Clinical outcomes of patients discharged from the Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic with non-anginal chest pain: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic (RACPC) has become an important means of assessing patients who present with ischaemic or ischaemia-like symptoms of recent onset. Observations have shown that up to 70% are discharged with a diagnosis of non-anginal chest pain (NACP) and accordingly "reassured". This study aims to describe the actual clinical outcomes of this cohort of patients discharged from the RACPC. METHODS: We undertook a single centre retrospective cohort study at a tertiary cardiac hospital. The outcomes of unselected patients diagnosed with NACP and discharged from the RACPC between April 2010 and March 2013 at University Hospitals of Leicester (UHL) were recorded. Re-referrals to cardiology outpatient clinic and emergency hospital admissions for cardiovascular disease within 6 months, and the mortality rate at 12 months, were determined. RESULTS: 7066 patients were seen in the UHL RACPC during the 36-month period. 3253 (46.0%) were diagnosed with NACP and discharged. 7 (0.2%) were diagnosed with coronary artery disease (CAD) and 8 (0.25%) cases of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) identified during the review period. 11 (0.3%) patients died within 12 months of discharge from RACPC. No deaths were attributable to CAD. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive assessment using risk-stratification criteria in a nurse practitioner-led RACPC can accurately identify patients who are at low-risk for subsequent CAD. Despite contemporary National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines that shift focus away from a clinical judgement based approach, this strategy appears to robustly predict favourable outcomes in patients diagnosed with NACP.

Randomized Trial of Primary PCI with or without RoutineManual Thrombectomy

During primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), manual thrombectomymay reduce distal embolization and thus improve microvascular perfusion. Smalltrials have suggested that thrombectomy improves surrogate and clinical outcomes,but a larger trial has reported conflicting results.MethodsWe randomly assigned 10,732 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) undergoing primary PCI to a strategy of routine upfront manualthrombectomy versus PCI alone. The primary outcome was a composite of deathfrom cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, orNew York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV heart failure within 180 days. The keysafety outcome was stroke within 30 days.ResultsThe primary outcome occurred in 347 of 5033 patients (6.9%) in the thrombectomygroup versus 351 of 5030 patients (7.0%) in the PCI-alone group (hazard ratio in thethrombectomy group, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.15; P = 0.86). Therates of cardiovascular death (3.1% with thrombectomy vs. 3.5% with PCI alone;hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.12; P = 0.34) and the primary outcome plusstent thrombosis or target-vessel revascularization (9.9% vs. 9.8%; hazard ratio,1.00; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.14; P = 0.95) were also similar. Stroke within 30 days occurredin 33 patients (0.7%) in the thrombectomy group versus 16 patients (0.3%)in the PCI-alone group (hazard ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.75; P = 0.02).ConclusionsIn patients with STEMI who were undergoing primary PCI, routine manual thrombectomy,as compared with PCI alone, did not reduce the risk of cardiovasculardeath, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or NYHA class IV heartfailure within 180 days but was associated with an increased rate of stroke within30 days. (Funded by Medtronic and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research;TOTAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01149044.

Clinical trial: chest pain caused by presumed gastro-oesophageal reflux in coronary artery disease - controlled study of lansoprazole vs. placebo.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER) and coronary artery disease commonly co-exist. Coronary artery disease patients may mistake GER-induced pain for cardiac pain or GER might provoke angina. AIM: To investigate if GER might contribute to nocturnal/rest chest pain among coronary artery disease patients. METHODS: Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study investigating effect of lansoprazole on chest pain; 125 patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease enrolled with at least one weekly episode of nocturnal/rest pain, randomized to lansoprazole 30 mg daily or placebo with crossover after 4 weeks. Symptoms recorded and QOL assessed by Nottingham Health Profile Questionnaire; ST segment depression episodes counted from 24 h electrocardiographic monitoring in final week of both periods. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: ANCOVA with period and carryover analysis. RESULTS: In all, 108 patients completed the study. There was a modest increase in pain-free days on lansoprazole vs. placebo (P < 0.02), with fewer days with pain at rest (P < 0.05) and at night (P < 0.009) on lansoprazole vs. placebo, but no significant differences in ST segment depression episodes (P = 0.64). There was a trend for reduction in the 'physical pain' QOL domain. CONCLUSIONS: Among coronary artery disease patients, lansoprazole modestly increases pain-free days and reduces rest/nocturnal pain. As lansoprazole did not affect ST segments, this may be by suppression of GER-provoked pain misinterpreted as angina, rather than acid-provoked ischaemia.

Contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention--30 years in the making.

Angioplasty has come a long way in 30 years. It is now the dominant therapy for obstructive coronary disease and becoming so for acute myocardial infarction and for the majority of patients it is a simple, quick procedure with same- or next-day discharge with negligible morbidity. Many of the developments have been led by pioneers conducting independent large randomised trials, but there are issues still to resolve and there are new exciting developments such as bioabsorbable stents and stereotaxis in the wings. Many have a lot to be grateful for when we reflect on the insights and pioneering work of Andreas Gruntzig.

Role of non-invasive imaging in the management of coronary artery disease: an assessment of likely change over the next 10 years. A report from the British Cardiovascular Society Working Group.

Coronary angiography has been the gold standard for determining the severity, extent and prognosis of coronary atheromatous disease for the past 15-20 years. However, established non-invasive testing (such as myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and stress echocardiography) and newer imaging modalities (multi-detector x ray computed tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance) now need to be considered increasingly as a challenge to coronary angiography in contemporary practice. An important consideration is the degree to which appropriate use of such techniques impacts on the need for coronary angiography over the next 10-15 years. This review aims to determine the role of the various investigation techniques in the management of coronary artery disease and their resource implications, and should help determine future service provision, accepting that we are in a period of significant technological change.

Is there any place for oral anti-restenotic treatment in the era of drug eluting stents?

Are drug eluting stents destined to become the standard of care for all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, or are alternative therapeutic approaches preferable under certain circumstances?

Drug eluting stents in interventional cardiology -- current evidence and emerging uses.

Intervention in coronary artery disease is an area of cardiology where novel drugs, in the form of drug-eluting stents (DES), are being used increasingly commonly. DES are used across the whole range of coronary intervention, from stable angina patients with single or multivessel disease, acute coronary syndromes and acute myocardial infarction (i.e. primary angioplasty). Most recently, they are being tested in a particularly challenging subset of patients, those experiencing symptoms due to restenosis within a previously stented area of vessel (in-stent restenosis, ISR). This article summarises the rationale for the use of DES, across all these areas, focussing specifically on the emerging results of trials and registries examining the effectiveness of DES in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and ISR. Drug-eluting stents represent a significant shift in the use of locally-delivered drugs in interventional cardiology. On the basis of encouraging trial data, including in the specific areas of in-stent restenosis and myocardial infarction, their use is becoming extremely widespread in place of bare-metal (drug-free) stents. This change is happening despite their high costs, relatively short follow-up data and concerns of possible unwanted effects, because of the weight of evidence that they are superior in preventing restenosis in many patient groups. This reduction is highly significant in angiographic terms and, to a lesser degree, in the prevention of clinically important restenosis requiring revascularisation, but not clearly in terms of overall mortality.

Evolution of vascular brachytherapy over time: data from the RENO-registry analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the evolution of procedural variations in vascular brachytherapy (VBT) and their relationship to medium-term outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: The RENO (European Surveillance Registry with Novoste Beta-Cath) prospectively collected procedural and clinical outcome data on 1098 patients treated with VBT. Patients were divided for this analysis into Group-I, the first 50% registered, and Group-II, the last 50% registered. Shorter 30-mm source trains were more commonly used in Group-I (p<0.001) while longer 40-mm (p=NS) and 60-mm (p<0.001) source trains were more commonly used in Group-II. Mean dwell time for radiation seeds was longer in Group-II compared to Group-I (4.20+/-1.48 min vs. 4.14+/-1.44 min; p<0.05). Mean radiation dose was higher in Group-II (19.73+/-3.33 Gy vs. 17.92+/-2.68 Gy; p<0.001). Cutting balloons were more frequently used in Group-II (p<0.001). There was significant drop in the incidence of geographic miss in Group-II (3.2% vs. 9%; p<0.00005). There were nonsignificant trends towards reduction in angiographic restenosis, target vessel (TV) revascularisation, death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). CONCLUSION: There has been a learning curve and evolution of VBT techniques over time. In general, there has been an increase in radiation source length, use of cutting balloons, dwell time and radiation dose. This has resulted in significant reduction of geographic miss and a trend towards improve clinical outcomes. Continued development may result in further improvement in the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Failure of intravascular ultrasound to identify the site of recurrent focal coronary spasm during stenting.

Focal coronary spasm is often associated with an area of mural plaque disease. This report describes a patient with recurrent severe coronary spasm unresponsive to medical treatment. Coronary arteriography and intravascular ultrasound identified a candidate area of minor coronary atheromatous disease but ergonovine provocation testing showed the spastic coronary segment to be distal to and distinct from this area. Coronary stenting of the site identified by ergonovine provocation testing was effective in relieving provoked and spontaneous spasm.

[Effect of beta radiation brachytherapy in the treatment of restenosis of coronary stents]. / Efekt brachyterapie beta zárením v lécbe restenózy v koronárním stentu.

Brachytherapy currently represents the only treatment method for in-stent restenosis (ISR) confirmed in randomised clinical studies. In a group of 46 patients, selected for brachytheraphy on the bases of clinical signs of restenosis accompanied with development or deterioration of angina pectoris and with angiography results showing significant in-stent restenosis, we used a beta radiation system BetaCath NOVOSTE. This therapy was safe. Results of acute angiography were positive in 91% of patients. Clinical restenoses within 6 month of clinical monitoring occurred in 8.6% of patients. Due to impairment of more arteries in the majority of patients from the sample, following revascularisation of nontarget vessels was necessary in 19.6% of patients. We haven't observed late thrombosis. It was probably eliminated by prolonged administration of a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel. Dosimetry results during brachytherapy showed that doses of radiation both for a surgeon and a patient corresponded to a fraction of doses received from an x-ray apparatus during fluoroscopy and acquisition. Both an edge restenosis and a diffuse restenosis were identified in stenoses of patients with in-stent restenosis. Brachytherapy with beta radiation seems to be an efficient method for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.

Clopidogrel induced urticarial rash in a patient with left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention: management issues.

Clopidogrel, an ideal treatment for prevention of subacute stent thrombosis, may not be feasible to use in every patient. Ticlopidine (plus aspirin) is a very good alternative, although the risks of life threatening neutropenia should mandate regular monitoring of blood counts. It is proposed that patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting should carry a warning card in an effort to make the public and general practitioners aware that antiplatelet treatment after angioplasty plays an important part in ensuring successful outcome.

Clinical and angiographic acute and follow up results of intracoronary beta brachytherapy in saphenous vein bypass grafts: a subgroup analysis of the multicentre European registry of intraluminal coronary beta brachytherapy (RENO).

OBJECTIVE: To assess clinically and angiographically the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of vascular brachytherapy (VBT) in saphenous vein bypass grafts (SVG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 67 of 1098 (6.1%) consecutive patients of the European registry of intraluminal coronary beta brachytherapy underwent treatment for 68 SVG lesions by VBT using a Sr/Y(90) source train (BetaCath). Clinical follow up data were obtained for all of them after a mean (SD) of 6.3 (2.4) months and angiographic follow up was performed in 61 patients (91.0%) after 6.9 (2.0) months. RESULTS: 58 (86.6%) patients were men, their mean (SD) age was 66 (10) years, 28 (41.8%) had unstable angina, and 21 (31.3%) had diabetes. Fifty three (77.9%) lesions were in-stent restenosis, 13 (19.1%) de novo lesions, and 2 (3.0%) non-stented restenotic lesions. Mean (SD) reference diameter before the intervention was 4.19 (0.52) mm, mean (SD) lesion length was 23.56 (20.38) mm, and mean (SD) minimum lumen diameter measured 0.73 (0.62) mm. Mean (SD) acute gain was 3.02 (0.88) mm. The prescribed radiation dose was 20.1 (3.2) Gy. Pullback manoeuvres were performed in 17 (25.0%) of cases. Most patients received combined aspirin and thienopyridin treatment for 6 or 12 months after the procedure. Technical success was obtained in 62 (91.2%) treated lesions and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events occurred in 4.5%. At follow up, mean (SD) reference diameter was 4.20 (0.53) mm, minimum lumen diameter 2.94 (1.50) mm, and late loss 0.86 (1.25) mm. The overall major adverse cardiac events rate was 26.7%. CONCLUSION: VBT of SVG is feasible and safe. At follow up the reintervention rate and cardiac morbidity and mortality seem to be favourable, considering that interventions in SVG usually are associated with the highest risks.

A multicentre European registry of intraluminal coronary beta brachytherapy.

AIMS: To assess the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of intravascular brachytherapy (VBT) in routine clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April 1999 and September 2000, 1098 consecutive patients treated in 46 European centres by intraluminal irradiation using a Sr/Y(90)source train (BetaCath, Novoste, GA) were included in a registry, and follow-up data were obtained for 98.8% of them after 6.3+/-2.4 months. Eight hundred and forty (76.5%) patients were males, and mean age was 62.0+/-10.2 years. Two hundred and seventy-one (26.9%) had unstable angina, and 256 (23.5%) were diabetics. Nine hundred and thirteen lesions (77.7%) were the result of in-stent restenosis, 208 (17.7%) were de novo lesions and 48 (4.1%) non-stented restenotic lesions. Mean estimated reference diameter was 3.2+/-0.5mm and mean estimated lesion length was 19.0+/-11.8mm. The prescribed radiation dose was 18.8+/-3.2Gy. Multivessel irradiation was done in 6.2% of cases, and a new stent was implanted in 29.6% of cases. Most patients received 6 or 12 months of combined aspirin and thienopyridin treatment after the procedure. Technical success was obtained in 95.9% of treated lesions, and the in-hospital major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was 1.8%. At follow-up, the MACE rate was 18.7% (1.9% deaths from any cause, 2.6% AMI, 13.3% TVR by PCI and 3.3% TVR by CABG). CONCLUSION: The major current application of VBT is the treatment of in-stent restenosis. The good results of VBT observed in recent randomized controlled trials can be reproduced in clinical practice.

Treating atherosclerosis: local drug delivery from laboratory studies to clinical trials.

Treating only the specific section of the vascular bed that is diseased appears to make sense. Giving drugs systematically to treat perhaps only a few centimetres of affected artery carries with it the risk of systemic side effects and reduced efficacy consequent on low concentrations of agent at the site of the problem. There has thus been great interest since the early 1990s in local drug delivery. Initial targets were the thrombotic response to plaque disruption but the problems arising from the incidental damage inflicted by devices used in interventional cardiology and the pathological consequences of this, namely smooth muscle cell initiated intimal hyperplasia, soon became the focus of pre-clinical studies. Problems to be overcome were the low efficiency of delivery of drugs and the low retention rates. Solutions to these problems included the development of strategies to target drugs, through the use of antibodies directed at antigens newly released at the site of damage. As it became clear that stents were becoming central to the attainment of a better clinical response to intervention by their inherent physical properties, it also became obvious that stents could be used to deliver agents. Issues such as which stent, how to load the drug onto the stent and what drug to use to inhibit the unwanted pathobiological response are ongoing issues.

Keeping the coronary arteries open: current opportunities.

Thrombolysis has reduced mortality from myocardial infarction, but effective opening of the artery with normal flow continues to be an important goal. Thrombolysis is not always as successful as it should be; alternatives include adjunctive therapy and mechanical opening of the arteries. In patients with acute coronary occlusion opening the artery should continue to be the primary aim.