Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 84(1): 60.e1-13, 2016 Jan.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26589473

ABSTRACT

The Advisory Committee on Vaccines of the Spanish Association of Paediatrics (CAV-AEP) annually publishes the immunisation schedule which, in our opinion, estimates optimal for children resident in Spain, considering available evidence on current vaccines. We acknowledge the effort of the Ministry of Health during the last year in order to optimize the funded unified Spanish vaccination schedule, with the recent inclusion of pneumococcal and varicella vaccination in early infancy. Regarding the funded vaccines included in the official unified immunization schedule, taking into account available data, CAV-AEP recommends 2+1 strategy (2, 4 and 12 months) with hexavalent (DTPa-IPV-Hib-HB) vaccines and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Administration of Tdap and poliomyelitis booster dose at the age of 6 is recommended, as well as Tdap vaccine for adolescents and pregnant women, between 27-36 weeks gestation. The two-dose scheme should be used for MMR (12 months and 2-4 years) and varicella (15 months and 2-4 years). Coverage of human papillomavirus vaccination in girls aged 11-12 with a two dose scheme (0, 6 months) should be improved. Information for male adolescents about potential beneficial effects of this immunisation should be provided as well. Regarding recommended unfunded immunisations, CAV-AEP recommends the administration of meningococcal B vaccine, due to the current availability in Spanish communitary pharmacies, with a 3+1 scheme (3, 5, 7 and 13-15 months). CAV-AEP requests the incorporation of this vaccine in the funded unified schedule. Vaccination against rotavirus is recommended in all infants. Annual influenza immunisation and vaccination against hepatitis A are indicated in population groups considered at risk.


Subject(s)
Immunization Schedule , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Child , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Pediatrics , Spain , Vaccination
2.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 82(1): 44.e1-44.e12, 2015 Jan.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25554656

ABSTRACT

The Advisory Committee on Vaccines of the Spanish Association of Paediatrics updates the immunisation schedule every year, taking into account epidemiological data as well as evidence on the safety, effectiveness and efficiency of current vaccines, including levels of recommendation. In our opinion, this is the optimal vaccination calendar for all children resident in Spain. Regarding the vaccines included in the official unified immunization schedule, the Committee emphasizes the administration of the first dose of hepatitis B either at birth or at 2 months of life; the recommendation of the first dose of MMR and varicella vaccine at the age of 12 months, with the second dose at the age of 2-3 years; DTaP or Tdap vaccine at the age of 6 years, followed by another Tdap booster dose at 11-12 years old; Tdap strategies for pregnant women and household contacts of the newborn, and immunization against human papillomavirus in girls aged 11-12 years old with a 2 dose scheme (0, 6 months). The Committee reasserts its recommendation to include vaccination against pneumococcal disease in the routine immunisation schedule, the same as it is being conducted in Western European countries. The recently authorised meningococcal B vaccine, currently blocked in Spain, exhibits the profile of a universal vaccine. The Committe insists on the need of having the vaccine available in communitary pharmacies. It has also proposed the free availability of varicella vaccines. Their efectiveness and safety have been confirmed when they are administred from the second year of life. Vaccination against rotavirus is recommended in all infants. The Committee stresses the need to vaccinate population groups considered at risk against influenza and hepatitis A.


Subject(s)
Immunization Schedule , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Algorithms , Child , Child, Preschool , Decision Trees , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Spain
3.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 82(3): 198.e1-9, 2015 Mar.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25304451

ABSTRACT

Meningococcal invasive disease, including the main clinical presentation forms (sepsis and meningitis), is a severe and potentially lethal infection caused by different serogroups of Neisseria meningitidis. Meningococcal serogroup B is the most prevalent in Europe. Most cases occur in children, with a mortality rate of 10% and a risk of permanent sequelae of 20-30% among survivors. The highest incidence and case fatality rates are observed in healthy children under 2-3 years old, followed by adolescents, although it can occur at any age. With the arrival in Spain of the only available vaccine against meningococcus B, the Advisory Committee on Vaccines of the Spanish Association of Paediatrics has analysed its preventive potential in detail, as well as its peculiar administrative situation in Spain. The purpose of this document is to publish the statement of the Committee as regards this vaccination and the access to it by the Spanish population, taking into account that it has been only authorized for people at risk. The vaccine is available free in the rest of Europe for those who want to acquire it, and in some countries and regions it has been introduced into the systematic immunisation schedules. The Committee considers that Bexsero® has a profile of a vaccine to be included in the official schedules of all the Spanish autonomous communities and insists on the need for it to be available in pharmacies for its administration in all children older than 2 months.


Subject(s)
Meningitis, Meningococcal/prevention & control , Meningococcal Vaccines , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B , Child , Europe , Humans
4.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 80(1): 55.e1-55.e37, 2014 Jan.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24412025

ABSTRACT

The Advisory Committee on Vaccines of the Spanish Association of Paediatrics (CAV-AEP) updates the immunisation schedule every year, taking into account epidemiological data as well as evidence on safety, effectiveness and efficiency of vaccines. The present schedule includes levels of recommendation. We have graded, as routine vaccinations, those that the CAV-AEP consider all children should receive; as recommended those that fit the profile for universal childhood immunisation and would ideally be given to all children, but that can be prioritised according to the resources available for their public funding; and as risk group vaccinations those that specifically target individuals in special situations. Immunisation schedules tend to be dynamic and adaptable to ongoing epidemiological changes. Based on the latest epidemiological trends, CAV-AEP recommends the administration of the first dose of MMR and varicella vaccines at age 12 months, with the second dose at age 2-3 years; the administration of DTaP or Tdap vaccine at age 4-6 years, always followed by another Tdap dose at 11-12 years; and the three meningococcal C scheme at 2 months, 12 months and 12 years of age. It reasserts its recommendation to include vaccination against pneumococcal disease in the routine immunisation schedule. The CAV-AEP believes that the coverage of vaccination against human papillomavirus in girls aged 11-12 years must be increased. Universal vaccination against varicella in the second year of life is an effective strategy, and the immediate public availability of the vaccine is requested in order to guarantee the right of healthy children to be vaccinated. Vaccination against rotavirus is recommended in all infants due to the morbidity and elevated healthcare burden of the virus. The Committee stresses the need to vaccinate population groups considered at risk against influenza and hepatitis A. The recently authorised meningococcal B vaccine has opened a chapter of hope in the prevention of this disease. In anticipation of upcoming national and international studies, the Committee recommends the vaccine for the control of disease outbreaks, and insists on the need to be available in pharmacies. Finally, it emphasises the need to bring incomplete vaccinations up to date following the catch-up immunisation schedule.


Subject(s)
Immunization Schedule , Vaccination/standards , Adolescent , Algorithms , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male
5.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 80(3): 173-80, 2014 Mar.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23796611

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There has been an increased incidence in invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) produced by non-vaccine serotype (NVS) of Streptococcus pneumoniae after the introduction of PCV7. Our objective was to describe the epidemiological, clinical and microbiological characteristics of IPD caused by NVS in a tertiary hospital in Madrid. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective (1998-2004) and prospective (2005-2009) study evaluating IPD caused by NVS in children. The study was divided into three periods: P1 (1998-2001) when PCV7 was not commercialized; P2 (2002-2005) with 40% vaccine coverage among children; and P3 (2006-2009) when the vaccine was added to the Childhood Immunization Schedule in Madrid. RESULTS: We analyzed 155 cases of IPD. One hundred and fifty of these isolates were serotyped (100 were NVS). There was an increase in the prevalence of IPD from P1 (31%) to P2 (54%) and P3 (91%). The most relevant emerging serotypes were 19A, 7F, 1, 5, 3 and 15C. The most significant clinical syndromes produced by some specific serotypes were as follows: lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) by serotypes 1, 3, 5 and 15C; LRTI, primary bacteremia and meningitis by serotype 19A; and primary bacteremia by serotype 7F (66%). The large majority (83.8%) of NVS were sensitive to penicillin. CONCLUSIONS: There has been an increased prevalence of IPD caused by NVS since the introduction of PCV7. These changes should prompt the introduction of new pneumococcal vaccines, which include most of the NVS, in the childhood immunization calendar to prevent IPD in children.


Subject(s)
Pneumococcal Infections/microbiology , Serogroup , Streptococcus pneumoniae/classification , Child, Preschool , Heptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine , Humans , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
6.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 79(5): 288-92, 2013 Nov.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23587534

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology, clinical syndromes and microbiological characteristics of serotype 19A as the main cause of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in children admitted to a tertiary hospital in Spain. METHODS: A retrospective (1998-2004) and prospective (2005-2009) study was conducted on children with IPD produced by serotype 19A. The study was divided into three periods (P): P1 (1998-2001) when PCV7 had not been commercialized; P2 (2002-2005) with 40% vaccine coverage among children; and P3 (2006-2009) when the vaccine was added to the Childhood Immunization Schedule in Madrid. RESULTS: A total of 155 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) producing IPD were analysed, with 21 of them being serotype 19A (14%). An increased prevalence of serotype 19A was found: 2/45 cases (4.4%) in P1, 3/41 cases (7.3%) in P2 and 16/69 cases (23.2%) in P3. It occurred mostly in children younger than 2 years (16/21; 76%). This serotype was the main cause of meningitis (5/20; 25%), pleural empyema (3/22; 14%) and bacteraemic mastoiditis (2/4; 50%). Thirteen isolates (61.5%) had an MIC ≥ 0.12µ/ml for penicillin in extra-meningeal infections, and 3 of the 5 isolates causing meningitis (60%) had an MIC ≥ 1µ/ml for cefotaxime. CONCLUSIONS: Serotype 19A was the main causal agent of IPD in the PCV7 era (P3), with high antibiotic resistance rates. This serotype was responsible for all types of IPD, being the main cause of meningitis.


Subject(s)
Pneumococcal Infections/epidemiology , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Incidence , Infant , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Serotyping , Streptococcus pneumoniae/classification , Time Factors
7.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 78(1): 59.e1-27, 2013 Jan.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23228438

ABSTRACT

The Advisory Committee on Vaccines of the Spanish Association of Paediatrics (CAV-AEP) updates the immunisation schedule every year, taking into account epidemiological data as well as evidence on the safety, effectiveness and efficiency of vaccines. The present schedule includes levels of recommendation. We have graded as routine vaccinations those that the CAV-AEP consider all children should receive; as recommended those that fit the profile for universal childhood immunisation and would ideally be given to all children, but that can be prioritised according to the resources available for their public funding; and as risk group vaccinations those that specifically target individuals in situations of risk. Immunisation schedules tend to be dynamic and adaptable to ongoing epidemiological changes. Nevertheless, the achievement of a unified immunisation schedule in all regions of Spain is a top priority for the CAV-AEP. Based on the latest epidemiological trends, CAV-AEP follows the innovations proposed in the last year's schedule, such as the administration of the first dose of the MMR and the varicella vaccines at age 12 months and the second dose at age 2-3 years, as well as the administration of the Tdap vaccine at age 4-6 years, always followed by another dose at 11-14 years of age, preferably at 11-12 years. The CAV-AEP believes that the coverage of vaccination against human papillomavirus in girls aged 11-14 years, preferably at 11-12 years, must increase. It reasserts its recommendation to include vaccination against pneumococcal disease in the routine immunisation schedule. Universal vaccination against varicella in the second year of life is an effective strategy and therefore a desirable objective. Vaccination against rotavirus is recommended in all infants due to the morbidity and elevated healthcare burden of the virus. The Committee stresses the need to vaccinate population groups considered at risk against influenza and hepatitis A. Finally, it emphasizes the need to bring incomplete vaccinations up to date following the catch-up immunisation schedule.


Subject(s)
Immunization Schedule , Vaccination , Adolescent , Chickenpox Vaccine , Child , Child, Preschool , Hepatitis A Vaccines , Humans , Infant , Influenza Vaccines , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Meningococcal Vaccines , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup C/immunology , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Rotavirus Vaccines
8.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 76(1): 43.e1-23, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22177960

ABSTRACT

The Advisory Committee on Vaccines of the Spanish Association of Pediatrics (CAV-AEP) updates the immunization schedule every year, taking into account epidemiological data as well as evidence on the effectiveness and efficiency of vaccines. The present schedule includes grades of recommendation. We have graded as routine vaccinations those that the CAV-AEP believes all children should receive; as recommended those that fit the profile for universal childhood immunization and would ideally be given to all children, but that can be prioritized according to the resources available for their public funding; and as risk group vaccinations those that specifically target individuals in situations of risk. Immunization schedules tend to be dynamic and adaptable to ongoing epidemiological changes. Nevertheless, the achievement of a unified immunization schedule in all regions of Spain is a top priority for the CAV-AEP. Based on the latest epidemiological trends, the main changes introduced to the schedule are the administration of the first dose of the MMR and the varicella vaccines at age 12 months (12-15 months) and the second dose at age 2-3 years, as well as the administration of the Tdap vaccine at age 4-6 years, always followed by another dose at 11-14 years of age. The CAV-AEP believes that the coverage of vaccination against human papillomavirus in girls aged 11-14 years must increase. It reasserts its recommendation to include vaccination against pneumococcal disease in the routine immunization schedule. Universal vaccination against varicella in the second year of life is an effective strategy and therefore a desirable objective. Vaccination against rotavirus is recommended in all infants due to the morbidity and elevated healthcare burden of the virus. The Committee stresses the need to vaccinate population groups considered at risk against influenza and hepatitis A. Finally, it emphasizes the need to bring incomplete vaccinations up to date following the catch-up immunization schedule.


Subject(s)
Immunization Schedule , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Spain
9.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 76(1): 44.e1-5, 2012 Jan.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22154734

ABSTRACT

The Advisory Committee on Vaccines of the Spanish Association of Paediatrics establishes annual recommendations on influenza vaccination in childhood before the onset of influenza season. Routine influenza vaccination is particularly beneficial when the strategy is aimed at children older than 6 months of age with high-risk conditions and their home contacts. The recommendation of influenza vaccination in health workers with children is also emphasized.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant
10.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 75(6): 413.e1-22, 2011 Dec.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21963606

ABSTRACT

Vaccination in immunocompromised infants, children and adolescents is a major aspect in the follow-up of this complex pathology in specific Paediatric Units. Vaccination is also an important prevention tool, as this can, to a certain extent, determine the morbidity and mortality in these patients. This consensus document was jointly prepared by Working Groups of the Spanish Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and the Advisory Committee on Vaccines of the Spanish Paediatric Association, who are usually involved in updating the management of vaccinations in immunocompromised children, and reflects their opinions. The consensus specifically summarises indications for vaccination in the following special paediatric populations: Solid organ and haematopoietic transplant-recipients; primary immunodeficiency; asplenic children; non-previously transplanted immunocompromised patients; chronically ill patients; HIV-infected children and also the vaccines recommended for immunodeficient children who travel.


Subject(s)
Immunocompromised Host , Vaccination/standards , Child , Chronic Disease , HIV Infections/immunology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Neoplasms/immunology , Organ Transplantation , Travel
11.
Aten Primaria ; 26(7): 439-45, 2000 Oct 31.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11268542

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the overall characteristics of prospective studies on vaccines in children, performed by Spanish investigators and published between 1990 and 1998. METHODS: Through a bibliographic research on MEDLINE and EMBASE, 24 prospective studies, performed in Spain, published as original papers, and with objectives directly related to the administration of vaccines to children have been identified. These studies were grouped as: clinical trials (group A), studies performed on established vaccination programmes (group B), and those that could not be included in the above mentioned groups (group C). RESULTS: 5, 9 and 10 studies belonged to groups A, B and C, respectively. More than 12,800 subjects participated in these studies, belonging to both normal population or specific risk groups. In 11 studies, the study population comprised newborns and infants. The vaccines under investigation were: hepatitis B (10 studies), DTPe/Pa (6), MMR (3), flu (2), Hib (1), hepatitis A (1), and meningococcus A and C (1) to address different objectives (in most of them, immunogenicity and/or reactogenicity). Nine had external financial support; 21 were performed by hospital and/or primary care investigators, and 18 in the Vasque Coutry, Madrid or Valencia. 13 publications reported obtaining informed consent, and 8 on the approval of the study protocol by an independent committee. Ten studies were published by international journals. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that most of the studies are conducted by clinicians, with vaccines targetted to newborns and infants, with no external financial support, in a small number of autonomous communities, and usually published in Spanish Journals. The submission of this type of studies to a research ethics committee is desirable, something done to a lesser extent than obtaining informed consent.


Subject(s)
Research , Vaccines , Child , Humans , Prospective Studies , Spain
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL