Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Dig Liver Dis ; 56(4): 672-678, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37758611

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most frequent inherited colorectal cancer syndrome. AIM: To assess the burden of adenoma in LS patients under 50 years-old followed in the PRED-IdF network. METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2019, all patients under 50 years of age with a confirmed LS germline mutation were included. The main objective was the description of adenomas characteristics according to path_MMR. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 708 patients (mean age 34.8 ± 8.6), of which 41.8 % were male. Among these patients, 37.6% had path_MLH1, 45.4% path_MSH2, 13.9% path_MSH6, 2.9% path_PMS2, and 1.2% path_EpCAM. The analysis included 1721 (70.9%) follow-up colonoscopies. A total of 682 adenomas were detected, including 140 (20.5%) advanced adenomas. The adenoma detection rates during the first and follow-up colonoscopies were 19.2% and 20.5%, respectively. Most adenomas were <10 mm (57.9%), located in the proximal colon (334, 48.9%), and presented as non-polypoid lesions (493, 72.3%). The median growth time for adenomas was 23 months (range 9-114) irrespective of the path_MMR mutation (p = 0.62). CONCLUSION: LS patients under 50 years of age have a high burden of adenomas, particularly small non-polypoid adenomas located in the proximal colon. These results highlight the need for intensive screening, with a particular focus on the proximal colon.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Female , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonoscopy , Germ-Line Mutation , Adenoma/epidemiology , Adenoma/genetics , Adenoma/diagnosis , DNA Mismatch Repair
2.
Nanoscale ; 13(35): 14866-14878, 2021 Sep 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34533159

ABSTRACT

In this study, we investigated the combination of extracellular (nano) vesicles (EVs) from pig adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) and a thermoresponsive gel, Pluronic® F-127 (PF-127), to prevent stricture formation after endoscopic resection in a porcine model. ADSC EVs were produced at a liter scale by a high-yielding turbulence approach from ADSCs 3D cultured in bioreactors and characterized in terms of size, morphology and membrane markers. The thermoresponsive property of the PF-127 gel was assessed by rheology. The pro-regenerative potency of ADSC EVs was investigated ex vivo in esophageal biopsies under starvation. In vivo tests were performed in a porcine model after extended esophageal endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD). Pigs were randomized into 3 groups: control (n = 6), gel (n = 6) or a combination of 1.45 × 1012 EVs + gel (n = 6). Application of gel ± EVs was performed just after ESD with a follow-up finalized on day 21 post-ESD. There was a trend towards less feeding disorder in the EV + gel group in comparison with the gel and the control groups (16.67% vs. 66.7% vs. 83.33%, respectively) but without reaching a statistically significant difference. A significant decrease in the esophageal stricture rate was confirmed by endoscopic, radiological and histological examination for the EV + gel group. A decrease in the mean fibrosis area and larger regenerated muscularis mucosae were observed for the EV + gel group. In summary, the application of EVs + gel after extended esophageal endoscopic resection succeeded in preventing stricture formation with an anti-fibrotic effect. This nano-therapy may be of interest to tackle an unmet medical need considering that esophageal stricture is the most challenging delayed complication after extended superficial cancer resection by endoscopy.


Subject(s)
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Stenosis , Extracellular Vesicles , Animals , Adipose Tissue , Hydrogels/pharmacology , Stromal Cells , Swine
3.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 7(8): 1102-1112, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31662867

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Small rectal neuroendocrine tumours are good candidates for endoscopic resection provided that complete pathological resection (R0) is obtained and their risk of metastatic progression is low. We conducted a large multicentre nationwide study to evaluate the outcomes of the management of non-metastatic rectal neuroendocrine tumours ≤2 cm diagnosed endoscopically. Patients and methods: The medical records, the endoscopic and pathological findings of patients with non-metastatic rectal neuroendocrine tumours ≤2 cm managed from January 2000-June 2018 in 16 French hospitals, were retrospectively analysed. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of R0 endoscopic resections. Results: A total of 329 patients with 345 rectal neuroendocrine tumours were included, 330 (96%) tumours were managed by local treatments: 287 by endoscopy only and 43 by endoscopy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. The final endoscopic R0 rate was 134/345 (39%), which improved from the first endoscopy (54/225, 24%), to the second (60/100, 60%) and the third endoscopy (20/26, 77%). R0 was associated with endoscopic technique (90% for advanced techniques, 40% for mucosectomy and 17% for polypectomy), but not with tumour or patient characteristics. Twenty patients had metastatic disease, which was associated with tumour size ≥10 mm (odds ratio: 9.1, 95% confidence interval (3.5-23.5)), tumour grade G2-G3 (odds ratio: 4.2, (1.5-11.7)), the presence of muscular (odds ratio: ∞, (11.9-∞)) and lymphovascular invasion (odds ratio: 57.2, (5.6-578.9)). Conclusions: The resection of small rectal neuroendocrine tumours often requires multiple procedures. Training of endoscopists is necessary in order to better recognise these tumours and to perform the appropriate resection technique.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy/methods , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery/methods , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Endoscopy/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading/methods , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnostic imaging , Neuroendocrine Tumors/mortality , Procedures and Techniques Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Procedures and Techniques Utilization/trends , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Surgeons/education , Treatment Outcome
4.
Presse Med ; 48(9): 904-914, 2019 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31561847

ABSTRACT

About 5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases occurred in the context of an underlying hereditary predisposition syndrome. Lynch syndrome is the main causes of hereditary CRC but is also associated with a higher risk of other cancers (such as endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer). It is the consequence of constitutional mutation in a MisMatch Repair (MMR) gene, involved in DNA repair: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2; or of the EPCAM gene (MSH2 promotor). If a mutation predisposing to Lynch Syndrome is identified in an individual, special monitoring should be initiated, adapted to estimated cancer risk. Clinical criteria (Amsterdam II and Bethesda) have been validated to identify the patients who should be referred for genetic counseling in order to initiate constitutional DNA testing. Furthermore, the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) systematically recommend tumoral testing looking for MMR system failure in case of CRC diagnosed under 60, endometrial cancer diagnosed under 50 or whatever the age in patients diagnosed with CRC or endometrial cancer harbouring personal or familal history of Lunch Syndrome cancers. In this review, we will discuss how to detect Lynch syndrome (identification of the index case and family screening) and how to monitor it in 2019.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Age Factors , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Early Detection of Cancer , Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnosis , Endometrial Neoplasms/genetics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Humans , Intestine, Large , Middle Aged , Mutation , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Pedigree , Population Surveillance/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Urologic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Urologic Neoplasms/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL