Extracorporeal photopheresis as an antirejection prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients: preliminary results.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is considered a promising immunomodulatory therapy of acute allograft rejection in organ transplantation and graft-versus-host disease. Our aim was to investigate the biological responses of 10 patients who underwent kidney transplantation with ECP as prophylactic treatment. They received conventional immunosuppressive therapy plus ECP immediately after transplantation: 12 to 16 applications over the course of 2.5 months. ECP procedures were performed using an automated system for leukocyte separation and photoactivation with methoxsalen. All recipients were followed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and peripheral T, B, natural killer, T-regulatory (Treg) and dendritic cells (DC) counts and phenotypes. An acute rejection episode appeared in one control group recipient. The ECP group showed a positive trend to an higher GFR at months 3 (53±11 vs 47.1±9; P=.17) and 6 (67.5±10 vs 53.6±3; P=.03, Wilcoxon test). An increased percentage of Treg (CD3+ CD4+ CD25+) among the total CD3 cell count (4.9%±1% to 9.4%±15%) as well as inducible Treg (CD3+ CD8+ CD28-) was observed among CD3 cells (3.3%±3% to 11.8%±8%, P=.025) within 3 months of ECP treatment. A significant difference in the percentage of Treg was noted at month 3 (completed ECP) between the ECP and the control groups (9.4%±15% vs 3%±1%; P=.01). Addition of ECP to standard immunosuppression was associated with a significantly higher GFR at 6 months and with a significant increase in natural Treg among CD3 cells.

Pretransplantation cellular alloreactivity is predictive of acute graft rejection and 1-year graft function in kidney transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To study cellular alloimmunity in kidney allograft recipients using an interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay (ELISPOT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Donor splenocyte peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained during kidney recovery in 53 kidney recipients including 11 with positive panel-reactive antibodies pretransplantation. For ELISPOT data analysis, the spot number, size, and intensity were calculated, reflecting the volume of cytokine secretion at the single-cell level. Results were recalculated as the ratio of the values observed for donor-stimulated to unstimulated recipient cells corrected for residual donor activity. RESULTS: Significantly greater pretransplantation donor-stimulated activity was observed in recipients who experienced an acute rejection episode (ARE) within 1 year (P < .05). Mean change in spot number, size, and intensity in patients without or with AREs was 0.99 vs 3.33, 1.60 vs 6.05, and 1.40 vs 6.31, respectively. The assessed parameters were prognostic of high risk of ARE: 1.5-fold increase in spot number (ARE incidence, 52% vs 9%), 2.5-fold increase in spot size (ARE incidence, 53% vs 13%), and 2.7-fold increase in spot intensity (ARE incidence, 52% vs 9%). The 3 parameters correlated with 1-year serum creatinine concentration (P < .05). In 14 recipients, AREs could have been predicted in 11 using pretransplantation ELISPOT results, and in only 2 on the basis of panel-reactive antibodies. CONCLUSION: The ELISPOT-determined capacity of donor-induced reactivity observed in recipient cells obtained just before transplantation is predictive of risk of graft rejection and 1-year allograft function.