ABSTRACT
This is a unique case report of a 67-year-old female diagnosed with multiple myeloma and extensive use of intravenous bisphosphonate, whose clinical and radiographic presentation of an oral lesion made it challenging to confirm its definitive diagnosis. This patient was referred to the dental service for a suspected medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Clinically, the lesion was located underneath a fixed partial denture in the left posterior mandible. There was a purulent swelling on the lingual side of the fixed partial denture, and a hyperplastic exophytic lesion on the buccal side of the bridge. Panoramic radiograph showed a well circumscribed radiolucent lesion in the left mandible. A biopsy of the gingival lesion on the buccal aspect was inconclusive. As the positron emission tomography scan showed lytic lesions, oral manifestation of multiple myeloma could not be ruled out. A computed tomography-guided biopsy of the left mandible showed plasma cell neoplasm in the histological analysis. Upon confirmed diagnosis, the patient was treated with 20Gy to the left mandible and subsequent debridement of the loose necrotic bone. Following treatment, this gingival lesion resolved completely, and the tumour has remained stable till date.
Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bone Density Conservation Agents , Multiple Myeloma , Osteonecrosis , Aged , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Diphosphonates , Female , Humans , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Radiography, PanoramicABSTRACT
Modern radiotherapy delivery systems and treatment strategies are aimed at limiting the irradiation of healthy structures in the head and neck. This seeks to mitigate post-treatment toxicities and complications such as osteoradionecrosis of the jaw. Given the changes to radiotherapy, conventional workflows for the management of patients requiring dentoalveolar surgery may no longer be suitable. It may therefore be appropriate to revisit current treatment algorithms for the management of patients with radiotherapy to the jaws who require dentoalveolar surgery. At present, there are poor data on this. Development of a randomised trial may be warranted to establish the true relative risk for extraction of teeth in the setting of modern radiation therapy delivery systems.