Impact of sex on outcomes associated with polyvascular disease in patients after PCI.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis in more than 1 vs. 1 arterial bed is associated with increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). This study aimed to determine whether the risk of post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) MACE associated with polyvascular disease (PVD) differs by sex. METHODS: We analyzed 18,721 patients undergoing PCI at a tertiary-care center between 2012 and 2019. Polyvascular disease was defined as history of peripheral artery and/or cerebrovascular disease. The primary endpoint was MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 1 year. Multivariate Cox regression was used to adjust for differences in baseline risk between patients with PVD vs. coronary artery disease (CAD) alone and interaction testing was used to assess risk modification by sex. RESULTS: Women represented 29.2% (N = 5,467) of the cohort and were more likely to have PVD than men (21.7% vs. 16.1%; P < .001). Among both sexes, patients with PVD were older with higher prevalence of comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors. Women with PVD had the highest MACE rate (10.0%), followed by men with PVD (7.2%), women with CAD alone (5.0%), and men with CAD alone (3.6%). Adjusted analyses revealed similar relative MACE risk associated with PVD vs. CAD alone in women and men (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.99; P < .001 and aHR 1.31, 95% CI 1.06-1.62; P = .014, respectively; p-interaction = 0.460). CONCLUSION: Women and men derive similar excess risk of MACE from PVD after PCI. The heightened risk associated with PVD needs to be addressed with maximized use of secondary prevention in both sexes.

Change in left ventricular function and outcomes following high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella-guided hemodynamic support.

Introduction: High-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HRPCI) are a potential treatment option for patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and coronary artery disease. The extent to which such intervention is coupled with improvement in LVEF and associated with favorable outcomes is unknown. Methods: We aimed to characterize the incidence and correlates of LVEF improvement after Impella-guided HRPCI, and compare clinical outcomes in patients with versus without LVEF improvement. Data on consecutive patients undergoing Impella-guided HRPCI from a single center registry were analyzed. LVEF-improvement was defined as an absolute increase of LVEF of ≥10% measured at ≥30-days after intervention. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization within 1-year. Results: Out of 161 consecutive patients undergoing Impella-guided HRPCI from June 2008 to December 2017, 43% (n = 70) demonstrated LVEF-improvement (baseline LVEF of 25.09 ± 6.19 to 33.30 ± 11.98 post intervention). Patients without LVEF-improvement had higher frequency of previous MI (61.5% vs. 37.1%, p = 0.0021), Q-waves on ECG (17.6% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.024) and higher SYNTAX scores (30.8 ± 17.6 vs. 25.2 ± 12.2; p = 0.043). After correction of these confounders by multivariable analysis, no significant differences were found regarding the composite endpoint in patients with versus without LVEF-improvement (34.9% vs. 38.3%; p = 0.48). Discussion: In this single-center retrospective analysis, we report the following findings. First, LVEF improvement of at least 10% was documented in over 40% of patients undergoing Impella supported high-risk PCI. Second, a history of MI, Q-waves on admission ECG, and higher baseline SYNTAX scores were independent correlates of no LVEF improvement. Third, one year rates of adverse CV events were substantial and did not vary by the presence or absence of LVEF improvement Prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to elucidate the impact of LVEF improvement on clinical outcomes.

Calcified coronary lesions: Imaging, prognosis, preparation and treatment state of the art review.

Calcific coronary artery stenosis is a complex disease associated with adverse outcomes and suboptimal percutaneous treatment. Calcium plaque modification has emerged as a key strategy to tackle the issues that accompany calcific stenosis - namely reduced device deliverability, unpredictable lesion characteristics, and difficult dilatation. Atherectomy has traditionally been the treatment modality of choice for heavily calcified coronary stenoses. Contemporary technologies have emerged to aid with planning, preparation, and treatment of calcified coronary stenosis in an attempt to improve procedural success and long-term outcomes. In this State Of The Art Review, we synthesize the body of data surrounding the diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of calcific coronary disease, with a focus on i) intravascular imaging, ii) calcific lesion preparation, iii) treatment modalities including atherectomy, and iv) updated treatment algorithms for the management of calcified coronary stenosis.

Cross-Seal IDE Trial: Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of the Cross-Seal Suture-Mediated Vascular Closure Device System.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of interventional procedures require large-sheath technology (>12F) with a favorable outcome with endovascular rather than open surgical access. However, vascular complications are a limitation for the management of these patients. This trial aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of the Cross-Seal suture-mediated vascular closure device in obtaining hemostasis at the target limb access site following interventional procedures using 8F to 18F procedural sheaths. METHODS: The Cross-Seal IDE trial (Investigational Device Exemption) was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study in subjects undergoing percutaneous endovascular procedures utilizing 8F to 18F ID procedural sheaths. The primary efficacy end point was time to hemostasis at the target limb access site. The primary safety end point was freedom from major complications of the target limb access site within 30 days post procedure. RESULTS: A total of 147 subjects were enrolled between August 9, 2019, and March 12, 2020. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement was performed in 53.7% (79/147) and percutaneous endovascular abdominal/thoracic aortic aneurysm repair in 46.3% (68/147) of subjects. The mean sheath ID was 15.5±1.8 mm. The primary effectiveness end point of time to hemostasis was 0.4±1.4 minutes. An adjunctive intervention was required in 9.2% (13/142) of subjects, of which 2.1% (3/142) were surgical and 5.6% (8/142) endovascular. Technical success was achieved in 92.3% (131/142) of subjects. Freedom from major complications of the target limb access site was 94.3% (83/88). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients undergoing percutaneous endovascular procedures utilizing 8F to 18F ID procedural sheath, Cross-Seal suture-mediated vascular closure device achieved favorable effectiveness and safety in the closure of the large-bore arteriotomy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03756558.

Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Disease Who Were Recommended for But Declined Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients may prefer percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, despite heart team recommendations. The outcomes in such patients have not been examined. We sought to examine the results of PCI in patients who were recommended for but declined CABG. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with stable ischemic heart disease and unprotected left main or 3-vessel disease or Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score >22 who underwent PCI after heart team review between 2013 and 2020 were included. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to heart team recommendations on the basis of appropriate use criteria: (1) PCI-recommended; (2) CABG-eligible but refused CABG (CABG-refusal); and (3) CABG-ineligible. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 1 year. The study included 3687 patients undergoing PCI (PCI-recommended, n=1718 [46.6%]), CABG-refusal (n=1595 [43.3%]), and CABG-ineligible (n=374 [10.1%]). Clinical and procedural risk increased across the 3 groups, with the highest comorbidity burden in CABG-ineligible patients. Composite events within 1 year after PCI occurred in 55 (4.1%), 91 (7.0%), and 41 (14.8%) of patients in the PCI-recommended, CABG-refusal, and CABG-ineligible groups, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, the risk of the primary composite outcome was significantly higher in the CABG-refusal (hazard ratio [HR], 1.67 [95% CI, 1.08-3.56]; P=0.02) and CABG-ineligible patients (HR, 3.26 [95% CI, 1.28-3.65]; P=0.004) groups compared with the reference PCI-recommended group, driven by increased death and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular event rates after PCI were significantly higher in patients with multivessel disease who declined or were ineligible for CABG. Our findings provide real-world data to inform shared decision-making discussions.

Prognostic impact of peripheral artery disease in patients with and without high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of PAD according to high bleeding risk (HBR) status. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation at a tertiary-care center (Mount Sinai Hospital) between 2012 and 2019 were stratified according to HBR and PAD status. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke 1 year after PCI. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding. RESULTS: Out of 16,750 patients, 43% were HBR and 57% were no-HBR. Within the two groups, PAD patients were 14% and 6%, respectively, and were more likely to have comorbidities and to undergo complex PCI than no-PAD patients. Within the HBR group, PAD was associated with an increased risk of MACE (11.4% vs. 7.3%, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-1.99, p < 0.001) and a numerical nonsignificant increase of major bleeding (8.5% vs. 6.9%, HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.98-1.59, p = 0.066) as compared with no-PAD. Among no-HBR patients, rates of MACE and major bleeding were numerically but not significantly higher in the PAD group. After multivariable adjustment, PAD was no longer a predictor of adverse outcomes, irrespective of HBR status. CONCLUSIONS: At 1-year after PCI, PAD was associated with increased 1-year risks of MACE in HBR patients. After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, the effect of PAD on adverse events was largely attenuated.

Impact of Bleeding Risk and Inflammation on Cardiovascular Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Markers of systemic inflammation, such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), have been associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether this risk varies according to the presence of high bleeding risk (HBR) conditions is unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of systemic inflammation, as measured by hsCRP levels and cardiovascular outcomes in patients stratified by HBR status following PCI. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing PCI between 2012 and 2019 with baseline hsCRP levels were included. High hsCRP was defined as >3 mg/L, and HBR was defined per the Academic Research Consortium HBR criteria. The primary outcome was MACCE, including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 1 year. All bleeding was assessed as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 15,150 patients were included, and 40.4% (n = 6,125) qualified as HBR. The adjusted risk for MACCE was consistently higher in patients with high hsCRP in both HBR (adjusted HR [aHR]: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.18-1.87) and non-HBR (aHR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.31-2.66) subgroups, with no interaction between HBR status and hsCRP level (Pinteraction = 0.26). Conversely, although bleeding risk was higher in the HBR cohort, hsCRP did not predict the occurrence of bleeding in either the HBR (aHR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.82-1.31) or the non-HBR (aHR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.71-1.39) subgroup (Pinteraction = 0.539). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated hsCRP at the time of PCI is associated with a higher risk for ischemic but not bleeding events, irrespective of HBR status.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on clinical outcomes after first episode in-stent restenosis PCI: Results from a large registry.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with a high rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after de novo coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether patients with DM undergoing PCI for in-stent restenosis (ISR) experience a similar heightened risk of MACE is not known. Hence, we sought to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with and without DM undergoing PCI for ISR. METHODS: Patients undergoing first episode ISR PCI between January 2015 and December 2021 were included. The primary outcome of interest was MACE (all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], and target lesion revascularization [TVR]) at 1-year. RESULTS: A total of 3156 patients (56.7% with DM) underwent PCI for ISR during the study period. Patients with DM were younger, more likely to be female, and had a higher prevalence of comorbidities. At 1-year follow-up, DM was associated with a higher rate of MACE (22.4% vs. 18.7%, unadjusted HR 2.03, 95%CI(1.27-3.25), p = 0.003). All-cause mortality and MI were significantly more frequent among people with DM at 1-year follow-up. The rate of TVR was similar in both groups (17.9% vs. 16.0%, unadjusted HR 1.14, 95%CI (0.94-1.37), p = 0.180). On adjusted analysis, there was no significant difference in the rate of MACE (AHR 1.07, 95%CI(0.90 - -1.29), p = 0.444), all-cause death (AHR 1.54, 95%CI(0.93-2.54), p = 0.095) or MI (AHR 1.10, 95%CI(0.74-1.63), p = 0.652). CONCLUSION: ISR PCI in patients with DM was associated with a higher rate of MACE at 1-year follow-up. However, this increased risk was no longer significant after adjusting for baseline characteristics.

Impact of Clinical Presentation on Outcomes After Rotational Atherectomy in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Rotational atherectomy (RA) is widely used in the percutaneous treatment of heavily calcified coronary artery lesions in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). However, the safety and efficacy of RA in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is not well established and is considered a relative contraindication. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RA in patients presenting with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), unstable angina (UA), and CCS. Consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with RA between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary single center were included. Patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) were excluded. The primary end points of interest were procedural success and procedural complications. The secondary end point was the risk of death or MI at 1 year. A total of 2,122 patients who underwent RA were included, of whom 1,271 presented with a CCS (59.9%), 632 presented with UA (29.8%), and 219 presented with NSTEMI (10.3%). Although an increased rate of slow-flow/no-reflow was noted in the UA population (p = 0.03), no significant difference in procedural success or procedural complications, including coronary dissection, perforation, or side-branch closure, was noted (p = NS). At 1 year, there were no significant differences in death or MI between CCS and non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS: UA + NSTEMI; adjusted hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 2.12); however, patients who presented with NSTEMI had a higher risk of death or MI than CCS (adjusted hazard ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 3.17). Use of RA in NSTE-ACS was associated with similar procedural success without an increased risk of procedural complications compared with patients with CCS. Although patients presenting with NSTEMI remained at higher risk of long-term adverse events, RA appears to be safe and feasible in patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions presenting with NSTE-ACS.

IVUS Improves Outcomes With SUPERA Stents for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral-Popliteal Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Nitinol interwoven bare metal stents represent an advancement in stent technology; however, nominal deployment remains an area of focus. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been shown to improve outcomes in both the coronary and peripheral vasculature by providing the operator with greater vessel detail; however, the use of adjunctive IVUS with nitinol bare metal stents has not been widely studied. This studies aims to determine the effect of IVUS when used adjunctively with nitinol interwoven bare metal stents in the management of femoropopliteal lesions. DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: This study included a cohort of 200 consecutive patients with peripheral artery disease. All patients were treated with ≥1 Supera bare metal stent, and 91 received adjunctive IVUS imaging prior to stent deployment. Deployment conditions of nominal, compressed, and elongated were measured, and the primary clinical outcomes included target lesion reintervention, amputation, and mortality. This study also showed that 8.3 number needed to treat (NNT) patients must be treated with IVUS to avoid an additional revascularization event. RESULTS: The patients who received IVUS had a significantly greater number of nominally deployed stents (p<0.001). Patients who had IVUS imaging also had significantly lower reintervention rates compared with those who did not receive IVUS imaging (p=0.047). CONCLUSION: The IVUS and angiography decreases clinically-driven target lesion reintervention and increases nominal deployment compared with angiography alone in femoropopliteal lesions treated with interwoven bare metal nitinol stents. CLINICAL IMPACT: Endovascular surgones may conisder the adjuctive use of IVUS when using the Supera stent for the treatment of infra inguinal superficial femoral artery lesions. The adjunct use of IVUS may lead to improved sizing, vessel prep, deployment, and ultiamtely reduction in CD-TLR.

Patients with higher-atherothrombotic risk vs. lower-atherothrombotic risk undergoing coronary intervention with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: an analysis from the randomized BIOFLOW trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients with atherothrombotic risk are at high hazard of ischemic events. Preventive medicine plays a major role in modifying their outcomes. Whether the choice of a BP-SES or DP-EES can contribute to the occurrence of events remains unclear. We sought to investigate the outcomes of patients with higher atherothrombotic risk (H-ATR) versus lower atherothrombotic risk (L-ATR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with either bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) or durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES). METHODS: Patients (n = 2361) from BIOFLOW-II, -IV, and -V randomized trials were categorized into H-ATR vs. L-ATR. L-ATR patients had ≤ 1 and H-ATR ≥ 2 of the following criteria: presentation in ACS, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction, previous PCI/CABG, or previous stroke. Endpoints were target lesion failure (TLF: cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction [TV-MI], target lesion revascularization [TLR]) and stent thrombosis (ST) at three years. RESULTS: H-ATR patients (n = 1023) were more morbid than L-ATR patients (n = 1338). TLF rate was significantly higher in H-ATR patients as compared with L-ATR (11.6% vs. 7.0%; HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.27-2.20, p < 0.0001). With BP-SES TLF rates were numerically lower as compared with DP-EES in H-ATR (10.5% vs. 13.5%; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.54-1.14, p = 0.20) and significantly lower in L-ATR (5.6% vs. 9.8%; HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.85, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: In the era of newer-generation DES, patients with H-ATR still are at hazard for ischemic events. Patients with BP-SES had lower TLF rates as compared with DP-EES, most consistent in L-ATR whereas in H-ATR patients most probably secondary preventive strategies are of higher value. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrial.gov. NCT01356888, NCT01939249, NCT02389946. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01356888 , https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01939249 , https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02389946 .

Peri-Interventional Triple Therapy with Dabigatran Modifies Vasomotion after Bare-Metal Stent Implantation in a Pig Coronary Artery Model.

(1) Background: Coronary artery stenting leads to local inflammation, disturbs vasomotion, and slows endothelialization, increasing vascular thrombus risk. We used a pig stenting coronary artery model to assess how peri-interventional triple therapy with dabigatran ameliorates these effects. (2) Methods: In a total of 28 pigs bare-metal stents were implanted. Four days before the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we started 16 of the animals on dabigatran, maintained through 4 days after the procedure. As controls, the remaining 12 pigs received no therapy. In both groups, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (clopidogrel, 75 mg plus aspirin, 100 mg) was administered until animals were euthanized. Just after the PCI and on day 3 after the procedure, we performed optical coherence tomography (OCT) in eight animals in the dabigatran group and four controls and euthanized them. We followed the eight remaining animals in each group with OCT and angiography for one month before euthanizing them and performed in vitro myometry and histology on harvested coronary arteries from all animals. (3) Results: The dabigatran group showed a significantly increased vasoconstriction at 3 days after PCI (10.97 ± 3.85 mN vs. 7.32 ± 5.41 mN, p = 0.03), but we found no differences between endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilatation. We also found no group differences in OCT, quantitative angiography, or histomorphometry findings. (4) Conclusions: Starting a short course of dabigatran just before PCI and continuing for a 3-day window along with usual post-PCI DAPT is associated with enhanced vasoconstriction after bare-metal stent implantation without reducing neointimal formation at one month.

Determinants of Seattle Angina Questionnaire in Multivessel Disease Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from a Single-Center Study.

INTRODUCTION: The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) quantifies the impact of angina on patient functionality and quality of life. There is scarce data on the impact of social determinants and comorbidities on SAQ-7 in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with planned staged PCI. METHODS: Patients completed a SAQ-7 before each PCI. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to study the impact of social determinants, comorbidities, and procedural characteristics on SAQ-7 scores at index PCI and at the time of the staged PCI. RESULTS: 531 patients were studied. Female sex, non-White race, coronary artery bypass graft history (CABG), and chronic lung disease were associated with lower baseline SAQ-7 scores. Overall, SAQ-7 increased between index procedure and staged PCI (11.9 ± 23.4). Body mass index (BMI) and the treatment of bifurcation lesions were independently associated with improvement of SAQ-7 between PCIs. Post-intervention, neither sex nor race was independently associated with changes in SAQ-7 scores. CONCLUSION: Different disparities and comorbid factors affect SAQ-7 before and after PCI. After revascularization, sex and race were not independent predictors of SAQ-7 improvement.

Revascularization Strategies for Patients With Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: No adequately powered studies exist to compare major clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy (EVT) with stent implantation vs bypass surgery (BSx) for symptomatic femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to perform a pooled analysis of individual patient data from all randomized controlled trials comparing EVT vs BSx. METHODS: Principal investigators of 5 of 6 available randomized controlled trials agreed to pool individual patient data. The primary endpoint was major adverse limb events, a composite of all-cause death, major amputation, or target limb reintervention. Secondary endpoints included amputation-free survival, individual major adverse limb event components, and primary patency. Early complications were bleeding, infection, or all-cause death within 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 639 patients were analyzed with a mean age of 68.1 ± 9.1 years and 29.0% women. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. At 2 years, there were no significant differences between patients who received EVT and those who received BSx regarding major adverse limb events (40.1% vs 36.4%; log-rank P = 0.447; adjusted HR [aHR]: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.80-1.36), amputation-free survival (88.1% vs 90.0%; log-rank P = 0.455; aHR for death or amputation: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.63-1.71) and the other secondary endpoints except for primary patency, which was lower in patients who received EVT vs those who received BSx (51.2% vs 61.3%; log-rank P = 0.024; aHR for loss of primary patency: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.02-1.69). EVT was associated with significantly lower rates of early complications (6.8% vs 22.6%; P < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (3.1 ± 4.2 days vs 7.4 ± 4.9 days; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings further support the efficacy and safety of EVT as an alternative to BSx in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease.