ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Participating in surveys can shape the perception of participants related to the study topic. Administering a vaccine hesitancy questionnaire can have negative impacts on participants' vaccine confidence. This is particularly true for online and cross-cultural data collection because culturally safe health education to correct misinformation is typically not provided after the administration of an electronic survey. OBJECTIVE: To create a culturally safe, online, COVID-19 vaccine confidence survey for Indigenous youth designed to collect authentic, culturally relevant data of their vaccine experiences, with a low risk of contributing to further vaccine confusion among participants. METHODS: Using the Aboriginal Telehealth Knowledge Circle consensus method, a team of academics, health care providers, policy makers, and community partners reviewed COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy surveys used in public health research, analyzed potential risks, and created a framework for electronic Indigenous vaccine confidence surveys as well as survey items. RESULTS: The framework for safer online survey items is based on 2 principles, a first do-no-harm approach and applying a strengths-based lens. Relevant survey domains identified in the process include sociodemographic information, participants' connection to their community, preferred sources for health information, vaccination uptake among family members and peers, as well as personal attitudes toward vaccines. A total of 44 survey items were developed, including 5 open-ended items to improve the authenticity of the data and the analysis of the experiences of Indigenous youth. CONCLUSIONS: Using an Indigenous consensus method, we have developed an online COVID-19 vaccine confidence survey with culturally relevant domains and reduced the risk of amplifying misinformation and negative impacts on vaccine confidence among Indigenous participants. Our approach can be adapted to other online survey development in collaboration with Indigenous communities.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recruitment to general practice has had periods of difficulty, but is currently going through a phase of relative popularity in the UK. AIM: To explore motivators for career choice and career satisfaction among UK GP trainees and newly qualified GPs. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional web-based questionnaire of GP trainees and GPs within the first 5 years of qualification in the UK. METHOD: All 9557 UK GP trainees and 8013 GPs who were within the first 5 years of qualification were invited to participate by email. Further publicity was conducted via general practice publications and the internet. RESULTS: Overall, there were 2178 responses to the questionnaire (12.4% response rate, 61.5% women, 61.8% trainees). Levels of satisfaction were high, with 83% of responders stating that they would choose to be a doctor again; of these, 95% would choose to be a GP again. The most frequently cited reason for choosing general practice was 'compatibility with family life', which was chosen by 76.6% of women and 63.2% of men (P<0.001). Other reasons given were: 'challenging medically diverse discipline' (women 59.8%, men 61.8%, P = 0.350), 'the one-to-one care general practice offers' (women 40.0%, men 41.2%, P = 0.570), 'holistic approach' (women 41.4%, men 30.1%, P<0.001), 'autonomy and independence' (women 18.0%, men 34.8%, P<0.001), 'communication' (women 20.6%, men 12.2%, P<0.001), 'negative experiences in hospital' (women 12.8%, men 9.8%, P= 0.036), and 'good salary' (women 7.8%, men 14.9%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The most important reason for both women and men choosing general practice as a career in the UK is its compatibility with family life. As such, changes to UK primary care that decrease family compatibility could negatively impact on recruitment.