[Recurrence and survival after conventional low anterior resection for rectal cancer]. / Recidiv og overlevelse efter konventionel lav anterior resektion for cancer recti.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of recurrence of local cancer, distant metastases and survival after conventional low anterior resection for cure in patients with rectal carcinoma, on the basis of the poor prognosis after colorectal cancer in Denmark. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients operated on in the nine Danish departments of surgical gastroenterology in 1992-1993. Retrospective collection of data on recurrence of local cancer, distant metastases, and over-all survival at the end of 1996. RESULTS: Of 268 patients, 77 (29%) developed recurrent local cancer and/or distant metastases. Forty-eight (18%) had local recurrence with a cumulative 5-year rate of 39%. Distant metastases were seen in 54 (20%). The local recurrence rate increased with increasing Dukes' tumour stage and was higher after operation by a non-specialist (30%) than by a consultant, another specialist, or a surgeon under training and supervised by a consultant (15-17%) (p = 0.04). Multiple regression showed that the recurrence rate was independent of tumour localisation, blood loss, transfusion, anastomotic leakage, and status of the surgeon. The cumulative crude 5-year survival was 50% and independent of the status of the surgeon. DISCUSSION: Our relatively high local recurrence rate and the results in the literature after total mesorectal excision (TME) indicate that the conventional technique should be replaced by TME, which has become the recommended method in recent years. Furthermore, we propose a changed strategy in the treatment of rectal cancer. The patients should be treated in fewer departments with established teams of rectal cancer specialists taking part in all operations for rectal cancer.

Short-term results after aortic valve replacement with stentless xenografts in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to chart the short-term results of the first 75 of our patients who had undergone first-time aortic valve replacement (AVR) with stentless xenografts. DESIGN: Our study included a complete follow-up (mean/max. 1.5/3.7 years) of the first 75 patients (42 males, 33 females; mean age 74, range 61-84 years) who underwent a first AVR with stentless xenografts. RESULTS: Forty-three percent of patients were in functional class II and 57% in classes III-IV preoperatively. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed in 33 patients. Early mortality (< or = 30 days) was 6.7%, with no significant relation to CABG or age. Crude survival was 81% (95% confidence interval, CI: 71-91 %) at 3 years. Using a multivariate analysis, we identified a low left ventricular ejection fraction as a predictor of early and late mortality. Late survival (early mortality excluded) was comparable with the survival of a matched Danish background population. There were six embolic events (all cerebral: 3 minor, 1 major, 2 fatal), while two patients underwent redo-AVR because of either endocarditis (fatal) or aortic regurgitation caused by malaligned commissures. There were no other valve-related complications. Cumulative freedom was 89% (95% CI: 79-99%) for embolism and 86% (95% CI: 76-96 %) for all complications at 3 years. At the end of the study, 64% of the survivors were in functional class I, 34% were in class II and 2% in class III. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the age composition of our patients, and compared with international results, our early mortality rates were acceptable. The absence of late excess mortality compared with the background population and the functional status at end-of-study may indicate the potential haemodynamic advantages of stentless aortic valves, at least in the short term.