Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Perioper Pract ; : 17504589241267859, 2024 Aug 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39133158

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies have proposed that the routine use of sugammadex could provide perioperative time savings and a reduction in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of sugammadex on perioperative times and on the incidences of adverse events when compared with the active control, neostigmine, for minimally invasive gastric sleeve surgery. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, patient characteristics, type of primary neuromuscular blocking reversal agents, operating room discharge times, post-anaesthesia care unit recovery times, and incidences of and treatment for postoperative nausea and vomiting and orotracheal reintubation were the measures of interest. Superiority testing determined the between-group means differences of the reversal agents on the two perioperative time periods of interest. RESULTS: Superiority testing demonstrated no improvement of the two perioperative times with sugammadex. There was no clinical difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting or in the number of antiemetic doses received in the post-anaesthesia care unit between the two groups. Finally, the two orotracheal reintubations in the post-anaesthesia care unit were in the sugammadex administered group. CONCLUSION: These results with sugammadex provide no perioperative time savings or reduce the incidence and treatment for postoperative nausea and vomiting in the post-anaesthesia care unit when compared with neostigmine.

2.
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 21(4): 345-351, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28486870

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective study examined the role of aortic valve (AV) disease in patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) to determine the incidence of postoperative cardiac morbidity and mortality when compared with a matched control group without AV disease. METHODS: Patients were included in the AV group if diagnosed with aortic stenosis (AS) or aortic regurgitation or had received AV replacement prior to OLT. The AV group (n = 53) was matched to a control group (n = 212) with the following preoperative variables: type of organ transplanted, age, gender, race, body mass index, MELD, redo-transplantation, preoperative renal replacement therapy, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, viral hepatitis, diabetes, and coronary artery disease. A 1:4 ratio was utilized to improve the efficiency and power of the analysis. RESULTS: No significant difference in survival or posttransplant cardiac complications (acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, or dysrhythmia) was observed between groups. However, statistically significantly more patients-11% (6/53)-required coronary intervention following OLT in the AV group, whereas 3% (7/212) required coronary intervention (χ2 = 5.8; P = .0156) in the control group. Following OLT, 9% (5/53) in the AV group required surgical or nonsurgical AV intervention, whereas no valvular events were observed in the control group. Event-free survival in the AV group, with an end point defined as AV intervention (n = 5) and death (n = 10), was 92% (49/53) at 1 year, 83% (44/53) at 3 years, and 72% (38/53) at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pretransplant AV replacement or AS have significant cardiac complications (myocardial infarction, AV replacement, or cardiac death) in 1 to 3 years post-OLT.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/epidemiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/epidemiology , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Heart Valve Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data , Liver Transplantation , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Time , Young Adult
3.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 31(2): 575-581, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27745797

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the agreement between two heparin assays, Hepcon HMS plus/Kaolin-ACT and Anti-Xa, and their predictive power in detecting circulating heparin levels post-reperfusion of the liver graft when compared with thromboelastogram (TEG) r time ratio in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study design. SETTING: Single center, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight consecutive adults who had undergone liver transplant. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Paired arterial blood samples were collected before surgical incision, 5 minutes after administration of an average dose of 2,054±771 units of intravenous unfractionated heparin before caval cross-clamping, 5 minutes after portal reperfusion, 5 minutes after hepatic artery reperfusion, and 1 hour after hepatic artery reperfusion. The observations that heparin assay measurements were within the predetermined limits of agreement, strongly suggested the two heparin assays (Hepcon HMS plus and Anti-Xa assay) are interchangeable during prophylactic heparin dose therapy during OLT. Post-reperfusion, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed high accuracy in measuring circulating heparin levels with both Anti-Xa and Hepcon HMS assays when compared with the TEG r time ratio assay. CONCLUSIONS: The point-of-care Hepcon HMS plus/Kaolin-ACT (activated clotting time) assay appeared to be a reliable alternative to the more expensive and laboratory-required Anti-Xa assay in monitoring the response to intravenous heparin in patients undergoing OLT.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Heparin/administration & dosage , Liver Transplantation/methods , Plant Preparations/administration & dosage , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Adult , Aged , Anticoagulants/blood , Blood Coagulation Tests/methods , Cohort Studies , Female , Heparin/blood , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Thrombelastography/methods
4.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 30(4): 917-23, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27020101

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the role of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) administered after reperfusion of the donor liver in the incidences of thromboembolic events and acute kidney injury within 30 days after orthotopic liver transplantation. One-year survival rates between the EACA-treated and EACA-nontreated groups also were examined. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, cohort study design. SETTING: Single-center, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 708 adult liver transplantations performed from 2008 to 2013. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: EACA administration was not associated with incidences of intracardiac thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (1.3%) or intraoperative death (0.6%). Logistic regression (n = 708) revealed 2 independent risk factors associated with myocardial ischemia (age and pre-transplant vasopressor use) and 8 risk factors associated with the need for post-transplant dialysis (age, female sex, redo orthotopic liver transplantation, preoperative sodium level, pre-transplant acute kidney injury or dialysis, platelet transfusion, and re-exploration within the first week after transplant); EACA was not identified as a risk factor for either outcome. One-year survival rates were similar between groups: 92% in EACA-treated group versus 93% in the EACA-nontreated group. CONCLUSIONS: The antifibrinolytic, EACA, was not associated with an increased incidence of thromboembolic complications or postoperative acute kidney injury, and it did not alter 1-year survival after liver transplantation.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Thromboembolism/etiology , Aminocaproic Acid/administration & dosage , Antifibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Replacement Therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis
5.
Liver Transpl ; 21(1): 13-21, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25213120

ABSTRACT

Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines caution that preoperative noninvasive cardiac tests may have poor predictive value for detecting coronary artery disease in liver transplant candidates. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the role of clinical predictor variables for early and late cardiac morbidity and mortality and the predictive values of noninvasive cardiac tests for perioperative cardiac events in a high-risk liver transplant population. In all, 389 adult recipients were retrospectively analyzed for a median follow-up time of 3.4 years (range = 2.3-4.4 years). Overall survival was 83%. During the first year after transplantation, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates were 15.2% and 2.8%. In patients who survived the first year, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates were 3.9% and 2%, with cardiovascular etiology as the third leading cause of death. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and single-photon emission computed tomography had respective sensitivities of 9% and 57%, specificities of 98% and 75%, positive predictive values of 33% and 28%, and negative predictive values of 89% and 91% for predicting early cardiac events. A rate blood pressure product less than 12,000 with DSE was associated with an increased risk for postoperative atrial fibrillation. Correspondence analysis identified a statistical association between nonalcoholic steatohepatitis/cryptogenic cirrhosis and postoperative myocardial ischemia. Logistic regression identified 3 risk factors for postoperative acute coronary syndrome: age, history of coronary artery disease, and pretransplant requirement for vasopressors. Multivariable analysis showed statistical associations of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and the development of acute kidney injury as risk factors for overall cardiac-related mortality. These findings may help in identifying high-risk patients and may lead to the development of better cardiac tests.


Subject(s)
Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Chi-Square Distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Female , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Diseases/mortality , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Hemodynamics , Humans , Incidence , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , New Orleans/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Ochsner J ; 11(1): 89-91, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21603342

ABSTRACT

This report discusses the perioperative anesthesia management of a pediatric patient with end-stage liver disease from progressive intrahepatic cholestasis, with particular emphasis on the coordinated, multidisciplinary approach our institution uses.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL