Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biomedicines ; 12(9)2024 Sep 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39335637

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In the present study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of immune-targeted therapy (IT) with or without transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study that included 265 HCC patients with PVTT (IT + TACE: 82, IT: 183). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as tumor responses and adverse events, were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients in the IT + TACE group experienced significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) periods, compared with those in the IT group (OS 19.0 vs. 13.0 months, p < 0.001; PFS 12.0 vs. 7.3 months, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed IT + TACE as an independent predictor for improved OS and PFS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated the benefits of IT + TACE in patients with rich PVTT blood supply. Preoperative imaging and DSA offered predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: TACE combined with IT provides a safe and effective treatment option for advanced-HCC patients with PVTT, particularly those with abundant PVTT blood supply.

2.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 39(4): 746-753, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38240156

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) versus lenvatinib and ICIs for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) refractoriness. METHODS: Patients with intermediate or advanced TACE-refractory HCC who received lenvatinib and ICIs with or without HAIC between 2020 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The tumor response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Factors affecting OS and PFS were identified with univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were enrolled, with 58 patients assigned to the HAIC-Len-ICI group and 63 patients assigned to the Len-ICI group. A higher objective response rate and disease control rate were found in the HAIC-Len-ICI group than in the Len-ICI group (48.30% vs 23.80%, P = 0.005; 87.90% vs 69.80%, P = 0.02, respectively). The median OS was 24.0 months in the HAIC-Len-ICI group and 13.0 months in the Len-ICI group (P = 0.001). The median PFS was 13.0 months in the HAIC-Len-ICI group and 7.2 months in the Len-ICI group (P < 0.001). Multivariable analyses suggested that the presence of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh B stage, and HAIC-Len-ICI therapy option were prognostic factors for OS and PFS. The incidences of any grade and grade 3/4 TRAEs were both comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: HAIC combined with lenvatinib and ICIs yielded better OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR than lenvatinib-ICI therapy in patients with HCC refractory to TACE, with manageable adverse events.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic , Liver Neoplasms , Phenylurea Compounds , Quinolines , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL