How Does an Integrated Pharmacist Add Value in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Values-Based Healthcare?

The World Health Organization has recommended that the management of chronic diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) should be undertaken using an integrated approach delivered by a multidisciplinary team. Although the composition of an IBD multidisciplinary team has been well described, the inclusion of an IBD pharmacist as a core member has been more recent, with variable uptake within IBD services internationally. While pharmacists continue to play the traditional role of safe prescribing and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, their role within the IBD team is rapidly expanding; however, the value, in terms of both clinical outcomes as well as financial savings (where available), which they add to IBD services has been less well described. In this narrative review, we perform a comprehensive evaluation of the literature detailing the expanding roles that IBD pharmacists play and describe opportunities that exist for integrated pharmacists to add value to IBD service delivery. Medication and adherence counseling, immunosuppressive monitoring, uptake of biosimilars, therapeutic drug monitoring, health promotion and prevention appear to be key areas where integrated pharmacists can add the most value to IBD patients and services. In particular, integrated IBD pharmacists can improve patient outcomes via rigorous monitoring pre and post initiation of drug therapies; focused medication counseling; advice on improving adherence; implementation of novel approaches to medication usage, and; strategies to help sustain IBD service delivery. These data can be used to further build a case for those seeking to add pharmacists to their team/services. Future studies should focus on evaluating the impact of an integrated IBD pharmacist on quality-of-care delivery together with the clinical and financial value added to IBD services compared to services that lack an integrated IBD pharmacist role.

Integration of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pharmacists adds value to IBD services by improving immunosuppressive monitoring, increasing patients' understanding and adherence to drug regimens and contributing to sustainable delivery of quality care, via novel models of care and innovative approaches to drug therapy.

Switching from Dose-Intensified intravenous to SubCutaneoUS infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (DISCUS-IBD): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: A substantial proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on intravenous infliximab require dose intensification. Accessing additional intravenous infliximab is labour-intensive and expensive, depending on insurance and pharmaceutical reimbursement. Observational data suggest that subcutaneous infliximab may offer a convenient and safe alternative to maintain disease remission in patients requiring dose-intensified infliximab. A prospective, controlled trial is required to confirm that subcutaneous infliximab is as effective as dose-intensified intravenous infliximab, to identify predictors of disease flare and to establish the role of subcutaneous infliximab therapeutic drug monitoring. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DISCUS-IBD trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label non-inferiority study comparing the rate of disease flares in participants randomised to continue dose-intensified intravenous infliximab to those switched to subcutaneous infliximab after 48 weeks. Participants are adult patients with IBD in sustained corticosteroid-free remission on any regimen of dose-intensified infliximab up to a maximum of 10 mg/kg 4-weekly intravenously. Participants allocated to intravenous infliximab will continue infliximab at the same dose-intensified regimen they were receiving at study enrolment. Subcutaneous infliximab dosing will be stratified by prior intravenous infliximab dosing. Clinical (Harvey-Bradshaw Index, partial Mayo score), biochemical (C reactive protein, faecal calprotectin), pharmacokinetic (drug-level±antidrug antibodies) and qualitative data are collected 12-weekly until study conclusion at week 48. 13 sites across Australia will participate in recruitment to reach a calculated sample size of 120 participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Multisite ethics approval was obtained from the Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) at The Alfred Hospital under a National Mutual Acceptance (NMA) agreement (HREC/90559/Alfred-2022; Local Reference: Project 618/22, version 1.6, 2 March 2023). Findings will be reported at national and international gastroenterology meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. DISCUS-IBD was prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) prior to commencing recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622001458729.

Safety and Effectiveness of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Following Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The management of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients with concurrent liver transplantation is challenging, and data regarding the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors with anti-rejection medications are required. We report the experience of all liver transplant recipients receiving tofacitinib and/or upadacitinib for IBD across three states in Australia. METHODS: All liver transplant recipients from the Australian states of Victoria, New South Wales, and Tasmania, who required tofacitinib or upadacitinib for the treatment of IBD, were identified using prospectively maintained liver transplant databases. Patients were followed up until medication cessation or last follow-up. Clinical safety and efficacy data were collected. RESULTS: Eight patients [median age 30 years] were included, seven of whom received first-line JAK inhibition with tofacitinib. All patients had failed one or more biologic therapies prior to commencing JAK inhibition, including six patients who had failed two or more agents. JAK inhibition was continued for a median of 17 months, with 143 patient-months of combined follow-up. The anti-rejection medication tacrolimus was prescribed in all patients. Overall, seven [88%] patients achieved clinical remission, including all three patients who were switched from tofacitinib to upadacitinib. One patient required colectomy after 1 month of treatment. There were no other cases of serious infection, venous thromboembolism, or major adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: As the largest case series to date, these data indicate that combining JAK inhibition with transplant anti-rejection medication may be a safe and clinically effective method of treating IBD in patients with prior biologic failure.

Transitioning patients from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab for inflammatory bowel disease: what is the opportunity cost of improving access to healthcare?

BACKGROUND: Biologic drugs are highly effective for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management but are key drivers of costs of care especially when administered intravenously (i.v.). Availability of subcutaneous (SC) formulations has increased convenience for patients and improved access to care, but at the cost of revenue to health services. AIMS: To evaluate the economic impact of transitioning a tertiary centre IBD cohort from i.v. to SC biologic administration and assess the implications for key stakeholders. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who received i.v. infliximab or vedolizumab in the outpatient infusion centre of a tertiary IBD centre between July 2019 and June 2021 was undertaken. Data were collated from electronic medical records, pharmacy dispensing systems and the hospital business intelligence unit. An economic analysis and theoretical financial/capacity impact analysis of a transition to an SC model were estimated under two scenarios using a random 10% and 30% of the patient cohort. RESULTS: Transitioning our IBD cohort from i.v. to SC administration would result in a loss to our health service of AU$2 732 123.75, composed of AU$1 463 003.75 in Weighted Inlier Equivalent Separation (WIES) and AU$1 269 120 in drug procurement revenue. However, it would ease capacity in the infusion centre by up to 5256 h. CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning patients to SC administration results in improved access to infusion centres and substantial savings to state governments; however, switching results in a loss of i.v. biologic-generated WIES to health services. Alternative funding models are required to achieve sustainability in IBD care and reduce reliance on i.v. biologic-generated income.

Outcomes out to 12 months after sequential use of high-dose tofacitinib following infliximab in acute severe ulcerative colitis.

Acute severe colitis (ASUC) remains a significant cause of morbidity in up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their disease course. We present the outcomes out to 12 months following the use of high-dose tofacitinib, 10 mg three times daily (TDS), in patients with steroid and infliximab refractory ASUC. A total of 11 patients with ASUC who were treated with high-dose tofacitinib after failing sequential infliximab therapy between 2019 and 2021 were identified at an Australian tertiary centre. Ten of 11 patients demonstrated clinical and biochemical response to treatment during admission. Two of 11 patients required colectomy, one during the index admission and the other during re-admission 10 days after the index presentation. Nine of the initial responders had a median Mayo score of 1 (IQR 0-4) at both 6 and 12 months, and all remained colectomy-free out to 12 months. Neither venous thromboembolic events nor major infective complications were observed. Tofacitinib may be a safe and effective induction and maintenance agent in the treatment of steroid and infliximab refractory ASUC. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required to explore the use of tofacitinib in ASUC before it can be routinely recommended as salvage therapy.

Upadacitinib in end stage renal disease: A case of acute severe ulcerative colitis.

Recent data, indicating that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be a risk factor for future chronic kidney disease, highlight the need to study the safety and clinical effectiveness of advanced IBD therapies in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD), defined as an eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m2. Upadacitinib, a selective oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in the management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. There is also emerging data indicating that JAK inhibition may be clinically effective in the setting of steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). There is, however, a lack of "real-world" data documenting the use of JAK inhibitors in patients with ESRD. Here, we report the use of upadacitinib in a patient with ESRD for the management of steroid-refractory ASUC, demonstrating, for the first time, the safe and clinically effective use of upadacitinib in this population.

Sequential Use of High-Dose Tofacitinib After Infliximab Salvage Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Preliminary data regarding the effectiveness of tofacitinib in acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC] have been presented in two previous case series. We aimed to describe the novel use of high-dose tofacitinib immediately following non-response to infliximab in the setting of steroid-refractory ASUC. METHODS: Five patients who received high-dose tofacitinib 10 mg three times a day immediately following non-response to infliximab for steroid-refractory ASUC were identified at an Australian tertiary inflammatory bowel disease centre. RESULTS: Four of the five patients demonstrated clinical response to high-dose tofacitinib induction during their inpatient admission, with one patient requiring colectomy owing to a lack of clinical response. At 90 days, all four initial responders remained colectomy-free, with two patients achieving combined clinical and endoscopic remission. No adverse events directly attributable to high-dose tofacitinib were identified. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose tofacitinib may have a role as salvage therapy in the setting of steroid-refractory ASUC. Prospective studies are required to determine the safety and efficacy of high-dose tofacitinib to determine whether it can be routinely recommended as primary or sequential salvage therapy in the setting of steroid-refractory ASUC.