Regorafenib monotherapy as second-line treatment of patients with RAS-mutant advanced colorectal cancer (STREAM): an academic, multicenter, single-arm, two-stage, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Maintaining angiogenesis inhibition and switching the chemotherapy backbone represent the current second-line therapy in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, prolonged overall survival (OS) in the chemorefractory setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: STREAM was an academic, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial, evaluating the activity of regorafenib in RAS-mutant mCRC, in terms of the rate of patients who were progression-free after 6 months from study entry (6mo-PF). Patients were pretreated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab. According to Simon's two-stage design, ≥18 patients 6mo-PF were needed in the overall population (N = 46). Secondary endpoints were safety, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and OS. Early metabolic response by [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]-FDG PET/CT) scan was an exploratory endpoint. EudraCT Number: 2015-001105-13. RESULTS: The number of patients 6mo-PF was 8/22 at the first stage and 14/46 in the overall population. The ORR was 10.9%, disease control rate was 54.6%, median (m)PFS was 3.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-6.7 months], mOS was 18.9 months (95% CI 10.3-35.3 months), and mPFS2 (from study entry to subsequent-line progression) was 13.3 months (95% CI 8.4-19.7 months). Long benefiter patients (>6mo-PF) significantly more often had a single metastatic site and lung-limited disease. No unexpected toxicity was reported. Grade ≥3 events occurred in 39.1% of patients, with hand-foot syndrome (13%), fatigue, and hyperbilirubinemia (6.5%) occurring mostly. Baseline metabolic assessment was associated with OS in the multivariate analysis, while early metabolic response was not associated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not meet its primary endpoint. However, regorafenib was well tolerated and did not preclude subsequent treatments. Patients with good prognostic features (single metastatic site and lung-limited disease) reported clinical benefit with regorafenib. The exploratory metabolic analysis suggests that baseline [18F]-FDG PET/CT might be useful to select patients with a favorable outcome. A chemotherapy-free interval with regorafenib was associated with durable disease control in a selected group of patients with favorable clinical characteristics.

Randomized trial on adjuvant treatment with FOLFIRI followed by docetaxel and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for radically resected gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Some trial have demonstrated a benefit of adjuvant fluoropirimidine with or without platinum compounds compared with surgery alone. ITACA-S study was designed to evaluate whether a sequential treatment of FOLFIRI [irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/LV)] followed by docetaxel plus cisplatin improves disease-free survival in comparison with 5-FU/LV in patients with radically resected gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were randomly assigned to either FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) day 1, LV 100 mg/m(2) as 2 h infusion and 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) as bolus, days 1 and 2 followed by 600 mg/m(2)/day as 22 h continuous infusion, q14 for four cycles) followed by docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 1, q21 for three cycles (sequential arm) or De Gramont regimen (5-FU/LV arm). RESULTS: From February 2005 to August 2009, 1106 patients were enrolled, and 1100 included in the analysis: 562 in the sequential arm and 538 in the 5-FU/LV arm. With a median follow-up of 57.4 months, 581 patients recurred or died (297 sequential arm and 284 5-FU/LV arm), and 483 died (243 and 240, respectively). No statistically significant difference was detected for both disease-free [hazard ratio (HR) 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-1.17; P = 0.974] and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.82-1.18; P = 0.865). Five-year disease-free and OS rates were 44.6% and 44.6%, 51.0% and 50.6% in the sequential and 5-FU/LV arm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A more intensive regimen failed to show any benefit in disease-free and OS versus monotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01640782.

A prospective study of the accuracy and precision of continuous cardiac output monitoring devices as compared to intermittent thermodilution.

BACKGROUND: Pulse pressure (PP) analysis from a radial arterial line is available with the LiDCO plus monitor (LiDCO, Cambridge, UK) and FloTrac/Vigileo (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA). The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement of continuous PP analysis against intermittent thermodilution (ITD) using the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). METHODS: This was a six-hour study in 29 patients monitored with a PAC. All measurements were referenced against CO measured from the average of four ITD curves from the PAC. The LiDCO plus was calibrated with a lithium dilution (PulseCOLi) and with ITD (PulseCOITD) at baseline. Measurements from Vigileo software 1.03 (APCO), LiDCO plus (PulseCOLi and PulseCOITD), CCO and ITD were taken every hour for the next six hours. The bias and precision between the two devices were calculated as well as the percentage error (PE) of agreement between the tested device and the reference. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the tested device was then derived. RESULTS: The average bias, PE and coefficient of variation for CCO vs. ITD of the tested device were 0.3 L/min, 28% and 13%, respectively; for APCO vs. ITD the calculations were -1.1 L/min, 55% and 27%; for PulseCOLi Cardiac output Blood pressure Thermodilution. ITD they were 0.5 L/min, 40% and 19%; and for PulseCOITD vs. ITD they were 0.2 L/min, -31% and 15%. CONCLUSION: APCO (Vigileo software 1.03) and PulseCOLi showed a moderate agreement with the PAC. When PulseCO was calibrated with ITD (PulseCOITD) it showed excellent agreement, demonstrating that PulseCO performs well against ITD when the calibration process is optimally performed.

Biweekly oxaliplatin combined with oral capecitabine (OXXEL regimen) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase II study.

Oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) iv on day 1, and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) orally bid from day 1 (evening) to day 11 (morning) were administered every 2 weeks (OXXEL regimen) to 38 patients as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. A total of 318 cycles were administered, with a median of 8 (range, 4-12) cycles per patient. Response rate (RR) was 45% (95% confidence interval (CI), 29%-62%), with 7 complete responses and 10 partial responses; furthermore, 12 patients showed a stable disease, so that a disease control was achieved in 29 (76%) patients. RR was greater among patients with performance status 0 (52%), without weight loss (52%), younger than 65 years (50%), and previously unexposed to adjuvant chemotherapy (48%), while no correlation was found with the actually delivered oxaliplatin dose intensity. Overall, haematological side effects were negligible, with no case of grade 4 toxicity, and only one patient suffering from an episode of grade 3 neutropenic fever. Severe anaemia occurred in 4 (11%) patients, and grade 3 neuropathy affected 9 (24%) patients. Median progression-free survival was 7.9 (95% CI, 6.2-9.6) months, and median overall survival has not been reached yet. In conclusion, the OXXEL regimen resulted safe and active, and it deserves further evaluation in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

[Early evaluation using PET-FDG of the efficiency of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy treatment in locally advanced neoplasia of the lower rectum]. / Valutazione precoce con PET-FDG della efficacia del trattamento radiochemioterapico neoadiuvante nelle neoplasie del retto inferiore localmente avanzate.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiation allows downstaging of locally advanced rectal cancer and in selected patients also a sufficient downsizing to ensure sphincter preservation. Selection of patients warranting a preoperative approach is improved by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which is able to define the involvement of mesorectal circumferential margin. Similarly it would be crucial to define the response to chemoradiation during the treatment but traditional morphologic imaging techniques may fail in differentiating neoplastic tissue from scarring. PET-FDG has been successfully used in the detection of metastatic colorectal cancer allowing imaging of deposits as small as 0.5 cm and may have a role in evaluating early response to chemoradiation. METHODS: In the present study, in patients with T3-T4 rectal cancer undergoing preoperative chemoradiation PET-FDG and flow cytometry analysis on endoscopic biopsy specimen have been performed before, during and after preoperative chemoradiation. RESULTS: Chemoradiation treatment has been successful in terms of downsizing and downstaging of the tumor. PET-FDG was able to demonstrate local response at only ten-fifteen days after the beginning of neoadjuvant therapy, also identifying non responding patients. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET may have a role in defining the response to chemoradiation and modulate the treatments strategy in patients with advanced rectal cancer.

Oxaliplatin plus irinotecan and leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil triplet regimen every other week: a dose-finding study in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin (OXA) and irinotecan (IRI) are active drugs in first-line as well as second-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients, their toxicity profiles are not overlapping, and both drugs have shown synergism with folinic acid-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). We planned this phase I study to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), and the recommended doses (RDs) for a triplet regimen including OXA plus IRI on day 1, and 6S-folinic acid (LFA) plus 5-FU on day 2, every 2 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At least three patients had to be treated at each dose level, and the trial proceeded if no more than 33% of patients showed a DLT after the first cycle. Starting from OXA 85 mg/m(2) (over 2 h) and IRI 150 mg/m(2) (over 1 h), an alternated escalation was planned up to 110 mg/m(2) and 200 mg/m(2), respectively. Thereafter, a fixed dose of LFA, 250 mg/m(2) (as 2-h infusion), plus an escalating dose of 5-FU (from 650 to 800 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus) was added on day 2 to the previous dose level of OXA and IRI. RESULTS: Forty-six patients, all but four affected by advanced colorectal primaries, entered this study. The MTDs for OXA and IRI given on the same day were 110 and 200 mg/m(2): these doses caused a DLT in three of six patients. The previous dose level (110 and 175 mg/m(2), respectively) on day 1 was safely followed on day 2 by LFA plus 5-FU up to 800 mg/m(2). Indeed, only one of three patients treated at this last level had a DLT. This cohort was then expanded including a total of 14 patients, and on the whole series five cases of DLT occurred: WHO grade 4 neutropenia (two patients), grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea (three patients). Cumulative toxicity was analysed in 43 patients for a total of 347 cycles: grade 4 neutropenia was detected in 13 patients (30%); it was not dose-related, nor was it exacerbated by the addition of modulated 5-FU. Febrile neutropenia occurred in four patients. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea was suffered by nine (21%) and five (12%) patients, respectively. Two complete and nine partial responses were reported on 40 evaluable patients (six patients were disease-free at study entry), giving a response rate of 27.5% (95% confidence interval 15% to 44%); nine of 18 (50%) assessable patients of the two last cohorts treated with the triplet regimen achieved a complete response (two patients) or a partial response (seven patients). CONCLUSIONS: The RDs for this biweekly regimen were: OXA 110 mg/m(2) plus IRI 175 mg/m(2) on day 1, and LFA 250 mg/m(2) plus 5-FU 800 mg/m(2) on day 2. This regimen appeared active in pretreated gastrointestinal malignancies, and it is worthy of being evaluated in advanced colorectal carcinoma after failure of 5-FU-based adjuvant or palliative treatment.

Oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed and leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus: a salvage regimen for colorectal cancer patients.

The aim of the present study was to define the activity and tolerability of a triplet regimen including oxaliplatin 130 mg x m(-2) (2 h i.v. infusion) and raltitrexed 3.0 mg x m(-2) (15 min i.v. infusion) given on day 1, followed by levo-folinic acid 250 mg x m(-2) (2 h i.v. infusion) and 5-fluorouracil 1050 mg x m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 2, every 2 weeks, in pretreated colorectal cancer patients. From April 1999 to December 2000, 50 patients were enrolled: 26 were males and 24 females, their median age was 63 (range, 43-79) years; ECOG performance status was 0 in 26 patients, > or =1 in 24 patients; 26 patients had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy, 40 patients had been exposed to one or two lines of palliative chemotherapy (including irinotecan in 31 cases); 18 patients were considered chemo-refractory. A total of 288 cycles were administered, with a median number of 6 (range 1-12) courses per patient. A complete response was obtained in three patients, and a partial response in nine patients, giving a major response rate of 24% (95% confidence interval, 13-38%), while 15 further patients showed a stable disease, for an overall control of tumour growth in 60% of patients. Three complete responses and three partial responses were obtained in patients pretreated with irinotecan (response rate, 19%); among refractory patients, three achieved partial responses (response rate, 13%). After a median follow-up of 18 (range, 10-30) months, 40 patients showed a progression of disease: the growth modulation index ranged between 0.2 and 2.5: it was > or =1.33 (showing a significant delay of tumour growth) in 16 (40%) patients. Actuarial median progression-free survival time was 7.6 months, and median survival time was 13.6 months: estimated probability of survival was 55% at 1 year. Main severe toxicity was neutropenia: World Health Organisation grade 4 affected 32% of patients; non-haematological toxicity was mild: World Health Organisation grade 3 diarrhoea was complained of by 8%, and grade 3 stomatitis by 4% of patients; neurotoxicity (according to Lévi scale) was scored as grade 3 in 8% of patients. In conclusion, this regimen was manageable and active as salvage treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients; it showed incomplete cross-resistance with irinotecan-based treatments, and proved to delay the progression of disease in a relevant proportion of treated patients.

Irinotecan and mitomycin C in 5-fluorouracil-refractory colorectal cancer patients. A phase I/II study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan (CPT-11) given on days 1 and 8 with mitomycin C (MMC) given on day 1 in a monthly cycle, and to assess the toxicity and activity of this regimen in patients with previously treated colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Fifty-two patients, all pretreated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (20 patients) and/or one (35 patients) or two (8 patients) lines of chemotherapy, were entered in this study. Escalating doses of CPT-11 (starting from 150 mg/m2) were administered on days 1 and 8, with escalating doses of MMC (starting from 8 mg/m2) given on day 1, recycling every 28 days. At least 3 patients were treated at each dose level. Escalation proceeded unless 2 out of 3 or 4 out of 6 patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) after the first cycle. RESULTS: Twelve patients were entered in the phase I study, and 4 consecutive dose levels were tested. At the last dose level (CPT-11 200 mg/m2 plus MMC 10 mg/m2) 4 of 6 patients experienced a DLT (i.e., grade 4 neutropenia in 2 patients and grade 3 diarrhea in 2 patients). Therefore, this dose level was considered as the MTD. Forty patients were treated at the previous dose level (CPT-11, 175 mg/m2 plus MMC 10 mg/m2). One complete, 4 partial, 3 minor responses and 11 cases of stable disease were registered, giving a response rate of 12% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4-27%] and an overall control of tumor growth in 47% (95% CI, 31-64%) of patients. The median time to treatment failure was 6 months (range 1-19+). The median survival time was 14.5 months, and the 1-year and 2-year probability of survival were 56 and 43%. Neutropenia and diarrhea affected 62 and 58% of patients, grade 3 or 4 being registered in 26 and 23% of them, respectively. One episode of neutropenic fever was reported. Other acute toxicities were usually mild and manageable. CONCLUSIONS: CPT-11 175 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 associated with MMC 10 mg/m2 on day 1, every 4 weeks, is a safe and moderately active regimen in heavily pretreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. The role of MMC in this combination is doubtful, and further attempts with other new agents should be made to improve the outcome in these patients.

A phase II study of sequential chemotherapy with docetaxel after the weekly PELF regimen in advanced gastric cancer. A report from the Italian group for the study of digestive tract cancer.

In advanced gastric cancer, we investigated feasibility and activity of sequential chemotherapy with docetaxel after an intensive weekly regimen consisting of cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, fluorouracil, leucovorin (PELF) plus filgrastim. Chemotherapy-naive patients with relapsed or metastatic gastric cancer received 8 weekly administrations of chemotherapy with cisplatin 40 mg/m(2), fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epidoxorubicin 35 mg/m(2), 6S-stereoisomer of leucovorin 250 mg/m(2) and glutathione 1.5 g/m(2). On the other days filgrastim 5 microg kg(-1) was administered by subcutaneous injection. Subsequently, patients with partial response or stable disease received 3 cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. 40 patients have been enrolled and they are evaluable for response and toxicity. After the PELF regimen, 3 patients achieved complete response, 13 patients showed partial response, 21 patients had stable disease and 3 patients progressed (40% response rate; 95% CI 25% to 55%). After docetaxel, 9 out 34 patients improved the outcome (26.5%); 7 patients with stable disease achieved partial response and 2 patients with partial response achieved complete response. The overall response rate in the 40 patients was 57.5% (95% CI, 42.5% to 72.5%). The PELF regimen did not cause any grade IV toxicity, the most frequent grade III acute side-effects were thrombocytopenia and vomiting which occurred in the 10% of 320 PELF cycles. Docetaxel caused grade III-IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in the 10% and the 19% of cycles respectively. Fatigue was a frequent side-effect during both PELF and docetaxel chemotherapy. The sequential application of docetaxel after PELF chemotherapy gained major objective responses with manageable toxicity. This strategy is worth of further investigation in the setting of palliative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Biweekly irinotecan or raltitrexed plus 6S-leucovorin and bolus 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase II-III randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this randomised trial was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including 6S-leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil (LFA-5-FU), combined with either irinotecan (CPT-11 + LFA 5-FU) or raltitrexed (Tomudex) (TOM + LFA-5-FU), in advanced colorectal cancer patients, and to make a preliminary comparison of both these experimental regimens with a biweekly administration of LFA-5-FU modulated by methotrexate (MTX + LFA-5-FU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma previously untreated for the metastatic disease (34 of them previously exposed to adjuvant 5-FU) were randomly allocated to receive: CPT-11, 200 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 850 mg/m2 s i.v. bolus (arm A); TOM, 3 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 1050 mg/m2 i.v. bolus (arm B); or MTX, 750 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 800 mg/m2 i.v. bolus (arm C). Courses were repeated every two weeks in all arms of the trial. Response rate (RR) was evaluated after every four courses. The sample size was defined to have an 80% power to detect a 35% RR for each experimental treatment, and to show a difference of at least 4% in RR with the standard treatment if the true difference is 15% or more. RESULTS: The RRs were: 34% (95% confidence interval (95%, CI): 21%-48%) in arm A, including 3 complete responses (CRs) and 15 partial responses (PRs), 24% (95% CI: 14%-38%) in arm B, including 2 CRs and 11 PRs, and 24% (95% CI: 14%-38%), with 2 CRs and 11 PRs, in arm C. After a median follow-up time of 62 (range 18-108) weeks, the median time to progression was 38, 25, and 27 weeks for arm A, B, and C, respectively. With 94 patients still alive, the one-year probability of survival was 61%, 54%, and 59%, respectively. WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and diarrhoea affected 46% and 16%, respectively, of patients treated with CPT-11 + LFA 5-FU. Median relative dose intensity over eight cycles (DI8) was 78% for CPT-11 and 82% for 5-FU. Severe toxicities of TOM + LFA-5-FU were neutropenia (16%) and diarrhoea (16%), but median relative DI8 was 93% for TOM, and 82% for 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: CPT-11 + LFA-5-FU compares favorably in term of activity and toxicity with other combination regimens including CPT-11 and continuous infusional 5-FU. The hypothesis of a RR 15% higher than the MTX + LFA-5-FU treatment can not be ruled out after this interim analysis. The TOM + LFA 5-FU regimen showed a RR and a toxicity profile very close to the MTX + LFA 5-FU combination, and dose not deserve further evaluation in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Oxaliplatin and raltitrexed combined with leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus every two weeks: a dose finding study in advanced previously treated colorectal carcinoma. Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) given as a two-hour infusion followed by raltitrexed (Tomudex [TOM]) administered as a 15-min infusion on day 1, and bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated by a fixed dose of levo-folinic acid (LFA) 250 mg/m2 on day 2, recycling every two weeks, and to have preliminary evidence of activity of this combination in pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma previously treated with one (25 cases) or two or more lines of chemotherapy, including irinotecan (26 cases), and/or modulated 5-FU (40 cases) entered this study. Starting doses of L-OHP, TOM, and 5-FU were 85, 2.5 and 750 mg/m2, respectively. RESULTS: Seven dose levels were tested. Neutropenia was the main dose limiting toxicity of the dose escalation (8 of 13 cases). The recommended doses were 130 mg/m2 of L-OHP, and 3.0 mg/m2 of TOM on day 1, followed by 250 mg/m2 of LFA, and 1050 mg/m2 of 5-FU on day 2, every two weeks. Severe diarrhoea and stomatitis were rarely reported. Most patients complained of mild peripheral sensitive aeurotoxicity, which was related to the cumulative dose of L-OHP. Twelve patients were considered as having a major responses (one complete), and an additional eight patients showed a minor response; the median time to treatment failure was twenty-four weeks. CONCLUSIONS: With this regimen it is possible to give full doses of all three cytotoxic drugs every two weeks. Its activity and its manageable toxicity profile deserve further evaluation in pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Concurrent irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil plus levo-folinic acid given every other week in the first-line management of advanced colorectal carcinoma: a phase I study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the maximum tolerable doses (MTDs) of irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levofolinic acid (LFA) administered together every two weeks, to define the toxicity profile of this regimen, and to have a preliminary evidence of its activity in the first-line management of advanced colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven colorectal carcinoma, no prior chemotherapy for their advanced disease, and with at least one measurable or evaluable indicator lesion, were admitted to this study. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 150 mg/m2 given i.v. (90 min infusion) on day 1, followed on day 2 by a fixed dose of LFA (250 mg/m2) as a two-hour i.v. infusion plus a starting dose of 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as i.v. bolus. No intra-patient dose escalation was allowed. If no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed among three patients of each cohort, CPT-11 and 5-FU were alternately escalated in the subsequent cohort. Otherwise, three more patients were enrolled at the same dose level. DLT was defined as: WHO grade 3 non-haematological toxicity (except for vomiting or alopecia), grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 4 neutro- or thombocytopenia, or a > 2-week delay in recycling. The MTDs were defined as the doses at which two of three, or four of six, patients showed the same DLT. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (five pretreated in adjuvant setting) were enrolled in this study, and a total number of 293 cycles (median 6/patient) were administered. Dose escalation safely proceeded to 210/950/250 mg/m2 of CPT-11/5-FU/LFA. These dosages were considered as MTDs, since four of six patients showed grade 4 neutropenia, in one case associated with grade 3 stomatitis. A mild decrease of both the CPT-11 and 5-FU doses to 200 and 850 mg/m2, respectively, caused different DLTs (neutropenia and diarrhoea) in two out of seven patients. At these dosages, transient grades 3 or 4 neutropenia affected two patients each during their treatment, while only one patient suffered from a severe delayed diarrhoea. Other non-haematological toxicities were mild and manageable. Therefore, we recommend this latter dose level for further study. Major responses (3 complete and 11 partial) were reported in 14 patients, for an overall response rate of 45% (95% CI: 27%-64%) according to an intent-to-treat analysis. Responses were observed from first dose level, and in four of five previously treated patients. Median failure-free and overall survivals, after a median follow-up of 39 weeks, were 42 and 55 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent administration of CPT-11 and modulated 5-FU every two weeks is feasible at the recommended dosages. This regimen demonstrated interesting activity in the management of advanced colorectal cancer patients, and it probably better exploits the synergism between CPT-11 and 5-FU than recently tested alternating schedules. A phase II study is ongoing to more precisely define its activity and toxicity.

Intensive weekly chemotherapy is not effective in advanced pancreatic cancer patients: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

Twenty-two patients, with locally advanced unresectable and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma, received weekly administration of cisplatin 40 mg m(-2), 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2), epidoxorubicin 35 mg m(-2), 6S stereoisomer of leucovorin 250 mg m(-2) and glutathione 1.5 mg m(-2), supported by a daily administration of lenograstim at a dose of 5 microg kg(-1). Nineteen patients were men and three were women. Median age was 63 years (range 47-70). At study entry, pain was present in 15 out of 22 patients (68%) with a mean value of Scott-Huskisson scale of 27.6+/-23.8, whereas a weight loss >10% was present in 15 patients. After eight weekly treatments, three partial responses were achieved for a response rate of 13% (95% CI 0-26%), five patients had stable disease and 14 progressed on therapy. Pain was present in 9 out of 22 patients (40%) with a mean value of Scott-Huskisson scale of 12.3+/-18.4. Eight patients (36%) (three partial response and five stable disease) had a positive weight change. Toxicity was mild: WHO grade III or IV toxicity was recorded in terms of anaemia in 7 out of 188 cycles (3.7%), of neutropenia in 9 out of 188 cycles (4.7%) and of thrombocytopenia in 3 out of 188 cycles (1.5%). Median survival of all patients was 6 months. The outcome of this intensive chemotherapy regimen does not support its use in pancreatic cancer.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of tomudex combined with 5-fluorouracil plus levofolinic acid in advanced head and neck cancer and colorectal cancer.

In vitro studies have shown a schedule-dependent synergism between Tomudex and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Incubation of different types of head and neck and colorectal cancer cells with levofolinic acid (LFA) plus 5-FU for 4 or 24 h, after 24-h incubation with Tomudex, produces a clear synergism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and activity of a combination of Tomudex, LFA, and 5-FU in advanced head and neck and colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the potential for 5-FU pharmacomodulation by Tomudex was also evaluated through an intrapatient assessment of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity and 5-FU AUC with and without pretreatment with Tomudex. Eligible patients were treated with Tomudex at the starting dose of 1.5 mg/m2 on day 1, LFA at a fixed dose of 250 mg/m2 on day 2, immediately followed by bolus 5-FU at the starting dose of 600 mg/m2. Tomudex and 5-FU doses were alternately escalated. Courses were repeated every 2 weeks. In the second course, LFA and 5-FU were administered on day 1 and Tomudex on day 2; further treatment was given according to the sequence used in the first course. Plasma 5-FU concentrations were analyzed on courses 1 and 2 using a high-performance liquid chromatography assay with UV detection. DPD activity was measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells on courses 1 and 2 using incubation of cytosol with [14C]FU and quantitation of metabolite formation. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. Dose escalation was stopped at step 8, because of the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity in two of three patients. The dose level immediately before (3 mg/m2 Tomudex, 1050 mg/m2 5-FU) was selected for further evaluation. Tomudex and 5-FU mean dose intensities actually delivered at the seventh step were 1.32 and 462 mg/m2/week, respectively. Six of 40 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer obtained an objective response (15%; 95% confidence interval, 6-30%). In particular, three complete responses and three partial responses were observed. Six of 17 patients with locally advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer obtained an objective response (1 complete response + 5 partial responses; 35%; 95% confidence interval, 14-62%). Median duration of response in colorectal cancer patients was 12 months. 5-FU AUC was not significantly different between the two courses (median intrapatient difference, 9.3%; P = 0.28). DPD activity in course 1 was significantly higher than course 2 (P = 0.041) in the 16 patients in which values were evaluable. The combination of Tomudex, LFA, and 5-FU is well tolerated and active in colorectal and head and neck cancer. The Tomudex mean dose intensity actually delivered is higher than usually achieved in monotherapy. The absence of a clear pharmacokinetic interaction suggests that the synergism of Tomudex and 5-FU might occur at the cellular level.

Concurrent modulation of 5-fluorouracil with methotrexate and L-leucovorin: an effective and moderately toxic regimen for the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma. A multicenter phase II study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) and leucovorin (LV) can enhance the cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) by modifying its metabolic pathway inside target cells. Some preclinical studies and clinical trials have suggested that the concurrent or sequential double modulation of 5FU by means of MTX and LV may give a higher activity than single biochemical modulations. The purpose of our phase II study was to assess the activity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including MTX, levo-LV and 5FU in colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: From July 1994 to May 1997, 100 consecutive patients affected by advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma were given MTX, 750 mg/m2 iv (2-h infusion) on day 1, and levo-LV, 250 mg/m2 iv (2-h infusion) followed by 5FU, 800 mg/m2 iv bolus on day 2, every two weeks. Patients were treated until complete response or progressive disease was documented, or for a maximum of 16 courses. RESULTS: Among 97 eligible patients, 5 complete and 25 partial responses were obtained, giving an overall response rate of 31% (95% exact confidence limits, 22-41%). Response rate was significantly higher in patients with a good (ECOG scale 0) than with a poor (ECOG scale 1 or 2) performance status (40% versus 17%, P <0.02). Median time to treatment failure was 27 weeks, median survival time was 63 (95% confidence limits, 54-71) weeks, and 2- and 3-year probability of survival were 34% and 12%, respectively. Performance status was the only pretreatment characteristic significantly affecting the outcome of patients. Indeed, median survival time was 94 weeks for patients with a performance status = 0 and 37 weeks for patients with a performance status > or = 1 (P<0.05). Toxicity of the treatment was low and manageable; grade 3 to 4 leukopenia affected 8% of patients, whereas grade 3 diarrhea and mucositis occurred in 5% and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The double biochemical modulation of 5FU by MTX and levo-LV is at least as effective as, and probably more effective than, the single modulation by MTX or by LV. It may therefore represent a therapeutic option for the palliative treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Weekly paclitaxel-cisplatin administration with G-CSF support in advanced breast cancer. A phase II study.

PURPOSE: In a previous phase I study we found the MTDs of paclitaxel and cisplatin when given together weekly, with or without G-CSF support, in patients with advanced solid tumors. The present study was conducted to define the toxicity and efficacy of this regimen, when used with G-CSF support, in chemotherapy-naive or pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer, and to compare the antiproliferative activity of paclitaxel-cisplatin and paclitaxel-doxorubicin combinations on two human breast cancer cell lines. METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer received weekly paclitaxel (as a 3-hour i.v. infusion) at the dose of 85 mg/m2 (75 mg/m2 in pretreated women) followed by cisplatin (40 mg/m2) for a minimum of 6 weeks. An additional 6 weekly cycles were delivered in patients showing absence of documented disease progression after the first 6 weeks. After the 12th cycle only patients who had shown a substantial tumor shrinkage received 6 further cycles. G-CSF 5 microg/kg was also given, SC on days 3 to 5 of each week, for the whole duration of chemotherapy. The combination of paclitaxel with cisplatin or doxorubicin was also tested in vitro on two breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and MDAMB-231). RESULTS: Forty-three women with metastatic breast cancer entered this trial between June 1995 and January 1997. Twenty-seven patients were previously untreated for their metastatic disease (but 23 had previously received adjuvant chemotherapy). The dominant site of disease involvement was visceral in 23, bone in 13, and soft tissues in 7 patients. Seven complete and 15 partial responses were observed in unpretreated patients, while no complete and 6 partial responses were achieved in the pretreated population. The overall response rate, assessed on an 'intent to treat' basis, was 81% (26% CRs) in patients unpretreated for metastatic disease and 37% in those who had received one or more previous chemotherapy regimens. Eighteen responder patients had previously received anthracyclines either as adjuvant chemotherapy (12) or in the treatment of metastatic disease (6). At a median potential follow-up of 12 (range, 3-21) months, 14/27 unpretreated and 12/16 pretreated patients had shown disease progression. The median time to treatment failure was 13 and 7 months, respectively, in the 2 subgroups. The 1-year survival probability was 95% in unpretreated patients. The treatment showed a moderate toxicity in both subgroups of patients. Both hematological toxicity and peripheral neuropathy occurred more frequently in pretreated patients. Treatment-related deaths did not occur, and severe myelosuppression was observed only in pretreated patients with massive liver involvement. Delays in chemotherapy administration were very uncommon, especially during the first 6 treatment cycles, and the average actually delivered dose intensity exceeded 90% in unpretreated patients. The in vitro data on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cell lines showed that exposure to the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel produced a tumor cell killing similar to that achievable with equivalent concentrations of doxorubicin and paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin with G-CSF support is an active and particularly well tolerated treatment for patients with either unpretreated or pretreated metastatic breast cancer. This approach seems quite effective also in patients relapsing after anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. In view of the negligible hematological toxicity associated with this regimen, further clinical trials testing the addition of non cross-resistant drugs to this combination should be performed.

Weekly paclitaxel/cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I study.

We designed a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated doses of weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (doses escalated alternately) when given concurrently with standard or hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) and to define the nature of the dose-limiting toxicity. Chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer received weekly combination cisplatin/paclitaxel with concurrent local RT. Radiation therapy was initially given at the dose of 1.2 Gy twice daily x 5 d/wk x 5 weeks (total dose, 60 Gy). In the last two patient cohorts, the single daily dose was decreased to 2 Gy x 5 d/wk x 6 weeks. Overall, 25 patients were recruited into five different cohorts. Esophagitis was the main nonhematologic toxicity, occurring in 16 of 25 patients (64%; grade 3 or 4 in five). Neutropenia was the most prevalent hematologic toxicity, occurring in 33 of 141 weekly courses, but grade 4 neutropenia was seen in only four courses. Cisplatin/paclitaxel doses of 35 mg/m2/wk and 45 mg/m2/wk, respectively, were safe when standard RT was used, while the cisplatin dose had to be decreased to 30 mg/m2/wk in patients receiving bifractionation. Two complete and 13 partial responses were observed, for a 60% overall response rate (95% confidence interval, 39% to 79%). Median survival was 16 months, with a 66% 1-year actuarial probability. We thus conclude that the cisplatin/paclitaxel combination given weekly can be safely administered concurrent with both standard or hyperfractionated RT. Hyperfractionation is associated with a higher incidence of severe esophagitis and required a slight reduction in cisplatin dose. To verify whether the use of a daily schedule translates into a better therapeutic index, a new phase I study is under way, testing twice-daily cisplatin/paclitaxel concurrently with hyperfractionated RT.

Fotemustine and dacarbazine plus recombinant interferon alpha 2a in thetreatment of advanced melanoma.

Forty-three consecutive patients with advanced melanoma not previously treated with cytotoxic drugs (22 of them had already received adjuvant recombinant interferon alpha 2a (rIFN alpha 2a)) were given a combination of intravenous (i.v.) fotemustine (FM), 100 mg/m2 on day 1, and dacarbazine (DTIC), 250 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2-5, every 3 weeks. rIFN alpha 2a was administered at the dosage of 3 MIU subcutaneously 3 times a week until progression. Four complete and 13 partial responses were registered, for an overall response rate of 40% (95% CI, 25-56%). Activity of this regimen was similar in patients with mainly visceral (10/22, 45%) or soft tissue (6/13, 46%) involvement. The median duration of responses was 24 weeks. Median survival time was 40 weeks, with a 13% 2 year survival rate. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia affected 67% and 51% of patients, but were of WHO grade 4 in only 2% and 5% of them, respectively. Side-effects attributable to rIFN alpha 2a were mild and manageable. In conclusion, the combination of FM + DTIC and rIFN alpha 2a seemed well tolerated and relatively active in patients with advanced melanoma. However, the role of rIFN alpha 2a in affecting the long-term outcome of patients is still questionable.

Weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I study.

PURPOSE: Both cisplatin (CDDP) and paclitaxel have shown good antitumor activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and are able to potentiate the antitumor effects of radiation therapy (RT). This study aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of CDDP and paclitaxel (escalated alternately) when given concurrently with RT and to define the nature of the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced NSCLC received six weekly administrations of a CDDP-paclitaxel combination with concurrent local RT. The starting doses of CDDP and paclitaxel were 30 mg/m2/wk and 35 mg/m2/wk, respectively. RT was initially given at the dose of 1.2 Gy twice daily for 5 days per week for 5 weeks (total dose, 60 Gy) and at a single daily dose of 2 Gy for 5 days per week for 6 weeks in the last two cohorts of patients. The drug doses were escalated alternately until DLT occurred in more than one third of the patients in a given cohort. RESULTS: Overall, 25 patients were recruited through five different cohorts. All were assessable for toxicity. Esophagitis was the main toxicity and occurred in 16 of 25 patients (64%) and was grade 3 or 4 in five of them. At step 3 (CDDP 35 mg/m2/wk and paclitaxel 45 mg/m2/wk), two of five patients had to discontinue treatment because of severe esophagitis and one of these died of complications related to grade 4 esophagitis. However, keeping the same doses of chemotherapy and replacing hyperfractionation with a standard single-day fraction, weekly doses of CDDP and paclitaxel of 35 mg/m2 and 45 mg/m2 could be safely administered. Neutropenia was by far the most relevant hematologic toxicity and occurred in 33 of 141 weekly delivered courses, but it was of grade 4 in only four courses. Substantial pulmonary or neurologic toxicity was not observed in this study. Two complete responses (CRs) and 13 partial responses (PRs) were observed, for a 60% overall response rate (95% confidence interval [CI], 39% to 79%). The median survival time was 16 months, with a 66% 1-year survival probability. CONCLUSION: CDDP 35 mg/m2/wk and paclitaxel 45 mg/m2/wk can be safely administered with concurrent standard RT. The use of hyperfractionation is associated with a more frequent occurrence of severe esophagitis and requires a reduction of the CDDP dose to 30 mg/m2/ wk. Only future randomized trials will elucidate which of these two approaches (standard or hyperfractionated RT) is the better option to improve the outcome of patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Cisplatin-paclitaxel weekly schedule in advanced solid tumors: a phase I study.

PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to determine the maximum tolerable doses (MTDs) of both paclitaxel and cisplatin when given in a weekly schedule alone or simultaneously with G-CSF in advanced solid neoplasms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer either chemotherapy-naive or resistant to standard treatments received paclitaxel in a three-hour infusion followed by cisplatin, with or without the addition of r-HuG-CSF (5 micrograms/kg s.c. days three to five). The starting doses of CDDP and paclitaxel were 25 mg/m2/week and 45 mg/m2/week, respectively. During the first six courses the dosages of the two drugs were alternately escalated by 20% (CDDP = 5 mg/m2/week, and paclitaxel 10 mg/m2/week) at each step until the appearance of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in one-third or more of the patients enrolled in that cohort. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with cancer (16 lung, 16 breast, 11 ovarian, 7 head and neck, 1 renal, 1 esophageal, 1 cervical, 1 soft-tissue sarcoma, and 1 of unknown primary), 25 of whom were pretreated, were entered into the study. A total of 439 weekly courses were delivered. In chemotherapy-naïve patients, the MTDs of cisplatin and paclitaxel were 30 mg/m2/week and 65 mg/m2/week, respectively, in the absence of G-CSF support, which increased to 40 mg/m2/week and 85 mg/m2/week, respectively, when G-CSF was given. There were no toxic deaths in this study. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity (100/439 courses), but was seldom severe. Neurotoxicity was quite frequent (18 of 55 patients for the total of 88 courses) but never dose-limiting. It was more frequent and clinically relevant in cisplatin-pretreated patients. Overall 18 patients (eight ovarian, five breast, three lung, and two head and neck) achieved objective responses. CONCLUSIONS: The cisplatin-paclitaxel weekly administration seems a safe, practical and effective therapeutical approach in patients with advanced solid neoplasms. Large phase II trials are warranted to accurately define the efficacy of this schedule in cisplatin-paclitaxel sensitive tumors.