Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Publication year range
1.
Rev Neurol ; 79(4): 99-105, 2024 Aug 16.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39078029

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The objective of treatment of complex regional pain syndrome is to relieve pain and restore function in the affected limb. The aim of this study is to evaluate spinal cord stimulation as a therapy for patients diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome, for whom adequate pain control could not be achieved with other previous treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from 2018 to 2020. We included patients diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome refractory to other treatments or techniques, classified by demographic data. Efficacy, functionality and opioid dependence in each patient were subsequently monitored for one year. RESULTS: Seven of the 13 patients (53.84%) included in the study achieved significant pain relief with spinal cord stimulation. Improvements in pain and functionality were obtained, and both were statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index/Neck Disability Index (ODI/NDI) was significantly associated with body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.011) and was lower as BMI increased. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that spinal cord stimulation is an effective therapeutic option for patients with CRPS refractory to other treatments. BMI and ODI/NDI also showed a significant correlation.


TITLE: Estimulación medular en el síndrome de dolor regional complejo refractario. Un estudio prospectivo.Introducción y objetivos. En el tratamiento del síndrome de dolor regional complejo se pretende aliviar el dolor y restaurar la función de la extremidad afectada. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la estimulación de la médula espinal como terapia para pacientes a quienes se les diagnosticó síndrome de dolor regional complejo, en los que no se ha podido conseguir un control adecuado del dolor con otros tratamientos previos. Pacientes y métodos. Se realizó un estudio prospectivo de 2018 a 2020. Se incluyó a pacientes diagnosticados de síndrome de dolor regional complejo refractario a otros tratamientos o técnicas, clasificados por datos demográficos. Posteriormente, se hizo seguimiento de la eficacia, la funcionalidad y la dependencia de opioides de cada paciente durante un año. Resultados. Siete de los 13 (53,84%) pacientes incluidos en el estudio consiguieron un alivio significativo de su dolor con la estimulación medular. Se obtuvo mejoría del dolor y de la funcionalidad, y ambas fueron estadísticamente significativas (p < 0,001 y p = 0,003, respectivamente). La mejoría en el Oswestry Disability Index/Neck Disability Index (ODI/NDI) se asoció significativamente con el índice de masa corporal (IMC) (p = 0,011) y fue menor cuanto mayor era el IMC. Conclusiones. Los resultados sugieren que la estimulación de la médula espinal es una opción terapéutica eficaz para pacientes con SDRC refractario a otros tratamientos. Además, el IMC y el ODI/NDI mostraron una correlación significativa.


Subject(s)
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Humans , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Prospective Studies , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/therapy , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Aged
2.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 124(4): 275-81, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21198450

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES - Determine whether bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation (STN-DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with an increase in neuropeptide Y (NPY) and/or resistance to inhibition by leptin in relation to post-surgery weight gain. MATERIALS AND METHODS - This prospective study included 20 patients who underwent bilateral STN-DBS and 17 who refused surgery. Data were obtained at baseline, 3 and 6 months on neurological and nutritional status, including determination of body mass index (BMI) and serum NPY and leptin levels. RESULTS - NPY and leptin levels changed over time, with a distinct pattern. The BMI increase at 6 months was greater in the surgical group (5.5 ± 6.3% vs 0.5 ± 3.5%; P = 0.035). Medical group exhibited a reduction in leptin level (-2.0 ± 4.3 ng/ml) and a consequent increase in NPY level (72.4 ± 58.7 pmol/ml). However, STN-DBS patients showed an increase in leptin (3.1 ± 5.0 ng/ml; P = 0.001 vs medical group) and also in NPY (12.1 ± 53.6 pmol/ml; P = 0.022 vs medical group) levels, which suggests resistance to inhibition by leptin. Rise in NPY level correlated with higher stimulation voltages. CONCLUSIONS - Bilateral STN-DBS causes disruption of the melanocortin system, probably related to diffusion of the electric current to the hypothalamus. This mechanism may in part explain the weight gain of patients with PD after surgery.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/adverse effects , Leptin/blood , Neuropeptide Y/blood , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Weight Gain/physiology , Aged , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Male , Melanocortins/metabolism , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Rev Neurol ; 41(4): 193-7, 2005.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16075395

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of stimulating the subthalamic nucleus (DBS-STN) in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) largely depends on the correct placement of the electrodes. Since the sensory-motor region of the STN lies beside the internal capsule (IC), we believe that the motor effectiveness of DBS-STN could be related to the stimulation threshold in which IC signs appear (IC threshold). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An examination of 17 consecutive patients with advanced PD who had been submitted to bilateral DBS-STN (one case was unilateral) was carried out to determine the motor improvement on each side of the body (n = 33) and the energy consumption one year after surgery according to the IC threshold obtained during the programming. RESULTS: A 45% improvement was observed in the UPDRS III in off and there was a 24% reduction in the equivalent dose of levodopa with bilateral DBS-STN. When the electrodes were considered, there was a statistically significant improvement that depended on the IC threshold. Energy consumption differed significantly between electrodes with an IC threshold of 3-7 V (1.5 +/- 1.2 microW) and those with an IC threshold > 7 V (8.3 +/- 9.4 microW). CONCLUSIONS: During the stimulation phase and following the correct location of the STN, which was achieved by neurophysiological recording, the IC threshold has prognostic implications in medium-long term motor effectiveness and in the consumption of the battery in the generator.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Electrodes, Implanted , Female , Humans , Internal Capsule/physiology , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL