ABSTRACT
JRC-Geel organised a Europe-wide proficiency test on gross alpha/beta activity concentration measurements in water with 154 participants from the field of environmental radioactivity monitoring. The performance of the participants was evaluated by comparing their results to the reference value using percentage deviation, z-score and zeta-score. Many of the participants' results deviated several orders of magnitude from the reference values regardless of the techniques used suggesting that the radioactivity monitoring of drinking water using gross-counting in Europe needs improving. Comparing with a similar proficiency test in 2012 reveals no major improvements and indicate that standards for gross-counting methods need revision. From the accompanied questionnaire, participants' measurement methods, laboratory practices and pitfalls were discussed. From the 14 best performing methods, JRC identified "Best practices".
Subject(s)
Drinking Water , Radioactivity , Water Pollutants, Radioactive , Environmental Monitoring , Europe , Humans , Water Pollutants, Radioactive/analysisABSTRACT
In 2018, a Europe wide proficiency test (PT) on measurements of the massic activity of 222Rn in drinking water was organised with the participation of 101 European environmental radioactivity monitoring laboratories. The performance of the participating laboratories was evaluated by comparing submitted results to the reference value using percentage deviation, z-score and zeta-score. It was found that 84% of the participants' results were within the ±20% reference range. When analysing the zeta-score it was found that 76% of the participants' results were acceptable. The accompanied questionnaire and workshop helped to identify practices that could lead to erroneous results. As it was probably the largest scale PT on radon-in-water ever, the evaluation of results is representative of the quality of radon-in-water monitoring in the EU today.
ABSTRACT
A pilot proficiency test (PT) on measurements of the massic activity of 222Rn in drinking water was organised by JRC-Geel. Fourteen environmental radioactivity monitoring laboratories were invited to participate. The key aim of the study was to test, optimise and stream-line the complete process for conducting such a PT in order to perform a large scale Europe-wide PT in a robust manner. The process involved using all state-of-the art knowledge on sampling, transporting and measuring 222Rn in water. It was found that the majority of the participants' results (92%) were within the ±15% reference range. The pilot-PT showed that the applied process was suitable and can be used for the large scale European PT planned for the third quarter of 2018.
ABSTRACT
The European Commission's Joint Research Centre organizes proficiency tests (PT) on radon-in-water measurements. In order to optimize sampling, transport and measurement methods many tests and small scale proficiency tests have been performed. The waters from natural springs, wells were sampled on-site in glass bottles then transported cooled to the JRC and collaborating laboratories. For the material characterization standard measurement methods based on gamma-ray spectrometry, emanometry and liquid scintillation counting were used. The influence of sampling, transport and sample handling on radon-loss was tested and quantified. It was observed that parameters like container material, filling height, storage temperature and handling can lead to substantial measurement bias due to radon-loss. This high risk for radon-loss from samples can potentially be a general radioprotection problem as doses to the public may be underestimated. Regular air and road transport can be considered adequate means of transport as they have little influence on radon-loss if a suitable glass sample container with flexible cap is used and that it is completely filled. On the basis of this work, modifications to the related standard as best practices are also proposed.
Subject(s)
Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radon/analysis , Water Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Scintillation CountingABSTRACT
The aim of this paper is to present information about currently used standard and routine methods for radon analysis in drinking waters. An overview is given about the current situation and the performance of different measurement methods based on literature data. The following parameters are compared and discussed: initial sample volume and sample preparation, detection systems, minimum detectable activity, counting efficiency, interferences, measurement uncertainty, sample capacity and overall turnaround time. Moreover, the parametric levels for radon in drinking water from the different legislations and directives/guidelines on radon are presented.
Subject(s)
Drinking Water/chemistry , Radon/analysis , Water Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Scintillation Counting , Uncertainty , Water SupplyABSTRACT
An interlaboratory comparison was organised by JRC-IRMM among environmental radioactivity monitoring laboratories for the determination of gross alpha/beta activity concentration in drinking water. Independent standard methods were used for the reference value determination. The performance of participating laboratories was evaluated with respect to the reference values using relative deviations. Sample preparation and measurement methods used by the participating laboratories are detailed, in particular in the view of method-dependency of the results. Many of the participants' results deviate by more than two orders of magnitude from the reference values regardless of the techniques used. This suggests that gross methods need revision.
ABSTRACT
One of the essential parameters influencing of the dose conversion factor is the ratio of unattached short-lived radon progeny. This may differ from the value identified for indoor conditions when considering special workplaces such as mines. Inevitably, application of the dose conversion factors used in surface workplaces considerably reduces the reliability of dose estimation in the case of mines. This paper surveyed the concentration of radon and its short-lived radon progeny and identified the unattached fraction of short-lived radon progeny. As well equilibrium factor during the month of August was calculated simultaneously at two extraction faces in a manganese ore mine. During working hours the average radon concentrations were 220 Bq m(-3) and 530 Bq m(-3) at Faces 1 and 2; the average short-lived progeny concentration was 90 Bq m(-3) and 190 Bq m(-3), the average equilibrium factors were 0.46 and 0.36, and the average unattached fractions were 0.21 and 0.17, respectively. The calculated dose conversion factor was between 9 and 27 mSv WLM(-1), but higher values could also be possible.
Subject(s)
Aerosols/analysis , Air Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Manganese , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radon Daughters/analysis , Air Pollutants, Radioactive/chemistry , Algorithms , Humans , Mining , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Occupational Exposure/classification , Radiation Dosage , Research DesignABSTRACT
Different radon measurement methods were applied in the old and new buildings of the Turkish bath of Eger, Hungary, in order to elaborate a radon measurement protocol. Besides, measurements were also made concerning the radon and thoron short-lived decay products, gamma dose from external sources and water radon. The most accurate results for dose estimation were provided by the application of personal radon meters. Estimated annual effective doses from radon and its short-lived decay products in the old and new buildings, using 0.2 and 0.1 measured equilibrium factors, were 0.83 and 0.17 mSv, respectively. The effective dose from thoron short-lived decay products was only 5 % of these values. The respective external gamma radiation effective doses were 0.19 and 0.12 mSv y(-1). Effective dose from the consumption of tap water containing radon was 0.05 mSv y(-1), while in the case of spring water, it was 0.14 mSv y(-1).
Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Radon Daughters/analysis , Radon/analysis , Housing , Humans , Hungary , SeasonsABSTRACT
Theoretically, the human body absorbs radon through the lungs and the skin and excretes it through the lungs and the excretory organs during radon bath therapy. To check this theory, the radon concentrations in urine samples were compared before and after radon bath therapy. During the therapy, the geometric mean (GM) and the geometric standard deviation of the radon concentration in air and in the bath water were 979 Bq m(-3), 1.58 and 73.6 Bq dm(-3), 1.1, respectively. Since radon was detected in each urine sample (GM around 3.0 Bq dm(-3)), urinary excretion of radon was confirmed. The results of this study can neither reject nor confirm the hypothesis of radon absorption through the skin. A 15 times higher increment of inhaled radon level did not cause significant changes in radon of urine samples.
Subject(s)
Balneology , Lung/radiation effects , Radon/therapeutic use , Radon/urine , Skin/radiation effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Monitoring , Young AdultABSTRACT
Several researchers have examined and achieved favourable results in connection with the building industry's use of red mud extracted in large quantities from the processing of bauxite. These days more and more precedence is being given to limiting the radiological dose to the population. In this study carried out in Hungary, the use of red mud, bauxite, and clay additives recommended for the production of special cements, were examined from a radiological aspect. (226)Ra and (232)Th activity concentrations measured in Hungarian bauxite, red mud and clay samples were significantly similar with the levels for such raw materials mentioned in international literature. Taking radiation protection aspects into consideration, none of these products can be directly used for building construction. Taking Hungarian and international values into consideration, a small amount of red mud, not exceeding 15% could be used for brick production, for example as a colouring material. However, beyond this amount the standards for building materials would not be met. For the production of cements an even stricter limit needs to be determined when both bauxite and red mud are used.