"Integrated behavioral health plus": The best of the worlds of collaborative care management, primary care behavioral health, and primary care.

INTRODUCTION: Discussions comparing the components and virtues of models of integrated behavioral health (IBH), that is, collaborative care management and primary care behavioral health, have been ongoing. In this conceptual article, we recommend shifting the focus to a broader set of components we have found essential to serve the needs of our patients, and hopefully the broader aims of dissemination and implementation of IBH. METHOD: We detail our 20-year experience including the personnel, program components, challenges, successes, and plans for the future that will meet our patients' behavioral health needs and serve primary care. RESULTS: We compare our "IBH Plus" approach using the central tenets of primary care known as the "six Cs" (6Cs) to two dominant models, illustrating differences and similarities among them. The "6Cs" are first contact/accessibility, continuity, comprehensiveness, coordination, context-based, and accountability. We detail how each of these "6Cs" guides the structure and functioning of IBH Plus in the team-based patient-centered medical home setting. DISCUSSION: We believe IBH Plus more clearly relates to and supports the rest of the primary care transformation movement while integrating components of the most popular models of IBH and may support greater implementation of IBH. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Acupuncture in the emergency department for pain management: A BraveNet multi-center feasibility study.

PURPOSE: Pain accounts for up to 78% of emergency department (ED) patient visits and opioids remain a primary method of treatment despite risks of addiction and adverse effects. While prior acupuncture studies are promising as an alternative opioid-sparing approach to pain reduction, successful conduct of a multi-center pilot study is needed to prepare for a future definitive randomized control trial (RCT). METHODS: Acupuncture in the Emergency Department for Pain Management (ACUITY) is funded by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. The objectives are to: conduct a multi-center feasibility RCT, examine feasibility of data collection, develop/deploy a manualized acupuncture intervention and assess feasibility/implementation (barrier/facilitators) in 3 EDs affiliated with the BraveNet Practice Based Research Network.Adults presenting to a recruiting ED with acute non-emergent pain (e.g., musculoskeletal, back, pelvic, noncardiac chest, abdominal, flank or head) of ≥4 on a 0-10-point Numeric Rating Scale will be eligible. ED participants (n = 165) will be equally randomized to Acupuncture or Usual Care.At pre-, post-, and discharge time-points, patients will self-assess pain and anxiety using the Numeric Rating Scale. Pain, anxiety, post-ED opioid use and adverse events will be assessed at 1 and 4 weeks. Opioid utilization in the ED and discharge prescriptions will be extracted from patients' electronic medical records.Acupuncture recipients will asked to participate in a brief qualitative interview about 3 weeks after their discharge. ED providers and staff will also be interviewed about their general perspectives/experiences related to acupuncture in the ED and implementation of acupuncture in ACUITY. RESULTS: Recruitment began on 5/3/21. As of 12/7/21: 84 patients have enrolled, the responsive acupuncture intervention has been developed and deployed, and 26 qualitative interviews have been conducted. CONCLUSION: Successful conduct of ACUITY will provide the necessary framework for conducting a future, multi-center, definitive RCT of acupuncture in the ED. CLINICAL TRIALSGOV: NCT04880733 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04880733.

Looking back and looking forward.

As the author's tenure as President of the Board of Collaborative Family Healthcare Association (CFHA) comes to a close it's time for some reflection on CFHA's past year and where the field of integrated behavioral health care is going. In summary, CFHA is growing, maturing and broadening its partners and its reach. CFHA's accomplishments are increasing, but there is an abundance of work still to do.

Observations from home: The patient centered medical home, integrated behavioral healthcare, teams and teamwork.

Medicine is no longer a single's game, it's a team sport. Long true in surgical specialties where the operative effort led by the chief surgeon is a carefully choreographed ballet of surgical assistants, surgical nurses, anesthesiologist, and other technical staff, now medical subspecialists are also assisted by teams composed of advanced practice nurses, physician assistants, social workers, and pharmacists. In primary care, the new vehicle for care teams is the Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH; Kellerman & Kirk, 2007), which is designed to serve 85%-90% of patients' needs with the broadest "basket of services" possible.

Integrated behavioral health: The train has left the station. Where to next?

It's time for the final push to make integrated behavioral health (IBH) the way primary care (and indeed all medical care) is practiced in the United States. Too many of our patients are still suffering from the fragmentation in our health system. Team-based care that includes integrated behavioral health care has the best chance of achieving the Triple Aims of a transformed and efficient health care delivery system that delivers better care, better health, and lower cost for all Americans. (PsycINFO Database Record

Effects of medical comorbidity on anxiety treatment outcomes in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of medical comorbidity on anxiety treatment outcomes. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 1004 primary care patients enrolled in a trial of a collaborative care intervention for anxiety. Linear-mixed models accounting for baseline characteristics were used to evaluate the effects of overall medical comorbidity (two or more chronic medical conditions [CMCs] versus fewer than two CMCs) and specific CMCs (migraine, asthma, and gastrointestinal disease) on anxiety treatment outcomes at 6, 12, and 18 months. RESULTS: At baseline, patients with two or more CMCs (n = 582; 58.0%) reported more severe anxiety symptoms (10.5 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 10.1-10.9] versus 9.5 [95% CI = 9.0-10.0], p = .003) and anxiety-related disability (17.6 [95% CI = 17.0-18.2] versus 16.0 [95% CI = 15.3-16.7], p = .001). However, their clinical improvement was comparable to that of patients with one or zero CMCs (predicted change in anxiety symptoms = -3.9 versus -4.1 at 6 months, -4.6 versus -4.4 at 12 months, -4.9 versus -5.0 at 18 months; predicted change in anxiety-related disability = -6.4 versus -6.9 at 6 months, -6.9 versus -7.3 at 12 months, -7.3 versus -7.5 at 18 months). The only specific CMC with a detrimental effect was migraine, which was associated with less improvement in anxiety symptoms at 18 months (predicted change = -4.1 versus -5.3). CONCLUSIONS: Effectiveness of the anxiety intervention was not significantly affected by the presence of multiple CMCs; however, patients with migraine displayed less improvement at long-term follow-up. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.com Identifier: NCT00347269.

Establishing the Collaborative Care Research Network (CCRN): a description of initial participating sites.

Collaborative care has increased dramatically in the past decade, yet the variability in collaborative strategies and the diversity of settings in which collaboration is being implemented make it difficult to assess quality and outcomes. Therefore, three aims were addressed in the current study: (a) describe and characterize the sites in the Collaborative Care Research Network (CCRN), (b) identify factors associated with practices' self-identified collaborative care model (e.g., coordinated, integrated, care management), and (c) identify limitations of available survey data elements so as to propose additional elements for future surveys. Initial (CCRN) sites completed surveys regarding several organizational factors (e.g., setting type, size of patient population, number of behavioral health providers). Results from 39 sites showed significant heterogeneity in self-identified type of collaborative care model practiced (e.g., integrated care, coordinated care), type of practice setting (e.g., academic, federally qualified health center, military), size of clinic, and ratio of behavioral health providers to medical providers. This diversity in network site characteristics can provide a rich platform to address a number of questions regarding the current practice of collaborative care. Recommendations are made to improve future surveys to better understand elements of the patient-centered medical home and the role it may play in outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).