Was there a weekend effect on mortality rates for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and acute myocardial infarction? Insights from the National Inpatient Sample, 2020.

Our study aimed to assess the effect of weekend versus weekday hospital admissions on all-cause mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2020, identifying patients with co-existing AMI and COVID-19 admitted on weekdays and weekends. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were assessed. A multivariable regression analysis was conducted, adjusting for confounders to determine the odds of all-cause mortality. Among 74,820 patients, 55,145 (73.7%) were admitted on weekdays, while 19,675 (26.3%) were admitted on weekends. Weekend admissions showed slightly higher proportions of men (61.3% vs. 60%) and whites (56.3% vs. 54.9%) with a median age of 73 years (range: 62-82). The overall all-cause mortality had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92-1.09; P = 0.934). After adjusting for covariates, there was no significant associations between mortality and hospital type (rural: OR = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.78-1.39; P = 0.789; urban teaching: OR = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94-1.14; P = 0.450) or geographic region (Northeast: OR = 1.16; 95% CI, 0.96-1.39; P = 0.12; Midwest: OR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.17; P = 0.871; South: OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.12; P = 0.697; West: OR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77-1.15; P = 0.554). There was no significant difference in the rate of all-cause mortality among patients admitted for AMI and COVID-19 between weekdays and weekends.

Association between preablation and postablation neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and atrial fibrillation recurrence: A meta-analysis.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence has become common in patients who have undergone catheter ablation. High neutrophil lymphocyte ratios (NLR) have been linked to an increased risk of recurrent AF. The research is, however, not conclusive. This meta-analysis addressed the value of easily accessible and affordable pre- and postablation NLR levels as indicators of AF recurrence in patients who had undergone ablation. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar for pertinent studies through May 2023. Using random effects models, the aggregated odds ratio (OR) of pre- and post-NLR and AF recurrence was estimated. Inter-study heterogeneity was described using I 2 statistics and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. A p-value < .05 was considered statistically significant. The literature search yielded 270 studies, seven of which were included in this meta-analysis of 1923 patients who experienced AF recurrence after undergoing ablation. There are five retrospective and two prospective studies with a mean follow-up of 20.5 months. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of AF recurrence for preablation NLR was 1.33 (95% CI: 1.04-1.71, p < .01, I 2 = 95.49%), while the adjusted OR was 1.45 (95% CI: 0.87-2.43, p < .01, I 2 = 95.1%). The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for postablation NLR was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.09-1.36, p < .01, I 2 = 85.9%), and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 1.28 (95% CI: 0.93-1.76), demonstrating significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 95.32%) with a p-value < .01. NLR was significantly associated with AF recurrence prediction. To detect AF recurrence, we recommend that clinicians add a simple NLR blood test to their diagnostic modalities.

Association of serum digoxin concentration with morbidity and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation, heart failure and reduced ejection fraction of 45 % or below.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are common cardiovascular conditions linked to significant health burdens. This review aims to study the relationship of serum digoxin concentration and mortality and morbidity outcomes in defined population. METHODS: We conducted a thorough search of databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, from inception until 20th Aug 2023. Studies that explored the relationship between serum digoxin concentration and mortality, morbidity, or other clinical endpoints in AF and HFrEF patients (ejection fraction ≤45 %) were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: The selected studies exhibited a wide range of designs, patient cohorts, and measured outcomes. The association between serum digoxin concentration, mortality and morbidity endpoints like hospitalization rates and cardiovascular events were assessed in these studies. Despite the methodological diversity, our systematic review uncovered consistent trends across the studies, suggesting that elevated serum digoxin concentrations may correlate with higher mortality and morbidity in AF and HFrEF patients. CONCLUSION: This systematic review emphasizes the need for cautious management of serum digoxin levels in patients with concurrent AF and HFrEF. While digoxin remains a valuable treatment for heart failure, its potential adverse effects on outcomes in this specific patient subgroup call for vigilant monitoring and individualized treatment approaches. Further research is required to elucidate the dose-response relationship and potential confounding factors influencing outcomes associated with serum digoxin concentration in AF and HFrEF patients. Clinicians should consider these findings when making therapeutic decisions to enhance patient care and outcomes.

Sympathetic nerve blocks for posttraumatic stress disorder: an evidentiary review for future clinical trials.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a chronic disorder resulting from exposure to traumatic events. In recent years, sympathetic nerve blocks have gained interest as an emerging treatment modality for PTSD. They have been shown to reduce autonomic dysfunction associated with PTSD symptoms, particularly in refractory and treatment-resistant patients. However, there is limited evidence regarding the technique's effectiveness in PTSD patients. Therefore, this scoping review was designed to update and summarize the current literature on this topic to inform the design of future clinical trials and studies. Our review of 22 studies (mostly case reports and series) included 1,293 PTSD patients who received sympathetic nerve blocks, primarily military service members and veterans, with a median age of 42.2 years. 0.5% Ropivacaine was the preferred anesthetic, and the right sided stellate ganglion block was the most commonly used technique. Relapse of symptoms was reported commonly, resulting in additional nerve block sessions. Most reported side effects were mild and transient. Despite the encouraging results, we remain cautious in interpreting the benefit of the technique due to the lack of sufficient standardized clinical trial data, heterogeneity in reported results, and the potential for bias in reporting. Future studies should focus on evaluating and addressing the technique's effectiveness, safety, tolerability, and indications.