A systematic review of focused ultrasound for psychiatric disorders: current applications, opportunities, and challenges.

OBJECTIVE: Advancements in MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) technology have led to the successful treatment of select movement disorders. Based on the comparative success between ablation and deep brain stimulation, interest arises in focused ultrasound (FUS) as a promising treatment modality for psychiatric illnesses. In this systematic review, the authors examined current applications of FUS for psychiatric conditions and explored its potential opportunities and challenges. METHODS: The authors performed a comprehensive review using the PRISMA guidelines of studies investigating psychiatric applications for FUS. Articles indexed on PubMed between 2014 to 2024 were included. The authors synthesized the psychiatric conditions treated, neural targets, outcomes, study design, and sonication parameters, and they reviewed important considerations for the treatment of psychiatric disorders with FUS. They also discussed active clinical trials in this research domain. RESULTS: Of 250 articles, 10 met the inclusion criteria. Eight articles investigated the clinical, safety, and imaging correlates of MRgFUS in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), whereas 3 examined treatment-resistant depression. Bilateral anterior capsulotomy resulted in a full responder rate of 67% (≥ 35% reduction in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score) and 33% (≥ 50% reduction in the score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) in OCD and treatment-resistant depression, respectively. Sonications ranged from 8 to 36 with targeted lesional temperatures of 51°C-56°C. Lesions in the anterodorsal aspect of the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC) and increased functional connectivity to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex significantly predicted reduction in symptoms among patients with OCD, with decreases in beta-band activity in the frontocentral and temporal regions associated with reductions in depression and anxiety. Treatment of the nucleus accumbens with low-intensity FUS (LIFU) in patients with opioid-use disorders resulted in significant reductions in cue-reactive cravings, lasting up to 90 days. No serious adverse events were reported, including cognitive decline. Side effects were generally mild and transient, consisting of headaches, pin-site swelling, and nausea. Fourteen active clinical trials were identified, primarily targeting depression with LIFU. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, FUS for psychiatric conditions is centered on OCD, with early pilot studies demonstrating promising safety and efficacy. Further research expanding on defining optimal patient selection, study design, intensity, and sonication parameters is warranted, particularly as FUS expands to other psychiatric illnesses and incorporates LIFU paradigms. Ethical considerations such as patient consent and equitable access also remain paramount.

How We Solved the Shortage of Cardiothoracic Surgeons: Train More or Work Longer.

BACKGROUND: In the early 2000s, a significant shortage of cardiothoracic surgeons was predicted. We sought to evaluate our specialty's progress and to update the predicted needs of cardiothoracic surgeons in the coming decades. METHODS: To assess the supply of cardiothoracic surgeons, the evolution of cardiothoracic surgery training was reviewed. The cardiothoracic surgery workforce and future supply and demand were obtained from the National Center for Health Workforce Analysis. Based on these data, predictions from the early 2000s were compared with the current status, and future supply of cardiothoracic surgeons was modeled. RESULTS: The number of cardiothoracic surgery trainees increased from 230 in 2008-2009 to 519 in 2022-2023. In 2022-2023, 174 trainees underwent the American Board of Thoracic Surgery Certification Exam, with 129 certificates awarded. From 2005 to 2021, the total number of practicing cardiothoracic surgeons in the United States increased from 4000 to 5200, which contradicts all projections from the early 2000s. The average attrition of 31 cardiothoracic surgeons per year was significantly less than predictive models from the early 2000s. Predictive models project a need of 7000 cardiothoracic surgeons by 2050, which can be met if we continue to fill our available training spots with 173 graduates per year. CONCLUSIONS: The predicted shortage of cardiothoracic surgeons by midcentury has been overcome by training more cardiothoracic surgeons as well as by a reduction in cardiothoracic surgeon attrition. Future increasing demand can be met by filling our available training positions. Continual assessment of cardiothoracic surgeon supply and demand will help achieve the optimal number of cardiothoracic surgery training positions.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Peri-and Post-operative Cardiac Surgery.

Purpose of Review: Despite efforts to curtail its impact on medical care, race remains a powerful risk factor for morbidity and mortality following cardiac surgery. While patients from racial and ethnic minority groups are underrepresented in cardiac surgery, they experience a disproportionally elevated number of adverse outcomes following various cardiac surgical procedures. This review provides a summary of existing literature highlighting disparities in coronary artery bypass surgery, valvular surgery, cardiac transplantation, and mechanical circulatory support. Recent Findings: Unfortunately, specific causes of these disparities can be difficult to identify, even in large, multicenter studies, due to the complex relationship between race and post-operative outcomes. Current data suggest that these racial/ethnic disparities can be attributed to a combination of patient, socioeconomic, and hospital setting characteristics. Summary: Proposed solutions to combat the mechanisms underlying the observed disparate outcomes require deployment of a multidisciplinary team of cardiologists, anesthesiologists, cardiac surgeons, and experts in health care equity and medical ethics. Successful identification of at-risk populations and the implementation of preventive measures are necessary first steps towards dismantling racial/ethnic differences in cardiac surgery outcomes.

Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion and Primary Graft Dysfunction Following Lung Transplantation: A Contemporary United Network for Organ Sharing Database Analysis.

Background: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) has detrimental effects on recipients following lung transplantation. Here, we determined the contemporary trends of PGD in a national database, factors associated with the development of PGD grade 3 (PGD3) and ex vivo lung perfusion's (EVLP) effect on this harmful postoperative complication. Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried from 2015 to 2023, and recipients were stratified into No-PGD, PGD1/2, or PGD3. The groups were analyzed with comparative statistics, and survival was determined with Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine factors associated with increased mortality. PGD3 recipients were then stratified based on EVLP use prior to transplantation, and a 3:1 propensity match was performed to determine outcomes following transplantation. Finally, logistic regression models based on select criteria were used to determine risk factors associated with the development of PGD3 and mortality within 1 year. Results: A total of 21.4% of patients were identified as having PGD3 following lung transplant. Those with PGD3 suffered significantly worse perioperative morbidity, mortality, and had worse long-term survival. PGD3 was also independently associated with increased mortality. Matched EVLP PGD3 recipients had significantly higher use of ECMO postoperatively; however, they did not suffer other significant morbidity or mortality as compared to PGD3 recipients without EVLP use. Importantly, EVLP use prior to transplantation was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of PGD3 development, while having no significant association with early mortality. Conclusions: EVLP is associated with decreased PGD3 development, and further optimization of this technology is necessary to expand the donor pool.

Extended ischemic times during ex vivo lung perfusion is not associated with increased mortality.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify the association of increasing ischemic times in recipients who receive lungs evaluated by ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and their association with outcomes following lung transplantation. METHODS: Lung transplant recipients who received an allograft evaluated by EVLP were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Database from 2016-2023. Recipients were stratified into three groups based on total ischemic time (TOT): short TOT (STOT, 0 to <7 h), medium TOT (MTOT, 7> to <14 h), and long TOT (LTOT, +14 h). The groups were assessed with comparative statistics and Kaplan-Meier methods. A Cox regression was created to determine the association of ischemic time in EVLP donors and long-term mortality. RESULTS: Recipients in the LTOT group had significantly longer length of stay and post-operative extracorporeal membrane use at 72 h (p < 0.05 for both). Additionally, they had nonsignificant increases in rate of stroke (4.7%, p = 0.05) and primary graft dysfunction grade 3 (PGD3, 27.5%, p = 0.082). However, there was no significant difference in hospital mortality or mid-term survival (p > 0.05 for both). On multivariable analysis, ischemic time was not associated with increased mortality whereas increasing recipient age, preoperative ECMO use and donation after circulatory death donors were (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: If EVLP technology is available, under certain circumstances, surgeons should not be dissuaded from using an allograft with extended ischemic time.

The impact of ex vivo lung perfusion location on lung transplant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) conducted outside of the transplant center has increased in recent years to mitigate its limitation by resources and expertise. We sought to evaluate EVLP performed at transplant centers and externally. METHODS: Lung transplant recipients were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. Recipients were then stratified into two groups based where they were perfused: Transplant Program (TP) or External Perfusion Centers (EPC). The groups were assessed with comparative statistics and long-term survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier method. The groups were then 1:1 propensity and this process was repeated. RESULTS: EPC use was generally restricted to the Southern United States. Following matching, there were no significant differences in post-operative outcomes to include post-operative stroke, dialysis, airway dehiscence, ECMO use, ventilator use or incidence of primary graft dysfunction Grade 3. Adjusted 3-year survival was 68.9% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 60.9%-77.9%) for the TP group and 67.6% (95% CI: 61.0%-74.9%) for the EPC group (p = 0.69). In allografts with extended ischemia (14+ h), those in the TP group had significantly longer length of stay, prolonged ventilation and treated rejection in the 1st year, though no significant difference in mid-term survival (p = 0.66). CONCLUSION: EVLP performed at an EPC can be carried out with results and survival similar to allografts undergoing EVLP at a TP. EPCs will extend the valuable resource of EVLP to lung transplant programs without the resources to perform EVLP.

Early Extubation: Who Qualifies Postoperatively in Lung Transplantation?

INTRODUCTION: Early extubation has been adopted in many settings within cardiothoracic surgery, with several advantages for patients. We sought to determine the association of timing of extubation in lung transplant recipients' short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Adult, primary lung transplants were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Recipients were stratified based on the duration of postoperative ventilation: 1) None (NV); 2) <5 Days (<5D); and 3) 5+ Days (5+D). Comparative statistics were performed, and both unadjusted and adjusted survival were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier Methods and a Cox proportional hazard model. A multivariable model including recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics was created to examine factors associated with NV. RESULTS: 28,575 recipients were identified (NV = 960, <5D = 21,959, 5+D = 5656). The NV group had shorter median length of stay (P < 0.01) and lower incidence of postoperative dialysis (P < 0.01). The NV and <5D groups had similar survival, while 5+D recipients had decreased survival (P < 0.01). The multivariable model demonstrated increased donor BMI, center volume, ischemic time, single lung transplant, and transplantation between 2011 and 2015 were associated with NV (P < 0.01 for all). Use of donation after cardiac death donors and transplantation between 2016 and 2021 was associated with postoperative ventilator use. CONCLUSIONS: Patients extubated early after lung transplantation have a shorter median length of stay without an associated increase in mortality. While not all patients are appropriate for earlier extubation, it is possible to extubate patients early following lung transplant. Further efforts are necessary to help expand this practice and ensure its' success for recipients.

Does Size Matter? The Effect of Size of Distal Perfusion Catheter on Acute Limb Ischemia: A Meta-Analysis.

Prevention of limb ischemia in patients with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is primarily achieved through the use of distal perfusion catheters (DPC). Our objective was to assess the role of DPC, and specifically the size of the catheter, in reducing the incidence of acute limb ischemia (ALI) through a meta-analysis. Seventeen studies met criteria for analysis. Pooled analysis included a total of 2,040 patients, of which 904 patients received ECMO with DPC and 1,136 patients underwent ECMO without DPC. Compared with ECMO alone, ECMO with DPC, regardless of size, significantly decreased ALI (relative risk [RR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.77; p = 0.002). When comparing reactive versus prophylactic placement of DPC, prophylactic DPC was associated with significantly decreased ALI (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.71; p = 0.02). No differences in mortality (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.76-1.03; p = 0.12) and bleeding events (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.41-4.96; p = 0.58) were observed between the two groups. This analysis demonstrates that the placement of DPC, if done prophylactically and regardless of size, is associated with a reduced risk of ALI versus the absence of DPC placement, but is not associated with differences in mortality or bleeding events.

Is Time Scheduling Important? An Analysis of Donor Heart Cross-clamp Times During Heart Transplantation.

Background: Outcomes in heart transplantation are affected by a variety of variables and patient factors. However, the impact of circadian rhythms, gene expression, and transcription remain underexplored. We thus evaluated the potential role of donor heart cross-clamp times on short-term and long-term outcomes after heart transplantation. Methods: A total of 31 713 heart transplants were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. Patients were first stratified on the basis of time of donor procurement: 12 am to 12 pm or 12 pm to 12 am. To evaluate a possible effect of circadian rhythms, donor time was further divided into 5 groups based on preclinical data: 4 am to 8 am; 8 am to 11 am; 11 am to 5 pm; 5 pm to 10 pm; 10 pm to 4 am. Groups were assessed with comparative statistics. Long-term survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Patients who received hearts recovered between 12 am and 12 pm had significantly higher survival than those who received hearts recovered between 12 pm and 12 am. This survival difference was observed in both unadjusted (P = 0.002) and adjusted analyses (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.97; P < 0.001). On unadjusted analysis, the survival difference among the 5 groups was insignificant (P = 0.07). Following adjustment, the periods of 11 am to 5 pm (HR: 1.09, 95% CI, 1.02-1.17; P = 0.012), 5 pm to 10 pm (HR: 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.19; P = 0.002), and 10 pm to 4 am (HR: 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15; P = 0.034), were all independently associated with increased long-term mortality. Notably, the time of 8 am to 11 am was not associated with a change in survival (HR: 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96-1.14; P = 0.3). Conclusions: Given the independent association of donor timing and survival after adjustment in a large national cohort, further investigation into the role of donor circadian rhythm and donor procurement time is warranted in preclinical and clinical studies. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of this observation could potentially lead to the development of effective treatments and donor procurement processes that prepare the organs for transplantation in a better condition.

Long-Term Survival Following Primary Graft Dysfunction Development in Lung Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a known risk factor for early mortality following lung transplant (LT). However, the outcomes of patients who achieve long-term survival following index hospitalization are unknown. We aimed to determine the long-term association of PGD grade 3 (PGD3) in patients without in-hospital mortality. METHODS: LT recipients were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. Patients were stratified based on the grade of PGD at 72 h (No PGD, Grade 1/2 or Grade 3). Groups were assessed with comparative statistics. Long-term survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and a multivariable shared frailty model including recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics. RESULTS: The PGD3 group had significantly increased length of stay, dialysis, and treated rejection post-transplant (P < 0.001). Unadjusted survival analysis revealed a significant difference in long-term survival (P < 0.001) between groups; however, following adjustment, PGD3 was not independently associated with long-term survival (hazard ratio: 0.972; 95% confidence interval: 0.862-1.096). Increased mortality was significantly associated with increased recipient age and treated rejection. Decreased mortality was significantly associated with no donor diabetes, bilateral LT as compared to single LT, transplant in 2015-2016 and 2017-2018, and no post-transplant dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: While PGD3 remains a challenge post LT, PGD3 at 72 h is not independently associated with decreased long-term survival, while complications such as dialysis and rejection are, in patients who survive index hospitalization. Transplant providers should be aggressive in preventing further complications in recipients with severe PGD to minimize the negative association on long-term survival.

Impact of Temporary Preoperative Mechanical Support on Heart Transplant Outcomes.

We sought to assess the impact of temporary preoperative mechanical circulatory support (TPMCS) on heart transplantation outcomes. A total of 4,060 adult heart transplants from June 1, 2006, to December 31, 2019, were identified in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database as having TPMCS. Recipients were divided into groups based on their type of TPMCS: intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), temporary ventricular assist device (VAD), biventricular assist device (BIVAD), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Perioperative outcomes and survival were compared among groups. Recipients with IABP were associated with older age, a smoking history, and a significantly shorter wait list time ( p < 0.01). Recipients with ECMO had a significantly increased in-hospital mortality as well as an increased incidence of dialysis ( p < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed worse 1 and 5 year survival for recipients with ECMO. Cox model demonstrated a significantly increased risk of mortality with BIVAD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.57; p < 0.01) and ECMO (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.33-2.03; p < 0.01). While patients with IABP have a survival comparable to patients without TPMCS or durable left VAD, outcomes for BIVADs and ECMO are not as favorable. Transplantation centers must continue to make careful choices about the type of TPMCS utilized before heart transplant.

Thoracic retransplantation: Does time to retransplantation matter?

OBJECTIVE: For some individuals, chronic allograft failure is best treated with retransplantation. We sought to determine if time to retransplantation impacts short- and long-term outcomes for heart or lung retransplant recipients with a time to retransplantation more than 1 year. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network STAR file was queried for all adult, first-time heart (June 1, 2006, to September 30, 2020) and lung (May 1, 2005, to September 30, 2020) retransplantations with a time to retransplantation of at least 1 year. Patients were grouped according to the tertile of time to retransplantation (tertile 1: 1-7.7 years, tertile 2: 7.7-14.7 years, tertile 3: 14.7+ years; lung: tertile 1: 1-2.8 years, tertile 2: 2.8-5.6 years, tertile 3: 5.6+ years). The primary outcome was survival after retransplantation. Comparative statistics identified differences in groups, and Kaplan-Meier methods and a Cox proportional hazard model were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: After selection, 908 heart and 871 lung retransplants were identified. Among heart retransplant recipients, tertile 1 was associated with male sex, smoking history, higher listing status, and increased mechanical support pretransplant. Tertile 3 had the highest rate of concomitant kidney transplant; however, the incidence of morbidity and in-hospital mortality was similar among the groups. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses revealed no survival difference among all groups. Regarding lung retransplant recipients, tertile 1 was associated with increased lung allocation score, pretransplant hospitalization, and mechanical support. Unadjusted and adjusted survival analyses revealed decreased survival in tertile 1. CONCLUSIONS: Time to retransplant does not appear to affect heart recipients with a time to retransplantation of more than 1 year; however, shorter time to retransplantation for prior lung recipients is associated with decreased survival. Potential lung retransplant candidates with a time to retransplantation of less than 2.8 years should be carefully evaluated before retransplantation.

Donor and Recipient Hepatitis C Status Does Not Affect Rejection in Thoracic Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have expanded the donor pool for heart and lung transplantation, but concerns have arisen about rejection. We examined the incidence of rejection after heart and lung transplantation in recipients of HCV-positive donors as well as HCV-positive recipients. METHODS: Adults undergoing heart and lung transplantation from March 31, 2015 to December 31, 2019 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Transplantation and Procurement Network Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file. Patients were stratified as donor-recipient HCV negative, donor positive, and recipient positive. Comparative statistics and a multilevel logistic regression model were used. RESULTS: Meeting the criteria were 10 624 heart transplant recipients. Donor-positive recipients were significantly associated with older age, blood group O, and shorter waitlist time. No significant differences existed with regards to treatment for rejection in the first year (negative, 19.5%; donor positive, 22.3%; recipient positive, 19.5%; P = .45) or other outcomes. On regression analysis HCV status was not associated with treated rejection; however center variability was significantly associated with treated rejection (median odds ratio, 2.18). Similarly, 9917 lung transplant recipients were identified. Donor-positive recipients were more commonly White and had obstructive disease and lower lung allocation scores. Both unadjusted (negative, 22.1%; donor positive, 23.0%; recipient positive, 18.6%; P = .43) and adjusted analyses failed to demonstrate a significant association between HCV status and treatment for rejection, whereas center variability remained significantly associated with treatment for rejection (median odds ratio, 2.41). CONCLUSIONS: Use of HCV donors has expanded the donor pool for heart and lung transplantation. HCV donor status was not associated with treatment for rejection in the first year, but center variability played a role in the incidence and treatment of rejection.

Disparities in heart transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart transplantation remains the gold standard therapy for end stage heart failure, but barriers remain, preventing equitable access to and affecting outcomes following transplantation. The objective of this review is to summarize current and historical literature on the disparities that persist, and to highlight the gaps in evidence for further investigation. RECENT FINDINGS: Although progress has been made to increase the rates of advanced heart failure therapies to racial/ethnic minority populations and those with lower socioeconomic status, differential access and outcomes remain. The disparities that persist are categorized by patient demographics, social influences, geopolitical factors, and provider bias. SUMMARY: Disparities in heart transplantation exist, which span a wide spectrum. Healthcare professionals need to be cognizant of these disparities that patients face in terms of access to and outcomes for heart transplantation. Further research and system changes are needed to make heart transplantation a fairer option for patients of varying backgrounds with end stage heart failure.

Total artificial heart as a bridge to transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since the first implantation of a total artificial heart (TAH) 50 years ago the devices and technique have evolved to provide reliable support for patients with biventricular failure as a bridge to heart transplant. The purpose of this review is to discuss the history and evolution of devices, current devices, critical aspects of patient selection, tips and pitfalls of implantation, and future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: The most studied device on the market is the SynCardia TAH, which has been implanted in over 2000 patients worldwide and is the only device that is currently Food and Drug Administration approved as a bridge to transplant. The overall survival in patients supported by the device at 1 year is 42% while those that make it to transplant have a 1 year post transplant survival of 83%. A newer device the Aeson TAH (Carmat, Velizy-Villacoublay, France) was first implanted in France in 2013 and is currently under clinical trial in the United States. SUMMARY: Significant progress has been made in both the technology and technique of TAH implantation and these devices remain both a reliable and sometimes only option for patients with severe biventricular heart failure.

Trends in Donation After Circulatory Death in Lung Transplantation in the United States: Impact Of Era.

Background: Use of lungs donated after circulatory death (DCD) has expanded, but changes in donor/recipient characteristics and comparison to brain dead donors (DBD) has not been studied. We examined the evolution of the use of DCD lungs for transplantation and compare outcomes to DBD lungs. Methods: The SRTR database was used to construct three 5-year intervals. Perioperative variables and survival were compared by era and for DCD vs. DBD. Geographic variation was estimated using recipient permanent address. Results: 728 DCD and 27,205 DBD lung transplants were identified. DCD volume increased from Era 1 (n = 73) to Era 3 (n = 528), representing 1.1% and 4.2% of lung transplants. Proportionally more DCD recipients were in ICU or on ECMO pre-transplant, and had shorter waitlist times. DCD donors were older, had lower PaO2/FiO2 ratios compared to DBD, more likely to be bilateral, had longer ischemic time, length of stay, post-op dialysis, and increased use of lung perfusion. There was no difference in overall survival. Geographically, use was heterogeneous. Conclusion: DCD utilization is low but increasing. Despite increasing ischemic time and transplantation into sicker patients, survival is similar, which supports further DCD use in lung transplantation. DCD lung transplantation presents an opportunity to continue to expand the donor pool.

Lung transplantation in the septuagenarian can be successfully performed though long-term results impacted by diseases of aging.

BACKGROUND: Advanced age is considered a risk factor for lung transplantation (LTX). We sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes of LTX in the septuagenarian. METHODS: LTX recipients in the UNOS transplant registry (May 1, 2005-June 12, 2020) were stratified into 18-59, 60-69, and > = 70 years of age. Recipient and transplant characteristics were evaluated for survival, cause of death (COD), length of stay (LOS), and complications. A Kaplan-Meier analysis examined long-term survival for all patients stratified by age, specifically looking at cause of death. RESULTS: A total of 27 632 recipients were identified. As recipients aged, we found a decrease in proportion of cystic fibrosis and an increase in restrictive disease while obstructive disease peaked in the 60-69yo cohort (P < .001). Septuagenarians had higher rates of single LTX, male gender, and white race (P < .001). Older recipients had significantly longer donor recovery distances traveled with paradoxical shorter ischemic times, shorter hospital LOS and were transplanted at higher volume centers. There was no difference with in-hospital mortality among groups (P = .5). Acute rejection during initial hospitalization, rejection within 1 year, and post-transplant dialysis incidence decreased with age. Graft failure was a common COD in younger patients while malignancy and cardio/cerebrovascular diseases were common COD in > = 70yo. CONCLUSION: Select septuagenarian LTX candidates may be safely transplanted with relatively few complications. Immunosenescence and conditions of the aged are likely contributing factors to the decreased rejection and graft failure observations. Septuagenarians should not be excluded from LTX consideration based solely on age. Transplantation in septuagenarians should only be done in very selected patients (screened for malignancies and atherosclerotic disease) and these recipients should be carefully followed after transplantation because of these risk factors.