Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 151(1): 225-32, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25893587

ABSTRACT

Brain metastases are associated with significant morbidity. Minimal research has been conducted on the risk factors for and incidence of brain metastases in women with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). 210 women with Stage III or IV IBC diagnosed from 1997-2011 were identified. Competing risk analysis and competing risks regression were used to calculate the incidence of brain metastases and identify significant risk factors. After a median follow-up in surviving patients of 2.8 years (range 0.6-7.6) and 3.3 years (range 0.2-14.5) in the 47 and 163 patients with (MET) and without (non-MET) metastatic disease at diagnosis, 17 (36 %) and 30 (18 %) developed brain metastases, respectively. The cumulative incidence at 1, 2, and 3 years was 17 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 8-30], 34 % (95 % CI, 20-48), and 37 % (95 % CI, 22-51) for the MET cohort. The corresponding non-MET values were 4 % (95 % CI, 2-8), 8 % (95 % CI 5-13), and 15 % (95 % CI, 10-22). Once non-MET patients developed extracranial distant metastases, the subsequent 1, 2, and 3 years cumulative incidence of brain metastases was 18 % (95 % CI, 10-28), 25 % (95 % CI, 15-36), and 31 % (95 % CI, 20-43). On multivariate analysis, brain metastases were associated with younger age [hazard ratio (HR), 0.73; 95 % CI, 0.53-1.00; P = 0.05] and distant metastases at diagnosis (HR, 2.33; 95 % CI, 1.11-4.89; P = 0.03). The incidence of brain metastases is high in women with IBC. Particularly for patients with extracranial distant metastases, routine screening with magnetic resonance imaging should be considered.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/epidemiology , Inflammatory Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Estrogen Receptor alpha/genetics , Female , Humans , Inflammatory Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Inflammatory Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptors, Progesterone/genetics , Risk Factors
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 22(8): 2483-91, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25791789

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive subtype. This study analyzes the patterns of failure in patients with IBC treated at our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 227 women with IBC presenting between 1997 and 2011. Survival analysis was used to calculate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival. Competing risk analysis was used to calculate locoregional recurrence (LRR). RESULTS: A total of 173 patients had locoregional-only disease at presentation (non-MET). Median follow-up in the surviving patients was 3.3 years. Overall, 132 (76.3 %) patients received trimodality therapy with chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Three-year OS was 73.1 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 64.9-82.4]. Cumulative LRR was 10.1, 16.9, and 21.3 % at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. No variable was significantly associated with LRR. Fifty-four patients had metastatic disease at presentation (MET). Median follow-up in the surviving patients was 2.6 years. Three-year OS was 44.3 % (95 % CI 31.4-62.5). Twenty-four (44.4 %) patients received non-palliative local therapy (radiotherapy and/or surgery). For these patients, median OS after local therapy was 2 years. Excluding six patients who received local therapy for symptom palliation, the crude incidence of locoregional progression or recurrence (LRPR) was 17 % (4/24) for those who received local therapy compared with 57 % (13/23) for those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: For non-MET patients, LRR remains a problem despite trimodality therapy. More aggressive treatment is warranted. For MET patients, nearly 60 % have LRPR with systemic therapy alone. Local therapy should be considered in the setting of metastatic disease to prevent potential morbidity of progressive local disease.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/secondary , Carcinoma/therapy , Inflammatory Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Inflammatory Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma/chemistry , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Inflammatory Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Lymphatic Metastasis , Mastectomy, Modified Radical , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Failure
3.
Radiographics ; 33(7): 2003-17, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24224593

ABSTRACT

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare breast cancer with a highly virulent course and low 5-year survival rate. Trimodality treatment that includes preoperative chemotherapy, mastectomy, and radiation therapy is the therapeutic mainstay and has been shown to improve prognosis. Proper diagnosis and staging of IBC is critical to treatment planning and requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes imaging. Patients with IBC typically present with rapid onset of breast erythema, edema, and peau d'orange. Both tissue diagnosis of malignancy and clinical findings of inflammatory disease are required to confirm diagnosis of IBC. Imaging is used to identify a biopsy target; direct biopsy; stage IBC; differentiate curable from incurable (stage IV) disease; and help plan chemotherapy, surgical management, and radiation therapy. Comparison of baseline and posttreatment images helps confirm and quantitate disease response. When imaging is used early in the course of therapy to noninvasively predict treatment response, optimal tailored strategies for management of IBC can be implemented. Imaging is vital to diagnosis and treatment planning for patients with IBC, and radiologists are an integral part of the multidisciplinary patient care team.


Subject(s)
Inflammatory Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Inflammatory Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Mammography/methods , Patient Care Team , Ultrasonography, Mammary/methods , Adult , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
4.
Ann Intern Med ; 159(6): 373-81, 2013 Sep 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24042365

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Chinese translation BACKGROUND: Rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) have increased dramatically, particularly among younger women with breast cancer, but little is known about how women approach the decision to have CPM. OBJECTIVE: To examine preferences, knowledge, decision making, and experiences of young women with breast cancer who choose CPM. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: 8 academic and community medical centers that enrolled 550 women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 years or younger between November 2006 and November 2010. PATIENTS: 123 women without known bilateral breast cancer who reported having bilateral mastectomy. MEASUREMENTS: A 1-time, 23-item survey that included items related to decision making, knowledge, risk perception, and breast cancer worry. RESULTS: Most women indicated that desires to decrease their risk for contralateral breast cancer (98%) and improve survival (94%) were extremely or very important factors in their decision to have CPM. However, only 18% indicated that women with breast cancer who undergo CPM live longer than those who do not. BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers more accurately perceived their risk for contralateral breast cancer, whereas women without a known mutation substantially overestimated this risk. LIMITATIONS: The survey, which was administered a median of 2 years after surgery, was not validated, and some questions might have been misinterpreted by respondents or subject to recall bias. Generalizability of the findings might be limited. CONCLUSION: Despite knowing that CPM does not clearly improve survival, women who have the procedure do so, in part, to extend their lives. Many women overestimate their actual risk for cancer in the unaffected breast. Interventions aimed at improving risk communication in an effort to promote evidence-based decision making are warranted. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Susan G. Komen for the Cure.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Decision Making , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mastectomy/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Perception , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Humans , Mastectomy/psychology , Mutation , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 17(5): 1034-42, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18483323

ABSTRACT

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and a disintegrin and metalloprotease 12 (ADAM 12) can be detected in the urine of breast cancer patients and provide independent prediction of disease status. To evaluate the potential of urinary metalloproteinases as biomarkers to predict breast cancer risk status, urine samples from women with known risk marker lesions, atypical hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), were analyzed. Urine samples were obtained from 148 women: 44 women with atypical hyperplasia, 24 women with LCIS, and 80 healthy controls. MMP analysis was done using gelatin zymography and ADAM 12 analysis was done via immunoblotting with monospecific antibodies and subsequent densitometric measurement. Positive urinary MMP-9 levels indicated a 5-fold risk of atypical hyperplasia and >13-fold risk of LCIS compared with normal controls. Urinary ADAM 12 levels were significantly elevated in women with atypical hyperplasia and LCIS from normal controls, with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showing an area under the curve of 0.914 and 0.950, respectively. To assess clinical applicability, a predictive index was developed using ADAM 12 in conjunction with Gail risk scores for women with atypia. Scores above 2.8 on this ADAM 12-Gail risk prediction index score are predictive of atypical hyperplasia (sensitivity, 0.976; specificity, 0.977). Our data suggest that the noninvasive detection and analysis of urinary ADAM 12 and MMP-9 provide important clinical information for use as biomarkers in the identification of women at increased risk of developing breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/urine , Breast Neoplasms/enzymology , Breast Neoplasms/urine , Metalloproteases/urine , ADAM Proteins/urine , ADAM12 Protein , Analysis of Variance , Carcinoma in Situ/enzymology , Carcinoma in Situ/urine , Case-Control Studies , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Matrix Metalloproteinase 9/urine , Membrane Proteins/urine , Middle Aged , Precancerous Conditions/enzymology , Precancerous Conditions/urine , Risk Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL