Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Meat Sci ; 112: 103-9, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26584399

ABSTRACT

Effects of sex class (physically castrated, PC or immunologically castrated, IC) and diet (0 or 5mg/kg ractopamine hydrochloride, RAC) on characteristics of ham and bellies were determined from pigs slaughtered in three groups with similar ending live weights. One carcass per pen per marketing group (n=8) was selected to evaluate further processing characteristics. Data were analyzed as a 2×2 factorial design with a split plot in time and fixed effects of sex, diet, marketing group, and their interactions. IC fresh bellies were thinner (P<0.01) and softer (P<0.01) than PC bellies. IC hams and bellies were leaner (P<0.05) than those from PC pigs. RAC feeding did not affect (P>0.05) fresh ham or belly characteristics but decreased (P<0.01) fat in cured PC bellies. Marketing group affected (P<0.05) fresh quality, processing characteristics, and composition of hams and bellies. Immunological castration and RAC produced leaner finished products but did not alter processing yield of hams or bacon.


Subject(s)
Contraception, Immunologic/veterinary , Food Handling , Food Quality , Growth Substances/adverse effects , Meat Products/analysis , Meat/analysis , Sus scrofa , Adiposity/drug effects , Administration, Oral , Animals , Body Weight , Chemical Phenomena , Contraception, Immunologic/adverse effects , Cooking , Crosses, Genetic , Diet, Fat-Restricted , Dietary Fats/analysis , Growth Substances/administration & dosage , Illinois , Male , Meat/standards , Meat Products/standards , Mechanical Phenomena , Muscle Development/drug effects , Orchiectomy/veterinary , Phenethylamines/administration & dosage , Phenethylamines/adverse effects
2.
J Anim Sci ; 92(8): 3715-26, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25006065

ABSTRACT

Effects of feeding ractopamine (RAC; 5 mg/kg) to physically castrated (PC) and immunologically castrated (IC) pigs on carcass characteristics, cutting yields, and loin quality were evaluated using 285 carcasses. Male pigs were randomly assigned to sex treatments (PC and IC) at birth and fed the same nursery diets before allotment into 32 pens with 22 pigs per pen in a grow-finish barn. Pigs in the PC group were physically castrated at approximately 5 d of age, and pigs in the IC group were administered Improvest at 11 and 18 wk of age. Diet treatments (control or RAC) were initiated on study d 87. Pigs were marketed at 12 d (4.5 wk post-second Improvest dose), 19 d (5.5 wk post-second Improvest dose), and 33 d (7.5 wk post-second Improvest dose) following the start of final diet treatments. Three carcasses per pen were selected for evaluation of cutting yields and loin quality. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED in SAS with fixed effects of sex, diet, market group, and their interaction; carcass (N = 285) was the experimental unit. Carcasses from RAC-fed pigs were heavier (P < 0.01) and had deeper (P = 0.02) loins than control-fed carcasses. Carcasses from IC pigs were similar (P = 0.22) in weight but had less (P < 0.01) fat and shallower (P = 0.02) loins when compared to PC carcasses. There were differences (P < 0.05) among market groups for carcass weights, fat depths, loin depths, and estimated carcass leanness. For cutting yields, RAC-fed carcasses had greater (P ≤ 0.03) bone-in lean and total carcass cutting yields than control-fed carcasses while there were no differences (P > 0.05) between RAC-fed and control-fed carcasses when evaluating LM color, marbling, firmness, pH, drip loss, and tenderness. Carcasses from IC pigs had greater (P < 0.05) boneless lean yields, bone-in lean yields, and total carcass cutting yields than PC carcasses. There were minimal differences (P < 0.05) in LM marbling, firmness, composition, and tenderness between PC and IC pigs. There was an interaction (P = 0.03) between sex and diet for LM composition. Control-fed PC loins had more (P < 0.01) lipid than all other treatment combinations. Market group had effects (P < 0.05) on carcass cutting yields, LM color, marbling and firmness scores, pH, purge loss, composition, and tenderness. The results from this study indicated RAC and immunological castration were additive in terms of improving carcass cutting yields while having minimal effects on pork quality.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Agonists/pharmacology , Meat/standards , Orchiectomy/methods , Phenethylamines/pharmacology , Vaccines, Contraceptive/immunology , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Body Composition/drug effects , Body Weight , Diet/veterinary , Male , Swine/immunology , Swine/physiology
3.
J Anim Sci ; 92(8): 3727-35, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25006070

ABSTRACT

Growth performance and carcass characteristics of physically castrated (PC) and immunologically castrated (IC) pigs fed ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC; 5 mg/kg) were evaluated in 64 pens of 22 pigs each. Male pigs were randomly assigned to castration method at birth. Pigs in the PC group were physically castrated at 5 d of age while IC pigs were administered Improvest at 11 and 18 wk of age. Pigs entered the grow-finish barn at approximately 9 wk of age (d 0). Dietary treatments (control or RAC) were initiated on d 87. Final treatment arrangement was a 2 × 2 factorial of castration method and diet. Data were analyzed using a mixed model with fixed effects of castration method, diet, market group, and all 2- and 3-way interactions. Pen was the experimental unit. From d 0 to 65, IC pigs had 11.2% greater (P < 0.01) G:F and 11.6% less (P < 0.01) ADFI than PC pigs, but ADG was increased 1.0% in PC pigs compared with IC pigs (P < 0.01). From d 65 to 87, IC pigs had 7.9% greater (P < 0.01) ADG and 12.1% greater (P < 0.01) G:F than PC pigs while having similar (P = 0.16) ADFI. At the initiation of diet (RAC) treatments, BW of all treatments were similar (P ≥ 0.32). From d 87 to 120 (RAC feeding period), IC pigs had 10.0% greater (P < 0.01) ADG and 10.5% greater (P < 0.01) ADFI than PC pigs while having similar (P = 0.64) G:F. Feeding RAC increased (P < 0.01) ADG by 16.9% and G:F by 17.9% while having no effect (P = 0.42) on ADFI from d 87 to 120. There were no significant interactions between castration method and diet on growth performance from d 87 to 120. For the entire study (d 0-120), IC pigs had 2.6% greater (P < 0.01) ADG, 4.6% less (P < 0.01) ADFI, and 7.3% greater (P < 0.01) G:F than PC pigs. Averaged over market groups, IC pigs were 2.5 kg heavier (P < 0.01) and had similar (P = 0.10) carcass weights and 1.8 percentage units less (P < 0.01) dressing yields than PC pigs. Additionally, IC pigs had 1.3 mm less (P < 0.01) fat and 1.7 mm less (P < 0.01) loin depth than PC pigs. Pigs fed RAC were 2.9 kg heavier (P < 0.01) and had 2.3 kg heavier (P < 0.01) carcasses and 2.2 mm deeper (P < 0.01) loins but similar (P = 0.21) dressing yields and tended (P < 0.10) to have 0.4 mm less fat than control-fed pigs when averaged over market groups. Group 3 pigs were the heaviest (P < 0.01) at slaughter and had the heaviest (P < 0.01) carcasses, greatest (P < 0.01) dressing yields, and the most (P < 0.01) carcass fat of all market groups. Overall, immunological castration and RAC were additive in terms of improving growth performance and carcass characteristics.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Diet/veterinary , Meat/standards , Orchiectomy/methods , Phenethylamines/pharmacology , Vaccines, Contraceptive/immunology , Animals , Body Composition/drug effects , Male , Phenethylamines/administration & dosage , Swine/growth & development
4.
J Anim Sci ; 92(3): 1200-7, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24492553

ABSTRACT

The objectives were to determine the effects of ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) in a 3-phase marketing strategy. One thousand seven hundred forty pigs were used in 80 single-sex pens in 2 blocks. Each pen housed approximately 22 pigs. Sixteen percent of the total population of pigs was sold during the first marketing period, 18% was sold during the second marketing period, and the remaining 66% was sold during the third marketing period. Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block design of 2 treatments. Pigs in the second marketing group had greater growth performance indicators than pigs in the first marketing group. Over the entire feeding period, pigs fed RAC were 2.73 kg heavier (P < 0.0001), had 0.11 kg/d greater (P < 0.0001) ADG, and had 0.04 greater (P < 0.0001) G:F than pigs not fed RAC. Hot carcass weights were 3.3% greater (P < 0.0001), carcass yields were 0.68 (% units) greater (P < 0.0001), fat depth was 7.2% less (P < 0.0001), loin depth was 5.6% greater (P < 0.0001), and estimated carcass lean was 0.97% units greater (P < 0.0001) in RAC-fed pigs when compared with pigs not fed RAC. By the end of the first marketing period carcasses from pigs fed RAC (89.73 kg) were 2.1% heavier (P = 0.04) and gained 0.19 kg/d more (P = 0.03) carcass weight than carcasses from pigs not fed RAC (87.89 kg). By the end of the second marketing period carcasses from pigs fed RAC (99.00 kg) were 3.1% heavier (P < 0.001) and gained 0.14 kg/d more (P < 0.001) carcass weight than carcasses from pigs not fed RAC (96.02 kg). By the end of the third marketing period carcasses from pigs fed RAC (102.75 kg) were 3.7% heavier (P < 0.0001) and gained 0.10 kg/d more (P < 0.0001) carcass weight than carcasses from pigs not fed RAC (99.06 kg). Although carcass gain per day decreased with extended RAC feeding duration, HCW advantages continued to increase as feeding duration was increased from 7 d to 35 d. Growth benefits were evident during the initial marketing period, but as duration increased differences diminished. Therefore, RAC can provide the expected growth performance benefits when included in the diet for up to 21 d, but HCW advantages continue to increase throughout the entire 35 d feeding period. Even though carcass benefits were not as evident in pigs sold during the first marketing period, advantages (particularly HCW) continued to increase with each marketing period.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Agonists/pharmacology , Body Composition/drug effects , Phenethylamines/pharmacology , Swine/growth & development , Swine/physiology , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/administration & dosage , Animal Feed/analysis , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Diet/veterinary , Female , Male , Phenethylamines/administration & dosage
5.
J Anim Sci ; 91(2): 793-803, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23148242

ABSTRACT

An experiment was performed to evaluate effects of dietary ractopamine, CLA, and corn distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) on growth and carcass and fat quality of finishing pigs. This study was conducted as a split-split plot arrangement in a generalized randomized block design. In total 1,102 crossbred barrows and gilts (initial BW = 100.4 kg, SD = 3.7 kg; pic 337 × c22) were randomly assigned to 1 of 8 dietary treatments that consisted of 2 diet sources [corn-soybean meal (corn-soy) and corn-soy + 20% DDGS], 2 levels of ractopamine (0 and 7.4 mg/kg), and 2 levels of CLA (0% and 0.6%). The pen was the experimental unit, with 6 replications per treatment for a total of 48 pens with 23 pigs per pen. Pigs had ad libitum access to water and feed during the 27-d experimental period. Ractopamine addition improved (p < 0.05) ADG and G:F over the control group. Furthermore, carcass weight, carcass yield, loin depth, and lean percentage were increased and back fat depth was decreased (p < 0.05) by feeding ractopamine. Feeding CLA resulted in improved (p < 0.05) ADG and G:F and increased lean percentage but reduced carcass yield (p < 0.05). The inclusion of DDGS did not affect ADG, adfi, or g:f but reduced (p < 0.05) carcass dressing percent. An increase (p < 0.05) in the concentration of pufa was observed with inclusion of DDGS, ractopamine, and CLA. Iodine value (iv) increased (p < 0.001) in both belly and jowl samples by feeding DDGS and ractopamine, whereas a decrease (p < 0.01) was observed when CLA was included in the diets. The fatty acid profiles of belly and jowl fat samples were affected (p < 0.05) by diet source × ractopamine, indicating that effects of dietary ractopamine depend on the fatty acid profile of the diet. These results indicate that feeding ractopamine and CLA could improve growth and carcass measures and that CLA was effective in diminishing some of the negative effects, especially on IV, caused by DDGS.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/drug effects , Animal Feed/analysis , Linoleic Acids, Conjugated/pharmacology , Phenethylamines/pharmacology , Swine/physiology , Zea mays , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/pharmacology , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Body Composition , Diet/veterinary , Fatty Acids/chemistry , Fatty Acids/metabolism , Female , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/chemistry
6.
Meat Sci ; 90(3): 643-52, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22062121

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate dietary corn distiller's dried grains with solubles (DDGS), ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC), and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on growth performance, carcass and fat quality, and shelf-life of fresh pork from finishing pigs. Barrows (n=72) were fed one of eight treatments consisting of two diet sources (corn-soy and corn-soy+20% DDGS), two levels of RAC (0 and 7.4ppm), and two levels of CLA (0 and 0.6%) for 28days. Loins were portioned (n=3) into one of three storage conditions (fresh, cold, frozen); each followed with seven days of retail display. Feeding RAC improved ADG and G:F (P<0.05), whereas DDGS decreased belly fat firmness (P<0.05). Dietary DDGS increased total polyunsaturated fatty acids in jowl and belly samples and increased Iodine Value (IV) (P<0.05), but addition of CLA decreased IV. Dietary DDGS, RAC, or CLA had minimal impact on pork quality following varied storage methods.


Subject(s)
Diet/veterinary , Food Storage/methods , Linoleic Acids, Conjugated/administration & dosage , Meat/analysis , Phenethylamines/administration & dosage , Zea mays , Adipose Tissue/drug effects , Animal Feed , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Body Composition/drug effects , Food Handling/methods , Glycine max , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL