Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 142
Filter
3.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed ; 116(Suppl 1): 1-45, 2021 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33427907

ABSTRACT

Medical intensive care medicine treats patients with severe, potentially life-threatening diseases covering the complete spectrum of internal medicine. The qualification in medical intensive care medicine requires a broad spectrum of knowledge and skills in medical intensive care medicine, but also in the general field of internal medicine. Both sides of the coin must be taken into account, the treatment with life-sustaining strategies of the acute illness of the patient and also the treatment of patient's underlying chronic diseases. The indispensable foundation of medical intensive care medicine as described in this curriculum includes basic knowledge and skills (level of competence I-III) as well as of behavior and attitudes. This curriculum is primarily dedicated to the internist in advanced training in medical intensive care medicine. However, this curriculum also intends to reach trainers in intensive care medicine and also the German physician chambers with their examiners, showing them which knowledge, skills as well as behavior and attitudes should be taught to trainees according to the education criteria of the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DGIIN).


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Critical Care , Curriculum , Emergency Medicine/education , Humans , Internal Medicine
4.
Pneumologie ; 75(2): 88-112, 2021 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33450783

ABSTRACT

Since December 2019, the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - Corona Virus-2) has been spreading rapidly in the sense of a global pandemic. This poses significant challenges for clinicians and hospitals and is placing unprecedented strain on the healthcare systems of many countries. The majority of patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) present with only mild symptoms such as cough and fever. However, about 6 % require hospitalization. Early clarification of whether inpatient and, if necessary, intensive care treatment is medically appropriate and desired by the patient is of particular importance in the pandemic. Acute hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency with dyspnea and high respiratory rate (> 30/min) usually leads to admission to the intensive care unit. Often, bilateral pulmonary infiltrates/consolidations or even pulmonary emboli are already found on imaging. As the disease progresses, some of these patients develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Mortality reduction of available drug therapy in severe COVID-19 disease has only been demonstrated for dexamethasone in randomized controlled trials. The main goal of supportive therapy is to ensure adequate oxygenation. In this regard, invasive ventilation and repeated prone positioning are important elements in the treatment of severely hypoxemic COVID-19 patients. Strict adherence to basic hygiene, including hand hygiene, and the correct wearing of adequate personal protective equipment are essential when handling patients. Medically necessary actions on patients that could result in aerosol formation should be performed with extreme care and preparation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Inpatients , Pandemics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Anaesthesist ; 70(Suppl 1): 19-29, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33245382

ABSTRACT

Since December 2019 a novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly spread around the world resulting in an acute respiratory illness pandemic. The immense challenges for clinicians and hospitals as well as the strain on many healthcare systems has been unprecedented.The majority of patients present with mild symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, 5-8% become critically ill and require intensive care treatment. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with severe dyspnea and an increased respiratory rate (>30/min) usually leads to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. At this point bilateral pulmonary infiltrates are typically seen. Patients often develop a severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).So far, remdesivir and dexamethasone have shown clinical effectiveness in severe COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. The main goal of supportive treatment is to ascertain adequate oxygenation. Invasive mechanical ventilation and repeated prone positioning are key elements in treating severely hypoxemic COVID-19 patients.Strict adherence to basic infection control measures (including hand hygiene) and correct use of personal protection equipment (PPE) are essential in the care of patients. Procedures that lead to formation of aerosols should be carried out with utmost precaution and preparation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Critical Illness , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Anaesthesist ; 70(Suppl 1): 1-10, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32211920

ABSTRACT

The current outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has reached Germany. The majority of people infected present with mild disease, but there are severe cases that need intensive care. Unlike other acute infectious diseases progressing to sepsis, the severe courses of COVID19 seemingly show prolonged progression from onset of first symptoms to life-threatening deterioration of (primarily) lung function. Diagnosis relies on PCR using specimens from the respiratory tract. Severe ARDS reflects the hallmark of a critical course of the disease. Preventing nosocomial infections (primarily by correct use of personal protective equipment) and maintenance of hospitals' operational capability are of utmost importance. Departments of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and emergency medicine will envisage major challenges.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Anesthesiologists , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Anaesthesist ; 70(1): 42-70, 2021 01.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32997208

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The present guidelines ( http://leitlinien.net ) focus exclusively on cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction (infarction-related cardiogenic shock, ICS). The cardiological/cardiac surgical and the intensive care medicine strategies dealt with in these guidelines are essential to the successful treatment and survival of patients with ICS; however, both European and American guidelines on myocardial infarction and heart failure and also position papers on cardiogenic shock focused mainly on cardiological aspects. METHODS: Evidence on the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of ICS was collected and recommendations compiled in a nominal group process by delegates of the German Cardiac Society (DGK), the German Society for Medical Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine (DGIIN), the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (DGTHG), the German Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), the Austrian Society for Internal and General Intensive Care Medicine (ÖGIAIM), the Austrian Cardiology Society (ÖKG), the German Society for Prevention and Rehabilitation of Cardiovascular Diseases (DGPR) and the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI), under the auspices of the Working Group of the Association of Medical Scientific Societies in Germany (AWMF). If only poor evidence on ICS was available, general study results on intensive care patients were inspected and presented in order to enable analogue conclusions. RESULTS: A total of 95 recommendations, including 2 statements were compiled and based on these 7 algorithms with defined instructions on the course of treatment.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Myocardial Infarction , Austria , Critical Care , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy
10.
Anaesthesist ; 69(4): 225-235, 2020 04.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32189015

ABSTRACT

The current outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has reached Germany. The majority of people infected present with mild disease, but there are severe cases that need intensive care. Unlike other acute infectious diseases progressing to sepsis, the severe courses of COVID19 seemingly show prolonged progression from onset of first symptoms to life-threatening deterioration of (primarily) lung function. Diagnosis relies on PCR using specimens from the respiratory tract. Severe ARDS reflects the hallmark of a critical course of the disease. Preventing nosocomial infections (primarily by correct use of personal protective equipment) and maintenance of hospitals' operational capability are of utmost importance. Departments of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and emergency medicine will envisage major challenges.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General/methods , Anesthesiologists , Coronavirus Infections , Critical Care/standards , Cross Infection , Infection Control , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Anesthesia, General/standards , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks , Germany , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Operating Rooms , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission
11.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed ; 115(2): 135-139, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30607450

ABSTRACT

A high incidence of care-relevant psychological problems in critical care medicine has been reported among patients, their families and professional care givers. International guidelines give appropriate recommendations for such care. What is unclear, however, is just how the care and support are provided in day-to-day practice and, in particular, which service providers are responsible for this support. The present care situation was studied in a web-based survey (38% response rate) among all members of the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DGIIN). Most respondents reported a moderate to substantial need for psychological support of patients in intensive care and a substantial to very substantial need in the case of their family members. The need for support in the case of staff showed a relatively broad scatter in the assessment. Providers of care are mainly the members of the intensive care team themselves, while clinical pastoral counsellors in particular are also involved and, to a lesser extent, counselling or liaison services specializing in psychotherapy.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Emergency Medicine , Counseling , Family , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed ; 115(3): 239-244, 2020 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30969352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since 2010, the number of organ donations has decreased by 30% in Germany; however, stricter organizational structures in clinics and improved payment for hospital services associated with organ removal should increase the current decline in the number of organ donations in Germany. In addition, the Federal Minister of Health proposed introduction of the double presumed consent solution for organ donation. This proposal is currently being discussed very controversially. Against this background, we conducted an online survey of all members of the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DGIIN) in order to evaluate the attitude towards organ donation. METHOD: The present work is an anonymous online survey among the members of DGIIN, which took place from 10-23 September 2018. In addition to a few demographic queries, the personal opinion on the regulation of organ donation was collected. RESULTS: A total of 1019 (51.9%) of 1964 invited DGIIN members took part at the survey: 79.3% of the participants were male; average age 47.5 ± 11.2 years; 97.7% were physicians, of whom 89.2% were specialists and 62.7% had the additional degree in critical care; 20.6% voted for the current decision-making solution, 43.1% for the presumed consent, 33.1% for the double presumed consent, whereas 3.2% of the respondents were uncertain in their decision. CONCLUSION: A clear majority of the surveyed members of DGIIN support the concept of presumed consent.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Adult , Critical Care , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Presumed Consent , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tissue Donors
13.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed ; 115(2): 152-155, 2020 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30357421

ABSTRACT

In rare cases, global cardiac decompensation is the only sign of a relevant endoleak after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) therapy from a thoracic aortic aneurysm due to a mechanical compression of the left atrium. In this case report, we describe such an unusual course of disease and we point out the importance of early bed-side echocardiography in the emergency department for immediate diagnostic and therapeutic planning.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Endoleak/diagnostic imaging , Endoleak/etiology , Endoleak/therapy , Heart Atria , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed ; 115(4): 334-339, 2020 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30725268

ABSTRACT

This is a case report of a chest tube incorrectly placed on the healthy left side in a patient with a spontaneous right-sided pneumothorax based on misguiding radiological findings. This erroneous chest tube placement was a result of an inconclusive clinical examination in a patient with a history of pulmonary fibrosis as well as the side-inverted digital production of the chest X­ray. Follow-up chest X­ray after chest tube placement on the wrong side displayed this serious adverse event. To avoid such errors, team training, bedside sonography, and checklists are important tools. Correctly documented radiological images should also be ensured.


Subject(s)
Chest Tubes , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , Pneumothorax/therapy , Drainage , Humans
15.
Pneumologie ; 73(12): 723-814, 2019 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31816642

ABSTRACT

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is an essential part of modern intensive care medicine. MV is performed in patients with severe respiratory failure caused by insufficiency of respiratory muscles and/or lung parenchymal disease when/after other treatments, (i. e. medication, oxygen, secretion management, continuous positive airway pressure or nasal highflow) have failed.MV is required to maintain gas exchange and to buy time for curative therapy of the underlying cause of respiratory failure. In the majority of patients weaning from MV is routine and causes no special problems. However, about 20 % of patients need ongoing MV despite resolution of the conditions which precipitated the need for MV. Approximately 40 - 50 % of time spent on MV is required to liberate the patient from the ventilator, a process called "weaning."There are numberous factors besides the acute respiratory failure that have an impact on duration and success rate of the weaning process such as age, comorbidities and conditions and complications acquired in the ICU. According to an international consensus conference "prolonged weaning" is defined as weaning process of patients who have failed at least three weaning attempts or require more than 7 days of weaning after the first spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Prolonged weaning is a challenge, therefore, an inter- and multi-disciplinary approach is essential for a weaning success.In specialised weaning centers about 50 % of patients with initial weaning failure can be liberated from MV after prolonged weaning. However, heterogeneity of patients with prolonged weaning precludes direct comparisons of individual centers. Patients with persistant weaning failure either die during the weaning process or are discharged home or to a long term care facility with ongoing MV.Urged by the growing importance of prolonged weaning, this Sk2-guideline was first published in 2014 on the initiative of the German Respiratory Society (DGP) together with other scientific societies involved in prolonged weaning. Current research and study results, registry data and experience in daily practice made the revision of this guideline necessary.The following topics are dealt with in the guideline: Definitions, epidemiology, weaning categories, the underlying pathophysiology, prevention of prolonged weaning, treatment strategies in prolonged weaning, the weaning unit, discharge from hospital on MV and recommendations for end of life decisions.Special emphasis in the revision of the guideline was laid on the following topics:- A new classification of subgroups of patients in prolonged weaning- Important aspects of pneumological rehabilitation and neurorehabilitation in prolonged weaning- Infrastructure and process organization in the care of patients in prolonged weaning in the sense of a continuous treatment concept- Therapeutic goal change and communication with relativesAspects of pediatric weaning are given separately within the individual chapters.The main aim of the revised guideline is to summarize current evidence and also expert based- knowledge on the topic of "prolonged weaning" and, based on the evidence and the experience of experts, make recommendations with regard to "prolonged weaning" not only in the field of acute medicine but also for chronic critical care.Important addressees of this guideline are Intensivists, Pneumologists, Anesthesiologists, Internists, Cardiologists, Surgeons, Neurologists, Pediatricians, Geriatricians, Palliative care clinicians, Rehabilitation physicians, Nurses in intensive and chronic care, Physiotherapists, Respiratory therapists, Speech therapists, Medical service of health insurance and associated ventilator manufacturers.


Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pulmonary Medicine/standards , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Ventilator Weaning/methods , Ventilator Weaning/standards , Child , Evidence-Based Medicine , Germany , Home Care Services , Humans , Respiratory Insufficiency/diagnosis , Societies, Medical
16.
Pneumologie ; 73(11): 670-676, 2019 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31715635

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Home mechanical ventilation is dramatically evolving in Germany. Patients with non-invasive and invasive ventilation are increasingly treated at home. In-hospital treatment of these patients is also necessary either for control visits or the management of acute medical problems. However, the development of in-hospital patient care, morbidity and mortality of these patients is unknown. METHODS: All patients with long-term dependence on mechanical ventilation for more than three months requiring hospitalisation between 2006 and 2016 were analysed (data obtained from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany). RESULTS: There was an exponential increase in the number of in-patients with long-term dependence of mechanical ventilation. While 24 845 patients were treated in-hospital in 2006, 86 117 patients were treated in 2016. Correspondingly, mortality decreased from 13.2 % (2006) to 5.7 % (2016). In addition, in 2016 47 % of all patients were treated on the intensive care or high dependency care unit. Overall, patients had been severely ill, as there were plenty of medical and neurological co-morbidities. The most common diagnosis was COPD with 58 % of all cases, followed by several cardiology diagnosis. A high number of patients had an impairment of renal function (24 %), in part requiring dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid development of home mechanical ventilation substantially impacts on the development of the hospital landscape in Germany. The exponential increase of these care-intensive patients is challenging for the health care system and requires a discussion about its limits.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Home Care Services , Patient Care/trends , Respiration, Artificial , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/trends , Germany , Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Home Care Services/trends , Hospitalization , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data
17.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed ; 114(4): 319-326, 2019 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30976838

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND CHALLENGE: Injuries, especially traumatic brain injury, or specific illnesses and their respective sequelae can result in the demise of the patients afflicted despite all efforts of modern intensive care medicine. If in principle organ donation is an option after a patient's death, intensive therapeutic measures are regularly required in order to maintain the homeostasis of the organs. These measures, however, cannot benefit the patient afflicted anymore-which in turn might lead to an ethical conflict between dignified palliative care for him/her and expanded intensive treatment to facilitate organ donation for others, especially if the patient has opted for the limitation of life-sustaining therapies in an advance directive. METHOD: The Ethics Section and the Organ Donation and Transplantation Section of the German Interdisciplinary Association of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI) have convened several meetings and a telephone conference and have arrived at a decision-making aid as to the extent of treatment for potential organ donors. This instrument focusses first on the assessment of five individual dimensions regarding organ donation, namely the certitude of a complete and irreversible loss of all brain function, the patient's wishes as to organ donation, his or her wishes as to limiting life-sustaining therapies, the intensity of expanded intensive treatment for organ protection and the odds of its successful attainment. Then, the combination of the individual assessments, as graphically shown in a {Netzdiagramm}, will allow for a judgement as to whether a continuation or possibly an expansion of intensive care measures is ethically justified, questionable or even inappropriate. RESULT: The aid described can help mitigate ethical conflicts as to the extent of intensive care treatment for moribund patients, when organ donation is a medically sound option. NOTE: Gerald Neitzke und Annette Rogge contributed equally to this paper and should be considered co-first authors.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Emergency Medicine , Organ Transplantation , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Critical Care , Humans , Organ Transplantation/ethics , Tissue Donors , Tissue and Organ Procurement/ethics
20.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed ; 114(4): 345-349, 2019 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29666878

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This case report presents a case of symptomatic methemoglobinemia (MetHb 31.6%) after inhalation of volatile nitrites (poppers). METHODS: The patient's medical history and symptoms are discussed together with pathophysiology of methemoglobinemia, diagnostics, and antidote therapy. Pulse oxymetry, arterial blood gas analysis, and CO-oximetry receive particular attention as well as antidote therapy with methylene blue. RESULTS: The patient was treated successfully with intravenous methylene blue. Within 60 min methemoglobinemia returned to normal values (MetHb 0.6%). CONCLUSION: Stimulating compounds such as volatile nitrites (poppers) may lead to potentially fatal methemoglobinemia. Swift and accurate diagnosis and targeted therapy with methylene blue can lead to rapid recovery.


Subject(s)
Methemoglobinemia , Nitrites , Adult , Antidotes , Humans , Male , Methemoglobinemia/diagnosis , Methemoglobinemia/etiology , Methylene Blue/therapeutic use , Nitrites/adverse effects , Oximetry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL