Safety and Treatment Effects of Nusinersen in Longstanding Adult 5q-SMA Type 3 - A Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a progressive autosomal recessive motor neuron disease caused by loss of the SMN1 gene. Based on randomized clinical trials in children with SMA type 1 and 2, Nusinersen has been approved as the first treatment for all types of SMA, including adults with SMA type 3. METHODS: We evaluated the safety and treatment effects of Nusinersen in longstanding adult 5q-SMA type 3. Patients were treated with intrathecal loading doses at day 1, 14, 28 and 63, followed by maintenance dose every four months up to 300 days. We monitored the patients within SMArtCARE, a prospective open-label outcome study for disease progression, side effects and treatment efficacy, encompassing clinical examination including MRC sum score, vital capacity in sitting position (VC, VC % pred.), ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALS-FRS), 6-Minute-Walk-Test (6MWT), Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM), and Hammersmith Functional Rating Scale (HFMSE). We also measured biomarkers in the spinal fluid (phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain pNFH, neuron-specific enolase NSE, proteins, ß-Amyloid 1-40, ß-Amyloid 1-42, tau and phospho-tau) and creatine kinase (CK). Assessments were performed at baseline, day 63 (V4), day 180 (V5) and day 300 (V6). For statistical analysis, we compared baseline to V4, V5 and V6, using the paired sample t-test. When there were significant differences, we added cohen's d and effect size r for evaluation of clinical meaningfulness. RESULTS: 19 patients were included, 17 of them have completed the observation period of 10 months (day 300, V6). Patients were aged 18 to 59 years with disease duration ranging from 6 to 53 years. Except for the 6MWT, the RULM and the peak cough flow, there were no relevant significant changes in all functional outcome assessments at V4, V5 or V6, compared to baseline. For the 6MWT, there was a statistically significant improvement at visit 5 and at visit 6. RULM-score increased significantly at V6, and peak cough flow at visit 5. In biomarker studies, there was a significant decline in NSE and pTAU as well as a slight increase in proteins. In safety analysis, overall, Nusinersen applications were well tolerated. Eleven patients reported adverse events that were related to the study procedures, comprising back pain in seven patients and post-lumbar-puncture headache following intrathecal administration in four patients. Post-lumbar-puncture headache was reported in three females and one male, in total eleven times of 108 punctures (10%). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective observational study indicates a mild treatment effect in adults with long-standing SMA3 after 10 months of treatment with Nusinersen, which had never occurred in the natural history of the disease. In our cohort, the most significant outcome measures were the 6MWT with statistically significant changes after day 180 and day 300, RULM after day 300 and peak cough flow after day 180.

Safety and efficacy of short- and long-term inspiratory muscle training in late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD): a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with late-onset Pompe disease, progressive respiratory muscle weakness with predominantly diaphragmatic involvement is a frequent finding at later stages of the disease. Respiratory muscle training (RMT) is an established therapy option for patients with several neuromuscular disorders including Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Forced voluntary muscle contractions of inspiration and/or expiration muscles enhance ventilation by increasing respiratory coordination, endurance, and strength. Efficacy of RMT in LOPD is rarely examined, and the clinical studies performed are difficult to compare because of different training programs and protocols. This impedes a useful statement and recommendation about the safety and efficacy of respiratory muscle training. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric unblinded single-arm pilot study in patients with LOPD to evaluate the safety and efficacy of inspiratory muscle training (IMT). The primary objective was to determine the efficacy of a 6-week repetitive IMT with a gradual increase of inspiratory resistance, measured by MIP (maximum inspiratory pressure) in the upright position. For statistical analysis, we used an A-B-C single subject design. The 6-week training-period A was followed by a 6-week non-training period B and an optional training period of 40 weeks in period C. The total study duration for the periods A, B and C was 52 weeks. Throughout the study, spirometry assessments (FCV, FEV1) and measurements of respiratory strength (MIP, MEP) were performed at defined time points, as well as capillary oximetry and capnometry, motor function test and patient's questionnaires for quality of life and dyspnea, measured by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and MMRC-Dyspnea scale. For the cross-sectional comparison, a paired two-sided t test, and for the longitudinal comparison, a two-sample, two-sided t test were used. When data were not normally distributed, a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was added. Finally, the annual decline in FVC and FEV1 before and after IMT was compared. FINDINGS: 11 subjects were included in this pilot study. Overall, IMT was well tolerated. In four subjects, a total of six adverse events related to the study procedures were noticed. Training compliance was excellent in the first weeks of training, but declined continuously in the extension period. There was a significant increase in our primary outcome measure MIP within the 6-week period of frequent IMT with a mean of 15.7% (p =0.024; d =0.402). A significant increase was also seen after week 52 by a mean of + 26.4% (mean + 13.4 cmH2O, p =0.001, d =0.636). In the 6-week non-training interim-period (period B), the values remained stable, and there was no clinically meaningful decline in secondary outcome measures. The increase in MIP did not have any effect on secondary outcome measures like spirometry tests (FVC, FEV1), capillary blood gas analysis, motor function tests, patient's perceived quality of life or any significant change in dyspnea score. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent IMT improves MIP and thereby stabilizes and decelerates the decline of the diaphragm strength. The gradual increase of inspiratory resistance is well tolerated without any increase of side effects, as long as IMT is supervised and resistance is individually adjusted to the patient's perceived grade of exhaustion. Although we could not detect a significant impact on secondary outcome measures, IMT should be offered to all LOPD patients, especially to those who demonstrate a progressive decline in respiratory muscle function or are unable to receive ERT.