ABSTRACT
The combination of targeted therapy with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is an area of intense interest. We studied the interaction of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibition with ICI in urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder, in which FGFR3 is altered in 50% of cases. Using an FGFR3-driven, Trp53-mutant genetically engineered murine model (UPFL), we demonstrate that UPFL tumors recapitulate the histology and molecular subtype of their FGFR3-altered human counterparts. Additionally, UPFL1 allografts exhibit hyperprogression to ICI associated with an expansion of T regulatory cells (Tregs). Erdafitinib blocked Treg proliferation in vitro, while in vivo ICI-induced Treg expansion was fully abrogated by FGFR inhibition. Combined erdafitinib and ICI resulted in high therapeutic efficacy. In aggregate, our work establishes that, in mice, co-alteration of FGFR3 and Trp53 results in high-grade, non-muscle-invasive UC and presents a previously underappreciated role for FGFR inhibition in blocking ICI-induced Treg expansion.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Animals , Humans , Mice , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Immunosuppression Therapy , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3/genetics , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3/metabolism , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/genetics , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/metabolismABSTRACT
Targeting therapeutic agents to specific organs in the body remains a challenge despite advances in the science of systemic drug delivery. We have engineered a programmable-bioinspired nanoparticle (P-BiNP) delivery system to simultaneously target the bone and increase uptake in homotypic tumor cells by coating polymeric nanoparticles with programmed cancer cell membranes. This approach is unique in that we have incorporated relevant clinical bioinformatics data to guide the design and enhancement of biological processes that these nanoparticles are engineered to mimic. To achieve this, an analysis of RNA expression from metastatic prostate cancer patients identified ITGB3 (a subunit of integrin α V ß 3) as overexpressed in patients with bone metastasis. Cancer cells were stimulated to increase this integrin expression on the cell surface, and these membranes were subsequently used to coat cargo carrying polymeric nanoparticles. Physicochemical optimization and characterization of the P-BiNPs showed desirable qualities regarding size, ζ potential, and stability. In vitro testing confirmed enhanced homotypic binding and uptake in cancer cells. P-BiNPs also demonstrated improved bone localization in vivo with a murine model. This novel approach of identifying clinically relevant targets for dual homotypic and bone targeting has potential as a strategy for treatment and imaging modalities in diseases that affect the bone as well as broader implications for delivering nanoparticles to other organs of interest.
ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a novel cabazitaxel bone targeted nanoparticle (NP) system for improved drug delivery to the bone microenvironment. MATERIALS & METHODS: Nanoparticles were developed using poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) and cabazitaxel as the core with amino-bisphosphonate surface conjugation. Optimization of nanoparticle physiochemical properties, in vitro evaluation in prostate cancer cell lines and in vivo testing in an intraosseous model of metastatic prostate cancer was performed. RESULTS: This bone targeted cabazitaxel nanocarrier system showed significant reduction in tumor burden, while at the same time maintaining bone structure integrity and reducing pain in the mouse tumor limb. CONCLUSION: This bone microenvironment targeted nanoparticle system and clinically relevant approach of evaluation represents a promising advancement for treating bone metastatic cancer.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Pain/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Taxoids/pharmacology , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Survival , Diphosphonates/chemistry , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Drug Carriers/chemistry , Drug Liberation , Humans , Lactic Acid/chemistry , Male , Mice , Mice, Nude , Particle Size , Polyglycolic Acid/chemistry , Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Surface Properties , Taxoids/chemistry , Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Elucidation of mechanisms regulating bone metastasis has progressed significantly in recent years and this has translated to many new therapeutic options for patients with bone metastatic cancers. However, the rapid rate of progress in both the basic science literature and therapies undergoing clinical trials makes staying abreast with current developments challenging. This review seeks to provide an update on the current state of the science in bone metastasis research and give a snap shot of therapies in clinical trials for bone metastatic cancer. MAIN BODY: Bone metastasis represents a difficult to treat clinical scenario due to pain, increased fracture risk, decreased quality of life and diminished overall survival outcomes. Multiple types of cancer have the specific ability to home to the bone microenvironment and cause metastatic lesions. This osteotropism was first described by Stephen Paget nearly 100 years ago as the 'seed and soil' hypothesis. Once cancer cells arrive at the bone they encounter a variety of cells native to the bone microenvironment which contribute to the establishment of bone metastatic lesions. In the first part of this review, the 'seed and soil' hypothesis is revisited while emphasizing recent developments in understanding the impact of native bone microenvironment cells on the metastatic process. Next, approved therapies for treating bone metastasis at the systemic level as well as those that target the bone microenvironment are discussed and current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines relating to treatment of bone metastases are summarized. Finally, all open interventional clinical trials for therapies relating to treatment of bone metastasis have been complied and categorized. CONCLUSION: Understanding the recent advancements in bone metastasis research is important for continued development of novel bone targeted therapies. The plethora of ongoing clinical trials will hopefully translate into improved treatments options for patients suffering from bone metastatic cancers.