ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Only about 1 out of every 3 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values <55mg/dL in the first year. The present study aims to evaluate the impact of early intensive therapy on lipid control after an AMI. METHODS: An independent, prospective, pragmatic, controlled, randomized, open-label, evaluator-blinded clinical trial (PROBE design) will analyze the efficacy and safety of an oral lipid-lowering triple therapy: high-potency statin+bempedoic acid (BA) 180mg+ezetimibe (EZ) 10mg versus current European-based guidelines (high-potency statin±EZ 10mg), in AMI patients. LDL-C will be determined within the first 48hours. Patients with LDL-C ≥ 115mg/dL (without previous statin therapy), ≥ 100mg/dL (with previous low-potency or high-potency statin therapy at submaximal dose), or ≥ 70mg/dL (with previous high-potency statin therapy at high dose) will be randomly assigned 1:1 between 24 and 72hours post-AMI to the BA/EZ combination or to statin±EZ, without BA. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients reaching LDL-C <55mg/dL at 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: The results of this study will provide novel information for post-AMI LDL-C control by evaluating the usefulness of an early intensive lipid-lowering strategy based on triple oral therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Early intensive lipid-lowering triple oral therapy vs the treatment recommended by current clinical practice guidelines could facilitate the achievement of optimal LDL-C levels in the first 2 months after AMI (a high-risk period). IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2021-006550-31.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency , Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/complications , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Prostheses and Implants , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Prosthesis Design , Treatment Outcome , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgeryABSTRACT
Introduction: Introduction: the administration of enteral nutrition through a nasogastric tube can cause potentially serious complications. We present a case of esophageal obstruction due to an enteral nutrition bezoar. Case report: the 77-year-old patient was admitted to our center in the intensive care unit for COVID pneumonia. The patient received enteral nutrition through a nasogastric tube (NGT), presenting difficulty passing it after a month of follow-up. After removal of the tube and attached to it, an esophageal mold for enteral nutrition was extracted. Later, a solvent solution is administered through a new SNG and the formula is modified for a hydrolyzed one. Discussion: enteral nutrition bezoars are a rare but can be a life-threatening complication.
Introducción: Introducción: la administración de nutrición enteral por sonda nasogástrica puede presentar complicaciones potencialmente graves. Presentamos un caso de obstrucción esofágica por un bezoar de nutrición enteral. Caso clínico: el paciente de 77 años ingresó en nuestro centro en la unidad de cuidados intensivos por neumonía COVID. El paciente recibía nutrición enteral por sonda nasogástrica (SNG) presentando al mes del seguimiento dificultad para el paso de la misma. Tras retirada de la sonda y unida a ella se extrajo un molde esofágico de nutrición enteral. Posteriormente se administra a través de una nueva SNG una solución disolvente y se modifica la fórmula por una hidrolizada. Discusión: los bezoar de nutrición enteral son una complicación rara pero potencialmente mortal.
Subject(s)
Bezoars , Enteral Nutrition , Humans , Aged , Enteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Bezoars/complications , Bezoars/therapy , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Esophagus , HospitalizationABSTRACT
PURPOSE AND METHODS: Sarcomas of the sellar region are uncommon and unexpected tumors. Here, we review the cases reported in literature via a systematic search. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients, 58.5% male with mean age of 39.2 ± 17.2 years were included. Fifty-seven (62%) had soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and 35 (38%) bone sarcomas (BS). Sarcoma was a primary tumor in 66%, developed after radiotherapy in 31.9% and 7.4% were metastatic. Median time between radiotherapy and sarcoma development was 10.5 (11) years. Main presentation symptoms were visual disorders (87.9%), headache (61.5%) and III cranial nerve palsy (24.1%). After surgery, sarcoma persisted or recurred in 82.3% and overall mortality reported was 44.6% with 6.5 (14) months of median survival. Tumor appeared earlier in BS compared to STS (34.4 ± 15.1 vs. 42.6 ± 17.6 years), p = 0.034 and complete tumor resection was achieved more often (41.3% vs. 4.4%), p = < 0.001. Condrosarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma were more frequent subtypes among primary tumors while fibrosarcoma was among post-radiation sarcomas. Tumor size was larger in radiation associated sarcomas (mean maximum diameter 46.3 ± 9.3 vs. 29.1 ± 8.0 mm, p = 0.004) and persistency/recurrence was similar in both groups (70.1 vs. 73.3%, p = 0.259). CONCLUSION: Sarcomas appear as mass effect symptoms in the middle aged population, mainly as primary tumors, but one third is associated with radiotherapy. Surgery is commonly not curative, mortality rate is high and death ensues shortly after diagnosis.