Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JAMA Cardiol ; 3(9): 815-822, 2018 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30046828

ABSTRACT

Importance: CER-001 is a negatively charged, engineered pre-ß high-density lipoprotein (HDL) mimetic containing apolipoprotein A-I and sphingomyelin. Preliminary studies demonstrated favorable effects of CER-001 on cholesterol efflux and vascular inflammation. A post hoc reanalysis of a previously completed study of intravenous infusion of CER-001, 3 mg/k, showed that the intravenous infusion in patients with a high coronary plaque burden promoted regression as assessed by intravascular ultrasonography. Objective: To determine the effect of infusing CER-001 on coronary atherosclerosis progression in statin-treated patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating the effect of 10 weekly intravenous infusions of CER-001, 3 mg/kg, (n = 135) or placebo (n = 137) in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and baseline percent atheroma volume (PAV) greater than 30% in the proximal segment of an epicardial artery by intravascular ultrasonography. The study included 34 academic and community hospitals in Australia, Hungary, the Netherlands, and the United States in patients with ACS presenting for coronary angiography. Patients were enrolled from August 15, 2015, to November 19, 2016. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive weekly CER-001, 3 mg/kg, or placebo for 10 weeks in addition to statins. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy measure was the nominal change in PAV from baseline to day 78 measured by serial intravascular ultrasonography imaging. The secondary efficacy measures were nominal change in normalized total atheroma volume and percentage of patients demonstrating plaque regression. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results: Among 293 patients (mean [SD] age, 59.8 [9.4] years; 217 men [79.8%] and 261 white race/ethnicity [96.0%]), 86 (29%) had statin prior use prior to the index ACS and 272 (92.8%) had evaluable imaging at follow-up. The placebo and CER-001 groups had similar posttreatment median levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (74 mg/dL vs 79 mg/dL; P = .15) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (43 mg/dL vs 44 mg/dL; P = .66). The primary efficacy measure, PAV, decreased 0.41% with placebo (P = .005 compared with baseline), but not with CER-001 (-0.09%; P = .67 compared with baseline; between group differences, 0.32%; P = .15). Similar percentages of patients in the placebo and CER-001 groups demonstrated regression of PAV (57.7% vs 53.3%; P = .49). Infusions were well tolerated, with no differences in clinical and laboratory adverse events observed between treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Infusion of CER-001 did not promote regression of coronary atherosclerosis in statin-treated patients with ACS and high plaque burden. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT2484378.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Apolipoprotein A-I/administration & dosage , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Phospholipids/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Aged , Apolipoprotein A-I/therapeutic use , Australia , Disease Progression , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Hungary , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Infusion Pumps , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Phospholipids/therapeutic use , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Interventional , United States
2.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs ; 17(6): 447-452, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28432573

ABSTRACT

While statins have formed the cornerstone of strategies for cardiovascular prevention, the residual risk related to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other lipoprotein factors provides a landscape for development of new therapies. However, a number of lipid-modifying therapies have failed to reduce cardiovascular event rates in contemporary clinical trials of statin-treated patients. The factors considered in outcome measure selection for clinical trials of novel lipid-lowering therapies are reviewed. Evaluation of lipid-modifying drugs in clinical trials spans a spectrum from their effects on conventional circulating lipid parameters through to their impact on atherosclerotic plaque and ultimately clinical outcomes. The design of these trials has an important impact on the result and ultimate interpretation of these studies.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hypolipidemic Agents/therapeutic use , Animals , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Humans , Lipids/blood , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/drug therapy , Research Design , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL