Electrical stimulation of the whole hypoglossal nerve in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: Electrical stimulation of the whole hypoglossal nerve (HGp-ES) has been demonstrated to enlarge the pharynx and improve pharyngeal stability and patency to airflow in all animals studied, but not in humans. The present study was undertaken to better understand the effect of HGp-ES on the human pharynx. METHODS: Eight patients with obstructive sleep apnea who had implanted stimulators with electrodes positioned proximally on the main truck of the hypoglossus were studied under propofol sedation. Pharyngoscopy and air flow measurements at multiple levels of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were performed before and during Hgp-ES. RESULTS: HGp-ES that activates both tongue protrusors and retractors narrowed the pharyngeal lumen at the site of collapse (velopharynx in all subjects) from 1.38 ± 0.79 to 0.75 ± 0.44 cm2, p < 0.05 (measured at mid-range of CPAP levels) and lowered airflow (from 8.88 ± 2.08 to 6.69 ± 3.51 l/min, p < 0.05). Changes in critical pressure (Pcrit) and velopharyngeal compliance were not significant, but oropharyngeal compliance decreased (from 0.43 ± 0.18 to 0.32 ± 0.13 cm2/cmH2O, p < 0.05). No correlation was found between the pattern of change in luminal shape (determined as the ratio of a-p vs. lateral diameter when lowering CPAP) or changes in cross-sectional area and airflow during Hgp-ES. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that human retractors dominate when stimulated together with the protrusors during HGp-ES. While co-activation of retractors may be beneficial, it should be limited. We speculate that exercises that augment protrusor force may improve the response to hypoglossal stimulation. The exclusion of patients with concentric pharyngeal obstruction should be re-evaluated.

Parameters affecting pharyngeal response to genioglossus stimulation in sleep apnoea.

Chronic stimulation of the hypoglossus nerve may provide a new treatment modality for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In previous studies we observed large differences in response to stimulation of the genioglossus (GG). We hypothesised that both individual patient characteristics and the area of the GG stimulated are responsible for these differences. In the present study, we compared the response to GG electrical stimulation at the anterior area (GGa-ES), which activates the whole GG and the posterior area (GGp-ES), which activates preferentially the longitudinal fibres. Studies were performed in 14 propofol-sedated OSA patients. The parameters evaluated included cephalometry, pressure-flow relationship and pharyngeal shape and compliance assessed by pharyngoscopy. Compared with GGa-ES, GGp-ES resulted in significantly larger decreases in the critical value of end-expiratory pressure (P(crit)) (from 3.8 ± 2.2 to 2.9 ± 3.3 and -2.0 ± 3.9 cmH(2)O, respectively (p<0.001)). Both tongue size and velopharyngeal shape (anteroposterior to lateral ratio) correlated significantly with the decrease in P(crit) during GGp-ES (R = 0.53 and -0.66, respectively; p<0.05). In the patients with the larger tongue size (n = 7), the decrease in P(crit) reached 8.0 ± 2.2 cmH(2)O during GGp-ES. We conclude that directing stimulation to longitudinal fibres of the GG improves the flow-mechanical effect. In addition, patients with large tongues and narrow pharynx tend to respond better to GGp-ES.