Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 58
Filter
2.
Int J Organ Transplant Med ; 12(4): 60-64, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36570353

ABSTRACT

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are regarded as a corner stone in immunosuppressive therapy after solid organ transplantation. However, neurotoxicity is a common side effect of CNIs, resulting in a wide range of neurological symptoms such as headache, tremor and seizures. In this case report, we describe a patient who developed severe motor and sensory neuron dysfunction related to CNIs after bilateral lung transplantation, which resolved after halting CNI and switching to a mammalian Target of Rapamycin-inhibitor.

5.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol ; 31(1): 97-104, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28395793

ABSTRACT

True visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) are a rare entity with an incidence of 0.01-2%. The risk of rupture varies amongst the different types of VAAs and is higher for pseudo aneurysms compared with true aneurysms. Size, growth, symptoms, underlying disease, pregnancy and liver transplantation have all been associated with increased risk of rupture. Mortality rates after rupture are around 25%. The splenic artery is most commonly affected and the etiology is predominantly atherosclerosis. Open repair can be done by simple ligation or reconstruction of the artery, while endovascular options include embolization or using a stent graft. Location, collateral circulation and medical condition of the patient should all be taken into account when an intervention is planned. We compared types of treatment and searched for risk factors for rupture but unfortunately, the level of evidence found in the literature is low. Therefore, deciding when and how to treat a patient with a VAA based on the current literature, remains challenging for clinicians.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm/pathology , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Acta Chir Belg ; 115(4): 293-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26324032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aortic dissection limited to the abdominal aorta is a rare clinical entity with non-specific clinical features. Optimal treatment, as well as natural history and progression of the disease, remain unclear. In 1992 we -reported 5 cases of isolated abdominal aortic dissection (IAAD) and in the present paper we update our series with 5 additional patients. A concise literature review is also provided. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2014, we diagnosed 5 patients with IAAD (4 men, mean age 60.6 years, range 45-77). No patient presented with acute onset of symptoms. One patient was diagnosed with a periumbilical bruit, and diagnosis was made with magnetic resonance (MR)-angiography. Other diagnoses were incidental findings on computed tomographic (CT) scanning. Dissection was located infrarenally in four cases and at the celiac trunk in one case. RESULTS: All cases were treated conservatively with hypertension control and close follow-up. Follow-up period ranged from 10 months to 20 years and was performed yearly by CT- or MR-angiography and blood pressure monitoring. All patients remained symptom-free, all dissection lengths remained stable. Slowly increasing post-dissection aneurysmal dilatation was encountered in two patients. We combined results of these five new patients with five previously diagnosed and reported patients at our center. Treatment was surgical in only one out of 10 patients. There was no disease-related mortality during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our case series, IAAD remains a rare clinical condition with relative benign clinical course. Treatment was almost exclusively conservative. Recent publications state IAAD might be underrecognized and under-diagnosed compared to thoracic aortic dissections.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Abdominal/injuries , Vascular System Injuries/diagnosis , Aged , Aorta, Abdominal/pathology , Female , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Incidental Findings , Magnetic Resonance Angiography , Male , Middle Aged , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/complications , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Vascular System Injuries/therapy
7.
Acta Chir Belg ; 115(3): 219-23, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26158254

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms has been revolutionized over the last two decades. Opening the doors for a percutaneous approach by avoiding surgical exposure of the vascular access site. The goal of this report is to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of using Perclose Proglide™ through a preclose technique in a percutaneous approach to Endurant™ endografting for Asymptomatisch infrarenal aortic aneurysms in an elective setting. METHODS: Between April 2011 and April 2014, 45 consecutive patients underwent percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (PEVAR) for an asymptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysm. Closure of percutaneous access sites was ensured with Perclose Proglide in a "preclose" technique. Data were collected in a prospective maintained database with a follow-up period of one month. Patient demographics, aneurysmal characteristics, procedural details and complications were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 170 Proglide devices were used to close 85 access sites. Adequate hemostasis was obtained in 96.5 percent (82 of 85 access sites). Conversion to a femoral cutdown was necessary in 2.4% (2 of 85 access sites). The mean hospitalization was 2.6 days and 86.7 percent of patients were discharged within 2 days. The incidence of post-procedural access-related complications was 2.2%. CONCLUSIONS: PEVAR using the Perclose Proglide in preclosing 14Fr to 20Fr access sites for Endurant endografting in the treatment of asymptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysms is feasible and effective. Moreover, the percutaneous approach allows for procedures to be performed under local anesthesia, while providing a low risk for access-related complications and a relatively short hospitalization.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asymptomatic Diseases , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Feasibility Studies , Female , Hemostasis, Surgical , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design
8.
Spinal Cord ; 52(9): 693-6, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24937700

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective intervention of noninvasive abdominal massage using an electromechanical apparatus on bowel function in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of noninvasive abdominal massage using an electromechanical apparatus on bowel function in individuals with SCI and chronic bowel problems. This easy-to-use apparatus can be applied by the patients at home without the help of a therapist. SETTING: Homes of community-living individuals. METHODS: Twenty-one subjects with SCI were instructed to use the massage apparatus daily for 20 min during a 10-week period. Compliance, effects, side effects and user satisfaction were assessed using questionnaires. RESULTS: Fifteen subjects completed the 10-week period. Although some characteristics of defecation changed positively for some of the subjects (time to result, amount, consistency), none felt better or more confident after using the massage device. In addition, some individuals experienced negative side effects (predominantly pain or discomfort). The overall satisfaction with the device is ambiguous, with half of the group judging the device as insufficient and the other half as at least adequate. CONCLUSION: The use of an electromechanical massage device does not improve bowel function in most individuals with SCI who have chronic bowel problems. Why some subjects benefit and others do not should be investigated in future studies.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/therapy , Constipation/therapy , Fecal Incontinence/therapy , Massage/instrumentation , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adult , Aged , Constipation/etiology , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 55(2 Suppl 1): 151-8, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24796908

ABSTRACT

Endovascular repair is an increasingly preferred treatment modality for aortic pathology. Concerns regarding durability and postimplant complications have let to recommendations for rigorous surveillance regimens which are not entirely data-driven. Besides the costs of an excessive imaging follow-up protocol, deleterious effects may arise from repeated contrast administration and radiation exposure. Due to improvements in selection, planning and execution, coupled with technical improvements in devices, reported complications following endovascular repair have gradually decreased since the pivotal reports. Although late failure may be multifactorial and therefore not totally preventable with any surveillance regimen, patients may be stratified according to the expected risk (balanced by the potential benefit gained with surveillance) and be offered an individualized surveillance program. In this review, we aimed to describe current strategies for surveillance, modern outcomes after abdominal and thoracic endovascular repair, and proposed risk-adapted strategies for postoperative surveillance.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnosis , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnosis , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/mortality , Aortography/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Angiography , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
10.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 47(5): 479-86, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24560648

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) has faced resistance owing to the marginal evidence of benefit over open surgical repair (OSR). This study aims to determine the impact of treatment modality on early mortality after rAAA, and to assess differences in postoperative complications and long-term survival. METHODS: Patients treated between January 2000 and June 2013 were identified. The primary endpoint was early mortality. Secondary endpoints were postoperative complications and long-term survival. Independent risk factors for early mortality were calculated using multivariate logistic regression. Survival estimates were obtained by means of Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-one patients were treated (age 72 ± 8 years, 90% male), 83 (38%) by EVAR and 138 (62%) by OSR. There were no differences between groups at the time of admission. Early mortality was significantly lower for EVAR compared with OSR (odds ratio [OR]: 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.97). Similarly, EVAR was associated with a threefold risk reduction in major complications (OR: 0.33, 95%CI: 0.15-0.71). Hemoglobin level <11 mg/dL was predictive of early death for patients in both groups. Age greater than 75 years and the presence of shock were significant risk factors for early death after OSR, but not after EVAR. The early survival benefit of EVAR over OSR persisted for up to 3 years. CONCLUSION: This study shows an early mortality benefit after EVAR, which persists over the mid-term. It also suggests different prognostic significance for preoperative variables according to the type of repair. Age and the presence of shock were risk factors for early death after OSR, while hemoglobin level on admission was a risk factor for both groups. This information may contribute to repair-specific risk prediction and improved patient selection.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortic Rupture/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Netherlands/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
11.
Acta Chir Belg ; 114(4): 245-9, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26021419

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare but aggressive thoracic malignancy with a poor prognosis. In this regard, a well-defined staging system is of utmost importance in order to correctly diagnose and assign an appropriate treatment to the patient. METHODS: The current TNM-staging system (7th edition) enables to either clinically or pathologically stage the severity of the disease according to extension of the tumor (T), number of nodes (N) and presence of metastases (M). Patients with stage I-III are considered for surgery, while palliative treatment is indicated for stage IV patients according to the current classification. RESULTS: Despite its widespread use, the validity of this staging system is questioned due to the low prevalence, histological variety and retrospective nature of the previous study design. In addition, the role of specific treatment modalities including surgery, has yet to be determined, especially for treatment of early-stage disease. In this regard, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) initiated the multi-centre, prospective "Mesothelioma Staging Project" in order to address limitations of the 7th edition and to optimize the staging system in accordance to current needs. CONCLUSIONS: An improved staging system will contribute to the design of prospective multi-institutional clinical trials investigating novel treatment strategies for mesothelioma. In this way comparison of outcome between different medical centres also becomes feasible.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/classification , Mesothelioma/classification , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Pleural Neoplasms/classification , Combined Modality Therapy , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Mesothelioma/diagnosis , Mesothelioma/therapy , Mesothelioma, Malignant , Pleural Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pleural Neoplasms/therapy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
12.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 54(1 Suppl 1): 47-53, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23443589

ABSTRACT

Since its introduction more than two decades ago, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the primary choice for elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in many medical centers. The (dis)advantages, including 30-day mortality and long-term survival, of both open and endovascular elective AAA repair have been studied extensively, including four randomized trials. On the contrary, the survival benefit of EVAR for ruptured AAAs is not as well established as in elective situations. In the absence of randomized trials, the best treatment modality for ruptured AAA has not been revealed. In this manuscript, we describe the design and (preliminary) results of recently completed and ongoing randomized trials. Furthermore, the trends in management and the results of the treatment of ruptured AAA in our tertiary center over a 20-year period are presented. In the last decade, a progressive increase in the proportion of patients managed by EVAR was observed. This increase was associated with an overall increase in the number of treated patients and, simultaneously, a decrease in the overall 30-day mortality (53% versus 39%) was seen when comparing the two last decades. The 30-day mortality rates were significantly lower in the patients treated with EVAR (24%) compared to open repair (52%). The survival advantage for EVAR after ruptured AAA persisted during the first 5 years after repair, but was lost after that period. The estimated 5-year survival was 44% and 39% for EVAR and open repair, respectively. These data support that endovascular repair is an effective and safe strategy as a primary treatment modality for ruptured AAA.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortic Rupture/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
13.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 44(1): 40-4, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22621978

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Sac growth after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an important finding, which may influence prognosis. In case of a type II endoleak or endotension, clipping of side branches and subsequent sac fenestration has been presented as a therapeutic alternative. The long-term clinical efficacy of this procedure is unknown. METHODS: The study included eight patients who underwent laparoscopic aortic collateral clipping and sac fenestration for enlarging aneurysms following EVAR. Secondary interventions and clinical outcome were retrieved from hospital records. Sac behaviour was evaluated measuring volumes on periodical computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging using dedicated software. RESULTS: Follow-up had a median length of 6.6 (range 0.6-8.6) years. During this time, only three patients successfully achieved durable aneurysm shrinkage (n = 2) or stability (n = 1). The remaining patients suffered persistent (n = 2) or recurrent sac growth (n = 3), all regarded as failure of fenestration. A total of six additional interventions were performed, comprising open conversion (n = 2), relining (n = 1) and implantation of iliac extensions (n = 3). All additional interventions were successful at arresting further sac growth during the remainder of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being a less invasive alternative to conversion and open repair, the long-term outcome of sac fenestration is unpredictable and additional major procedures were often necessary to arrest sac growth.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Endoleak/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Aged , Angiography/methods , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/etiology , Disease Progression , Endoleak/complications , Endoleak/diagnostic imaging , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Reoperation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
15.
Acta Chir Belg ; 111(5): 312-4, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22191134

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Due to its location in the chest wall, surgical treatment of lesions at the origin of the brachiocephalic trunk or common carotid artery (CCA) is unattractive. Complete endovascular treatment of lesions at the origin of the common carotid artery or brachiochephalic trunk combined with high-grade lesions at the carotid bifurcation carries a high risk for distal emboli before cerebral protection is installed. Therefore, the combination of open carotid endarterectomy with retrograde stenting of the proximal lesion through one stage is most attractive. METHODS: Eleven patients were treated with a combined procedure for tandem lesions at the origin of the brachiocephalic trunk or common carotid artery (CCA) and the carotid bifurcation. Endpoint of this evaluation was the 30-day MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events). RESULTS: All procedures were finished as planned and no conversion was necessary. Thirty-day mortality was 0%. One patient developed a restenosis after only 4 days for which he underwent a re-PTA procedure. The 30-day MACE was 0%. None of the patients needed additional treatment during follow-up (mean follow-up 33 months; range: 11 to 60) although one patient developed a non-significant stenosis during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment of tandem lesions of the carotid artery is safe and effective in the long-term.


Subject(s)
Carotid Stenosis/surgery , Embolic Protection Devices , Endarterectomy, Carotid , Stents , Aged , Brachiocephalic Trunk , Carotid Artery, Common , Endarterectomy, Carotid/methods , Female , Humans , Intracranial Embolism/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged
16.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 42(4): 510-6, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21795080

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate the impact of gender on long-term survival of patients who underwent non-cardiac vascular surgery. DESIGN, MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our prospectively collected data contained information on 560 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA), 923 elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs (AAA) and 1046 lower limb reconstructions (LLR). Patient characteristics and long-term mortality of women were compared to that of men. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were constructed for men and women, on which we superimposed age- and sex-matched KM survival curves of the general population. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: Men in the CEA group had statistically significant higher all-cause mortality, hazard rate ratio (HRR) 1.41 (95% CI 1.01-1.98) No differences in mortality between the genders were observed in the AAA and LLR groups. Overall, men had more co-morbidities but received more disease-specific medication compared to women. Women retained their higher life expectancy after CEA but lost it in the AAA and LLR groups. CONCLUSION: Women retain their higher life expectancy after CEA; however, after AAA repair and LLR, this advantage is lost. Both men and women received too little disease-specific medication, but women were worse off.


Subject(s)
Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortality , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Carotid Stenosis/surgery , Cause of Death , Endarterectomy, Carotid , Female , Humans , Leg/blood supply , Life Expectancy , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Sex Factors , Survival Rate
17.
Acta Chir Belg ; 111(1): 2-6, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21520779

ABSTRACT

The objective of this review is to establish the role of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in women. A step by step approach is taken looking at sex and gender differences in epidemiology, pathogenesis and natural history. We then proceed to discuss the results from the three randomized controlled trials comparing EVAR to open repair. Finally, sex-specific secondary prevention, risk factor management and medication, is discussed. Women seem to have higher mortality and more complications after EVAR. Risk factors such as diabetes and hypertension are associated with worse outcome in women compared to men. The role of EVAR in women is poorly investigated and its definite role remains to be determined. Aggressive treatment of risk factors and the optimisation of medication in women are indicated and deserve more attention in clinical practice and future research.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aged , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Risk Factors , Sex Factors
18.
Acta Chir Belg ; 111(6): 389-92, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27391544

ABSTRACT

Most tumors are staged according to the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) classification. For lung cancer a new edition was introduced in 2009 and generally applied since 2010. This 7(th) TNM-classification is based on a large, international retrospective database. Important changes were made regarding the T, N, M factors and specific subcategories were added. However, this 7(th) edition is still purely based on anatomical information. Other prognosticators such as laboratory results, histology, tumor markers and molecular genetic factors are not yet considered. To prepare the 8(th) TNM classification a prospective database developed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), is currently enrolling patients from all continents. In this way, more precise and reliable data will become available on specific subdivisions of the T, N and M factors. If proven to be prognostically valid, other parameters will be included as histology, demographic data and specific biochemical and molecular predictive and prognostic factors. All centers with a large experience in thoracic oncology are encouraged to participate in this prospective database.

19.
Acta Chir Belg ; 111(6): 389-92, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22299327

ABSTRACT

Most tumors are staged according to the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) classification. For lung cancer a new edition was introduced in 2009 and generally applied since 2010. This 7th TNM-classification is based on a large, international retrospective database. Important changes were made regarding the T, N, M factors and specific subcategories were added. However, this 7th edition is still purely based on anatomical information. Other prognosticators such as laboratory results, histology, tumor markers and molecular genetic factors are not yet considered. To prepare the 8th TNM classification a prospective database developed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), is currently enrolling patients from all continents. In this way, more precise and reliable data will become available on specific subdivisions of the T, N and M factors. If proven to be prognostically valid, other parameters will be included as histology, demographic data and specific biochemical and molecular predictive and prognostic factors. All centers with a large experience in thoracic oncology are encouraged to participate in this prospective database.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Staging/standards , Adenocarcinoma/classification , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Humans , International Cooperation , Lung Neoplasms/classification , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lymphatic Metastasis , Medical Records , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prognosis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Survival Analysis
20.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 51(5): 657-67, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20924327

ABSTRACT

Aortic dissection is a devastating cardiovascular condition with an incidence of 3,5:100 000. It is classified according to anatomic extent, mechanism of lesion, duration from index event and course (uncomplicated vs. complicated). Intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcers share many of the features of classic dissections, but tend to occur in older patients with advanced atherosclerosis. In uncomplicated type-B dissection, conservative treatment with tight blood pressure and heart rate control is safe and effective. Early stent-graft implantation may, however, result in more favorable aortic remodeling and reduced late complications. For acute complicated cases intervention is usually required. Stent-graft coverage of the entry tear frequently resolves malperfusion, but the role of the false lumen in organ perfusion must be assessed and endovascular revascularization performed if necessary. In chronic type-B dissections, coverage of the entry tear likely results in continued pressurization of the false lumen due to rigidity of the dissecting membrane and distal fenestrations. Better understanding of the different disease mechanisms involved, imaging advances and introduction of dedicated stent-grafts are expected to further improve patient outcomes in the future. Primary and secondary pharmacological prevention, stricter follow-up protocols and screening of family members may also prove valuable. Better patient selection will allow preventive treatment with low morbidity for those at higher risk of complications.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm/surgery , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Evidence-Based Medicine , Patient Selection , Acute Disease , Aortic Dissection/diagnosis , Aortic Dissection/mortality , Aortic Dissection/physiopathology , Aortic Aneurysm/diagnosis , Aortic Aneurysm/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm/physiopathology , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Chronic Disease , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Hemodynamics , Humans , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL