Clinical Effects and Safety of Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Lipiodol versus Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Alone for Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in 2 groups of patients: those who receive lipiodol (referred to as the lipiodol group) and those who do not receive lipiodol (referred to as the control group). METHODS: From January 2016 through December 2023, 85 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled in this retrospective study. In total, 40 patients received HAIC with lipiodol, while 45 patients were given HAIC without lipiodol. The modified response evaluation criteria for solid tumors were used to evaluate the tumor response, which was assessed through an imaging study. The two groups were compared regarding their overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: The outcomes between the lipiodol group and control group demonstrated no significant difference: the objective response rates (p = 0.066) were 32.5% and 15.6%; the disease control rates (p = 0.556) were 67.5% and 73.3%; the median OS times (p = 0.339) were 224 days and 398 days; the median PFS (p = 0.334) times were 191 days and 286 days in the lipiodol group and the control group, respectively. Adverse events also showed no significant difference between the two groups: elevation of total bilirubin (p = 0.834) rates were 40.0% and 37.8%; elevation of alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.191) percentages were 35.0% and 22.2%; and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase values (p = 0.058) were 65.0% and 44.4% in the lipiodol group and the control group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HAIC without lipiodol was non-inferior to HAIC with lipiodol in the clinical outcome.

Tumor complete response and pyogenic liver abscess secondary to concurrent microwave ablation plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab in liver cancer: a case report.

Background: Pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) could be fatal even after standard treatment with antibiotics and percutaneous drainage. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, bevacizumab or microwave ablation may cause PLA, respectively. This paper presents the first case of PLA secondary to the concomitant use of microwave ablation with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in the treatment of liver cancer. Case Description: A 54-year-old Chinese man with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) C-stage liver cancer complained of fever and chills twenty-nine days after concurrent microwave ablation plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Post-hospitalization, a computed tomography revealed a rim-enhancing hypodensity within the right lobe of the liver, approximately 8.8 cm in diameter containing foci of gas. Laboratory examination revealed elevated white blood cell count, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, and blood culture indicated the presence of Escherichia coli bacteremia. The patient was diagnosed with PLA complicated by septic shock, and due to recurrent fever, multiple courses of antibiotics (imipenem/cilastatin sodium, cefoperazone/sulbactam, meropenem, respectively) were administered in combination with five percutaneous drainages over the next 90 days. The patient's fever eventually resolved, and the patient was discharged. The patient was re-treated with two cycles of atezolizumab and bevacizumab initiated in March 2024. An imaging evaluation in May 2023 demonstrated tumor progression. Subsequently, the patient underwent one transarterial chemoembolization procedure and two cycles of atezolizumab and bevacizumab over the subsequent 2 months. Notably, the patient achieved a complete response at the July 2024 imaging evaluation. Conclusions: In patients undergoing atezolizumab and bevacizumab, the potential risk of PLA versus the antitumor benefit of microwave ablation requires to be assessed. The use of multiple courses of antibiotics over a prolonged period did not appear to influence the effectiveness of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Further studies are, however, needed to substantiate this finding.

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization alone compared to its combination with anlotinib among patients with intermediate or advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II randomized controlled trial.

Background: Anlotinib hydrochloride is a potent oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR1-3, FGFR1-4, and PDGFR α/ß, demonstrating significant antiangiogenic activity. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered the effective treatment for intermediate/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which remains a major global health challenge. This study evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of combining anlotinib with TACE against the standard TACE monotherapy among patients with intermediate or advanced HCC. Methods: This phase II randomized controlled trial included 38 patients diagnosed with intermediate or advanced HCC. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either TACE in combination with anlotinib or TACE alone. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. This trial aimed to determine whether the addition of anlotinib could extend PFS and improve other clinical outcomes compared to TACE alone. Results: The median PFS for patients treated with TACE and anlotinib was significantly longer at 11.04 months compared to 6.87 months in the TACE-alone group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.46; P=0.02], indicating a robust enhancement in disease management. Although the median OS was not reached at the time of analysis, early trends suggest potential improvement. Both treatment groups had comparable ORR and DCR, demonstrating effective disease control. The safety profile of the combined treatment was manageable, with side effects similar in nature to those observed with TACE alone but not significantly more severe, thus maintaining patient quality of life. Conclusions: The addition of anlotinib to TACE appears to provide a safe and effective therapeutic benefit for patients with intermediate or advanced-stage HCC. However, longer follow-up is needed for a more comprehensive efficacy assessment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04066543.

TACE vs. TARE for HCC ≥ 8 cm: A propensity score analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) as first-line treatments for unresectable HCC > 8 cm. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 129 HCC patients with tumor diameters greater than 8 cm from January 2010 to December 2021, including 40 patients who received TARE, and 89 patients treated with TACE as primary treatment. Following Propensity Score Matching (PSM), 40 patients from each group were harmonized for baseline characteristics. Tumor responses were evaluated using mRECIST criteria, and survival outcomes were compared between treatment groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and the Log-rank test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) at 3, 6, and 12 months between the two groups; ORR and DCR were 72.6%, 83.1% in TACE group vs. 72.5%. 87.5% in TARE group for best tumor response (p-values: 0.625 and 0.981, respectively). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups were comparable pre- and post-PSM. After PSM, the OS was 33.2 months (20.0-58.6) in TACE group and 38.1 months (13.8-98.1) in TARE group (p = 0.53), while PFS was 11.5 months (7.7-18.4) and 9.1 months (5.2-23.8) respectively. After PSM, post-embolization syndrome developed more in TACE group (100% vs. 75%, p = 0.002). Major adverse events were 72% in TACE group vs. 5% in TARE group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TARE and TACE offer comparable efficacy in managing large HCC, with TARE providing a safer profile, suggesting its consideration as a preferable initial therapeutic approach for unresectable HCC patients with tumors larger than 8 cm.

Comparison of Chemoembolization Outcomes Using 70-150 µm and 100-300 µm Drug-Eluting Beads in Treating Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) according to the size of the beads for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 212 patients with a single HCC ≤5 cm from five tertiary institutions. One hundred and nine patients were treated with 70-150-µm doxorubicin DEBs (group A), and 103 patients received 100-300-µm doxorubicin DEBs (group B). The initial tumor response (assessed between 3 weeks and 2 months after DEB-TACE), time to local tumor progression (TTLTP), restricted mean duration of complete response (RMDCR), rate of complications, incidence of post-embolization syndrome, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze prognostic factors for initial tumor response. RESULTS: The initial objective response rates were 91.7% (100/109) and 84.5% (87/103) for groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.101). In the subgroup analysis of tumors ≤3 cm, the initial objective response rates were 94.6% (53/56) and 78.0% (39/50) for groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.012). There was no significant difference in the TTLTP (median, 23.7 months for group A vs. 19.0 months for group B; P = 0.278 [log-rank], 0.190 [multivariable Cox regression]) or RMDCR at 24 months (11.4 months vs. 8.5 months, respectively; P = 0.088). In the subgroup analysis of tumors >3-cm, the RMDCR at 24 months was significantly longer in group A than in group B (11.8 months vs. 5.7 months, P = 0.024). The incidence of mild bile duct dilatation after DEB-TACE was significantly higher in group B than in group A (5.5% [6/109] vs. 18.4% [19/103], P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE using 70-150-µm microspheres demonstrated a higher initial objective response rate in ≤3-cm HCCs and a longer RMDCR at 24 months in 3.1-5-cm HCCs compared to larger DEBs (100-300-µm).

Comparison of Small-Sized (70-150 µm) and Intermediate-Sized (100-300 µm) Drug-Eluting Embolics for Transarterial Chemoembolization of Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas (≤3 cm).

PURPOSE: To compare oncologic outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using 70-150-µm and 100-300-µm drug-eluting embolics (DEEs) to treat small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 93 patients with small HCC (≤3 cm) who underwent their first TACE with DEEs: (a) 43 with 70-150-µm DEEs and (b) 50 with 100-300-µm DEEs. Initial tumor response was assessed using per-patient and per-lesion analyses. Progression-free survival (PFS) and target tumor PFS were analyzed for patients and lesions with initial complete response (CR). Overall survival (OS) and safety outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: At 1 month, initial CR rates were 72.1% in the 70-150-µm group and 70.0% in the 100-300-µm group. PFS was significantly longer in the 70-150-µm group (median, 26 months) compared with that in the 100-300-µm group (median, 11 months; log-rank P = .049), with comparable OS results (P = .096, median not reached at 36 months for either group). Per-lesion analysis found that target tumor PFS was significantly longer in the 70-150-µm group (median, 30 months) compared with that in the 100-300-µm group (median, 13 months; P = .009). Subgroup analysis revealed that the 70-150-µm group had significantly longer target tumor PFS compared with the 100-300-µm group in the 1.0-2.0-cm subgroup (P = .017), but not in the 2.1-3.0-cm subgroup (P = .117). No significant differences in adverse events were observed between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 70-150-µm and 100-300-µm DEE-TACEs resulted in comparable tumor response and short-term safety in small HCCs (≤3 cm). However, in cases where CR was achieved, treatment with smaller microspheres demonstrated longer PFS and target tumor PFS.

Consistent efficacy of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy irrespective of PD­L1 positivity in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Atezolizumab/bevacizumab is the first line of treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), combining immune checkpoint inhibitor and anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is administered when the above-described combination fails to confer sufficient clinical benefit. The present study aimed to explore the association between tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity and HAIC response. A total of 40 patients with HCC who had undergone HAIC with available biopsy samples obtained between January 2020 and May 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. PD-L1 expression in tumor samples was assessed using a combined positivity score. The response rates of HAIC-treated patients with advanced HCC after failure of atezolizumab/bevacizumab combination therapy were recorded. OS (P=0.9717) and PFS (P=0.4194) did not differ between patients with and without PD-L1 positivity. The objective response rate (P=0.7830) and DCR (P=0.7020) also did not differ based on PD-L1 status. In conclusion, the current findings highlight the consistent efficacy of HAIC, regardless of PD-L1 positivity.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization: exploring the influence of prior transarterial chemoembolization and additional transarterial chemoembolization on survival outcomes.

Background: The selection of an efficacious treatment modality for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosed as refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) presents numerous challenges. In addition to systemic therapies, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) may serve as an alternative option. However, it is imperative to identify patients who are appropriate candidates for HAIC to confer a survival benefit. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of the number of TACE sessions prior to HAIC treatment and the addition of TACE during HAIC on the survival of HCC patient's refractory to TACE. Methods: This retrospective study included 82 patients with HCC refractory to TACE (mean age 60.5 years, 75 males). Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, with comparison between two groups via the log-rank test; the Cox regression model was utilized to identify factors influencing survival. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) was observed to be 29.3%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 56.1%. Patients receiving more than four TACE sessions prior to HAIC exhibited a significantly poorer survival prognosis compared to those receiving fewer than four TACE sessions, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.151 (P=0.02). The median overall survival (OS) was markedly different, being 3.4 (range, 0.5-13.6) months for the former group and 14 (range, 8.5-19.5) months for the latter (P=0.01). Furthermore, patients undergoing additional TACE while receiving HAIC treatment demonstrated improved survival outcomes compared to those who did not, with an HR of 0.491 (P=0.02); the respective OS for these groups was 14 (range, 3.6-14.4) and 6.7 (range, 2.8-11) months (P=0.02). Conclusions: HAIC can be a suitable alternative treatment for HCC patient's refractory to TACE. For those with a history of more than 4 TACE sessions, other alternative treatments should be considered. The addition of TACE during HAIC treatment may extend patient OS time, provided it is balanced with maintaining safe liver function.

Transarterial chemoembolization for omental vein tumor thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report.

Background: In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, recognizing major vascular invasions such as portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and hepatic vein tumor thrombosis (HVTT) is crucial for disease staging. Less documented is the invasion of other vessels. We report a case of omental vein tumor thrombosis (OVTT) in an HCC patient treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Case Description: A 74-year-old male patient with hepatitis B infection was diagnosed with HCC in segment 8 five years ago and treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The tumor recurred at the ablation site, measuring 25 mm × 18 mm, invading the portal vein branch of the posterior segment and a omental vein, showing tumor thrombosis. The patient received TACE targeting branches from the right hepatic artery and omental artery. After two TACE sessions, the tumor and thrombosis completely responded, and tumor markers returned to normal. Conclusions: This case report highlights the uncommon presentation of OVTT alongside PVTT in advanced HCC, emphasizing the need for vigilance in diagnosing atypical disease progressions in HCC and a possible treatment efficacy of TACE.

Higher objective responses by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy following atezolizumab and bevacizumab failure than when used as initial therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (atezo-bev) is the first-line chemotherapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) can be used as an alternative. Our aim was to compare the prognosis of HAIC treatment between newly diagnosed patients and patients treated after failure of atezo-bev. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 73 patients with HCC treated with HAIC between January 2022 and September 2023. Fifty-seven patients were treated with HAIC at initial diagnosis, while 16 were treated with HAIC after first-line atezo-bev combination chemotherapy. We evaluated tumor responses, such as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in either OS or PFS between patients with HCC treated with HAIC at the initial diagnosis and those treated after atezo-bev treatment failure. However, the ORR of the initial HAIC group was 19.6% and that of the HAIC group after atezo-bev therapy failure was 43.6%, which was a statistically significantly difference. CONCLUSION: Although no significant difference was observed for OS and PFS, the ORR of patients in the HAIC group after the failure of atezo-bev therapy was superior to that of newly diagnosed patients. HAIC may prolong survival in patients with HCC after atezo-bev treatment failure.

Complete and Incomplete Alcohol Sclerotherapy for Treatment of Symptomatic Hepatic Cysts: Comparison of Volume Reduction and Clinical Outcomes.

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of incomplete alcohol sclerotherapy with complete treatment for hepatic cysts. Methods: From 2005 to 2021, a total of 80 patients (19 males, 61 females; median age 65 years; age range, 42-86 years) who underwent alcohol sclerotherapy for symptomatic benign hepatic cysts were enrolled and retrospectively reviewed. Complete treatment was defined as injecting 25-33% of the aspirated cyst volume with alcohol in 2-3 cycles, with a maximum of 100 mL per cycle. The overall volume reduction rate was compared between the complete and incomplete treatment groups. The response, based on cystic volume reduction, was classified as a complete regression (CR), near-complete regression (NCR), partial regression (PR), or no response (NR). CR and NCR were considered objective responses. Among 80 patients with 85 hepatic cysts, 26 patients with 29 hepatic cysts received incomplete treatment. Results: The overall volume reduction rate was not significantly different between the complete and incomplete treatment groups (94.39% vs. 95.47%, respectively, p = 0.623). The CR and NCR groups showed a significantly higher rate of symptom improvement than the PR and NR groups (p = 0.043). Conclusions: In conclusion, the efficacy of incomplete alcohol sclerotherapy was not inferior to that of complete treatment.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Acute Ischemic Cholecystitis after Transarterial Chemoembolization: Correlation with Cone Beam CT Findings.

Purpose: Acute cholecystitis is a complication of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) that occasionally requires surgical intervention. We aimed to analyze the incidence and risk factors of cholecystitis requiring surgical intervention in patients with embolic material uptake on cone beam CT (CBCT) performed immediately after various TACE procedures. Materials and Methods: After a retrospective review of 2633 TACE procedures performed over a 6-year period, 120 patients with embolic material retention in the gallbladder wall on CBCT immediately after TACE were selected. We analyzed the incidence of and risk factors for acute cholecystitis. Results: The overall incidence of acute cholecystitis requiring surgical intervention was 0.45% (12 of 2633 TACE procedures); however, it was present in 10% (12 of 120) of procedures that showed high-density embolic material retention in the gallbladder wall on CBCT performed immediately after TACE. Acute cholecystitis requiring surgical intervention occurred in eight patients (66.7%) who underwent direct cystic arterial embolization. Surgical intervention was performed 15 days (mean) after TACE. Conclusion: Most unintended chemolipiodol deposits in the gallbladder wall resolved without intervention or surgery. However, superselective direct cystic arterial chemoembolization was associated with a high incidence of acute cholecystitis requiring surgery, and patients who undergo this procedure should be closely monitored.

Role of Portosystemic Shunt and Portal Vein Stent in Managing Portal Hypertension Due to Hematological Diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with hematological diseases experience complications related to portal hypertension, including life-threatening complications such as variceal bleeding. METHODS: We analyzed the prognosis of patients with hematological diseases and portal hypertension treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) or portal vein stents. We retrospectively assessed patients with hematological diseases and portal hypertension who had variceal bleeding. We evaluated the characteristics and prognosis of the enrolled patients. A total of 11 patients with hematological diseases who underwent TIPS, or portal vein stenting, were evaluated. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 420 days. Of the 11 patients, eight showed resolution of portal hypertension and its complications following TIPS, or stent insertion. One patient experienced rebleeding due to incomplete resolution of portal hypertension, and two other patients also experienced rebleeding because they underwent TIPS closure or revision due to repetitive hepatic encephalopathy. CONCLUSION: Portosystemic shunt and stent installation are effective treatment options for portal hypertension due to hematological diseases.

Arterial-Portal Venous Shunt after Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Risk factors and Impact on Patient Survival.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been well established. The differential impacts of drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) as opposed to conventional TACE (cTACE) on vascular changes, such as arterial-portal venous shunts (APSs), have been recognized. However, their subsequent effects on treatment outcomes have not been fully explored. This study aims to identify risk factors associated with the occurrence of APS in HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE and to evaluate its impact on patient survival. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted from January 2012 to December 2018 including 74 HCC patients receiving DEB-TACE as initial treatment and a 1:1 cTACE. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Logistic regression identified significant risk factors for APS occurrence after DEB-TACE. RESULTS: APS incidence was significantly higher after DEB-TACE than cTACE (46.0% vs. 16.2%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in median OS between APS and non-APS groups after DEB-TACE: 50 months (24.6-75.4) versus 26.9 months (19.5-43.2), p = 0.111; median PFS was 15.6 months (4.1-27.1) and 9.5 months (6.8-12.1) for the two groups, respectively, p = 0.065. Risk factors for APS occurrence after DEB-TACE were more than two feeding arteries (OR: 7.25, 95% CI: 1.82-28.95, p = 0.005) and non-selective embolization (OR: 8.02, 95% CI: 2.30-27.95, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: APS occurrence was higher in DEB-TACE-treated HCC patients, but it did not significantly affect OS and PFS. More than two feeding arteries and non-selective embolization were significant risk factors for APS occurrence after DEB-TACE.

Multiparametric quantification of T1 and T2 relaxation time of bone metastasis in comparison with red or fatty bone marrow using magnetic resonance fingerprinting.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the T1 and T2 values of bone marrow lesions in spine and pelvis derived from magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) and to evaluate the differences in values among bone metastasis, red marrow and fatty marrow. METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent lumbar spine and pelvic MRI with magnetic resonance fingerprinting were retrospectively included. Among eligible patients, those with bone metastasis, benign red marrow deposition and normal fatty marrow were identified. Two radiologists independently measured the T1 and T2 values from metastatic bone lesions, fatty marrow, and red marrow deposition on three-dimensional-magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Intergroup comparison and interobserver agreement were analyzed. RESULTS: T1 relaxation time was significantly higher in osteoblastic metastasis than in red marrow (1674.6 ± 436.3 vs 858.7 ± 319.5, p < .001). Intraclass correlation coefficients for T1 and T2 values were 0.96 (p < 0.001) and 0.83 (p < 0.001), respectively. T2 relaxation time of osteoblastic metastasis and red marrow deposition had no evidence of a difference (osteoblastic metastasis, 57.9 ± 25.0 vs red marrow, 58.0 ± 34.4, p = 0.45), as were the average T2 values of osteolytic metastasis and red marrow deposition (osteolytic metastasis, 45.3 ± 15.1 vs red marrow, 58.0 ± 34.4, p = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: We report the feasibility of three-dimensional-magnetic resonance fingerprinting based quantification of bone marrow to differentiate bone metastasis from red marrow. Simultaneous T1 and T2 quantification of metastasis and red marrow deposition was possible in spine and pelvis and showed significant different values with excellent inter-reader agreement. ADVANCE IN KNOWLEDGE: T1 values from three-dimensional-magnetic resonance fingerprinting might be a useful quantifier for evaluating bone marrow lesions.

Policresulen to treat hypergranulation tissue around drainage tubes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of policresulen for the treatment of hypergranulation. METHOD: This was a retrospective study of patients with percutaneous catheters. Inpatients from two hospitals and those from outpatient clinics were included. Approximately 2ml of 50% policresulen solution was applied to hypergranulation tissue, which was then immediately pressed with gauze for 1-3 minutes using light pressure. When haemostasis was achieved and the granulation tissue size decreased, the procedure was terminated. RESULTS: A total of eight patients (four females and four males) were included in this study. Effective haemostasis was achieved in all patients. The size of the hypergranulation tissue decreased with policresulen treatment, and resolved completely in one patient. There were no complications. Hypergranulation tissue recurred in one patient. Haemostasis was successfully achieved after repeated procedures. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study showed policresulen to be an inexpensive, easy treatment for hypergranulation at catheter insertion sites.

Usefulness of tumor perfusion on cone-beam CT after hepatic arterial infusion port implantation for evaluating tumor response to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.

PURPOSE: To compare tumor perfusion on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) after hepatic artery infusion port implantation with the tumor response to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in patients with advanced HCC treated with HAIC from 2015 to 2020. We performed CBCT with contrast injection via a port on the day following implantation. We classified tumor perfusion on CBCT into three groups: hyperperfusion, isoperfusion, and hypoperfusion. We also evaluated tumor response to HAIC on follow-up images using RECIST 1.1 and compared it with tumor perfusion on CBCT. RESULTS: This study included 206 tumors in 193 patients (mean: 60.5 years) with HCC. There were 100 hyperperfusion tumors (48.5%), 92 isoperfusion tumors (44.7%), and 14 hypoperfusion tumors (6.8%). The tumor response to HAIC included 10 tumors with a complete response (CR) (4.9%), 66 tumors with a partial response (32%), 60 tumors with stable disease (29.1%), and 70 tumors with progressive disease (34%). Hyperperfusion tumors had a 65% objective response rate (ORR) and a 92% disease control rate (DCR). Isoperfusion tumors had a 12% ORR and a 46.8% DCR, while hypoperfusion tumors had a 0% ORR and a 7.1% DCR. A CR was shown only in hyperperfusion tumors. The ORR and DCR of the three groups were different, with statistical significance (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Hyperperfusion tumors on CBCT showed a better tumor response to HAIC, with a 65% ORR in patients with HCC. Tumor perfusion on CBCT after implantation of the hepatic arterial infusion port was associated with the tumor response to HAIC.

Comparative Analysis of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Propensity Score Study.

This study aimed to compare the prognosis and characteristics of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) combination therapy and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). We retrospectively assessed 193 and 114 patients treated with HAIC and AB combination therapy, respectively, between January 2018 and May 2023. The progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with AB combination therapy was significantly superior to that of patients treated with HAIC (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS). After propensity score matching, our data revealed no significant differences in OS and PFS between patients who received AB combination therapy and those who received HAIC therapy (p = 0.5617 and 0.3522, respectively). In conclusion, our propensity score study reveals no significant differences in OS and PFS between patients treated with AB combination therapy and those treated with HAIC.

Upper tract heparin instillation for maintenance of ureteral stent patency.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of heparin packing after antegrade ureteral stent placement in the renal pelvis to protect against early dysfunction. METHOD: From December 2019 to September 2021, 44 double J (DJ) stent placements were performed with heparin packing (heparin packing group). Between February 2008 and March 2014, 250 DJ stent placements without heparin packing were performed (control group). One-week patency and 3-month patency of the two groups were compared. The patency of the DJ stent according to the blood retention grade in the urinary system was also compared by subgroup analysis. RESULT: The 1-week patency rate in the heparin packing group was significantly higher compared to the control group (88.6% and 65.2%, respectively, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the 3-month patency rate between the two groups (72.7% and 60.9%, respectively; p = 0.187). In the subgroup analysis, among the patients with high blood retention grades, the 1-week patency rates of the heparin packing group were significantly higher than that of the control group (100% and 60.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Heparin packing through the catheter after DJ stent installation aids in DJ stent patency.

Impact of aortoceliac angle in implantation of subcutaneous hepatic artery port-catheter system for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy via femoral approach.

BACKGROUND: In patients with an acute aortoceliac angle, the diagnostic catheter often fails to enter the common hepatic artery. PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the impact of aortoceliac angle on the implantation of a port-catheter system via a femoral approach for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 399 patients with advanced HCC underwent percutaneous implantation of a port-catheter system for HAIC. Among these patients, 383 underwent successful implantation via a femoral artery approach (success group). In 16 patients, port-catheter systems were implanted via a subclavian artery approach (failure group) after failure of the initial attempt via the femoral artery due to failed catheter tip fixation to the gastroduodenal artery. We statistically analyzed aortoceliac angle, ostial celiac stenosis, sex, age, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) between groups. RESULTS: The average aortoceliac angle, weight, and BMI were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.02, P < 0.001, respectively). Among them, only the aortoceliac angle was a significant risk factor in logistic regression analysis. The smaller the aortoceliac angle, the more often the femoral approach failed (P < 0.001, odds ratio = 0.817, 95% confidence interval = 0.752-0.887). There were no significant differences in ostial celiac stenosis, sex, or age between the two groups (P = 0.549, 0.056, 0.173, and 0.773, respectively). CONCLUSION: For patients with an acute aortoceliac angle, the femoral approach is likely to fail. A subclavian artery approach should be preferentially considered for percutaneous implantation of a port-catheter system in such patients.