Role of RAS inhibition in the regulation of Cu/Zn-SOD in the cardiac and peripheral arterial beds in humans.

Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) improves hemodynamics and may ameliorate oxidative stress in heart failure (HF). Through activation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase, angiotensin II induces superoxide, which is primarily cleared by cytosolic copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn-SOD). We examined the interdependency of hemodynamics and levels of Cu/Zn-SOD and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) in HF patients, using a randomized, double-blinded, crossover design to compare (i) the outcomes of single-agent therapy with either benazepril or valsartan alone vs. the combination thereof and (ii) the outcome of single-agent treatment with benazepril vs. single-agent treatment with valsartan. After each treatment, arterial (ART) and coronary sinus (CS) blood samples were collected. Cu/Zn-SOD and oxLDL levels were higher in CS samples than in ART samples. Furthermore, patients under combined treatment exhibited the highest CS levels of Cu/Zn-SOD, whereas there was no significant difference between the groups on either benazepril or valsartan alone. This finding suggests an augmentation of the cardiac antioxidative potential under more complete RAS inhibition. Cu/Zn-SOD and oxLDL levels correlated with measures of afterload rather than preload, which in turn suggests a beneficial effect of afterload reduction on oxidative stress in HF.

Acute and 3-month treatment effects of candesartan cilexetil on hemodynamics, neurohormones, and clinical symptoms in patients with congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the short-term and long-term effects of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist candesartan cilexetil on hemodynamics, neurohormones, and clinical symptoms in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study, 218 patients with CHF (New York Heart Association class II or III) with impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction < or =40%) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure > or =13 mm Hg were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of treatment with placebo (n = 44) or candesartan cilexetil (2 mg [n = 45], 4 mg [n = 46], 8 mg [n = 39], or 16 mg [n = 44]) once daily after a 2-week placebo run-in period. Hemodynamic measurements were performed by right heart catheterization over a 24-hour period after single (day 1) and repeated (3-month) treatment with the study drug. RESULTS: On regression analysis of the time-response curves, single and multiple doses of candesartan cilexetil produced sustained, significant, and dose-dependent reductions in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (short-term effect P =.036, long-term effect P =.035) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (short-term effect P =.031, long-term effect P =.042). Systemic vascular resistance showed a trend toward decreasing with dose on short-term and long-term treatments. No consistent changes were seen in cardiac index. Compensatory increases in plasma renin activity and angiotensin II levels with decreases in aldosterone and atrial natriuretic peptide were dose-dependent and significant. Candesartan cilexetil improved clinical symptoms, stabilized patient New York Heart Association status compared with placebo, and was judged to be an efficacious treatment by the investigators. More patients receiving placebo stopped the trial prematurely because of an adverse event than in any candesartan cilexetil group, and there was no excess of deaths in any treatment group. Candesartan was safe and well tolerated at all dosages. CONCLUSIONS: Candesartan cilexetil demonstrated significant short-term and long-term improvements in hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and symptomatic status and was well tolerated in patients with CHF.

[Medicamentous management of acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation]. / Medikamentöses Management des akuten Koronarsyndroms ohne ST-Hebung.

Recent advances in the recognition and the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have lead to an improvement in patient survival and definition of newer guidelines. Current strategies for the treatment of patients with non-ST-elevation ACS include anti-ischemic and antiplatelet medications. While aspirin, beta-blockers, heparin and nitrates are still common practice, the advent of newer anticoagulants (low molecular weight heparins) and antiplatelet agents (glycoprotein llb/IIIa inhibitors and thienopyridines like ticlopidin and clopidogrel) and, possibly, aggressive lipid lowering with statins have added significant benefits to the treatment options with a better prognosis for these patients. Moreover, aggressive medical strategies seem to be justified not only in high-risk patients but also in those that undergo an early invasive approach.

Sudden cardiac death after coronary artery bypass grafting is not predicted by signal-averaged ECG.

BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major cause of death despite successful revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease. The signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) is a sensitive predictor of SCD and could be used in the screening strategy to select patients for prophylactic cardioverter implantation. METHODS: The SAECG was recorded in 561 patients (mean age: 60 +/- 8.8 years) within 10 days of coronary artery bypass grafting. Signal-averaged ECG was performed with a bandpass filtering of 40 to 250 Hz for more than 250 beats until a noise level of 0.6 microV was achieved. All patients were followed for 5.5 +/- 1.2 years after the procedure. RESULTS: Preoperative angiographic ejection fraction was at least 60% in 393 patients (72%), 40% to 60% in 126 patients (23%), and 40% or less in 28 patients (5%). There were 34 deaths, 10 of which were SCD. Late potentials were found in a total of 150 patients (27%) and were equally frequent preoperatively and postoperatively and among patients with (30%) and without (27%) SCD. The only predictors for overall mortality were age and a reduced ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Signal-averaged ECG did not predict prognosis in low-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

The dual endothelin receptor antagonist tezosentan acutely improves hemodynamic parameters in patients with advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Endothelin-1, a potent vasoconstrictor, is elevated in congestive heart failure and is postulated to play a major role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Endothelin receptor antagonism may be a specific therapeutic approach. This study was designed to determine the effective dosage range, hemodynamic effects, and tolerability of tezosentan, an intravenous dual endothelin receptor antagonist, in patients with advanced heart failure. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial enrolled 38 patients with symptomatic stable heart failure (New York Heart Association class III, left ventricular ejection fraction <35%) undergoing right heart catheterization. Patients were equally randomized to a 4-hour intravenous infusion of placebo or tezosentan in ascending doses (5, 20, 50, and 100 mg over 1 hour each). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics were withheld 24hours before the study. Hemodynamics were measured during and for 4 hours after the infusion. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, tezosentan treatment produced a significant increase in cardiac index (treatment difference 0.59 L/min/m(2), P =.0001) and decreases in pulmonary and systemic vascular resistances (P

Tezosentan (an intravenous endothelin receptor A/B antagonist) reduces peripheral resistance and increases cardiac power therefore preventing a steep decrease in blood pressure in patients with congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of tezosentan (an intravenous endothelin-1 receptor antagonist) on vascular resistance and cardiac function and determined the dose response in patients with stable congestive heart failure (CHF) due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. METHODS: In a double-blind fashion, tezosentan or placebo were administered in ascending doses (5, 20, 50, 100 mg h(-1)) to 38 CHF (NYHA class III) patients with ejection fraction or=15 mmHg. Systemic vascular resistance index (SVRi) was estimated as mean arterial blood pressure [(MAP-right atrial pressure)/cardiac index (CI)]. Cardiac function was assessed as cardiac power index (Cpi), calculated as pressure x flow (MAP x CI), where MAP represents pressure and CI represents cardiovascular flow. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Compared to the placebo, tezosentan induced a dose-dependent decrease in SVRi (-32%), an increase in Cpi (+20%) and a small decrease in MAP (-9%). By contrast, patients treated with nitrate vasodilators or nesiritide (a natriuretic peptide) showed a decrease in SVRi not accompanied by a significant increase in Cpi leading to a steep decrease in MAP. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Cpi in the assessment of the hemodynamic effects of tezosentan, provides a useful alternative characterization of the complex influences of vasodilators on cardiac function in patients with CHF.

Hemodynamic effects of bosentan in patients with chronic heart failure.

A role of the potent and long-acting vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin-1 and the pathophysiology of chronic human heart failure has been postulated based upon indirect evidence such as elevated plasma endothelin-1 levels and their with the degree of hemodynamic impairment. The advent of specific of endothelin-1 receptor antagonists has provided the opportunity not only to directly evaluate its pathophysiological role but also to assess its potential role as a new approach to heart failure therapy. This brief review summarizes the evidence linking endothelin-1 to the pathophysiology of chronic heart failure and the clinical results obtained in patients during acute, intravenous and more prolonged, oral administration with bosentan, a mixed ET(A)/ET(B)-receptor antagonist. Bosentan acutely and during short-term oral therapy markedly improved hemodynamics in patients in addition to standard heart failure therapy, including an ACE-inhibitor. These effects were associated with a reduced responsiveness of the renin-angiotensin system to diuretic therapy and reduced basal plasma aldosterone levels. Although the hemodynamic and neurohumoral profile of short-term bosentan therapy looks promising for the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure appropriate trials will have to be performed to document clinical benefit during long-term therapy. Finally, the question remains open whether mixed endothelin-1 receptor antagonists like bosentan will have similar effects as compared to antagonists which block the ET(A) receptor only.

The therapeutic potential of endothelin receptor antagonists in cardiovascular disease.

Endothelin (ET)-1, a 21-amino acid peptide, is the predominant isoform of the endothelin peptide family. ET-1 is ubiquitously expressed and stimulates vasoconstriction and cell proliferation. Enzymes such as endothelin converting enzymes (ECE), chymases, and non-ECE metalloproteinases contribute to the synthesis of ET-1, which is regulated in an autocrine fashion in vascular and nonvascular cells. Endothelin ET(A) receptors mediate vasoconstriction and cell proliferation, whereas ET(B) receptors are involved in the clearance of ET-1, inhibition of endothelial apoptosis, release of nitric oxide and prostacyclin, and inhibition of ECE-1 expression. Most cardiovascular diseases, such as arterial hypertension, atherosclerosis, restenosis, heart failure, idiopathic cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, and renal failure are associated with local activation of the endothelin system. Experimental studies and first clinical trials suggest that ET-1 is importantly involved in the functional and structural changes in the cardiovascular system, and that many of the actions of ET-1 are mediated through pressure-independent mechanisms. Endothelin antagonists promise to be successful as a new class of drugs for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Therapeutic benefits of increasing natriuretic peptide levels.

Natriuretic peptides play an important role in water and salt homeostasis and in the regulation of the cardiovascular system. In recent years, exogenous administration of natriuretic peptides has primarily been used to improve our understanding of the role of natriuretic peptides. Also, it became evident that natriuretic peptides may be used therapeutically. Because of their peptide character, they cannot be administered orally and, therefore, may be used for short-term intravenous therapy only. In recent years, inhibitors of neutral endopeptidase, which degrades natriuretic peptides to inactive metabolites, have been investigated. This review focuses on the potential benefits of increasing natriuretic peptide levels, either through exogenous administration or inhibiting the degradation of endogenous natriuretic peptides.

Post-prandial lipaemia and endothelial function among healthy men.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that elevated post-prandial lipoproteins adversely affect progression and outcome of cardiovascular disease. Traditional risk factors are associated with impaired endothelium-mediated vasodilatation. However, studies regarding the relationship between post-prandial lipaemia and endothelial function are divergent. METHODS: Twelve healthy non-smokers were included in this study. Before and after intake of a lipid cocktail rich in dairy fat, we tested endothelial-dependent (acetylcholine 0.8-160 mg/min per 100 ml forearm tissue) and -independent (sodium nitroprussid 0.6 microgram/min) vascular function in the forearm vascular bed with plethysmography. Moreover, we tested the effect of 1-NMMA, a competitive inhibitor of the NO synthetase, on base-line flow. Extent of post-prandial lipaemia was assessed with the increases in triglycerides and retinyl-palmitate, a marker for intestinally derived lipoproteins. RESULTS: Baseline flow was higher after the test meal than during fasting (preprandial 6.5 +/- 0.5 ml/min* 100 ml tissue, post-prandial 8.0 +/- 0.5, p = 0.03), but similar after 1-NMMA (p = 0.85). Before and after intake of the test meal, there was no significant difference in acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent vasodilatation (repeated measurement ANOVA, p = 0.22). At the highest acetylcholine dose, forearm flow was very similar (fasting 18.4 +/- 1.9, post-prandial 17.9 +/- 1.9, p = 0.75). At maximum acetylcholine dose, there was a weak inverse but non-significant correlation between forearm flow and post-prandial triglyceridaemia (r = -0.38, p = 0.23) and intestinally derived lipoproteins (chylomicrons r = -0.29, p = 0.35, chylomicron remnants r = -0.15, p = 0.63). However, at the lowest acetylcholine dose there was a suggestion for a positive correlation between change in flow and post-prandial lipaemia (triglyceridaemia, r = 0.53, p = 0.07; chylomicrons, r = 0.41, p = 0.18 and remnants, r = 0.51, p = 0.09). Endothelium-independent vasodilatation in response to sodium nitroprusside did not significantly change (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that among healthy men post-prandial lipaemia is not associated with a notable impairment of endothelium-mediated vascular function in forearm resistance vessels.

Isradipine improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in normotensive coronary artery disease patients with hypercholesterolemia.

OBJECTIVE: The dihydropyridine calcium antagonist isradipine has anti-atherosclerotic effects in animals and improves endothelium-mediated nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vasodilation in vitro. As improved endothelial function may be beneficial we investigated its effects in patients with a high likelihood of endothelial dysfunction. DESIGN: Thirty patients (two female, age 55.4 +/- 10.5 years) with known coronary artery disease and elevated (> 6 mmol/l) total cholesterol (cholesterol: mean 6.7 +/- 0.78 mmol/l) or a cholesterol/high density lipoproteins (HDL) ratio of > 5 not on lipid lowering therapy, participated in the study. Endothelial vasodilator function was assessed before and after double-blind, randomized administration of isradipine 5 mg/day or placebo for 3 months. METHODS: Endothelial function was assessed as forearm blood flow (FBF, venous occlusion plethysmography) responses to graded brachial artery infusions of acetylcholine (Ach), to the NO-synthase blocker NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) and to the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (SNP). Blood pressure was measured either directly from the brachial arterial or by sphygmomanometer during clinic visits. RESULTS: Blood pressure was unchanged in both groups after 3 months (isradipine: 88.8 versus 92.1 mmHg; placebo: 81.0 versus 82.5 mmHg; NS) but cholesterol levels decreased similarly in both groups (isradipine: 6.7 versus 6.1 mmol/l, NS; placebo: 6.6 versus 5.9 mmol/l, P< 0.05). The vasodilator response to SNP and the decrease in FBF in response to blockade of NO synthesis by L-NMMA were unchanged in both groups. However, isradipine, but not placebo, enhanced the NO-dependent vasodilator response to Ach (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Isradipine improves acetylcholine-mediated vasodilation in hypercholesterolemic patients independent of changes in lipids or blood pressure.

The role of endothelin receptor antagonists in the treatment of chronic heart failure.

A role of the potent and long-acting vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin-1 in the pathophysiology of chronic human heart failure has been postulated based on indirect evidence such as elevated plasma endothelin-1 levels, their correlation with the degree of hemodynamic impairment, and their predictive value for patient survival. The advent of specific of endothelin-1 receptor antagonists has provided the opportunity to directly evaluate its pathophysiologic role and assess its potential role as a new approach to heart failure therapy. This review summarizes the evidence linking endothelin-1 to the pathophysiology of chronic heart failure, and analyzes the clinical results obtained thus far in patients during acute intravenous, and more prolonged, oral administration of endothelin-1-receptor antagonists.

Rationale and perspective of endothelin-1 antagonism in acute heart failure.

A role of the potent and long-acting vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin (ET)- I in the pathophysiology of chronic human heart failure has been postulated, based upon indirect evidence such as elevated plasma ET-1 levels and their relationship to the degree of haemodynamic impairment. Acute heart failure shares many features of chronic heart failure, albeit in an exaggerated fashion. As both the mixed ETA/ETB-receptor antagonist bosentan and the selective ETA receptor antagonist BQ 123 acutely improved the haemodynamics of chronic heart failure patients, there seems to be good reason to believe that ET-1 receptor antagonism may also be of benefit in the setting of acute heart failure. However, appropriate trials will have to be performed to document the clinical benefit of such an approach. Finally, the question remains open as to whether mixed ET-1 receptor antagonists like bosentan will prove better, worse or equal to antagonists that block the ETA, receptor only.

Endothelin and endothelin receptor antagonism in heart failure.

Endothelin (ET)-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor with growth promoting and mitogenic properties associated with various cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and has been found to be an important protagonist in congestive heart failure (CHF). The introduction of ET-1 receptor antagonists into the arena of clinical research has amplified our understanding of the ET system: the first human trials with acute and chronic inhibition of the ET system have shown promising results and confirm the findings from experimental models. The availability of oral compounds such as bosentan has raised the hope that these novel drugs might become a new therapeutic class of agents for the treatment of CVD and, in particular, of CHF. The question, however, remains whether the beneficial effects observed so far in patients with CHF go beyond simple hemodynamic improvements and whether these compounds improve long-term survival in these patients.

Systemic, pulmonary, and renal hemodynamic effects of endothelin ET(A/B)-receptor blockade in patients with maintained left ventricular function.

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) regulates vascular tone in congestive heart failure and modulates renal function. Its role in patients with normal left ventricular (LV) function and its renal effects are unclear. Cardiac and renal hemodynamics were studied in 24 patients with normal LV function and coronary arteries after single-dose, double-blind, randomized administration of TAK-044 (25, 50, or 100 mg, i.v.), an ET(A/B)-receptor antagonist, or placebo. Hemodynamics were monitored using Swan-Ganz and arterial catheters, and ET levels were measured. Renal function was assessed by clearance techniques. In the absence of a dose-response relation, TAK-044 patients were analyzed as a single group. Most hemodynamic effects occurred during the first 4 h. TAK-044 reduced mean arterial (-9.3 mm Hg, p < 0.001), pulmonary (-1.8 mm Hg, p = 0.01), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (-1.6 mm Hg, p < 0.001) between 30 min and 4 h. Mean reduction in systemic vascular resistance was 279 dyne/s/cm2 (p < 0.001), whereas heart rate increased 6.1 beats/min (p < 0.001) and cardiac index by 0.37 L/m2 (p = 0.01). Stroke volume index, right atrial pressure, and pulmonary vascular resistance did not change. TAK-044 increased renal plasma flow in proportion to the increase in cardiac output (+119 ml/min, 4 h after TAK-044; p < 0.05) and ET-1 levels (2.5-fold; p < 0.05). No serious side effects were noted. In patients with normal cardiac function, ET-receptor blockade causes vasodilation and reduces systemic but not pulmonary vascular resistance and increases cardiac index and renal plasma flow.

Use of an emboli containment and retrieval system during percutaneous coronary angioplasty in native coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of distal embolisation during percutaneous coronary revascularisation may be necessary to reduce postinterventional morbidity and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: We employed a newly developed emboli containment and retrieval system in native coronary arteries during percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stenting in 39 selected patients (mean age 58.9 +/- 10.1 years, 11 females) presenting with acute (n = 22; 8 LAD, 3 LCX, 11 RCA), subacute (n = 7; 2 LAD, 2 LCX, 3 RCA) or chronic (n = 6; 2 LAD, 4 RCA) total or subtotal occlusion of an infarct-related vessel, or with severe stenosis and symptoms of unstable angina (n = 4; 2 LAD, 2 RCA). Protection device-assisted angioplasty with stent implantation was uneventful in all patients with good angiographic results and normal postprocedural flow. Intermittent aggravation of anginal pain during inflation of the occlusive balloon (from 2.5 to a maximum of 25 minutes cumulative inflation time) was observed in 19 of the 36 conscious patients (7 with acute, 7 with subacute and 3 with chronic occlusion, and 2 with unstable angina), but caused neither interruption of distal occlusion nor haemodynamic instability. In 31 patients the aspirates contained visible debris. Histological analysis showed particles up to 12 mm in size, consisting of necrotic core, inflammatory cells, cholesterol debris, and old and fresh thrombi. In 8 patients the aspirated particles were too small to allow microscopic diagnosis or debris was absent. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary report demonstrates the feasibility of using a protection device in native coronary arteries to prevent distal embolisation of particulate matter that is mobilised during percutaneous interventions. To the extent that this material contributes to the mechanisms of distal embolisation, noreflow and infarction, this device may help to reduce such complications. Appropriately designed trials are required to assess the clinical benefit of this system.

Prevention of osteoporosis in heart transplant recipients: a comparison of calcitriol with calcitonin and pamidronate.

Bone loss and osteoporotic fractures are common in cardiac transplant recipients. To compare two prophylactic medical regimens after heart transplantation, 26 consecutive heart transplant recipients were randomized to receive either continuous oral calcitriol (0.5 microg/day) combined with nasal salmon calcitonin (200 U/day) for the first 3 months (group A) or intermittent intravenous pamidronate (0.5 mg/kg body weight) every third month (group B). Bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical indices of bone turnover were measured at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after transplantation. The mean pretransplant BMD, measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was significantly lower in the patients compared with age-matched healthy controls. During the first year of treatment, rates of bone loss at the lumbar spine and femoral neck were slightly but significantly slower in the patients treated with pamidronate, but there was no longer a significant difference between the two groups after 18 months of heart transplantation. Irrespective of the mode of osteoporosis prevention, osteocalcin levels increased whereas urinary deoxypyridinoline decreased after transplantation, and significant bone loss was observed in both treatment groups. We found no relationship between initial BMD, markers of bone turnover, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, or cyclosporine levels and the rate of bone loss after cardiac transplantation. In summary, we found that the rapid and severe bone loss following heart transplantation could be attenuated by two preventive measures, pamidronate or calcitriol with calcitonin.