopic mucosal biopsies for successful NGS, using samples obtained from a BE 'progressor'. Paired-end whole-genome NGS was performed on the Illumina platform using libraries generated from mucosal biopsies of normal squamous epithelium (NSE), BE and EAC obtained from a patient who progressed to adenocarcinoma during endoscopic surveillance. Selective validation studies, including Sanger sequencing, immunohistochemistry and functional assays, were performed to confirm the NGS findings. NGS identified somatic nonsense mutations of AT-rich interactive domain 1A (SWI like) (ARID1A) and PPIE and an additional 37 missense mutations in BE and/or EAC, which were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. ARID1A mutations were detected in 15% (3/20) high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/EAC patients. Immunohistochemistry performed on an independent archival cohort demonstrated ARID1A protein loss in 0% (0/76), 4.9% (2/40), 14.3% (4/28), 16.0% (8/50) and 12.2% (12/98) of NSE, BE, low-grade dysplasia, HGD and EAC tissues, respectively, and was inversely associated with nuclear p53 accumulation (P=0.028). Enhanced cell growth, proliferation and invasion were observed on ARID1A knockdown in EAC cells. In addition, genes downstream of ARID1A that potentially contribute to the ARID1A knockdown phenotype were identified. Our studies establish the feasibility of using mucosal biopsies for NGS, which should enable the comparative analysis of larger 'progressor' versus 'non-progressor' cohorts. Further, we identify ARID1A as a novel tumor-suppressor gene in BE pathogenesis, reiterating the importance of aberrant chromatin in the metaplasia-dysplasia sequence.
Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Barrett Esophagus/metabolism , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Biopsy , Blotting, Western , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , DNA-Binding Proteins , Endoscopes , Epithelium/metabolism , Epithelium/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/metabolism , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Gene Regulatory Networks , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation, Missense , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , RNA Interference , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcriptome , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/metabolismSubject(s)
Choristoma/diagnostic imaging , Epidermal Cyst/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Spleen , Choristoma/pathology , Choristoma/surgery , Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Endosonography , Epidermal Cyst/pathology , Epidermal Cyst/surgery , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Diseases/pathology , Pancreatic Diseases/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Endoscopic therapy of brisk upper gastrointestinal bleeding remains challenging. A proprietary nanopowder (TC-325) has been proven to be effective in high pressure bleeding from external wounds. The efficacy and safety of TC-325 were assessed in a survival gastrointestinal bleeding animal model. METHOD: 10 animals were randomized to treatment or sham. All animals received intravenous antibiotics, H2-blockers and heparin (activated clotting time 2 × normal). In a sterile laparotomy the gastroepiploic vessels were dissected, inserted through a 1-cm gastrotomy, and freely exposed in the gastric lumen, and the exposed vessel lacerated by needle knife. The treatment group received TC-325 by a modified delivery catheter while the sham group received no endoscopic treatment. Time to hemostasis, and mortality at 60 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days were noted. Necropsy was performed in all animals. RESULTS: Spurting arterial bleeding was achieved in all animals. No control animal showed hemostasis within the first hour compared with 100 % (5 / 5) in the treatment arm (mean 13.8 minutes, P < 0.0079). Durable hemostasis was achieved with no evidence of rebleeding after 1 and 24 hours in 80 % (4 / 5) of the treated animals compared with none in the control group ( P < 0.0098). None of the control animals survived more than 6 hours. Necropsy at 1 week in treated animals revealed healed gastrotomy without foreign body granuloma or embolization to the lung or brain. CONCLUSION: TC-325 is safe and highly effective in achieving hemostasis in an anticoagulated severe arterial gastrointestinal bleeding animal model.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Hemostatics/administration & dosage , Powders/administration & dosage , Animals , Female , Gastroepiploic Artery , Nanoparticles , Sus scrofaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is rapidly emerging as a valuable tool for gastrointestinal endoscopic imaging. Fluorescent contrast agents are used to optimize imaging with CLE, and intravenous fluorescein is the most widely used contrast agent. Fluorescein is FDA-cleared for diagnostic angiography of the retina. For these indications, the safety profile of fluorescein has been well-documented; however, to date, fluorescein is not cleared for use with CLE. AIMS: To estimate the rate of serious and total adverse events attributable to intravenous fluorescein when used for gastrointestinal CLE. METHODS: We performed a cross sectional survey of 16 International Academic Medical Centres with active research protocols in CLE that involved intravenous fluorescein. Centres using i.v. fluorescein for CLE who were actively monitored for adverse events were included. RESULTS: Sixteen centres performed 2272 gastrointestinal CLE procedures. The most common dose of contrast agent was 2.5-5 mL of 10% sodium fluorescein. No serious adverse events were reported. Mild adverse events occurred in 1.4% of individuals, including nausea/vomiting, transient hypotension without shock, injection site erythema, diffuse rash and mild epigastric pain. The limitation is that only immediate post procedure events were actively monitored. CONCLUSIONS: Use of intravenous fluorescein for gastrointestinal CLE appears to be safe with few acute complications.
Subject(s)
Contrast Media/adverse effects , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Fluorescein/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exanthema/chemically induced , Exanthema/epidemiology , Humans , Hypotension/chemically induced , Hypotension/epidemiology , Injections, Intravenous/adverse effects , Microscopy, Confocal/methods , Nausea/chemically induced , Nausea/epidemiology , Pain/chemically induced , Pain/epidemiology , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Pancreatic ablation is gaining popularity for the treatment of focal pancreatic lesions. The aim of our study was to evaluate local effects of intrapancreatic alcohol injection and the utility of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for its monitoring in a porcine model. METHODS: We performed four survival experiments on 50-kg pigs. Under linear EUS guidance, 0.5 mL of 50% ethanol plus purified carbon particle solution (GI Spot) was injected into the pancreatic body to create a focal area of pancreatic necrosis. The animals survived for 24-48 hours (pigs # 1, # 2, and # 3) and 7 days (pig # 4). EUS was then repeated with and without perflutren lipid microspheres (Definity) administration through the peripheral vein. Standard and microsphere-enhanced images of the pancreas were compared. Afterwards the animals were euthanized for necropsy. RESULTS: Alcohol injection caused focal pancreatic necrosis, which was barely seen by standard EUS as a subtle hypoechoic lesion 1 cm in diameter. Color and power Doppler EUS of this region did not reveal any blood flow. After intravenous injection of microspheres, color Doppler EUS revealed marked contrast enhancement of normal pancreatic parenchyma with a clearly delineated avascular alcohol-treated area, which on postmortem examination corresponded to the discrete necrotic area marked with carbon particles. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided alcohol injection consistently causes focal areas of pancreatic necrosis. Contrast-enhanced EUS with microspheres improves visualization of altered pancreatic vascular perfusion and can be used to facilitate detection of small pancreatic lesions and its follow-up post-ablation.
Subject(s)
Caustics/administration & dosage , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Endosonography , Ethanol/administration & dosage , Pancreas/diagnostic imaging , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Image Enhancement , Injections, Intralesional , Injections, Intravenous , Microspheres , Necrosis , Pancreas/pathology , Pilot Projects , SwineABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Creation of a submucosal cushion before endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) significantly reduces perforation risk. We evaluated six solutions as cushioning agents in live pigs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 5 ml of normal saline, normal saline plus epinephrine, albumin 12.5 %, albumin 25 %, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, and the pig's own whole blood were endoscopically injected into the porcine esophageal submucosa. Blood was obtained from a peripheral vein immediately before injection. Injections were made every 4 cm from the gastroesophageal junction. The time from completion of the injection to disappearance of the cushion was recorded. Endoscopy was repeated at 48 hours post injection. Two EMRs were performed after blood injection. Statistical analysis employed one-way analysis of variance followed by pairwise T test comparisons using the Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Five animal experiments were completed. The mean time to dissipation of the submucosal cushion was shortest for saline plus epinephrine sites (2.87 minutes, SD 2.21) followed by the saline (4.8 minutes, SD 1.56), albumin 12.5 % (5.68 minutes, SD 3.48), albumin 25 % (7.83 minutes, SD 2.02), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (9.77 minutes, SD 1.55), and blood sites (38.6 minutes, SD 6.07). Injection of blood resulted in significantly longer mucosal elevation than any other solution ( P < 0.0007). Blood from the cushion did not hamper visualization and facilitated EMR. CONCLUSION: Blood produces the most durable cushion compared with standard agents, also having the advantages of being readily available and without cost. Albumin 25 % provides as durable a cushion as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose.
Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion, Autologous/methods , Mucous Membrane , Albumins/administration & dosage , Animals , Esophagus , Hypromellose Derivatives , Injections , Methylcellulose/administration & dosage , Methylcellulose/analogs & derivatives , Models, Animal , Swine , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Barrett's esophagus is a premalignant condition in which normal squamous epithelium of the esophagus is replaced by metaplastic columnar epithelium. It is a known risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. With the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma rising, it is reasonable to study Barrett's esophagus as a potential target for therapy that may prevent, delay and/or reverse ongoing tumorigenic processes. Epidemiologic and animal studies support the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the chemoprevention of several cancers, including esophageal cancer. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors are a new class of NSAIDs that inhibit prostaglandin synthesis by selectively blocking the COX-2 enzyme. The COX-2 enzyme has been reported to be over-expressed in premalignant and malignant states, including in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. The Chemoprevention for Barrett's Esophagus Trial (CBET) is a phase IIb, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study of the selective COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, in patients with Barrett's dysplasia. The sample size is 200 patients with high or low grade Barrett's dysplasia. Celecoxib is administered orally, 200 mg twice per day; the dosing schedule for placebo is the same. Randomization is stratified by dysplasia grade and by clinic. Endoscopy with biopsies is performed at specified time intervals according to the highest grade of dysplasia determined at randomization. The primary outcome measure is the change from baseline to 1 year in the proportion of biopsies exhibiting dysplasia. Secondary outcomes include change from baseline in the maximal grade, extent and surface area of dysplasia. Tertiary outcomes will include measurements of various relevant biomarkers.
Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/prevention & control , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Genes, Tumor Suppressor , Humans , Methylation , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Design , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Intestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Methylene Blue , Barrett Esophagus/complications , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Intestinal Neoplasms/complications , Metaplasia/pathology , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Surveillance of patients with Barrett esophagus (BE) is recommended to detect dysplasia and early cancer. In 1998, practice guidelines for the surveillance of patients with BE were developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). Our objective is to assess physicians' awareness of agreement with and adherence to these guidelines. METHODS: A national prospective cohort study of practicing gastroenterologists who completed a self-administered questionnaire containing case studies prior to the release of the guidelines and another survey 18 months later. Analysis of adherence to the guidelines was done using the McNemar chi(2) test. RESULTS: Of the 154 gastroenterologists (66%) who responded to the follow-up survey, more than half (55%) were aware of the guidelines, and members of the ACG were more likely to know of their existence than nonmembers (61% vs 38%; P =.01). Overall, about 27% of physicians reported practicing in accordance with the guidelines at baseline; adherence increased modestly to 38% in the 18-month follow-up (P =.04) and was inversely related to fee-for-service reimbursement. Awareness was not associated with an increased likelihood of adherence, but agreement with the guidelines was strongly correlated with adherence (P<.001). The most frequent reasons for disagreement were concerns about liability, cancer risk, and inadequate evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the guidelines published by the ACG was low. Guideline awareness did not predict adherence. Improvement in guideline adherence will require steps beyond mere dissemination and promotion. Addressing disagreements about liability, disease risk, and scientific evidence as well as restructuring payment incentives may help achieve optimal practice.
Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Awareness , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Methylene blue selectively stains specialized columnar epithelium in Barrett's esophagus with high accuracy. We prospectively evaluated the methylene blue staining properties of dysplastic and nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus and the association of these properties with the risk for dysplasia and cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a ex vivo study, we mapped, photographed, and sampled esophagectomy specimens with high grade dysplasia and/or early adenocarcinoma before and after methylene blue staining. In a concurrent in vivo study, we performed methylene blue staining and characterized methylene blue stain characteristics. Pathologists estimated the proportion of specialized columnar epithelium in each specimen and graded dysplasia. RESULTS: We examined 551 biopsies from 47 patients with biopsy-proven Barrett's esophagus and 48 sections from five surgical specimens with Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma. The accuracy of ex vivo and in vivo methylene blue staining for specialized columnar epithelium was 87% and 90%, respectively. It was influenced by the length of Barrett's esophagus, biopsy location, and the presence of esophagitis and/or dysplasia. Light to absent staining (p = 0.01) and moderate to marked heterogeneity (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with high grade dysplasia or cancer in the univariate analysis and in a multivariate model that adjusted for the length of Barrett's esophagus and the presence of a lesion. These staining characteristics were present in all patients with severe dysplasia and/or adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Highly dysplastic or malignant Barrett's esophagus stains differently with methylene blue. Increased heterogeneity and decreased methylene blue stain intensity are significant independent predictors of high grade dysplasia and/or cancer. These features may help to direct biopsies in patients without a lesion.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagus/pathology , Methylene Blue , Staining and Labeling , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Epithelium/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
At the current time, pancreatic cancer remains a difficult and typically fatal disease. A number of case reports and case-control epidemiologic studies have suggested that familial aggregation plays a role in as many as 10% of all pancreatic cancers. During the last several years, genetic alterations responsible for syndromes linked with pancreatic cancer have been identified. These genes include BRCA2, p16, PRSS1, STK11, and various mismatch repair genes. Unfortunately, most kindreds with a familial aggregation cannot be explained by one of these known genetic syndromes. Recent data from the National Familial Pancreas Tumor Registry at Johns Hopkins have estimated the prospective risk of pancreatic cancer among first-degree relatives of pancreatic cancer patients. The risk was estimated by comparing observed new cases of pancreatic cancer to expected numbers. In families where three first-degree relatives had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, the risk of another individual developing pancreatic cancer rose to a 57-fold increase over the basal risk. This article reviews the data concerning familial pancreatic cancer. Additionally, this article reviews the data concerning the histological precursors of invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias. Further, the current Johns Hopkins methodology used to screen for early pancreatic neoplasia in familial pancreatic cancer patients and in patients with familial Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is discussed. In summary, the notable advances in the field of molecular genetics have allowed for a better definition of the genetics of pancreatic cancer. With this knowledge has evolved a better understanding of several high-risk clinical syndromes associated with pancreatic cancer, familial pancreatic cancer, and the evolution of strategies to screen high-risk families for early pancreatic neoplasia.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/prevention & control , Genes, Tumor Suppressor , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/prevention & control , Carcinoma in Situ/complications , Carcinoma in Situ/genetics , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Chemoprevention , Humans , Mass Screening , Molecular Biology , Pedigree , Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome/complications , Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Smoking CessationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endoscopically applied methylene blue selectively stains specialized columnar epithelium in Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: The diagnostic yield and cost of cancer surveillance in patients with Barrett's esophagus using methylene blue-directed biopsies (MBDB) were compared with surveillance using a "jumbo" random biopsy technique in a prospective, sequential, controlled trial. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed with either MBDB or random biopsy in a randomized sequence. The proportions of various types of epithelia in each biopsy were estimated and dysplasia was graded in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with short- (n = 8), limited- (n = 10), and long-segment (n = 25) Barrett's esophagus were studied. Using MBDB technique, the average number of biopsies obtained per patient was significantly lower and the proportion of specialized columnar epithelium in each specimen was significantly higher compared with random biopsy. Dysplasia or cancer was diagnosed in significantly more MBDB specimens (12% vs. 6%, p = 0.004). Despite fewer biopsies per patient using MBDB, dysplasia or cancer was diagnosed in significantly more patients (44% vs. 28%, p = 0.03) than by random biopsy technique. MBDB cost less and detected more cancers than random biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: MBDB is a more accurate and cost-effective technique than random biopsy for diagnosing specialized columnar epithelium and dysplasia/cancer, particularly in long-segment Barrett's esophagus.
Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Coloring Agents , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagoscopy , Methylene Blue , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology , Epithelium/pathology , Esophagus/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Metaplasia , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Standard endosonographic (EUS) staging criteria are unreliable for staging esophageal carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy; however, measurement of tumor size reduction can identify patients who have achieved a pathologic response. In the current study the authors prospectively compared survival between patients classified as responders and those classified as nonresponders by EUS. METHODS: The maximal transverse cross-sectional area of the tumor was measured before and after neoadjuvant therapy in patients who were candidates for multimodality treatment. Response was defined as a > or = 50% reduction in tumor area. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients at 2 centers were followed for a median of 19 months. EUS assessed response in 34 patients (58%). Overall, responders had a median survival of 17.6 months compared with 14.5 months for nonresponders (P < 0.005). Survival was significantly longer in responders compared with nonresponders in the patient subgroup who underwent surgical resection (19.7 months vs. 14.6 months; P < 0. 005), the patient subgroup with adenocarcinoma (21.4 months vs. 10.8 months; P < 0.005), and the patient subgroup initially classified as having T3N1 disease (17.6 months vs. 14.1 months; P < 0.05). Survival was not found to differ significantly between responders and nonresponders in the subgroup of patients with squamous cell carcinoma. EUS response was the only clinical variable that was associated with survival time in a multivariate analysis (relative hazard = 0.27; P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with esophageal carcinoma who respond to neoadjuvant treatment as identified by EUS measurement of reduction in tumor size have a significantly better prognosis than nonresponders.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnostic imaging , Endosonography , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Radiotherapy , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This phase II trial evaluated continuous-infusion cisplatin and fluorouracil (5-FU) with radiotherapy followed by esophagectomy. The objectives of this trial were to determine the complete pathologic response rate, survival rate, toxicity, pattern of failure, and feasibility of administering adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable cancer of the esophagus treated with preoperative chemoradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were staged using computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound, and laparoscopy. The preoperative treatment plan consisted of continuous intravenous infusion of cisplatin and 5-FU and a total dose of 44 Gy of radiation. Esophagogastrectomy was planned for approximately 4 weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy. Paclitaxel and cisplatin were administered as postoperative adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled onto the trial. Of the 39 patients who proceeded to surgery, 29 responded to preoperative treatment: 11 achieved pathologic complete response (CR) and 18 achieved a lower posttreatment stage. Five patients had no change in stage, whereas eight had progressive disease (four with distant metastases and four with increases in the T and N stages). At a median follow-up of 30.2 months, the median survival time has not been reached and the 2-year survival rate is 62%. The median survival of pathologic complete responders has not been reached, whereas the 2-year survival rate of this group is 91% compared with 51% in patients with complete tumor resection with residual tumor (P =.03). CONCLUSION: An excellent survival rate, comparable to that of our prior preoperative trial, was achieved with lower doses of preoperative cisplatin and 5-FU concurrent with radiotherapy.