Assessing the use of a smartphone app to teach eye screening to opticians.

INTRODUCTION: Torch-light Eye Screening Test (TEST) is a simple eye screening technique designed for use by opticians to look for common anterior segment eye conditions. The TEACHES-Learning Electronic Module (TEACHES-LEM) is an e-learning platform that was developed to teach opticians to perform TEST. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of TEACHES-LEM with face-to-face training (F2FT) in the training and assessment of knowledge among opticians. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned in this experimental study to receive either the intervention group ((TEACHES-LEM, n = 60) or the control group (F2FT, n = 57). The conceptual knowledge of TEST was assessed with a 20-item clinical scenario-based multiple choice question (MCQ) test before and after teaching (immediately post-teaching and 1-month post-teaching). The MCQ test was developed by three ophthalmologists to give face validity. RESULTS: The pre-teaching test scores (TS), indicating prior knowledge, were comparable in both groups (10.02 ± 2.79 versus 10.40 ± 4.17, p = 0.563, independent t test). The mean immediate post teaching score for TEACHES-LEM was 13.3 ± 4.01 versus 12.3 ± 3.29 in the F2FT group (p = 0.170, independent t test). The mean post 1-month teaching score for TEACHES-LEM and F2FT groups were also comparable, 14.5 ± 4.19 versus 13.4 ± 3.90 respectively (p = 0.295, independent t test), indicating non-inferiority of TEACHES to F2FT. CONCLUSION: The TEACHES-LEM e-learning tool is as effective as F2FT in teaching opticians to perform TEST. It is an alternative to face-to-face teaching in delivering knowledge and assessment. The obviation for physical contact will make it a useful teaching tool during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

Noradrenergic projections to brainstem nuclei: evidence for differential projections from noradrenergic subgroups.

Retrograde transport of the fluorescent tracer True Blue was used in combination with immunohistochemical staining of dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (a marker protein for noradrenergic neurons) to determine the origin of noradrenergic projections to three cranial nerve nuclei: 1) the motor nucleus of the trigeminal nerve, 2) the motor nucleus of the facial nerve, and 3) the spinal trigeminal nucleus pars interpolaris. Noradrenergic cells in the rat brainstem were divided into subgroups and their numbers were determined in serial sections stained with an antiserum to rat dopamine-beta-hydroxylase. Following tracer injections into the three brainstem nuclei, retrogradely labeled noradrenergic neurons were counted and the percentage of True Blue-labeled noradrenergic cells in each subgroup was calculated. Injections of tracer into the three cranial nerve nuclei resulted in distinctly different labeling patterns of noradrenergic cells. Of the total number of norepinephrine neurons projecting to the motor nucleus of the trigeminal nerve, 68% were observed within the A7 cell group; 75% of those innervating the motor nucleus of the facial nerve were found in the A5 cell group, and 65% of those projecting to the spinal trigeminal nucleus pars interpolaris were present in the locus ceruleus and subceruleus. These findings indicate that norepinephrine cells in the rat brainstem do not constitute a homogeneous population of cells but that several discrete systems can be identified that differ not only in topography but also in the terminal distribution of their axons. This combined retrograde transport-immunohistochemical study reveals a much higher degree of topographic order in the projections of norepinephrine neurons than has previously been recognized. The observation of differential projections of noradrenergic subgroups argues against the notion of a global influence of these cells over functionally diverse areas of the brainstem.