Unexpected positive cultures in conversion hip and knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with previous history of periarticular surgery, such as osteosynthesis, can be surprisingly complex. This type of procedure is known as conversion arthroplasty (cTHA or cTKA) and has a higher risk of complications. The rates of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) and the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to primary arthroplasty is unclear. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of Unexpected Positive Cultures (UPC) in a series of conversion arthroplasty patients. The main questions to answer are: 1. Are the patients with conversion arthroplasties more susceptible to UPC than other causes of revision arthroplasties? 2. Are the conversion patients with UPC more susceptible to developing PJI? METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients submitted to cTHA and cTKA from January 2012 to September 2018. Patients with history of previous infection or with missing intraoperative cultures were excluded. The UPC was defined as a single positive culture obtained during a procedure previously considered aseptic and PJI was defined according to the 2018 ICM criteria. After excluding 141 cases, 205 patients were analyzed, 160 hips and 45 knees. RESULTS: Nine (4.4%) UPC were identified, five (3.1%) in the hip group and four (8,9%) in the knee group. Staphylococcal species were the most common isolated bacteria (n = 7, 77.7%). During the study period, four (1,9%) patients were diagnosed with PJI. Only one case had an UPC and a different germ was identified during revision arthroplasty workup. CONCLUSIONS: While UPC are more prevalent in conversion knee arthroplasties compared to conversion hip arthroplasties, the rates are similar to those observed in revision arthroplasty for other indications. Importantly, the presence of a UPC in conversion arthroplasty does not appear to elevate the risk of subsequent periprosthetic joint infection, provided a thorough PJI workup has been conducted preoperatively. Therefore, in such cases, UPCs may be safely disregarded.

What Factors Influence In-Hospital Mortality Following Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Single-Center Analysis of 13,203 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is associated with an extended surgical period, an increased hospitalization period, expanded blood loss, and high mortality rates. The purpose of the present study was to assess the risk factors that contribute to in-hospital mortality following aseptic rTHA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective examination of the medical records of all patients who underwent elective rTHA surgery at our tertiary referral arthroplasty center between March 1996 and March 2019. The study involved a group of 13,203 patients, including 70 who expired during hospitalization and 13,133 in the control group. Baseline characteristics, medical history, comorbidities, and surgery-related parameters of the patients were recorded. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between independent variables and in-hospital mortalities, which were presented as odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Patient factors associated with in-hospital mortality included hepatitis C (OR 75.5, 95% CI 3.5 to 1,625.2), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 30.7, 95% CI 6.5 to 145.7), rheumatoid arthritis (OR 28.9, 95% CI 3.8 to 218.5), history of myocardial infarction (OR 24.9, 95% CI 4.4 to 140.8), history of cerebrovascular disease (OR 23.1, 95% CI 3.8 to 142), congestive heart failure (OR 18.9, 95% CI 3.8 to 94.2), and diabetes mellitus (OR 10.2, 95% CI 2.4 to 42.6). Surgical factors included the history of multiple prior revisions (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.7), postoperative blood transfusion (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 7.3), and decreased preoperative hemoglobin (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.1). CONCLUSIONS: Several patient-related and intraoperative factors significantly increased the risk of in-hospital mortality following aseptic rTHA. Vigilance and close perioperative monitoring are essential for patients undergoing this complex surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Microbiological Differences Among Age Groups in Patients Diagnosed With Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Database Analysis of 2,392 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) poses substantial economic and quality-of-life challenges. With the rising incidence of hip and knee arthritis globally, understanding the changing profile of PJIs across different age groups becomes crucial. While various studies have explored risk factors, the influence of age on PJI remains debated, with potential bimodal relationships. This study aims to investigate the causative organisms of PJIs in patients of different age groups undergoing TJA. METHODS: Conducted as a retrospective cohort study at a high-volume PJI referral center, the study adhered to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Data spanned from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2022, including patients with documented PJI undergoing revision TJA. Patients were categorized into age quintiles, and outcomes analyzed included causative organisms, difficult-to-treat infections, antimicrobial resistance, and Gram stain characteristics. Statistical analyses used descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and sensitivity analyses for hip and knee patients separately. RESULTS: The study comprised 2,392 patients, with 60.7% undergoing hip arthroplasty and 39.3% undergoing knee arthroplasty. 1,080 women (45.2%) and 1,312 men (54.8%) were included. Older patients were markedly more likely to have gram-negative infections and atypical infections. Patients in the youngest age group had the lowest rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Results were similar between hip and knee PJIs. CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals age-related variations in the characteristics of PJIs after TJA, emphasizing higher risks of atypical and resistant infections in older patients. These findings underscore the importance of tailored preventive measures and potential considerations for adjunctive or prolonged antibiotic therapies, especially in the elderly population. Recognizing the unique infection patterns in older patients may inform better prevention and treatment strategies, with implications for enhanced patient care and outcomes. Future directions should focus on patient-specific strategies for preventing and treating PJIs, particularly in high-risk populations.

Microbiological profiles in periprosthetic joint infections after total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the microbiological profiles in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. The study aims to address what are the variations in microbial colonization and infection patterns between diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 2,569 culture-positive cases of PJIs post-TKA was conducted, comparing outcomes between diabetic (n = 321) and non-diabetic (n = 2,248) patients. Demographic, clinical, and microbiological data were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, logistic regression, and other statistical tests. RESULTS: Diabetic patients exhibited distinct microbial colonization patterns, with a higher prevalence of pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus (p = 0.033), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p < 0.001), Streptococcus spp. (Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus dysgalactiae; p = 0.010, 0.016 respectively), Candida spp. (p = 0.010), and Corynebacterium spp. (p = 0.024). Additionally, diabetic patients were at increased risk of polymicrobial infections. Comorbidities associated with diabetes, including chronic pulmonary disease, renal insufficiency, and peripheral artery disease, were significantly more prevalent in diabetic patients and further complicated PJI outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the importance of tailored perioperative antimicrobial strategies and vigilant infection control measures in diabetic patients undergoing TKA. Understanding the differential microbial profiles and associated comorbidities can inform targeted interventions to mitigate the risk of PJIs and improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and optimize management strategies for diabetic patients undergoing TKA.

Microbial Diversity of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients Following Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major complication following hip arthroplasty, leading to prolonged hospital stays, increased health care costs, and major morbidity. Diabetes mellitus is a prevalent comorbidity among hip arthroplasty patients, contributing to an increased risk of surgical complications, including infections. However, limited evidence exists regarding the microbial profiles of PJIs in diabetic patients compared to nondiabetic counterparts. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate the microbial diversity of PJIs in diabetic and nondiabetic patients following hip arthroplasty. Medical records of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty procedures between 1996 and 2021 were reviewed. Patients diagnosed with PJI, based on the international consensus meeting, were included in the study. Microbiological data, including culture results, and risk factors were collected and analyzed. A total of 4,261 culture-positive patients diagnosed with PJI following hip arthroplasty were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Microbiological analysis revealed a diverse spectrum of microbial pathogens, with Staphylococcus species being the most commonly isolated pathogen. Comparison between diabetic and nondiabetic patients revealed differences in the microbial profiles of PJIs, with diabetic patients more likely to be infected with specific pathogens, including Candida albicans (P = 0.01 odds ratio (OR) 2.8, confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 6.2), Klebsiella pneumoniae (P = 0.03 OR 2.4, CI 1.0 to 5.6), Staphylococcus aureus (P = 0.04 OR 1.3, CI 1.0 to 1.8), Staphylococcus epidermidis (P < 0.001 (R 1.7, CI 1.4 to 2.2), Polymicrobial infections (P < 0.001 OR 1.5, CI 1.2 to 1.8), and Clostridium perfringens (P = 0.04 OR 5.9, CI 1.0 to 33.1). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides valuable insights into the microbial diversity of PJIs in diabetic and nondiabetic patients following hip arthroplasty. The identification of a tendency to different microbial profiles in diabetic patients underscores the need for tailored approaches to infection prevention and management in this high-risk population. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and develop targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes.

Risk Factors and Microbiological Profile of Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infections With Sinus Tract.

BACKGROUND: A sinus tract is an abnormal channel that communicates between the skin and the joint, and meets one of the major criteria that is diagnostic of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study was to compare the risk factors and the microorganism profile of PJI of the knee with an overlying sinus tract to PJI without a sinus tract. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of PJI following total knee arthroplasty with and without the presence of an overlying sinus tract from 1996 to 2020. There were 2,685 unique cases of chronic PJI following total knee arthroplasty, of which 405 cases (15.1%) had a sinus tract and 2,280 cases (84.9%) did not. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors and the microorganism profiles of the 2 groups. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were reported. RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders in the multivariate analysis, the presence of a sinus tract was associated with a history of severe liver disease (P = .039; odds ratio: 1.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 3.84). Polymicrobial infections comprised 41.7% of PJI in the sinus tract group, compared to 29.1% in patients who did not have a sinus tract (P < .001). Of the monomicrobial PJI, Staphylococcus aureus (P < .001), Enterococcus faecalis (P < .001), Enterobacter cloacae (P = .002), Corynebacterium species (P = .037), Proteus mirabilis (P = .028), coagulase-negative Staphylococci (P = .019), and Candida albicans (P = .029) were more common in patients who had a sinus tract. CONCLUSIONS: The microbiology profile is significantly different in patients who have PJI of the knee with a sinus tract. These findings can guide the surgeon with surgical planning and selecting the appropriate antibiotic-loaded bone cement and empiric antibiotic treatment.

Increased Involvement of Staphylococcus epidermidis in the Rise of Polymicrobial Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to analyze the temporal distribution of polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), while also evaluating the patient risk factors associated with these infections following total joint arthroplasty at our institution across 2 distinct periods. METHOD: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated 259 patients who had knee or hip PJI from 2001 to 2006 and 2018 to 2022. A PJI was diagnosed using the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria. We utilized the Polymicrobial Pathogens' Co-occurrence Network Analysis, a novel approach that leverages network theory to map and quantify the complex interplay of organisms in PJIs. RESULTS: Of the 259 patients who had polymicrobial PJI, 58.7% were men, with mean age 67 years (range, 24 to 90). Of the 579 identified pathogens, Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common (22.1%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (9.0%) and Cutibacterium acnes (7.8%). The co-occurrence analysis indicated that Staphylococcus epidermidis frequently coexisted with Cutibacterium acnes (26 cultures) and Staphylococcus capitis (22 cultures). A notable increase in body mass index from 27.7 ± 4.4 in 2001 to 2006 to 29.7 ± 6.2 in 2018 to 2022 was observed (P = .001). Moreover, infections from Staphylococcus epidermidis, Cutibacterium acnes, and Staphylococcus capitis saw a significant uptick (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that from 2001 to 2022, there was a significant change in the pathogens responsible for polymicrobial PJIs, particularly an increase in Staphylococcus epidermidis, Cutibacterium acnes, and Staphylococcus capitis. Alongside these microbial changes, there was a rise in body mass index and shifts in comorbid conditions, such as more renal disease and fewer cases of congestive heart failure. These changes highlight the dynamic interplay between host and microbial factors in the pathogenesis of polymicrobial PJIs, necessitating adaptive strategies in both surgical and postoperative care to mitigate the rising tide of these complex infections.

Unexpected positive cultures in revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Unexpected positive cultures are defined as a single positive culture in intraoperative samples taken during revision surgery after prosthetic joint infection was preoperatively ruled out. This study aims to determine the prevalence of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). As a secondary objective, this study aims to compare the re-intervention rate in this specific group, between UPC and non-UPC patients. The hypothesis is that the UPC prevalence in patients who undergo a revision TKA after UKA is not higher than in other TKA revision cases and this does not increase the risk of re-intervention. METHODS: This is a retrospective study where all patients who underwent a UKA revision from January 2016 to February 2023 in a high-volume arthroplasty centre, were analyzed. Unexpected positive culture prevalence in this group of patients was obtained. RESULTS: During the included period, 270 UKA revision surgeries were performed. Eight cases had at least two positive cultures and were therefore excluded. The final analysis included 262 patients. Of these, 8 (3.05%) patients presented UPCs and the isolated microorganisms were low-virulence organisms. None of the UPC patients received any treatment. No statistical differences were found between UPC and non-UPC groups in the analyzed variables. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of unexpected positive cultures in patients following revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is lower than in patients who undergo a revision of total knee arthroplasty. In UKA patients a UPC does not seem to increase the risk of a re-intervention, so it can be safely ignored if ICM criteria are not met.

How reliable is the soft tissue radiological knee index in predicting superficial surgical site infection following total knee arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between the Soft Tissue Radiological Knee (SToRK) Index and the risk of developing a superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: The SToRK Index was measured using calibrated long leg radiographs (LLR) in 174 patients undergoing TKA. RESULTS: A moderate correlation was found between the SToRK Index and body mass index (BMI) (rs=0.574; p < 0.001). The SToRK Index was a better predictor of SSSI in females than males. In females, a SToRK Index cutoff of 2.01 had a sensitivity and specificity of 41.3% and 74.6% for developing SSSI, respectively, with a positive likelihood ratio of 1.63. CONCLUSION: The SToRK Index can be used as an additional tool in assessing the risk for SSSI after TKA. It might be more predictive in females due to the different fat distribution compared to males.

Individualized megaimplants in acetabular revision arthroplasty: what have we learned in the last 15 years?

Acetabular revision arthroplasty, a demanding field of reconstructive hip surgery, calls for innovative strategies to deal with challenging bone defects and implant failure seen in revision cases. Conventional implant solutions might fall short of adequately addressing severe bone loss and ensuring stable fixation, highlighting the necessity of customized strategies. Personalized megaimplants, distinguished by their tailor-made design and large-scale construction, present a viable option to overcome these challenges. The present article provides an elaborate analysis of custom-made megaimplants in acetabular revision arthroplasty, shedding light on the underlying principles, design complexities, manufacturing methods, applications in the clinical setting, and outcome assessment. The aim of this review is to present a comprehensive insight into personalized megaimplants and their contribution to the advancement of orthopedic surgery.

Preoperative MRSA screening using a simple questionnaire prior elective total joint replacement.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the management and results of our standarized protocol for preoperative identification of MRSA colonisation in patients undergoing primary total hip and knee replacement procedures. METHODS: Following hospital protocol, between January 2016 and June 2019 37,745 patients awaiting elective joint replacement underwent a standardized questionnaire to assess the risk of MRSA infection, identifying patients requiring preoperative MRSA screening. An evaluation of the questionnaire identified effective questions for identifying infected patients. Furthermore, an analysis evaluated the impact of comorbidities or Charlson Comorbidity Index scores on positive MRSA colonization. Additionally, we evaluated the cost savings of targeted testing compared to testing all surgery patients. RESULTS: Of the 37,745 patients, 8.057 (21.3%) were swabbed, with a total of 65 (0.81%) positive tests. From this group 27 (36.48%) who were treated were negative before surgery. Some of the questionnaire results were consistently associated with a higher chance of colonization, including hospitalization during the past year (47,7%), previous history of MRSA (44,6%), and agriculture or cattle farming related work (15,4%). By selectively testing high-risk patients identified through the questionnaire, we achieved a 79% reduction in costs compared to universal MRSA screening. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the simple and standardized questionnaire is a valuable tool for preoperative screening, effectively identifying high-risk patients prone to MRSA colonisation. The risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and its associated sequelae may be reduced by this approach.

Outcomes of rotating versus pure hinge knee arthroplasty in the setting of one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection.

PURPOSE: Rotating or pure hinge knee prostheses are often used in case of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Five-year survival data of rotating hinge implants ranging from 52 to 90%, whereas pure hinge data are sparse. This study describes the results of both hinge knee prostheses after one-stage septic exchange. METHODS: One hundred sixty-seven one-stage septic exchanges of a primary unconstrained total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to a cemented hinge prosthesis (117 rotating and 50 pure hinge TKAs) performed between 2008 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria were stem extensions or augments used in primary TKA, history of extensor mechanism reconstruction, and a follow-up less than two years after surgery. Rates of reinfection, mechanical failures, and all-cause revision-free survival data were documented. RESULTS: At five years, the all-cause revision-free survival was 77% (95% CI 69 to 82). Thirty-one patients (19%) had further revision for aseptic reasons. In the rotating hinge group, the mechanical failure rate was more than twice as high as in the pure hinge group (13% vs 6%), significantly influenced by higher body weight. At a mean follow-up of 6.7 years, 21 (13%) patients had a reinfection and underwent a further surgery. Reinfection rates did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of hinge TKA in the revision of PJI shows favourable five year infection-free and all-cause revision-free survival rates of 91% and 77%, respectively. Our study showed poorer results of the rotating hinge design. These results may help surgeons to choose proper implants in case of septic knee revision.

Survival analysis of 3D printed acetabular implants in revision total hip arthroplasty associated with severe pelvic discontinuities.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons still face difficulties when performing aseptic acetabular revision on patients with extensive defects. Advances in three-dimensional printing technology (3DP) have afforded to the surgeons to create a patient-specific implant matching the morphology and topography of the defect. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current research was to determine the survivorship in the treatment of acetabular bone defects with pelvic discontinuity (PD). METHODS: In order to reconstruct Paprosky type III defects with PD, twenty-three patients underwent revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) utilizing 3D-printed implants (Mobelife). The primary outcomes were the implant-associated failure rate correlated with survivorship. As secondary variables, complications and the effect of age, sex, comorbidities, history of infections and the presence of other lower limb arthroplasties on a new revision were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients were followed out to a mean of 67.22 ± 39.44 months (range, 0.9-127 months). Mobelife implant mean survival was 102.57 ± 9.90 months (95% CI 83.17-121.96). The cohort's implant one-year survival rate was 87%; at ten years, it dropped to 78.3%. There were four revisions: three due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and one case due to aseptic loosening. Cox regression analysis did not identify any variable as predictor of failure. CONCLUSION: The use of 3DP patient-specific acetabular components has shown encouraging results and it is a viable treatment option for addressing acetabular defects with combined PD in aseptic THA revision.

Intramedullary Positive Tissue Culture Increases the Risk of Reinfection Following One-Stage Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative acquisition of representative tissue samples is essential during revision arthroplasty of the infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While the number of intraoperative tissue samples needed to identify the organism is well described in the literature, there is still a paucity of evidence regarding the location of positive intraoperative samples and their correlation to postoperative outcomes. METHODS: There were forty-two patients who had septic failure following one-stage revision TKA for periprosthetic joint infection who were identified between January 2009 and December 2017. They were matched to a control group of patients who had successful one-stage revision TKA without septic failure. The location of positive intraoperative tissue samples was categorized as: 1) soft tissue; 2) interface between bone and prosthesis; and 3) intramedullary (IM). Chi-square, Student's t-, and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U-tests were used as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of septic failure. RESULTS: Weight > 100 kilograms (P = .033), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (P < .001), and positive IM cultures (P < .001) were associated with a higher risk of reinfection after one-stage revision TKA. A positive IM sample carried a nearly five-fold increase in odds of reinfection (odds ratio 4.86, 95% confidence interval 1.85 to 12.78, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: A positive IM culture sample is significantly associated with septic failure after one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee. Patients who had positive IM cultures may benefit from longer postoperative antibiotic therapy for the treatment of one-stage exchange arthroplasty to minimize the risk of reinfection.

Unexpected Positive Cultures in Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of unexpected positive cultures noted at the time of revision surgery for periprosthetic fracture (PPF) after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Moreover, we evaluated whether this finding should be considered clinically significant and what type of treatment, if any, was required. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review of 270 patients undergoing surgery for PPFs from December 2010 to December 2021. Exclusion criteria included: open fractures; history of infection at fractured joint; non-operatively treated patients; and intraoperative fractures. The primary end point was the prevalence of unexpected positive cultures noted at the time of revision surgery. This was defined as one or more positive cultures in a PPF that the surgeon had preoperatively classified as aseptic according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting. Data collection included patient demographics, medical histories, preoperative investigations, postoperative microbiology, and treatment. RESULTS: During the study period, 159 patients were admitted with PPFs of the hip and 61 with PPFs of the knee. The mean age was 70 years (range, 32 to 93 years). Unexpected positive cultures were diagnosed postoperatively in 15 patients (6.8%; 10 hips, 5 knees). The most prevalent organism was Staphylococcus epidermidis (35.0%). Of those 15 patients, 6 required a surgical revision for infection. None of the patient-related risk factors were found to be associated with an increased risk of unexpected positive cultures. The comparison between infected and noninfected patients showed a significant association between preoperative C-reactive protein >10 mg/mL (P = .04), loose implant (P = .07), and infection. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of unexpected positive cultures was 6.8% in our study cohort. Although surgical treatment may be required, the majority of patients seem to require no treatment. Larger series are required to investigate the clinical importance of this rare finding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

How Reliable Is the Absolute Synovial Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil Cell Count in Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a daunting task for even the most experienced orthopedic surgeons, as there is currently no test available that can provide absolute accuracy. Utilizing an established synovial indicator for detecting PJI without incurring additional costs or resources would be the optimal solution for predicting the presence of infection. Therefore, we hypothesized that synovial absolute neutrophil count (ANC) would improve the diagnostic accuracy of chronic knee and hip PJI. METHODS: The study included 260 patients (134 men and 126 women, mean age of 70 years [range, 26 to 89]) who underwent aspiration during preoperative workup. Of these, 109 patients (41.9%) were diagnosed with chronic PJI (50 knees, 59 hips), and 151 patients (58.1%) were diagnosed as aseptic (94 knees, 57 hips). Data obtained from all patients included age, sex, procedure type (total hip or total knee arthroplasty), operation side, synovial white blood cell count (cells/µL), synovial polymorphonuclear cells percentage, and synovial α-defensin immunoassay value at the admission were retrieved from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: The calculated optimal threshold for synovial ANC of 1,415.5 cells/µL was associated with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.930 for chronic knee PJI diagnosis. The calculated optimal threshold for synovial ANC of 2,247 cells/µL was associated with an AUC of 0.905 for chronic hip PJI diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study has conclusively shown that the synovial ANC serves as a valuable marker in the complicated diagnosis of PJI. This highly effective and efficient approach should be utilized for obtaining further information through standard tests, thereby ruling out the possibility of PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio correlate with Chronic Prosthetic Joint Infection but are not useful markers for diagnosis.

PURPOSE: To investigate reported correlations between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte (NLR) and Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte (LMR) ratios and their value in diagnosis of chronic prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a large cohort of patients from a single specialist hospital. METHODS: Diagnostic aspirations of 362 patients under investigation for PJI were identified. Of the included patients 185 patients received a final diagnosis of PJI and 177 were classed as aseptic. Established criteria (ICM 2018) were employed to define PJI. Included in the analysis are differential white cell counts, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Synovial Leukocyte Count, Synovial Alpha-defensin ELISA and Synovial Leukocyte esterase activity. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for each of the available diagnostic tests together with the corresponding area under the curve values (AUC). Youden's index was utilized to identify the optimal diagnostic threshold point for the NLR and LMR. Other diagnostic tests were evaluated as per the threshold values previously defined in the literature and specified in the ICM criteria. RESULTS: Using Youden's Index to identify the optimal NLR cut-off within our cohort we established a value of 2.93. This yielded a sensitivity of 0.60 and specificity of 0.64. The area under the curve (AUC) of a receiving operator characteristics (ROC) curve was 0.625. Regarding the LMR the results demonstrate similar findings; a positive correlation with a diagnosis of infection but poor sensitivity and specificity. The AUC for LMR was 0.633 and was not superior to NLR (P = 0.753). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant correlation between higher Neutrophil-Lymphocyte and Lymphocyte-Monocyte ratios, and a diagnosis of PJI. The sensitivity and specificity of this calculation is poor and the does not add value to the diagnostic algorithm for PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Retrospective Cohort analysis.

Unexpected positive cultures in patients with arthrofibrosis following total hip and total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: It has been suggested that low-grade infections could be the cause of arthrofibrosis. However, this hypothesis has not been conclusively proven. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in patients undergoing revision total joint arthroplasty for a diagnosis of arthrofibrosis. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre review was performed. All patients who underwent an aseptic revision due to histologically confirmed arthrofibrosis (based on the synovial-like interface membrane (SLIM) criteria) were included. The incidence of UPC was then calculated. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were included. Of these, 100 underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedure and 46 a total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. One patient had a periprosthetic joint infection and was therefore excluded. Of the 146 included patients, 6 had confirmed UPC (4.08%). The following bacteria were identified: Anaerococcus octavius, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterobacter cloacae, Staphylococcus hominis, Streptococcus pluranimalium, Staphylococcus pettenkoferi. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the incidence of UPC in patients with arthrofibrosis is low. It is lower than that of UPC in patients that undergo a revision for other causes. There is no proven relationship between histologically confirmed arthrofibrosis following total joint arthroplasty and prosthetic joint infection.

Utility of histopathological examination in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The utility of a routine histopathological examination in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been well explored. We aim to describe the approach and present the results of histopathological examination, focusing on its clinical usefulness in the setting of aseptic revision THA. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed 285 performed aseptic revision THA with available histopathological reports between 2015 and 2017 at a single institution. We described histopathological requests by the surgical team. Preoperative diagnoses, intraoperative findings, as well as histopathology and culture results were analysed. RESULTS: 13 painful THAs (4.5%) had preoperatively unknown diagnoses. In 10 of them, potential causes of pain were intraoperatively identified. Histopathology confirmed these findings in 8 THAs. 19 THAs (6.7%) revealed unexpected positive cultures (UPC). Histopathology was negative for infection in 18 of them. Among 16 consultants, 3 surgeons requested histopathology in 47% of the cases (130/285), usually to exclude infection (101/285; 35%). Documentation for tissue sample location was lacking in 51% (145/285), and for question asked by the surgeon in 47% (135/285). CONCLUSIONS: Histopathology is deemed a useful confirmatory tool in the context of ruling out infection in UPCs, and in documenting intraoperative findings in painful THAs with unknown preoperative diagnoses. Importantly, the approach to requesting histopathology should be optimised. Further large-scale studies, including cost analyses, are warranted to explore the usefulness of histopathology in routine utility.