Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Anim Sci ; 93(1): 1-10, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25412749

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to estimate covariance components for BW at 270 d (BW270) and carcass and ham quality traits in heavy pigs using models accounting for social effects and to compare the ability of such models to fit the data relative to models ignoring social interactions. Phenotypic records were from 9,871 pigs sired by 293 purebred boars mated to 456 crossbred sows. Piglets were born and reared at the same farm and randomly assigned at 60 d of age to groups (6.1 pigs per group on average) housed in finishing pens, each having an area of 6 m(2). The average additive genetic relationship among group mates was 0.11. Pigs were slaughtered at 277 ± 3 d of age and 169.7 ± 13.9 kg BW in groups of nearly 70 animals each. Four univariate animal models were compared: a basic model (M1) including only direct additive genetic effects, a model (M2) with nonheritable social group (pen) effects in addition to effects in M1, a model (M3) accounting for litter effects in addition to M2, and a model (M4) accounting for social genetic effects in addition to effects in M3. Restricted maximum likelihood estimates of covariance components were obtained for BW270; carcass backfat depth; carcass lean meat content (CLM); iodine number (IOD); and linoleic acid content (LIA) of raw ham subcutaneous fat; subcutaneous fat depth in the proximity of semimembranosus muscle (SFD1) and quadriceps femoris muscle (SFD2); and linear scores for ham round shape (RS), subcutaneous fat (SF), and marbling. Likelihood ratio tests indicated that, for all traits, M2 fit the data better than M1 and that M3 was superior to M2 except for SFD1 and SFD2. Model M4 was significantly better than M3 for BW270 (P < 0.001) and CLM, IOD, RS, and SF (P < 0.05). The contribution of social genetic effects to the total heritable variance was large for CLM and BW270, ranging from 33.2 to 35%, whereas the one for ham quality traits ranged from 6.8 (RS) to 11.2% (SF). Direct and social genetic effects on BW270 were uncorrelated, whereas there was a negative genetic covariance between direct and social effects on CLM, IOD, RS, and SF, which reduced the total heritable variance. This variance, measured relative to phenotypic variance, ranged from 21 (CLM) to 54% (BW270). Results indicate that social genetic effects affect variation in traits relevant for heavy pigs used in dry-cured hams manufacturing. Such effects should be exploited and taken into account in design of breeding programs for heavy pigs.


Subject(s)
Body Composition/genetics , Body Weight/genetics , Meat/standards , Social Behavior , Animals , Behavior, Animal , Body Composition/physiology , Body Weight/physiology , Breeding , Female , Likelihood Functions , Male , Models, Biological , Muscle, Skeletal , Phenotype , Subcutaneous Fat , Swine/genetics , Swine/physiology
2.
J Dairy Sci ; 97(4): 1961-9, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24508440

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to investigate genetic and nongenetic variation in the degree of glycosylation of κ-casein (κ-CN) and to estimate the effects of glycosylated (G-κCN) and unglycosylated (U-κCN) κ-CN contents on milk coagulation properties of Simmental cows. Measures of contents of the main casein fractions, G-κCN, and U-κCN, and assessment of genotypes at CSN2, CSN3, and BLG were obtained by reversed-phase HPLC analysis of 2,015 individual milk samples. Content of total κ-CN (κ-CNtot, g/L) was the sum of G-κCN and U-κCN, and the glycosylation degree of κ-CN (GD) was measured as the ratio of G-κCN to κ-CNtot. Rennet coagulation time (RCT) and curd firmness were measured by using a computerized renneting meter. Measures of curd firmness were adjusted for RCT before statistical analysis. Variance components of κ-CNtot, G-κCN, U-κCN, and GD were estimated by Bayesian procedures and univariate linear models that included the class effects of the herd-test-day, parity, days in milk, genotypes at milk protein genes, and animal. These class effects, those of G-κCN, U-κCN, and content of other caseins, and the linear effect of milk pH were accounted for by models investigating the influence of κ-CN glycosylation on coagulation properties. The GD ranged from 22 to 76%, indicating that variation in G-κCN depends on the variation both in κ-CNtot and in the efficiency of κ-CN glycosylation. Genotype CSN3 BB exhibited high G-κCN and U-κCN relative to that of CSN3 AA. Heritability of G-κCN, U-κCN, and GD was high and ranged from 0.46 to 0.56. A large proportion of the additive genetic variation in G-κCN and U-κCN was attributable to influence of CSN and BLG, but these genes did not affect variation in GD, and across-genotypes differences in the trait were small or trivial. Average RCT of the milk class having the highest G-κCN was, on average, 2min (standard deviation 0.5) shorter than that of the lowest class. Conversely, U-κCN and content of other caseins were not associated with any effect on RCT, except for a slight delay in coagulation when U-κCN was very high. Curd firmness increased when the contents of both κ-CN fractions and other caseins increased. This study provides evidence that the positive association between RCT and κ-CN content is exclusively attributable to the glycosylated fraction of the protein. Because exploitable additive genetic variation in G-κCN exists, improvement of κ-CN composition through selective breeding might be an effective way to enhance milk coagulation properties.


Subject(s)
Caseins/metabolism , Cattle/genetics , Chymosin/metabolism , Genetic Variation , Milk/chemistry , Animals , Female , Glycosylation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL