ABSTRACT
Public and private genomic sequencing initiatives generate ever-increasing amounts of genomic data creating a need for improved solutions for genomics data processing (Stephens et al.PLoS Biol 13:e1002195, 2015). The Sentieon® Genomics software enables rapid and accurate analysis of next-generation sequence data. In this work, we present a typical use of the Sentieon Genomics software for germline variant calling. The Sentieon germline variant calling pipeline produces more accurate results than other tools on third-party benchmarks (Katherine et al. Front Genet 10:736, 2019; Shen et al. bioRxiv, 885517, 2019) in one tenth the time of comparable pipelines. Parts of this guide come from the official Sentieon Genomics software manual in https://support.sentieon.com/manual (Sentieon. Sentieon Genomics software manual, n.d.) and from the official Sentieon Genomics software application notes in https://support.sentieon.com/appnotes (Sentieon. Sentieon Genomics software application notes, n.d.) and are republished with permission. For additional details and advanced usage instructions of the Sentieon tools, refer to the software manual.
Subject(s)
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Software , Genomics/methods , Germ Cells , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methodsABSTRACT
Neuropsychiatric disorders have a complex genetic architecture. Human genetic population-based studies have identified numerous heritable sequence and structural genomic variants associated with susceptibility to neuropsychiatric disease. However, these germline variants do not fully account for disease risk. During brain development, progenitor cells undergo billions of cell divisions to generate the ~80 billion neurons in the brain. The failure to accurately repair DNA damage arising during replication, transcription, and cellular metabolism amid this dramatic cellular expansion can lead to somatic mutations. Somatic mutations that alter subsets of neuronal transcriptomes and proteomes can, in turn, affect cell proliferation and survival and lead to neurodevelopmental disorders. The long life span of individual neurons and the direct relationship between neural circuits and behavior suggest that somatic mutations in small populations of neurons can significantly affect individual neurodevelopment. The Brain Somatic Mosaicism Network has been founded to study somatic mosaicism both in neurotypical human brains and in the context of complex neuropsychiatric disorders.
Subject(s)
Brain/abnormalities , Mental Disorders/genetics , Mosaicism , Nervous System Diseases/genetics , Neural Stem Cells/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Brain/metabolism , Cell Division/genetics , DNA Damage , DNA Mutational Analysis/methods , DNA Repair/genetics , DNA Replication , Genome, Human , Germ Cells/metabolism , Humans , Nerve Net/growth & development , Nerve Net/metabolism , Neural Stem Cells/metabolism , Neurons/metabolismABSTRACT
De novo mutation is highly implicated in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the contribution of post-zygotic mutation to ASD is poorly characterized. We performed both exome sequencing of paired samples and analysis of de novo variants from whole-exome sequencing of 2,388 families. While we find little evidence for tissue-specific mosaic mutation, multi-tissue post-zygotic mutation (i.e. mosaicism) is frequent, with detectable mosaic variation comprising 5.4% of all de novo mutations. We identify three mosaic missense and likely-gene disrupting mutations in genes previously implicated in ASD (KMT2C, NCKAP1, and MYH10) in probands but none in siblings. We find a strong ascertainment bias for mosaic mutations in probands relative to their unaffected siblings (p = 0.003). We build a model of de novo variation incorporating mosaic variants and errors in classification of mosaic status and from this model we estimate that 33% of mosaic mutations in probands contribute to 5.1% of simplex ASD diagnoses (95% credible interval 1.3% to 8.9%). Our results indicate a contributory role for multi-tissue mosaic mutation in some individuals with an ASD diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics , Autism Spectrum Disorder/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Mosaicism , Myosin Heavy Chains/genetics , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Nonmuscle Myosin Type IIB/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Autism Spectrum Disorder/pathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Exome/genetics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation, Missense , Organ Specificity/genetics , SiblingsABSTRACT
Somatic mosaicism refers to the occurrence of two genetically distinct populations of cells within an individual, derived from a postzygotic mutation. In contrast to inherited mutations, somatic mosaic mutations may affect only a portion of the body and are not transmitted to progeny. These mutations affect varying genomic sizes ranging from single nucleotides to entire chromosomes and have been implicated in disease, most prominently cancer. The phenotypic consequences of somatic mosaicism are dependent upon many factors including the developmental time at which the mutation occurs, the areas of the body that are affected, and the pathophysiological effect(s) of the mutation. The advent of second-generation sequencing technologies has augmented existing array-based and cytogenetic approaches for the identification of somatic mutations. We outline the strengths and weaknesses of these techniques and highlight recent insights into the role of somatic mosaicism in causing cancer, neurodegenerative, monogenic, and complex disease.
ABSTRACT
Human identity testing is critical to the fields of forensics, paternity, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Most bone marrow (BM) engraftment testing currently uses microsatellites or short tandem repeats that are resolved by capillary electrophoresis. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are theoretically a better choice among polymorphic DNA; however, ultrasensitive detection of SNPs using next-generation sequencing is currently not possible because of its inherently high error rate. We circumvent this problem by analyzing blocks of closely spaced SNPs, or haplotypes. As proof-of-principle, we chose the HLA-A locus because it is highly polymorphic and is already genotyped to select proper donors for BM transplant recipients. We aligned common HLA-A alleles and identified a region containing 18 closely spaced SNPs, flanked by nonpolymorphic DNA for primer placement. Analysis of cell line mixtures shows that the assay is accurate and precise, and has a lower limit of detection of approximately 0.01%. The BM from a series of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients who tested as all donor by short tandem repeat analysis demonstrated 0% to 1.5% patient DNA. Comprehensive analysis of the human genome using the 1000 Genomes database identified many additional loci that could be used for this purpose. This assay may prove useful to identify hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients destined to relapse, microchimerism associated with solid organ transplantation, forensic applications, and possibly patient identification.
Subject(s)
DNA , Haplotypes , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Alleles , Bone Marrow Cells , Cell Line, Tumor , Computational Biology , Genetic Testing/methods , Genetic Testing/standards , Genome, Human , HLA-A Antigens/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/standards , Humans , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The personalized cueing method is a novel procedure for treating naming deficits of persons with aphasia that is relatively unfamiliar to most speech-language pathologists. The goal of this article is to introduce the personalized cueing method to clinicians so that it might be expanded and improved upon. It is also hoped that this article will promote further research in the treatment of naming deficits of clients with aphasia. METHOD: This clinical focus article (a) describes the origins of the personalized cueing method, the steps involved in creating personalized cues, and training and assessment procedures used with the personalized cueing method; (b) summarizes the published research supporting the use of the personalized cueing method; and (c) highlights some of the clinical advantages of this novel naming treatment for clients and clinicians. RESULTS: Research with the personalized cueing method indicates that durability (long-term naming accuracy) for items trained with the personalized cueing method exceeds that for items trained with phonological cueing and other methods. It further shows that as the stimuli used to train naming in the personalized cueing experiments have become more realistic, durability of personalized cueing has increased. CONCLUSION: Personalized cueing is a parsimonious approach for treatment of naming deficits of persons with aphasia that has shown positive treatment effects in 8-12 training sessions.