Interleukin-1 blockade with RPH-104 (goflikicept) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): secondary endpoints from an international, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase IIa study.

In a randomized double-blinded clinical trial of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), goflikicept, an Interleukin-1 (IL-1) blocker, significantly reduced systemic inflammation, measured as the area-under-the-curve (AUC) for high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) at 14 days. We report secondary analyses of biomarkers at 28 days, and cardiac function and clinical endpoints at 1 year. Patients received a single administration of goflikicept 80 mg (n=34), goflikicept 160 mg (n=34), or placebo (n=34). Both doses of goflikicept significantly reduced the AUC for hsCRP at 28 days compared with placebo, without statistically significant differences between the doses. There we no statistically significant differences between groups in the AUC for natriuretic peptides at 28 days. There were no significant differences between placebo, goflikicept 80 mg and 160 mg groups in deaths (2.9%, 2.9% and 0%), hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons (9.1%, 5.9%, and 0%), new-onset or progression of heart failure (9.1%, 5.9%, and 5.9%), and new or increased use of loop diuretics (24.2%, 14.7%, and 17.6%), nor in the number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events, with no treatment-related serious adverse events in any group. In conclusion, in patients with STEMI, IL-1 blockade with goflikicept 80 mg or 160 mg was well tolerated and associated with significant reduction of systemic inflammation. Further adequately powered studies are warranted to determine whether the reduction in systemic inflammation with goflikicept translates into a clinical benefit in patients with STEMI.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Valvular Cardiogenic Shock.

Background: The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who develop cardiogenic shock (CS) secondary to primary valvular dysfunction (valvular cardiogenic shock [VCS]) remain unclear. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe the cohort of patients with VCS and understand their outcomes compared to other forms of CS. Methods: All patients admitted to Cleveland Clinic cardiac intensive care unit between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021, with a diagnosis of CS were retrospectively identified. Characteristics and outcomes for shock patients with VCS were compared to those without VCS. Results: A total of 2,754 patients were admitted to our cardiac intensive care unit with CS, of which 442 (16%) had VCS. The median age of patients with VCS was higher than those with non-VCS (70 years vs 64 years, P < 0.001) and were more likely females (40.3% vs 32.1%, P = 0.001). VCS was predominantly due to native valve dysfunction as compared to prosthetic valve dysfunction (71% vs 29%, P < 0.001), with the aortic valve noted to be the most common valve affected. Patients with VCS had higher 1-year (44% vs 37%, P < 0.001) and 30-day all-cause mortality (28% vs 20%, P < 0.001) compared to those without VCS. When compared to percutaneous intervention and medical therapy alone, surgical intervention in VCS was associated with the best short- and long-term outcomes (P < 0.001). Conclusions: VCS is associated with poor short and long outcomes. Native valvular dysfunction and aortic valve involvement account for the majority of patients with VCS. Definitive surgical therapy and expanding the role of percutaneous therapies may be pivotal in improving clinical outcomes in this high-risk cohort.

Predicting Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Recurrent Pericarditis.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is a complex condition associated with significant morbidity. Prior studies have evaluated which variables are associated with clinical remission. However, there is currently no established risk-stratification model for predicting outcomes in these patients. OBJECTIVES: We developed a risk stratification model that can predict long-term outcomes in patients with RP and enable identification of patients with characteristics that portend poor outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively studied a total of 365 consecutive patients with RP from 2012 to 2019. The primary outcome was clinical remission (CR), defined as cessation of all anti-inflammatory therapy with complete resolution of symptoms. Five machine learning survival models were used to calculate the likelihood of CR within 5 years and stratify patients into high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk groups. RESULTS: Among the cohort, the mean age was 46 ± 15 years, and 205 (56%) were women. CR was achieved in 118 (32%) patients. The final model included steroid dependency, total number of recurrences, pericardial late gadolinium enhancement, age, etiology, sex, ejection fraction, and heart rate as the most important parameters. The model predicted the outcome with a C-index of 0.800 on the test set and exhibited a significant ability in stratification of patients into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups (log-rank test; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a novel risk-stratification model for predicting CR in RP. Our model can also aid in stratifying patients, with high discriminative ability. The use of an explainable machine learning model can aid physicians in making individualized treatment decision in RP patients.

Discordant cardiac inflammation between 18F-FDG PET and CMR in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.

Current diagnostic criteria for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) rely on non-invasive imaging tools including positron emission tomography (PET-CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of discordant myocardial inflammation between PET-CT and CMR in patients with known cardiac sarcoidosis. We retrospectively identified patients with both 18F-FDG PET-CT and CMR who had histology-proven sarcoidosis (N = 148). Among these 25 (17%) had abnormal 18F-FDG metabolism with normal tissue characterization by CMR. Of these, 13 (9%) had the studies concomitantly within 180 days (median 5 days, IQR 1-31). During median follow up of 7 years, 3 (23%) deaths were documented. Although prospective studies are required to address the best imaging approach for cardiac inflammation, our observation that some patients with CS have evidence of disease activity on PET-CT, but not on limited CMR without mapping suggests that a negative limited CMR may not fully exclude CS.

Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Treatment of Pericarditis: A Review.

Importance: Pericarditis accounts for up to 5% of emergency department visits for nonischemic chest pain in North America and Western Europe. With appropriate treatment, 70% to 85% of these patients have a benign course. In acute pericarditis, the development of constrictive pericarditis (<0.5%) and pericardial tamponade (<3%) can be life-threatening. Observations: Acute pericarditis is diagnosed with presence of 2 or more of the following: sharp, pleuritic chest pain that worsens when supine (≈90%); new widespread electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation and PR depression (≈25%-50%); a new or increased pericardial effusion that is most often small (≈60%); or a pericardial friction rub (<30%). In North America and Western Europe, the most common causes of acute pericarditis are idiopathic or viral, followed by pericarditis after cardiac procedures or operations. Tuberculosis is the most common cause in endemic areas and is treated with antituberculosis therapy, with corticosteroids considered for associated constrictive pericarditis. Treatment of acute idiopathic and pericarditis after cardiac procedures or operations involves use of high-dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with doses tapered once chest pain has resolved and C-reactive protein level has normalized, typically over several weeks. These patients should receive a 3-month course of colchicine to relieve symptoms and reduce the risk of recurrence (37.5% vs 16.7%; absolute risk reduction, 20.8%). With a first recurrence of pericarditis, colchicine should be continued for at least 6 months. Corticosteroids are often used if pericarditis does not improve with NSAIDs and colchicine. In certain patients with multiple recurrences, which can occur for several years, interleukin 1 (IL-1) blockers have demonstrated efficacy and may be preferred to corticosteroids. Conclusions: Acute pericarditis is a common cause of nonischemic chest pain. Tuberculosis is the leading cause of pericarditis in endemic areas and is treated with antitubercular therapy. In North America and Western Europe, pericarditis is typically idiopathic, develops after a viral infection, or develops following cardiac procedures or surgery. Treatment with NSAIDs and colchicine leads to a favorable prognosis in most patients, although 15% to 30% of patients develop recurrence. Patients with multiple recurrent pericarditis can have a disease duration of several years or more, are often treated with corticosteroids, and IL-1 blockers may be used for selected patients as steroid-sparing therapy.

Serial Changes in Ventricular Strain in Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Treated With Mavacamten: Insights From the VALOR-HCM Trial.

BACKGROUND: In severely symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, VALOR-HCM (A Study to Evaluate Mavacamten in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Who Are Eligible for Septal Reduction Therapy) demonstrated that mavacamten reduces the need for septal reduction therapy with sustained improvement in left ventricular (LV) outflow tract gradients and symptoms. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), a measure of regional myocardial function, is a more sensitive marker of systolic function. In VALOR-HCM, we assessed serial changes in LV and right ventricular (RV) strain. METHODS: VALOR-HCM included 112 patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (mean, 60 years; 51% male; LV ejection fraction, 68%). Patients assigned to mavacamten at baseline continued the drug for 56 weeks (n=56) and those assigned to placebo (n=52) transitioned to mavacamten from weeks 16 to 56 (40-week exposure). LV-GLS and RV-GLS assessment was performed using a vendor-neutral software. Non-foreshortened apical (4-, 3-, and 2-chamber) views were used to obtain peak LV-GLS. RV focused 4-chamber view was used to calculate RV 4-chamber and free wall strain. A more negative strain value is favorable. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean LV-GLS, RV 4-chamber, and free wall strain values were -14.7%, -22.2%, and -16.8%, respectively (all worse than reported normal means). In the total study sample, LV-GLS significantly improved from baseline to week 56 (P=0.02). Twelve patients had transient reduction in LV ejection fraction (<50%) requiring temporary drug interruption (including 3 permanent discontinuations). The LV-GLS in this subgroup was worse at baseline versus total study population (-11.4%), with no significant worsening from baseline through week 56 (P=0.64). Both free wall and 4-chamber RV-GLS remained unchanged from baseline to week 56 (P=0.62 and P=0.56, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In VALOR-HCM, treatment with mavacamten improved LV-GLS from baseline through week 56 (with no significant worsening of LV-GLS in patients with a reduction in LV ejection fraction ≤50%), suggesting a favorable long-term impact on regional LV systolic function. Additionally, there was no detrimental impact on RV systolic function. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04349072.

Pericardiocentesis: History, Current Practice, and Future Directions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the evolution in the approach to pericardial effusions and drainage from a historical perspective, the present state, and pathways for future innovative therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Incorporation of advanced imaging tools has dramatically improved the safety profile of pericardial interventions. Outcome data allow for refined approaches to management of pericardial disease in special populations, such as pulmonary arterial hypertension. Consideration of intrapericardial interventions and pharmacotherapy represent novel and promising approaches to management of pericardial effusions moving forward. Although the impact of excess or rapidly accumulating pericardial fluid on hemodynamics has been recognized for centuries, the therapeutic approaches have only recently become more refined with the routine incorporation of such tools as echocardiography and fluoroscopy. The most utilized approaches for pericardiocentesis include the apical, subxiphoid, and parasternal, and the most favorable approach is that in which the pericardial fluid is closest to the body surface, where intervening vital structures are least likely to be damaged. With the notable exception of patients with pre-existing pulmonary hypertension, complete decompression of pericardial fluid with careful drain management reduces likelihood of pericardial effusion recurrence. In addition, percutaneous balloon pericardiotomies have been demonstrated to reduce recurrence in nonmalignant effusions.

Mavacamten-Associated Temporal Changes in Left Atrial Function in Obstructive HCM: Insights From the VALOR-HCM Trial.

BACKGROUND: In severely symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the VALOR-HCM (A Study to Evaluate Mavacamten in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Who Are Eligible for Septal Reduction Therapy) trial showed that mavacamten reduced the eligibility for septal reduction therapy with sustained improvement in left ventricular outflow tract gradients. Mavacamten also resulted in favorable cardiac remodeling, including improvement in biomarkers (eg, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and troponin T). However, the impact of mavacamten on left atrial (LA) function is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess serial changes in LA strain measures in patients enrolled in the VALOR-HCM trial. METHODS: VALOR-HCM included 112 symptomatic patients with obstructive HCM (mean age 60 years; 51% male). Patients assigned to receive mavacamten at baseline (n = 56) continued therapy for 56 weeks and those assigned to placebo transitioned to mavacamten (n = 52) from week 16 to week 56. Echocardiographic LA strain (reservoir, conduit, and contraction) was measured by using a vendor-neutral postprocessing software. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean LA volume index (LAVI) and LA strain values (conduit, contraction, and reservoir) were 41.3 ± 16.5 mL/m2, -11.8% ± 6.5%, -8.7% ± 5.0%, and 20.5% ± 8.7%, respectively (all worse than reported normal). LAVI significantly improved by -5.6 ± 9.7 mL/m2 from baseline to week 56 (P < 0.001). There was a significant (P < 0.05) improvement in absolute LA strain values from baseline to week 56 (conduit [-1.7% ± 6%], contraction [-1.2% ± 4.5%], and reservoir [2.8% ± 7.7%]). Patients originally receiving placebo had no differences in LA measurements up to week 16. There was no significant improvement in LA strain values (conduit [-0.9% ± 3.8%], contraction [-0.4% ± 3.4%], and reservoir [1.4% ± 6.1%]; all; P = NS) from baseline to week 56 in patients with history of atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: In VALOR-HCM, mavacamten resulted in an improvement in LAVI and LA strain at week 56, suggesting sustained favorable LA remodeling and improved function, except in the atrial fibrillation subgroup. Whether the advantageous LA remodeling associated with long-term treatment with mavacamten results in a favorable impact on the observed high burden of atrial tachyarrhythmias in HCM remains to be proven. (A Study to Evaluate Mavacamten in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Who Are Eligible for Septal Reduction Therapy [VALOR-HCM]; NCT04349072).

Pericardial Diseases: International Position Statement on New Concepts and Advances in Multimodality Cardiac Imaging.

Pericardial diseases have gained renewed clinical interest, leading to a renaissance in the field. There have been many recent advances in pericardial diseases in both multimodality cardiac imaging of diagnoses, such as recurrent, transient constrictive and effusive-constrictive pericarditis, and targeted therapeutics, especially anti-interleukin (IL)-1 agents that affect the inflammasome as part of autoinflammatory pathophysiology. There remains a large educational gap for clinicians, leading to variability in evaluation and management of these patients. The latest pericardial imaging (American Society of Echocardiography, European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging) and clinical guidelines (European Society of Cardiology) are >8-10 years of age and may not reflect current practice. Recent clinical trials involving anti-IL-1 agents in recurrent pericarditis, including anakinra (AIRTRIP), rilonacept (RHAPSODY), and goflikicept have demonstrated their efficacy. The present document represents an international position statement from world leaders in the pericardial field, focusing on novel concepts and emphasizing the role of multimodality cardiac imaging as well as new therapeutics in pericardial diseases.

Longitudinal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging following clinical response to rilonacept and prior to recurrence upon treatment suspension: a RHAPSODY subgroup analysis.

AIMS: In the phase 3 trial, RHAPSODY, rilonacept effectively resolved active pericarditis recurrences, and long-term treatment led to sustained pericarditis recurrence risk reduction. Prior analysis suggested association between higher late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at baseline and more rapid recurrence upon rilonacept suspension after 12 weeks of treatment. This subgroup analysis assessed the utility of longitudinal serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for tracking clinical improvement and predicting post-treatment-cessation outcomes to help guide clinical decision making. METHODS AND RESULTS: At an 18-month decision milestone (18MDM) in the RHAPSODY long-term extension, investigators decided if patients would continue rilonacept, suspend rilonacept for off-treatment observation, or discontinue the study. Pericardial thickness, pericardial edema (T2-STIR), and LGE were determined at baseline and 18MDM by an imaging core lab blinded to clinical data, and pericarditis recurrence was investigator-assessed. CMR results in patients with data at both baseline and 18MDM (n=13) showed that pericardial thickness, T2-STIR, and LGE were reduced during rilonacept treatment. Among patients with CMR data who suspended rilonacept at the 18MDM (n=7), 5 (71%) had a pericarditis recurrence within 1-4 months of rilonacept suspension, despite all having had none/trace LGE (n=7) and negative T2-STIR (n=7) at the 18MDM and 2 having received prophylactic colchicine. CONCLUSIONS: Continued clinical improvement during prolonged rilonacept treatment corresponded with improvement on CMR, including reduced pericardial thickness, resolution of pericardial edema, and resolution of LGE. However, none/trace LGE at 18MDM while on treatment did not predict absence of pericarditis recurrence upon subsequent rilonacept suspension in this size-limited subgroup.

Standardized ketogenic dietary preparation for metabolic PET imaging in suspected and known cardiac sarcoidosis.

Aims: A major limitation of cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) with F18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F18-FDG) for the evaluation of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is associated with physiologic myocardial glucose uptake. The optimal dietary protocol to suppress physiologic myocardial F18-FDG uptake is not well-established. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a novel dietary preparation using a ketone-based infant formula. Methods and results: Between 2018 and 2021, consecutive studies using a ketogenic dietary preparation were identified (n = 198). The rate of non-diagnostic studies due to failure to suppress myocardial glucose was 7.1% (n = 14) with a similar incidence in diabetics (n = 6, 8.1%). Among studies reported to have no inflammation (n = 137), 130 studies (66%) had mean myocardial standardized uptake value (SUV) less than or equal to mean blood pool SUV. Conclusion: Patient preparation with a ketone-based infant formula resulted in low rate of inappropriate myocardial glucose suppression in patients undergoing F18-FDG cardiac PET to evaluate CS.

Absence of Pericarditis Recurrence in Rilonacept-Treated Patients With COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: Results From the RHAPSODY Long-term Extension.

Background: Rilonacept inhibits the interleukin-1 pathway, and extended treatment in patients with recurrent pericarditis (RP) reduced recurrence risk by 98% in the phase 3 trial, RHAPSODY long-term extension (LTE). Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2 vaccination and/or infection may trigger pericarditis recurrence, and in clinical practice, it is unknown whether to continue rilonacept during SARS-CoV-2 infection. This post-hoc analysis of the RHAPSODY LTE aimed to inform rilonacept management in RP patients vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 or who contract COVID-19. Methods: Analysis was conducted from May 2020 to June 2022. The LTE portion of RHAPSODY LTE enabled up to 24 months of additional open-label rilonacept treatment beyond the pivotal study. Rilonacept efficacy data in preventing pericarditis recurrence were assessed, and concomitant SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and COVID-19 adverse event data were evaluated. Results: No pericarditis recurrences were temporally associated with vaccination. Sixteen COVID-19 cases were reported; 10 in 30 unvaccinated or partially vaccinated patients (33%) vs 6 of 44 fully vaccinated patients (14%; P = 0.04). Twelve of 16 patients (75%) were receiving rilonacept at the time of infection, and none experienced pericarditis recurrence. One pericarditis recurrence occurred in the peri-COVID-19 period in 1 of 4 patients who had stopped rilonacept treatment > 4.5 months prior. COVID-19 severity was mild in 13 patients, moderate in 2, and severe in 1. Conclusions: Full vaccination effectively reduced COVID-19 events in patients treated with rilonacept. Vaccination or COVID-19 during rilonacept treatment did not increase pericarditis recurrence. Continued rilonacept treatment in patients contracting COVID-19 did not worsen disease severity, whereas rilonacept interruption increased pericarditis recurrence, supporting a recommendation for continued rilonacept treatment for RP during vaccination or COVID-19. ClinicalTrialsgov identifier: NCT03737110.

Contexte: Le rilonacept inhibe la voie de l'interleukine-1 et, d'après les résultats de la période de prolongation à long terme de l'essai de phase III RHAPSODY, la poursuite du traitement par cet agent chez les patients atteints de péricardite récidivante a réduit le risque de récidive de 98 %. La vaccination contre le syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère (SRAS)-CoV-2 ou l'infection à ce virus pourrait toutefois déclencher une récidive de la péricardite, et dans la pratique clinique, on ignore s'il vaut mieux poursuivre le traitement par rilonacept pendant l'infection à SRAS-CoV-2. Cette analyse post-hoc de la période de prolongation à long terme de l'essai RHAPSODY vise à orienter la gestion du rilonacept chez les patients atteints de péricardite récidivante qui sont vaccinés contre le SRAS-CoV-2 ou qui contractent la COVID-19. Méthodologie: L'analyse a été effectuée de mai 2020 à juin 2022. La période de prolongation à long terme de l'essai RHAPSODY a permis d'accumuler des données en mode ouvert pendant une période allant jusqu'à 24 mois au-delà de l'étude pivot. Les données sur l'efficacité du rilonacept en prévention de la récidive de péricardite ont été évaluées, tout comme les données sur la vaccination concomitante contre le SRAS-CoV-2 et les cas de COVID-19. Résultats: Aucune récidive de la péricardite n'a pu être associée sur le plan temporel avec la vaccination. Au total, 16 cas de COVID-19 ont été signalés, dont 10 chez les patients non vaccinés ou partiellement vaccinés sur 30 (33 %) et 6 chez les patients complètement vaccinés sur 44 (14 %; p = 0,04). De ces 16 patients, 12 (75 %) prenaient du rilonacept au moment de l'infection et aucun n'a connu de récidive de la péricardite. Une récidive de la péricardite s'est produite dans la période suivant la COVID-19 chez 1 des 4 patients qui avaient cessé de prendre le rilonacept > 4,5 mois auparavant. La COVID-19 a été légère chez 13 patients, modérée chez 2 patients et sévère chez 1 patient. Conclusions: La vaccination complète a réduit efficacement les cas de COVID-19 chez les patients traités par le rilonacept. La vaccination ou l'infection à SRAS-CoV-2 pendant le traitement par rilonacept n'a pas augmenté le risque de récidive de la péricardite. La poursuite du traitement par rilonacept chez les patients atteints de COVID-19 n'a pas aggravé la sévérité de la maladie, tandis que l'interruption du traitement a augmenté le risque de récidive de la péricardite, ce qui plaide en faveur de la recommandation de poursuivre le traitement de la péricardite récidivante par le rilonacept pendant la vaccination ou la COVID-19. Numéro d'identification ClinicalTrialsgov: NCT03737110.

Pericardial Diseases and Best Practices for Pericardiectomy: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Remarkable advances have occurred in the understanding of the pathophysiology of pericardial diseases and the role of multimodality imaging in this field. Medical therapy and surgical options for pericardial diseases have also evolved substantially. Pericardiectomy is indicated for chronic or irreversible constrictive pericarditis, refractory recurrent pericarditis despite optimal medical therapy, or partial agenesis of the pericardium with a complication (eg, herniation). A multidisciplinary evaluation before pericardiectomy is essential for optimal patient outcomes. Overall, given the good outcomes reported, radical pericardiectomy on cardiopulmonary bypass, if feasible, is the preferred approach. Due to patient complexity, as well as the technical aspects of the surgery, pericardiectomy should be performed at high-volume centers that have the required expertise. The current review highlights the essential features of this multidisciplinary approach from diagnosis to recovery in patients undergoing pericardiectomy.

Evaluation and Management of Mechanical Heart Valve Dysfunction and Thrombosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Dysfunction and thrombosis of mechanical heart valves, although uncommon, represents a challenge that requires multidisciplinary expertise for diagnosis and management. The aim of this review is to summarize strengths and weaknesses of diagnostic methods and therapeutic strategies for this uncommon but potentially life-threatening pathology. RECENT FINDINGS: Expeditious diagnosis of mechanical valve thrombosis and exclusion of other diagnostic considerations, often with incorporation of multimodality imaging, can inform the best treatment strategy. Presentation of mechanical valve thrombosis can be asymptomatic or can include heart failure, life-threatening embolic events, or cardiogenic shock. Echocardiography, fluoroscopy and computed tomography are important in the evaluation of mechanical valve dysfunction. Therapeutic strategies for thrombosis include anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis, and surgery. Choice of treatment depends on multiple factors including thrombus size, degree of valve dysfunction, clinical presentation, and available surgical expertise.

Left and right ventricular longitudinal systolic function following aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER 2 trial and registry.

AIMS: Evaluation of left and right ventricular (RV) longitudinal systolic function may enhance risk stratification following aortic valve replacement (AVR). The study objective was to evaluate the changes in left and RV longitudinal systolic function and RV-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling from baseline to 30 days and 1 year after AVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain (LS), tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and RV-PA coupling were evaluated in patients from the PARTNER 2A surgical AVR (SAVR) arm (n = 985) and from the PARTNER 2 SAPIEN 3 registry (n = 719). TAPSE and RV-PA coupling decreased significantly following SAVR, but remained stable following TAVR. Lower LV LS, TAPSE, or RV-PA coupling at baseline was associated with increased risk of the composite of death, hospitalization, and stroke at 5 years [adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for LV LS < 15%: 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.45, P = 0.001; TAPSE < 14 mm: 1.44, 95% CI 1.21-1.73, P < 0.001; RV-PA coupling < 0.55 mm/mmHg: 1.32, 95% CI 1.07-1.63, P = 0.011]. Reduced TAPSE at baseline was the most powerful predictor of the composite endpoint at 5 years. Patients with LV ejection fraction <50% at baseline had increased risk of the primary endpoint with SAVR (HR: 1.34, 95% CI 1.08-1.68, P = 0.009) but not with TAVR (HR: 1.12, 95% CI 0.88-1.42). Lower RV-PA coupling at 30 days showed the strongest association with cardiac mortality. CONCLUSION: SAVR but not TAVR was associated with a marked deterioration in RV longitudinal systolic function and RV-PA coupling. Lower TAPSE and RV-PA coupling at 30 days were associated with inferior clinical outcomes at 5 years. In patients with LVEF < 50%, TAVR was associated with superior 5-year outcomes.