Dwindling dollars: The inflation-adjusted decline of Medicare reimbursement in endocrine surgery (2003-2023).

INTRODUCTION: Medicare determines reimbursement rates for medical services, often setting a benchmark that is followed by private insurers. Across various medical specialties, decreases in Medicare reimbursement have been observed. However, the extent of Medicare reimbursement for endocrine surgery remains unexplored. This study investigates the trajectory of reimbursement rates for endocrine surgical procedures. METHODS: Data spanning 2003 to 2023 were gathered from the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool for 16 endocrine operations and procedures. Each operation's or procedure's relative value units and conversion factor, which accounts for geographic variation in relative value units, are determined annually by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The total annual Medicare reimbursement for each operation or procedure was determined by multiplying procedure-specific relative value units with the conversion factor. Raw yearly percentage changes in reimbursement were computed and compared to changes in the general consumer price index. All data were then corrected for inflation. The compound annual growth rate for each procedure was calculated using inflation-adjusted data. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2023, the mean unadjusted percentage change for all queried procedures was +14.14% (standard deviation 0.28). During this same time, the consumer price index increased by 69.15% (P < .001). After adjusting for inflation, the mean total adjusted percentage change for all queried procedures over the entire study period was -31% (standard deviation 0.17). The adjusted average yearly compound annual growth rate was -1.93% (standard deviation 0.92). Only 1 procedure showed an increase in reimbursement (image-guided fine-needle aspiration, +32%). CONCLUSION: Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement rates for endocrine surgical procedures have consistently declined. Stakeholders must address these trends to ensure access to quality surgical endocrine care in an evolving health care landscape.

A Bilingual Readability Assessment of Online Breast Cancer Screening and Treatment Information.

INTRODUCTION: Presenting health information at a sixth-grade reading level is advised to accommodate the general public's abilities. Breast cancer (BC) is the second-most common malignancy in women, but the readability of online BC information in English and Spanish, the two most commonly spoken languages in the United States, is uncertain. METHODS: Three search engines were queried using: "how to do a breast examination," "when do I need a mammogram," and "what are the treatment options for breast cancer" in English and Spanish. Sixty websites in each language were studied and classified by source type and origin. Three readability frameworks in each language were applied: Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease, Flesch Kincaid Grade Level, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) for English, and Fernández-Huerta, Spaulding, and Spanish adaptation of SMOG for Spanish. Median readability scores were calculated, and corresponding grade level determined. The percentage of websites requiring reading abilities >sixth grade level was calculated. RESULTS: English-language websites were predominantly hospital-affiliated (43.3%), while Spanish websites predominantly originated from foundation/advocacy sources (43.3%). Reading difficulty varied across languages: English websites ranged from 5th-12th grade (Flesch Kincaid Grade Level/Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease: 78.3%/98.3% above sixth grade), while Spanish websites spanned 4th-10th grade (Spaulding/Fernández-Huerta: 95%/100% above sixth grade). SMOG/Spanish adaptation of SMOG scores showed lower reading difficulty for Spanish, with few websites exceeding sixth grade (1.7% and 0% for English and Spanish, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Online BC resources have reading difficulty levels that exceed the recommended sixth grade, although these results vary depending on readability framework. Efforts should be made to establish readability standards that can be translated into Spanish to enhance accessibility for this patient population.

Evaluating Health Literacy Resources for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in End-Stage Kidney Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Parathyroidectomy is recommended for severe secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) due to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), but surgery is underutilized. High quality and accessible online health information, recommended to be at a 6th-grade reading level, is vital to improve patient health literacy. This study evaluated available online resources for SHPT from ESKD based on information quality and readability. METHODS: Three search engines were queried using the terms "parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism," "parathyroidectomy kidney/renal failure," "parathyroidectomy dialysis patients," "should I have surgery for hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure?," and "do I need surgery for hyperparathyroidism due to kidney failure if I do not have symptoms?" Websites were categorized by source and origin. Two independent reviewers determined information quality using JAMA (0-4) and DISCERN (1-5) frameworks, and scores were averaged. Cohen's kappa evaluated inter-rater reliability. Readability was determined using the Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease, Flesch Kincaid Grade Level, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook tools. Median readability scores were calculated, and corresponding grade level determined. Websites with reading difficulties >6th grade level were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty one (86.1%) websites originated from the U.S., with most from hospital-associated (63.9%) and foundation/advocacy sources (30.6%). The mean JAMA and DISCERN scores for all websites were 1.3 ± 1.4 and 2.6 ± 0.7, respectively. Readability scores ranged from grade level 5-college level, and most websites scored above the recommended 6th grade level. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-oriented websites tailoring SHPT from ESKD are at a reading level higher than recommended, and the quality of information is low. Efforts must be made to improve the accessibility and quality of information for all patients.

Evolving Economics: The Erosion of Medicare Reimbursement in Breast Surgery (2003-2023).

INTRODUCTION: Medicare significantly influences reimbursement rates, setting a standard that impacts private insurance policies. Despite declining rates in various specialties, the magnitude of these trends has not been examined in breast surgery. This study examines Medicare reimbursement trends for breast surgery operations. METHODS: Data for 10 breast operations from 2003 to 2023 were collected from the Medicare Physician Fee Look-Up Tool and yearly reimbursement was computed using the conversion factor. The year-to-year percentage change in reimbursement was calculated, and the overall median change was compared with the consumer price index (CPI) for inflation evaluation. All data were adjusted to 2023 United States dollars. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was calculated using inflation-adjusted data. RESULTS: Over the study period, reimbursement for the 10 breast operations had a mean unadjusted percentage increase of + 25.17%, while the CPI increased by 69.15% (p < 0.001). However, after adjustment, overall reimbursement decreased by - 20.70%. Only two operations (lumpectomy and simple mastectomy) saw increased inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement (+ 0.37% and + 3.58%, respectively). The CAGR was - 1.54% overall but remained positive for the same two operations (+ 0.02% and + 0.18%, respectively). Based on these findings, breast surgeons were estimated to be reimbursed $107,605,444 less in 2023 than if rates had kept pace with inflation over the past decade. CONCLUSION: Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement rates for breast surgeries have declined from 2003 to 2023. This downward trend may strain resources, potentially leading to compromises in care quality. Surgeons, administrators, and policymakers must take proactive measures to address these issues and ensure the ongoing accessibility and quality of breast surgery.

Lost in Translation: Multilingual Analysis of Online Breast Cancer Information.

INTRODUCTION: Patients use the internet to learn more about health conditions. Non-English-speaking patients may face additional challenges. The quality of online breast cancer information, the most common cancer in women, is uncertain. This study aims to examine the quality of online breast cancer information for English and non-English-speaking patients. METHODS: Three search engines were queried using the terms: "how to do a breast examination," "when do I need a mammogram," and "what are the treatment options for breast cancer" in English, Spanish, and Chinese. For each language, 60 unique websites were included and classified by type and information source. Two language-fluent reviewers evaluated website quality using the Journal of American Medical Association benchmark criteria (0-4) and the DISCERN tool (1-5), with higher scores representing higher quality. Scores were averaged for each language. Health On the Net code presence was noted. Inter-rater reliability between reviewers was assessed. RESULTS: English and Spanish websites most commonly originated from US sources (92% and 80%, respectively) compared to Chinese websites (33%, P < 0.001). The most common website type was hospital-affiliated for English (43%) and foundation/advocacy for Spanish and Chinese (43% and 45%, respectively). English websites had the highest and Chinese websites the lowest mean the Journal of American Medical Association (2.2 ± 1.4 versus 1.0 ± 0.8, P = 0.002) and DISCERN scores (3.5 ± 0.9 versus 2.3 ± 0.6, P < 0.001). Health On the Net code was present on 16 (8.9%) websites. Inter-rater reliability ranged from moderate to substantial agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of online information on breast cancer across all three languages is poor. Information quality was poorest for Chinese websites. Improvements to enhance the reliability of breast cancer information across languages are needed.

Adrenalectomy Outcome Variations Across Different Functional Adrenal Tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Adrenalectomy generally has favorable outcomes. It is unknown if patients with functional adrenal tumors experience different clinical outcomes than those with benign adrenal tumors, due to the presence of comorbid conditions secondary to the functional tumor. We investigated outcomes following open and laparoscopic adrenalectomy for benign nonfunctional (BNF) versus functional adrenal masses. METHODS: Patients undergoing adrenalectomy were identified in the 2015-2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, then categorized as BNF, hyperaldosteronism, hypercortisolism, and pheochromocytoma. The primary outcome of interest was 30-d morbidity and secondary outcomes included 30-d mortality, 30-d readmission, and postoperative length of stay (LOS). Subgroup analysis was performed based upon surgical approach. Univariate analysis was performed, followed by multivariable logistic regression for individual outcomes that differed significantly between patients with BNF and functional neoplasm, factoring in patient demographics and operative approach with statistical significance on univariate analysis. Descriptive statistics and outcomes were analyzed using Pearson's χ2 test and Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate. RESULTS: There were 3291 patients with BNF while 484 had hyperaldosteronism, 263 hypercortisolism, and 46 pheochromocytomas. Within the laparoscopic group of 3615 (88.5%) of adrenalectomy patients, compared to BNF patients, patients with hyperaldosteronism had lower rates of postoperative morbidity (1.9% versus 5.2%, P < 0.001) and shorter LOS (1 d, interquartile range (IQR) [1-1] versus 1d IQR [1-2], P = 0.003); these persisted on multivariate analysis (OR 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.74 and odds ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.36-0.60, P < 0.001). Patients with hypercortisolism had higher morbidity (7.3% versus 5.2%, P < 0.001), 30-d readmission rates (5.3% versus 2.9%, P = 0.042) and longer LOS (2d, IQR [1-3] versus 1d, IQR [1-2, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, presence of hypercortisolism was independently associated with increased likelihood of readmission within 30 d (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.11-2.99, P = 0.012) and longer LOS (>1 d) (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.33-2.40, P < 0.001). Compared to BNF patients, patients with pheochromocytoma had higher rates of postoperative morbidity (6.2% versus 5.2%, P < 0.001). Within the open group of 469 (11.5% of adrenalectomy patients), there were no statistically significant differences in outcomes between patients with BNF and functional adrenal masses. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes after adrenalectomy performed for functional neoplasms differ based on surgical indication.

Perioperative Outcomes After Adrenalectomy for Secondary Adrenal Malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: The risk of adverse outcomes after adrenal metastasectomy is not well defined. Knowledge of these risks is essential to guide patient counseling. METHODS: The 2015-2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program datasets were combined. Patients who underwent adrenalectomy for secondary adrenal malignancy (SM) and benign nonfunctional (BNF) adrenal neoplasms were identified; BNF neoplasms were chosen as a comparison as functional neoplasms can contribute to comorbidity. Patients who had additional surgery at the time of adrenalectomy were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative factors, and outcomes were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of 3496 adrenalectomy patients, 332 had SM and 3164 had BNF neoplasms. Patients with SM were older (65 versus 54 y) and more often had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (7.5% versus 4.4%), chronic steroid use (10.5% versus 3.8%), and bleeding disorders (4.5% versus 2.2%) than patients with BNF, respectively (P < 0.01 for all). Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was the most common operative approach for both groups (74.7% versus 88.3%). Rates of mortality, morbidity, reoperation, readmission, and nonhome discharge did not differ significantly between groups. Patients with SM had higher rates of postoperative bleeding than patients with BNF (6.3% versus 2.6%, P < 0.001). This persisted on multivariable regression analysis that adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and operative approach (odds ratio 2.34, 95% confidence interval 1.19-4.64). CONCLUSIONS: Adrenalectomy for SM is associated with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding compared to adrenalectomy for BNF adrenal neoplasms. Patients with SM that meet criteria for adrenal metastasectomy should be counseled appropriately.

Consolidation trends in vascular surgery.

BACKGROUND: Practice consolidation by vertical and horizontal integration is a growing trend in surgery. Practice consolidation has not been previously examined in vascular surgery. METHODS: The Medicare Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System data were used to identify vascular providers and vascular surgery practices in the United States in 2015 and 2020. Practices were categorized as solo (1 surgeon), small (2), medium (3-5), and large (≥6). The number of providers and the number of practices in each size group were determined. The Hirfendahl-Hirshman index (HHI), a measure of market consolidation, was calculated. Provider count, practice size, and HHI were additionally analyzed by urban and rural regions. All values were calculated for each time point and compared. RESULTS: Vascular providers increased in number from 2929 to 3154 (7.7%) from 2015 to 2020. The number of practices decreased from 1351 to 1090 (19.3%). The number of large practices increased by 49.4%; the number of small or solo practices decreased by 42.1%. The mean HHI increased from 0.486 in 2015 to 0.498 in 2020. Both urban and rural regions had a decrease in solo practices (43.3% and 2.3%, respectively) and an increase in HHI (from 0.499 to 0.509 and 0.793 to 0.818, respectively). All changes were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: From 2015 to 2020, there is a trend toward vascular providers working in larger practice groups and a corresponding increase in measures of market consolidation.

To report hounsfeld units or not: There is no question.

INTRODUCTION: Most adrenal incidentalomas are not appropriately evaluated. Reporting the mass in the radiology report summary and providing recommendations in the report can positively impact evaluation. This study evaluated the effect of reporting Hounsfield units(HU) on adrenal incidentaloma follow-up. METHODS: Patients with adrenal incidentalomas identified on noncontrast CT scan from 2015 to 2020 â€‹at a tertiary care institution were studied. Chart review was conducted. Patient and imaging characteristics were compared between patients who did and did not have HU reported. Outcomes of interest were 1)outpatient referral, 2)biochemical evaluation, and 3)dedicated imaging if appropriate. Multivariate analysis determined the impact of HU, reporting in the summary and provision of recommendations on the outcomes. RESULTS: 363 patients were studied, 36(9.9 â€‹%) had HU reported. When HU were used in addition to recommendations and reporting in the summary, the likelihood of outpatient referral increased from 10.1 to 32.6-fold (95%CI 7.7-138.1, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Similarly, the likelihood of biochemical workup increased from 2.5 to 7.8-fold (95%CI 2.5-24.1, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). CONCLUSION: Recording adrenal incidentaloma HU on non-contrast CT scans was associated with increased rates of outpatient referral and biochemical workup.

Disparities in Access to High-Volume Surgeons and Specialized Care.

The significant volume-outcome relationship has triggered interest in improving quality of care by directing patients to high-volume centers and surgeons. However, significant disparities exist for different racial/ethnic, geographic, and socioeconomic groups for thyroid, parathyroid, adrenal, and pancreatic neuroendocrine surgical diseases disease.

From Debt to Dollars: Assessing a General Surgeon's Career Value.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical residents make decisions that may have a dramatic impact on career earnings based off conceptions regarding future income potential. This study examines the effect of debt burden, repayment plan, and practice setting on a general surgeon's career value. METHODS: Debt levels, repayment plans, and practice setting were considered to model a surgeon's career value using net present value (NPV) across 35 scenarios. The NPV was calculated using salary, education debt, yearly spending, and a discount rate of 5%. Salary data were obtained from the Medical Group Management Association, student debt information from the Association of American Medical Colleges, and tax and household spending data from U.S. government records. Assumptions included no gaps in training, no prior debt, single-person household, and career duration of 35 y. RESULTS: A general surgeon's salary adequately repays debt burdens from $100,000-$300,000 over 10-25 y, regardless of repayment plan or practice setting. Practice setting decreased career value for academic surgeons when debt burden and repayment plan were held constant: the NPV for an academic surgeon was $382,000 compared to $500,000 for a nonacademic surgeon with the same debt and repayment plan. Debt burden repaid through unsubsidized and income-based repayment plans reduced NPV for all surgeons, while subsidized plans increased NPV. The projected NPV for all scenarios ranged $2.35M-$2.87 M. CONCLUSIONS: Though the modeled scenarios do not account for prior debt burden, major expenditures, or increases in yearly household spending beyond national averages, surgery residents should be aware that general surgery remains a financially feasible career.

Older age impacts outcomes after adrenalectomy.

BACKGROUND: Adrenalectomy is well tolerated with low complication rates. It is unclear if these excellent outcomes are consistent across all age groups. METHODS: The 2015-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program datasets were used. Patients who underwent adrenalectomy were identified and grouped based on age: ≤60, 61 to 70, 71 to 80, and >80 years. Patient characteristics, surgical indications, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared between age groups. Primary outcome measures were mortality, morbidity, postoperative length of stay, non-home discharge, and unplanned readmission. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Adrenalectomy was performed on 6,114 patients. Younger patients more frequently had surgery for non-functional benign neoplasms compared with older (55.7% vs 52.8% vs 45.9% vs 45.3%, for patients ≤60, 61 to 70, 71 to 80, and >80 years, respectively, P < .001), and less frequently had surgery for malignancy (8.8% vs 14.4% vs 22.5% vs 24.5%, P < .001). The median length of stay for patients ≤60 was 1 day compared with 2 days for patients 61-70, 71-80, and >80 (P < .001). The overall mortality rate was <1% and did not differ based on age (P = .18). Morbidity occurred less frequently in the younger age groups (7.3% vs 8.9% vs 11.2% vs 16.0%, P < .001) compared with older. Similar trends were seen for non-home discharge (1.4% vs 2.5% vs 4.8% vs 17.0%, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, patients aged >80 had a 2-fold increased likelihood of morbidity and a 9-fold increased likelihood of non-home discharge compared to patients aged ≤60. CONCLUSION: Older age is associated with morbidity and non-home discharge after adrenalectomy. Knowledge of these risks is critical when counseling an aging surgical population.