An international survey to better understand the current incidence, severity, and management of VOD/SOS.

This international questionnaire survey aimed to explore the current incidence, diagnostic policies, management, and outcomes of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) among healthcare providers involved in the management of these patients. A questionnaire was e-mailed to practitioners with an interest in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Of the respondents, 144 of 215 (67.0%) felt that early detection or diagnosis of VOD/SOS was difficult. Regarding diagnostic criteria, 142 (66.1%) already declared using the 2023 EBMT refined criteria. Most respondents (163/215, 75.8%) found these recent refined EBMT criteria useful for diagnosis, and 193 (89.8%) found the severity criteria easy to use. The major risk factors identified for VOD/SOS were a second allo-HCT (41.4%), pre-existing liver disease (54.9%), and prior use of antibody-drug conjugates (49.8%). Preferences for starting VOD/SOS treatment varied, with 61 (28.4%) preferring initiating therapy at a mild stage, and 122 (56.7%) preferring the moderate stage. In summary, this survey provided valuable insight into the challenges and opportunities of the identification and management of VOD/SOS. By improving current knowledge and increasing collaboration among healthcare professionals, early detection, management, and clinical outcomes for patients with this potentially serious complication can also be improved.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in de novo core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: data from the EBMT.

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) represents 12-15% of all AML cases. Although CBF positivity infers a survival advantage, overall survival (OS) remains dismal. Treatment is with cytarabine/anthracycline-based chemotherapy induction followed by high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is reserved for relapse or for patients having not achieved MRD-negativity at high risk for relapse. The role of SCT in first complete remission (CR1) remains controversial and is considered in high risk conditions. In this retrospective, multi-national, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)-based study, we identified 1901 patients with de novo CBF-AML who received an allo-SCT or autologous transplantation (ASCT) in CR1. 65.5% harbored t(8;21) and 34.4% inv(16). In this group, the majority (77%) were treated with allo-SCT in CR1. In multivariate analysis, treatment with allo-SCT was an independent and significant, negative predictor of NRM and OS (HR 4.26, p < 0.0001 and HR 1.67, p = 0.003) and among patients treated with allo-SCT, those treated with MSD had the best outcomes, comparable to those treated with ASCT. There was no interaction between the type of transplant and MRD status at time of SCT. In both, MRD-negative and MRD-positive groups, NRM was worse in the allo-SCT group (MRD-: 12.9% vs 5.2%, p = 0.007; MRD+: 10.6% vs 0%, p = 0.004). We therefore demonstrated that consolidation in CR1 with allo-SCT results in worse outcomes than ASCT. Whether consolidation with ASCT yields better outcomes than chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy in combination with Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin is yet to be investigated.

Young (<35 years) haploidentical versus old (≥35 years) mismatched unrelated donors and vice versa for allogeneic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: a study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

We compared transplantation (HSCT) outcomes in AML patients undergoing HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in first complete remission from 1065 young (<35 years) haploidentical (Haplo) donors (yHaplo) vs. 147 old (≥35 years) mismatched unrelated donors (oMMUD) (first comparison) and from 271 young (<35 years) MMUD (yMMUD) vs. 1315 old (≥35 years) Haplo donors (oHaplo) (second comparison). Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) grades II-IV were significantly lower in the yHaplo vs. oMMUD group (HR = 0.62, p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in chronic GVHD, non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence, leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival. As for the second comparison, more patients in the oHaplo group had de novo AML, 86.6% vs. 81.9% in the yMMUD group (p = 0.044), while myeloablative conditioning was used more frequently in the yMMUD group, 53.3% vs. 46.8% in the oHaplo group (p = 0.049). aGVHD grades II-IV and NRM were significantly lower in the yMMUD vs. oHaplo group (HR = 0.69, p = 0.013 and HR = 0.60, p = 0.022). All other transplant outcomes did not differ. In conclusion, HSCT from young alternative donors (<35 years) results in a lower incidence of grades II-IV aGVHD. In addition, NRM is lower in HSCT from yMMUD compared to HSCT from oHaplo.

Trends in allogeneic transplantation for favorable risk acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: a longitudinal study of >15 years from the ALWP of the EBMT.

We assessed outcomes of allogeneic transplantation (HSCT) in favorable risk AML in CR1 over 3 time periods. 1850 patients were included, 2005 to 2009- 222, 2010 to 2014 -392, and 2015 to 2021-1236; 526 with t (8:21), 625 with inv (16), and 699 with NPM1mutFLT3WT. Patients transplanted in 2015-2021 were older (p < 0.0001) with more patients ≥60 years of age (p < 0.0001). The most frequent diagnosis in 2015-2021 was NPM1mutFLT3WT vs. t (8:21) in the 2 earlier periods, (p < 0001). Haploidentical transplants (Haplo) increased from 5.9% to 14.5% (p < 0.0001). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) was more frequent in 2015-2021 vs. the other 2 periods (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, incidence of total chronic GVHD was reduced in HSCTs performed ≥2015 vs. those performed in 2005-2009, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74 (95% CI 0.56-0.99, p = 0.046) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) improved for patients transplanted from 2010-2014 vs. those transplanted in 2005-2009, HR = 0.74 (95% CI 0.56-0.98, p = 0.037). Other HSCT outcomes did not differ with no improvement ≥2015. LFS, OS, and GRFS were inferior in patients with t (8:21) with HR = 1.32 (95% CI 1.03-1.68, p = 0.026), HR = 1.38 (95% CI 1.04-1.83, p = 0.027) and HR = 01.25 (95% CI 1.02-1.53, p = 0.035), respectively. In conclusion, this retrospective analysis of HSCT in patients with favorable risk AML, transplanted over 16 years showed an increased number of transplants in patients ≥60 years, from Haplo donors with PTCy. Most importantly, 3-year GRFS improved ≥2010 and total chronic GVHD reduced ≥2015, with no significant change in other HSCT outcomes.

The EBMT-ADWP and the CIBMTR.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has evolved over the last 25 years as a specific treatment of patients with severe neurologic autoimmune diseases (ADs), through eradication of the pathologic, immunologic memory, and profound immune "resetting." HSCT for ADs is recently facing a unique developmental phase across transplant centers. Data from patients undergoing HSCT and cellular therapies have been captured through the established major transplant registries, such as the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). The EBMT Autoimmune Diseases Working Party (ADWP) is central to bringing together HSCT and disease-specialist communities. The AD section of the EBMT registry is the largest database of its kind worldwide, reporting more than 3700 transplants. Multiple sclerosis (MS) covers approximately 50% of transplants in AD, HSCT being an integral and standard-of-care part of the treatment algorithm. In the Americas, at least a subset of HSCT is reported to the CIBMTR, as reporting is voluntary. A total of 1400 recipients of autologous HSCT were reported and 1030 were performed for the treatment of neurologic conditions. MS accounts for 96% of all diagnoses among neurologic indications for HSCT. Although the activity of HSCT for MS is low in the United States in relation to its prevalence, the number of transplants has increased in recent years. In contrast, Mexico has reported a sharp increase in the number of these transplants. This chapter provides an overview of the EBMT and CIBMTR registries, then offers the current status and publication outputs in relation to neurologic AD.

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 mutations predict better outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a study of the ALWP of the EBMT.

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) mutations have uncertain prognostic implications in AML. We investigate the impact IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in AML patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in first complete remission (CR1). In total, 1515 adult patients were included, 15.91% (n = 241) carried IDH1 mutation (mIDH1), and 26.27% (n = 398) IDH2 mutation (mIDH2) and 57.82% (n = 876) had no-IDH mutation. NPM1 was frequently encountered with IDH1 mutation (no-IDH group, n = 217, 24.8%, mIDH1, n = 103, 42.7%, mIDH2, n = 111, 27.9%, p < 0.0001). At day 180, the cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was significantly lower in mIDH1 and mIDH2 compared to no-IDH groups (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66 (95% CI 0.47-0.91), p = 0.011; HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.56-0.96), p = 0.025, respectively). In the mIDH1 group, overall survival (OS) was improved compared to no-IDH (HR = 0.68 (95% CI 0.48-0.94), p = 0.021), whereas mIDH2 was associated with lower incidence of relapse (HR = 0.49 (95% CI 0.34-0.7), p < 0.001), improved leukemia free survival (LFS) (HR = 0.7 (95% CI 0.55-0.9), p = 0.004) and OS (HR = 0.74 (95% CI 0.56-0.97), p = 0.027). In the subgroup of NPM1 wild type, only IDH2 was associated with improved outcomes. In conclusion, our data suggest that IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are associated with improved outcomes in patients with AML undergoing allo-HCT in CR1.

Higher survival following transplantation with a mismatched unrelated donor with posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis than with double unit umbilical cord blood in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: A study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

The best donor option for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients lacking an HLA-matched donor has remained intensively debated. We herein report the results of a large retrospective registry study comparing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes between double-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation (dCBT, n = 209) versus 9/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor (UD) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (UD 9/10, n = 270) in patients with AML in first complete remission (CR1). Inclusion criteria consisted of adult patient, AML in CR1 at transplantation, either peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from UD 9/10 with PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis or dCBT without PTCy, transplantation between 2013 and 2021, and no in vivo T-cell depletion. The 180-day cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 29% in UD 9/10 versus 44% in dCBT recipients (p = .001). After adjustment for covariates, dCBT recipients had a higher non-relapse mortality (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.23-4.48; p = .01), comparable relapse incidence (HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.67-1.86; p = .66), lower leukemia-free survival (HR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.01-2.23; p = .047), and lower overall survival (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.08-2.55; p = .02) compared with patients receiving UD 9/10 HCT. In summary, our results suggest that transplantation outcomes are better with UD 9/10 with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis than with dCBT for AML patients in CR1. These data might support the use of UD 9/10 with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis over dCBT in AML patients lacking an HLA-matched donor.

Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine a combined with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for AML In first complete remission: a study from the acute leukemia working party (EBMT).

Choice of calcineurin inhibitor may impact the outcome of patients undergoing T-cell replete hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We retrospectively analyzed 2427 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission transplanted from a haploidentical (n = 1844) or unrelated donor (UD, n = 583) using cyclosporine A (CSA, 63%) or tacrolimus (TAC, 37%) and PT-Cy/MMF. In univariate analysis, CSA and TAC groups did not differ in 2-year leukemia-free or overall survival, cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse or non-relapse mortality. CI of severe grade III-IV acute GVHD was lower with TAC (6.6% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.02), without difference in grade II-IV acute GVHD or grade III-IV acute GVHD/severe chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival (GRFS). In multivariate analysis, TAC was associated with a lower risk of severe grade III-IV acute GVHD solely with haploidentical donors (HR 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.98], p = 0.04), but not UD (HR 0.49 [95% CI, 0.2-1.21], p = 0.12). There was no significant difference for chronic GVHD. In conclusion, PT-Cy/MMF-based GVHD prophylaxis resulted in favorable OS and GRFS, irrespective of the CNI added. In haploidentical HCT, TAC seemed to prevent severe acute GVHD more effectively than CSA without impact on other outcome parameters.

Impact of the Type of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (imatinib or dasatinib) Used Before allo-HCT on Outcome of Patients with Philadelphia-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. A Study on Behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT.

The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) during induction and consolidation, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), is a standard of care for patients with Philadelphia (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The goal of this study was to compare results of allo-HCT according to the type of TKI used pre-transplant, either imatinib, dasatinib or both. This was a retrospective, registry-based analysis including adult patients with Ph-positive ALL treated with allo-HCT between years 2010-2022. The analysis included 606 patients pre-treated with imatinib, 163 with dasatinib and 94 with both imatinib and dasatinib. Allo-HCTs were performed in first complete remission from either unrelated (56%), matched sibling (36%) or haploidentical donors (8%). Relapse incidence at 2 years was 26% in the imatinib group and 21% in the dasatinib group and 19% in the imatinib + dasatinib group (P = .06) while non-relapse mortality was 19%, 15%, and 23%, respectively (P = .37). No significant differences were found for leukemia-free survival (55% vs. 63% vs. 58%, P = .11) and overall survival (72% vs. 76% vs. 65%, P = .32). The incidence of grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD was comparable across study groups, while the incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was significantly increased for patients pre-treated with dasatinib alone (20%) than in the imatinib group (10%) or imatinib + dasatinib group (13%) (P = .002). On multivariate analysis a chance of GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS) was significantly decreased while the risk of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was increased for the dasatinib compared to imatinib group (hazard ratio, HR = 1.27, P = .048 and HR = 2.26, P = .0009, respectively). This study provides no evidence for the advantage of one TKI over another in terms of LFS and OS. However, the use of dasatinib is associated with increased risk of severe acute GVHD and decreased GRFS.

Older MRD vs. younger MUD in patients older than 50 years with AML in remission using post-transplant cyclophosphamide.

An increasing number of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are offered an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Normally, older patients have older matched related donors (MRD). Matched unrelated donors (MUD) are an important alternative, but it remains unclear whether a younger MUD is associated with better outcomes, especially in the context of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We compared outcomes of patients older than 50 years with AML in first complete remission (CR1) and receiving a first HSCT from a 10/10 MUD aged younger than 40 years to those receiving a graft from a MRD aged older than 50 years, using PTCy and with well-known transplant conditioning intensity (TCI) score. A total of 345 consecutive patients were included and classified according to TCI score as low, intermediate, or high. On multivariable analysis in the TCI-intermediate/high group, MUD was associated with better graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival, lower non-relapse mortality and lower relapse incidence. For patients receiving a TCI-low regimen, outcomes are independent on the type of donor. In patients with AML in CR1, older than 50 years and receiving a TCI-intermediate/high conditioning regimen using PTCy, a MUD younger than 40 years is preferable over a MRD older than 50 years.

Comparable relapse incidence after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus conventional anti-graft versus host disease prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: A study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

We compared relapse incidence (RI) post-unrelated transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) versus no PTCy graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, in 7049 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in remission, 707 with PTCy, and 6342 without (No PTCy). The patients in the PTCy group were younger, 52.7 versus 56.6 years (p < .001). There were more 9/10 donors in the PTCy group, 33.8% versus 16.4% (p < .001), and more received myeloablative conditioning, 61.7% versus 50.2% (p < .001). In the No PTCy group, 87.7% of patients received in vivo T-cell depletion. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were lower in the PTCy versus No PTCy group, 93.8% and 80.9% versus 97.6% and 92.6% (p < .001). RI was not significantly different in the PTCy versus the No PTCy group, hazard ratio (HR) of 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-1.37) (p = .31). Acute GVHD grades II-IV and III-IV, were significantly lower in the PTCy versus the No PTCy group, HR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.92, p = .007) and HR = 0.56 (95% CI 0.38-0.83, p = .004), as were total and extensive chronic GVHD, HRs of 0.5 (95% CI 0.41-0.62, p < .001) and HR = 0.31 (95% CI 0.22-0.42, p < .001). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was significantly lower with PTCy versus the No PTCy group, HR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.5-0.91, p = .007). GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was higher in the PTCy versus the No PTCy group, HR of 0.69 (95% CI 0.59-0.81, p = .001). Leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ between the groups. In summary, we observed comparable RI, OS, and LFS, significantly lower incidences of GVHD and NRM, and significantly higher GRFS in AML patients undergoing unrelated donor-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with PTCy versus No PTCy GVHD prophylaxis.

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide versus anti-thymocyte globulin versus combination for graft-versus-host disease prevention in haploidentical transplantation for adult acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Acute Leukemia Working Party.

BACKGROUND: The optimal choice for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) remains debatable. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) are two common strategies, but little is known about their combination. METHODS: Using the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry, the authors identified 3649 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who underwent haplo-SCT in complete remission between 2007 and 2021 at 260 EBMT-participating centers who received either PTCy (n = 2999), ATG (n = 358), or combination prophylaxis (n = 292). Cord blood transplants, combined bone marrow and peripheral grafts, and transplants with ex vivo graft manipulation were excluded. Median follow-up was 31.8 months. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, adjusting for patient age and performance status, disease status at transplant, cytogenetic risk, conditioning intensity, stem cell source, female-to-male graft, and donor and patient CMV status, we present the following. Compared to PTCy, ATG had a higher risk of nonrelapse mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; p = .003), worse leukemia-free survival (HR, 1.4; p = .002), overall survival (HR, 1.49; p = .0009), and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (HR, 1.29; p = .012). The combination of PTCy and ATG, however, led to significantly reduced rates of grade 2-4 (HR, 0.51; p = .0003) and grade 3-4 (HR, 0.5; p = .018) acute GVHD and did not affect any transplant outcomes compared to PTCy without ATG. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that ATG alone is a less effective prophylaxis strategy compared to PTCy, however, the combination of PTCy and ATG is superior to either monotherapy. They propose that this combination could be considered a potential new standard of care for GVHD prophylaxis in haplo-SCT for AML.

Younger unrelated donors may be preferable over HLA match in the PTCy era: a study from the ALWP of the EBMT.

ABSTRACT: There is a paucity of information on how to select the most appropriate unrelated donor (UD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of 10/10 matched UDs (MUDs) and 9/10 mismatched UDs (MMUDs) that may affect transplant outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first or second complete remission (CR1 or CR2). The primary end point was leukemia-free survival (LFS). Overall, 1011 patients were included with a median age of 54 years (range, 18-77). Donors had a median age of 29 years (range, 18-64); 304 (30%) were females, of which 150 (15% of the whole group) were donors to male recipients, and 621 (61%) were MUDs; 522 (52%) had negative cytomegalovirus (CMV-neg) serostatus, of which 189 (19%) were used for CMV-neg recipients. Donor age older than 30 years had a negative impact on relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.8), LFS (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.12-1.74), overall survival (HR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.85) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) free, relapse-free survival (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.56). In addition, CMV-neg donors for CMV-neg recipients were associated with improved LFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.99). The use of MMUD and female donors for male recipients did not significantly impact any transplant outcomes. For patients undergoing HSCT from a UD with PTCy for AML, donor age <30 years significantly improves survival. In this context, donor age might be prioritized over HLA match considerations. In addition, CMV-neg donors are preferable for CMV-neg recipients. However, further research is needed to validate and refine these recommendations.

Lower relapse incidence with haploidentical versus matched sibling or unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for core-binding factor AML patients in CR2: A study from the Global Committee and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is recommended for core-binding factor mutated (CBF) AML patients achieving second complete remission (CR2). However, approximately 20% of patients may relapse after transplant and donor preference remains unclear. We compared in this EBMT global multicenter registry-based analysis the allo-HCT outcomes using either haploidentical (Haplo), matched siblings donors (MSD), or 10/10 matched unrelated donors (MUD). Data from 865 de novo adult CBF AML patients in CR2 receiving allo-HCT in 227 EBMT centers from 2010 to 2022 were analyzed, in which 329 MSD, 374 MUD, and 162 Haplo-HCTs were included. For the entire cohort, 503 (58%) patients were inv(16)/CBFB-MYH11 and 362 patients (42%) were t(8;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1 AML. On multivariate analysis, Haplo-HCT was associated with a lower Relapse Incidence (RI) compared to either MSD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.97; p < .05) or MUD (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33-0.99, p < .05). No significant difference was observed among the 3 types of donors on LFS, OS and GRFS. CBF-AML with t(8;21) was associated with both higher RI (HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.3-2.47; p < .01) and higher NRM (HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.1-2.27; p < .01) than CBF-AML with inv(16), which led to worse LFS, OS and GRFS. To conclude, for CBF-AML patients in CR2, Haplo-HCTs were associated with a lower RI compared to MSD and MUD allo-HCTs. There was no difference on LFS, OS or GRFS. CBF AML patients with inv(16) had a better progonosis than those with t(8;21) after allo-HCT in CR2.

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide, calcineurin inhibitor, and mycophenolate mofetil compared to anti-thymocyte globulin, calcineurin inhibitor, and methotrexate combinations as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis post allogeneic stem cell transplantation from sibling and unrelated donors in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide plus calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)(tacrolimus or cyclosporine A) plus mycophenolate mofetil (PTCy/TAC or CSA/MMF) and anti-thymocyte globulin plus CNI (tacrolimus or cyclosporine A) plus methotrexate (ATG/TAC or CSA/MTX) are common graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimens. We compared the two regimens in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic transplantation from matched siblings or unrelated donors. 402 received PTCy/TAC or CSA/MMF and 5648 received ATG/TAC or CSA/MTX. Patients in the PTCy-based group were younger (48.7 vs. 51.5 years, p = 0.024) and there was a higher frequency of patient cytomegalovirus seropositivity and female donor to male patient combination in this group (77.8% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.009 and 18.4% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.029, respectively). More patients in the PTCy-based group received reduced-intensity conditioning (51.5% vs. 41%, p < 0.0001). No differences were observed in the incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV and III-IV (21.2% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.92 and 8.1% vs. 6%, p = 0.1) or 2-year total and extensive chronic GVHD (33.7% vs. 30%, p = 0.09 and 10.7% vs. 11.2%, p = 0.81) between the groups. In the multivariate analysis, all transplant outcomes did not differ between the groups. PTCy/CNI/MMF and ATG/CNI/MTX are alternative regimens for GVHD prophylaxis in AML patients.

Prognostic impact of number of induction courses to attain complete remission in patients with acute myeloid leukemia transplanted with either a matched sibling or human leucocyte antigen 10/10 or 9/10 unrelated donor: An Acute Leukemia Working Party European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation study.

INTRODUCTION: For the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) an allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) in first complete remission (CR) is preferred. However, whether the number of courses required to achieve CR has a prognostic impact is unclear. It is unknown which factors remain important in patients requiring more than one course of induction to attain remission. METHODS: This Acute Leukaemia Working Party study from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation identified adults who received an allograft in first CR from either a fully matched sibling or 10/10 or 9/10 human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matched unrelated donor (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, or HLA-DQ). Univariate and multivariate analyses were undertaken to identify the prognostic impact of one or two courses of induction to attain CR. RESULTS: A total of 4995 patients were included with 3839 (77%) patients attaining a CR following one course of induction chemotherapy (IND1), and 1116 patients requiring two courses (IND2) to attain CR. IND2 as compared to IND1 was a poor prognostic factor in a univariate analysis and remained so in a multivariate Cox model, resulting in an increased hazard ratio of relapse (1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.64; p = .0003) and of death (1.27; 95% CI, 1.09-1.47; p = .002). Adverse prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis of the outcomes of patients requiring IND2 included age, FLT3-ITD, adverse cytogenetics, and performance status. Pretransplant measurable residual disease retained a prognostic impact regardless of IND1 or IND2. CONCLUSION: Initial response to chemotherapy as determined by number of courses to attain CR, retained prognostic relevance even following SCT in CR.

Haploidentical transplantation in primary refractory/relapsed secondary vs de novo AML: from the ALWP/EBMT.

ABSTRACT: We compared the outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in 719 patients with primary refractory (PR) or first relapse (Rel) secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML; n = 129) vs those with de novo AML (n = 590), who received HSCT between 2010 and 2022. A higher percentage of patients with sAML vs de novo AML had PR disease (73.6% vs 58.6%; P = .002). In 81.4% of patients with sAML , the antecedent hematological disorder was myelodysplastic syndrome. Engraftment was 83.5% vs 88.4% in sAML and de novo AML, respectively (P = .13). In multivariate analysis, haplo-HSCT outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups: nonrelapse mortality hazard ratio (HR), 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.98; P = .083), relapse incidence HR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.4.7.-1.00; P = .051). The HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, and GVHD and relapse-free survival were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.76-1.28; P = .94), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.29; P = .97), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.27; P = .94), respectively. We conclude that outcomes of haplo-HSCT with PTCy are not different for PR/Rel sAML in comparison with PR/Rel de novo AML, a finding of major clinical importance.

Haploidentical stem cell donor choice for patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the ALWP of the EBMT.

ABSTRACT: There is a paucity of information to guide the selection of the most suitable donor in haploidentical (Haplo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). For this reason, from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of Haplo donor characteristics on outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). The primary end point was graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS). Overall, 2200 patients were included. The median age of donors was 37 years (range, 8-71); 820 (37%) were females, including 458 (21%) who were used for male recipients. In addition, 1631 donors (74%) donated peripheral blood (PB). Multivariable analysis identified certain donor-related risk factors with a detrimental impact on transplant outcomes. The use of PB, older donors' ages (>37 years), and female donors to male recipients negatively affected GRFS. Donor's age and female donor-to-male recipient combination also affected nonrelapse mortality, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival. In conclusion, donor-related variables significantly influence outcomes in patients with AML after Haplo-HSCT with PTCy. When possible, younger donors and male donors for male recipients should be prioritized. The use of bone marrow can additionally prevent GVHD.