Prognostic implications of response to preoperative infusional chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of response to preoperative infusional chemoradiation on outcome parameters among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy, 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2 per day), was given to 117 patients. As determined by pretreatment endorectal ultrasound (EUS), 96% of cases were Stage T3, and 51% had EUS evidence of perirectal adenopathy. Surgery was performed approximately 6 weeks after chemoradiation therapy. Postoperatively adjuvant systemic therapy, consisting of 400-425 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil plus 20 mg/m2 leucovorin for 5 days, was administered every 28 days for six cycles. Outcome parameters of local control (LC), freedom from distant metastases (DMC), disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were evaluated relative to primary tumor characteristics. RESULTS: The final post-treatment pathological tumor stages were complete response in 27%, Tis-2 N0 in 26%, T2 N1 in 5%, T3 N0 in 21%, T3 N1 in 15%, T4 N0 in 5% and T4 N1 in 1%. Down-staging occurred in 61% of cases. The pretreatment primary tumor size only influenced rates of local control (P < 0.03) and had no other influence on outcome parameters. Pretreatment evidence of perirectal lymph node involvement had no impact on outcome parameters. Pathologic evidence of nodal involvement did affect DMC (P < 0.002) and DFS (P < 0.003). Pathologic evidence of response did influence freedom from the development of distant metastases (P < 0.004). On pairwise analysis this relationship held only when responders were compared to non-responders. No difference was observed based on the level of downstaging at the primary tumor. Correspondingly, DFS was improved when non-responders were compared to downstaged patients (P < 0.01). Response to preoperative chemoradiation failed to affect rates of LC or CSS. For the group as a whole, adjuvant chemotherapy improved only CSS (P < 0.03). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 74 patients, 36 of whom had responded to preoperative chemoradiation. Improvements were only seen in DFS (P < 0.03) when down-staged patients were compared to the non-responders who received adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, the DFS rates were lower in the non-responder group who received adjuvant chemotherapy even when they were compared to down-staged patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.04). CONCLUSION: Consistent with other reports, disease free survival and subsequent development of distant metastases is reduced in the more than 60% of patients who respond to preoperative infusional chemoradiation. Evidence of response appears more significant than the degree of response. At present, no impact is seen on cancer specific survival rates. Consideration should be given for strategies that base selection of subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy on response to preoperative chemoradiation.

Rapid-fractionation preoperative chemoradiation, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and intraoperative radiation therapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicities, radiographic and pathologic responses, and event-free outcomes with combined modality treatment that involves preoperative rapid-fractionation chemoradiation, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and electron-beam intraoperative radiation therapy (EB-IORT) for patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with radiographically resectable localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head were entered onto a preoperative protocol that consisted of a 2-week course of fluorouracil (5-FU) 300 mg/m2 daily 5 days per week and concomitant rapid-fractionation radiation 30 Gy, 3 Gy daily 5 days per week. Radiographic restaging was performed 4 weeks after chemoradiation, and patients with localized disease underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with EB-IORT 10 to 15 Gy. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were entered onto the study and completed chemoradiation, 34 (97%) as outpatients. Three patients (9%) experienced grade 3 nausea and vomiting; no other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. Of the 27 patients taken to surgery, 20 patients (74%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with EB-IORT. All patients had a less than grade III pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiation. At a median follow-up of 37 months, the 3-year survival rate in patients who underwent combined modality therapy was 23%. CONCLUSION: Combined modality treatment with preoperative rapid-fractionation chemoradiation, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and EB-IORT is associated with minimal toxicity and excellent locoregional control. This represents one approach to maximize the proportion of patients who receive all components of combined modality therapy and avoids the toxicity of pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients found to have metastatic disease at the time of restaging.

Preoperative vs. postoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas: a matter of presentation.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma is typically preoperative or postoperative, with advocates of each. In this study, the relationship of the sequencing of radiotherapy and surgery to local control was examined. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The cohort consisted of 453 patients with Grade 2-3 malignant fibrous histiocytoma, synovial sarcoma, or liposarcoma treated from 1965-1992. Retroperitoneal sarcomas were excluded. Median follow-up was 97 months. There were 3 groups of patients that were classified by the treatment administered at our institution: preoperative radiotherapy to a median dose of 50 Gy given before excision at MDACC (Preop; n = 128); postoperative radiotherapy to a median dose of 64 Gy given after excision at MDACC (Postop; n = 165); and radiotherapy to a median dose of 65 Gy without excision at MDACC (RT Alone; n = 160). Those in the RT Alone Group had gross total excision at an outside center prior to referral. RESULTS: Histological classification, whether locally recurrent at referral, and final MDACC margins were independent determinants of local control in Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis using the entire cohort. The type of treatment was not significant; however, tumor status at presentation (gross disease vs. excised) affected these findings greatly. Gross disease treated with Preop was controlled locally in 88% at 10 years, as compared to 67% with Postop (p = 0.01). This association was independently significant for patients treated primarily (not for recurrence). In contrast, for those presenting after excision elsewhere, 10-year local control was better with Postop (88% vs. 73%,p = 0.07), particularly for patients treated primarily (91% vs. 72%, p = 0.02 in univariate analysis; p = 0.06 in multivariate analysis). Re-excision at MDACC (Postop) resulted in enhanced 10-year local control over that with RT Alone (88% vs. 75%, p = 0.06), and was confirmed to be an independent predictor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Local control was highest with Preop in patients presenting primarily with gross disease, and with Postop in patients presenting primarily following gross total excision. The data suggest that 50 Gy is inadequate after gross total excision, possibly due to hypoxia in the surgical bed.

Locally advanced rectal cancer: surgical complications after infusional chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To compare the surgical complication rate after further experience with infusional chemotherapy and radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative radiation therapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks) and concurrent continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (300 mg.m-2.d-1) were given to 117 patients with rectal cancer. Approximately 6 weeks after therapy, surgery was performed. RESULTS: The histopathologic cancer stages were Tis-2N0 in 30 patients (26%), T2N1 in six (5%), T3N0 in 24 (21%), T3N1 in 18 (15%), T4N0 in six (5%), and T4N1 in one (1%); a complete response to preoperative therapy was histopathologically confirmed in 32 patients. A decrease in cancer stage allowed a sphincter-saving procedure in 68 patients (58%) and abdominoperineal resection in 49 patients (42%). Only one patient developed fistula; nine patients, perioperative wound complications; and four patients, pelvic infection. In the authors' previously reported chemotherapy and radiation therapy results (same protocol), eight (22%) of 37 patients developed fistulas and five (14%) developed pelvic abscess; in the authors' previous experience with preoperative radiation therapy only (median total dose, 45 Gy; dose range, 40.0-59.4 Gy), results were similar. CONCLUSION: Surgical complications after chemotherapy and radiation therapy are statistically significantly (P < .05) reduced with further experience.

Preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation strategies in patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

PURPOSE: The effects of preoperative versus postoperative fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy and irradiation on treatment toxicity, duration of treatment, tumor recurrence, and survival were compared in patients who underwent potentially curative therapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head during a 5-year period. METHODS: From July 1990 to July 1995, 142 patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head deemed resectable on the basis of radiographic images were treated with curative intent using a multimodality approach involving either preoperative or postoperative chemoradiation. Patients with biopsy confirmation of adenocarcinoma and a low-density mass in the pancreatic head identified by computed tomography (CT) received preoperative chemoradiation. Patients without a mass on CT or in whom the preoperative biopsy was negative underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with planned postoperative chemoradiation. Protocol-based preoperative chemoradiation consisted of external-beam irradiation at a dose of 50.4 Gy (standard fractionation; 1.8 Gy/d, 5 d/wk) or 30 Gy (rapid fractionation; 3 Gy/d, 5 d/wk) combined with continuous infusion 5-FU (300 mg/m2/d, 5 d/wk). Postoperative chemoradiation combined 50.4 Gy of external-beam irradiation (standard fractionation) with continuous-infusion 5-FU. RESULTS: No patient who received preoperative chemoradiation experienced a delay in surgery because of chemoradiation toxicity, but six of 25 eligible patients (24%) did not receive postoperative chemoradiation because of delayed recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy. No significant differences in toxicities from chemoradiation were observed between groups. Patients treated with rapid-fractionation preoperative chemoradiation had a significantly (P < .01) shorter duration of treatment (median, 62.5 days) compared with patients who received postoperative chemoradiation (median, 98.5 days) or standard-fractionation preoperative chemoradiation (median, 91.0 days). At a median followup of 19 months, no significant differences in survival were observed between treatment groups. No patient who received preoperative chemoradiation and pancreaticoduodenectomy experienced a local recurrence; peritoneal (regional) recurrence occurred in 10% of these patients. Local or regional recurrence occurred in 21% of patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy and postoperative chemoradiation. CONCLUSION: Delivery of preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation in patients who underwent potentially curative pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head resulted in similar treatment toxicity, patterns of tumor recurrence, and survival. Rapid-fractionation preoperative chemoradiation ensured the delivery of all components of therapy to all eligible patients with a significantly shorter duration of treatment than with standard-fractionation chemoradiation given either before or after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Prolonged recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy prevents the delivery of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation in up to one fourth of eligible patients.

Liposarcoma: outcome and prognostic factors following conservation surgery and radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Liposarcoma is among the more common types of soft-tissue sarcoma. This retrospective review was performed to determine the outcome and delineate prognostic factors for this disease when treated by conservation surgery and radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1964 and 1992, 112 consecutive patients with liposarcoma were treated with conservation surgery and radiotherapy. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to evaluate the outcome with local control, metastatic relapse, and survival as end points, and to delineate independently significant prognostic factors. RESULTS: Preoperative radiation to a mean dose of 50 Gy was used in 36 patients and postoperative radiation to a mean dose of 61 Gy was used in 76 patients. At a median follow-up of 9 years (range 2-25), 34 patients (30%) developed disease progression at some site. Local recurrence developed in 14 patients (13%), and the actuarial local relapse rate was 13% at 10 years. Metastases developed in 23 patients (21%) with an actuarial metastatic rate of 23% at 10 years. Five-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 79%, 69%, and 61%, respectively. The most important factor influencing outcome--whether local control, metastases, or survival--was tumor histologic subtype. Well-differentiated (15 patients) and myxoid (including round cell) (71 patients) subtypes had a local control rate exceeding 90% at 10 years. No patient with well-differentiated liposarcoma developed metastases. The actuarial metastatic rate for myxoid tumors was 22% at 10 years and was higher for large than small tumors. The pattern of metastases for this variant was atypical with a preponderance of extrapulmonary sites. Pleomorphic liposarcoma (26 patients) was a highly malignant tumor with a high local recurrence rate of 37% and a metastatic rate of 41% at 10 years. Larger pleomorphic tumors had a significantly higher metastatic rate than smaller ones. These biologic factors were reflected in progressively decreasing 10-year survival rates from 87% for well-differentiated lesions, through 76% for myxoid tumors, to 39% for pleomorphic tumors. Although other factors such as positive resection margins and prior local recurrence were also independently significant determinants of outcome, histology was the overriding factor. CONCLUSION: Liposarcoma is a highly pleomorphic disease whose outcome is greatly determined by its histologic subtype: so greatly that results reported without histologic stratification are likely meaningless. Conservation surgery and radiation achieve excellent local results and with relatively little metastatic risk for patients with well-differentiated and myxoid liposarcomas. The same treatment strategy appears appropriate for pleomorphic liposarcoma, but with a much smaller expectation of a satisfactory outcome. The development of effective systemic therapy is an important goal for this variant of liposarcoma.

Central lymphatic irradiation for stage III nodular malignant lymphoma: long-term results.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term results of central lymphatic irradiation for stage III nodular malignant lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1969 and 1985, 34 patients (26 with nodular poorly differentiated lymphoma, four with nodular mixed lymphocytic/histiocytic lymphoma, and four with nodular histiocytic lymphoma) were treated with central lymphatic irradiation. Median age of the group was 51 years (range, 30 to 73). There were 15 men and 19 women. Staging work-up included a physical examination and bone marrow biopsy in all patients. Seventy-four percent had a lymphangiogram (LAG) and 44% a laparotomy (LAP). Eighty-two percent had either a LAP or a LAG. Thirty-two patients were Ann Arbor stage IIIA and two were stage IIIB. All patients received lymphatic irradiation that encompassed cervical, supraclavicular, axillary, mediastinal, paraaortic, mesenteric, pelvic, and femoral lymphatics to total doses ranging from 20 to 30 Gy in 1.0- to 1.8-Gy fractions. Waldeyer's ring was initially treated in 17 patients. Follow-up information is available on all 34 patients. Median follow-up is 9 years, 8 months (range, 15 to 244 months). RESULTS: Life-table actuarial overall, disease-free, and cause-specific survival rates at 15 years are 28%, 40%, and 46%, respectively. Only one relapse was observed after 9 years. Disease-free survival was significantly improved in patients with five or fewer sites of involvement (P = .02). Age, sex, B symptoms, histology, and technique of irradiation were not prognostically significant. Salvage therapy, including further irradiation and/or chemotherapy, was delivered to 20 patients. Ten percent of these patients remain alive without evidence of disease. Toxicity data were available for the patients treated at the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute hematologic, gastrointestinal, and salivary toxicity scores were < or = 2 in 83% of patients. Late toxicity scores were < or = 2 in 96%. Persistent xerostomia was noted in 23% of patients who received initial treatment to Waldeyer's ring. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that initial comprehensive central lymphatic irradiation may be the preferred approach to achieve a durable relapse-free interval for this group of patients.