Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Publication year range
1.
Geroscience ; 43(5): 2333-2343, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34273049

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 is a particularly aggressive disease for the elderly as 86% of deaths related to COVID-19 occur in people over 65 years of age. Despite the urgent need for a preventive treatment, there are currently no serious leads, other than the vaccination. The aim of this retrospective case-control study is to find a pharmacological preventive treatment of COVID-19 in elderly patients. One-hundred-seventy-nine patients had been in contact with other COVID-19 patients at home or in hospital, of whom 89 had tested RT-PCR-positive (COVID-pos) for the virus and 90 had tested RT-PCR-negative (COVID-neg). Treatments within 15 days prior to RT-PCR (including antihypertensive drugs, antipsychotics, antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), oral antidiabetics (OADs), corticosteroids, immunosuppressants), comorbidities, symptoms, laboratory values, and clinical outcome were all collected. COVID-pos patients more frequently had a history of diabetes (P = .016) and alcoholism (P = .023), a lower leukocyte count (P = .014) and a higher mortality rate - 29.2% versus 14.4% - (P = .014) when compared to COVID-neg patients. Patients on PPIs were 2.3 times less likely (odds ratio [OR] = 0.4381, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.2331, 0.8175], P = .0053) to develop COVID-19 infection, compared to those not on PPIs. No other treatment decreased or increased this risk. COVID-pos patients on antipsychotics (P = .0013) and OADs (P = .0153), particularly metformin (P = .0237), were less likely to die. Thus, patients on treatment with PPI were less likely to develop COVID-19 infection, and those on antipsychotics or metformin had a lower risk of mortality. However, prospective studies, including clinical trials, are needed to confirm or not these findings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
2.
Presse Med ; 40(7-8): e325-32, 2011.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21458213

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are major nosocomial pathogens in many countries. VRE can spread rapidly, mostly by cross-transmission through hands of healthcare workers, leading to outbreaks. Moreover, VRE have the possibility to transfer vancomycin resistance genes to other Gram-positive organisms. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a 9-month prospective study to demonstrate the effectiveness of "contact" precautions to prevent the spread of VRE in a long-term care facility. METHODS: Six patients with VRE colonisation were admitted in an 80-bed long-term care facility. The following interventions were implemented to prevent the spread of VRE: gathering patients with VRE colonisation in the same unit, reinforcement of hand hygiene practices, "contact" precautions, reduction of some antibiotics and extensive screening of VRE carriers and contact patients by rectal swabs. RESULTS: There was no secondary case of VRE colonisation. Screening tests converted from positive to negative in four of the six patients. CONCLUSION: Compliance with hand hygiene recommendations and "contact" precautions can prevent the spread of VRE in a long-term care facility.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/transmission , Enterococcus/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/transmission , Vancomycin Resistance , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Female , Humans , Long-Term Care , Male , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL