ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Urgent care centres' (UCCs) hours were developed with the aim of reducing inappropriate emergency department (ED) attendances in England. We aimed to examine the presenting complaint and outcomes of care in 2 general practitioner (GP)-led UCCs with extended opening times. DESIGN: Retrospective observational epidemiological study using routinely collected data. SETTING: 2 GP-led UCCs in London, colocated with a hospital ED. PARTICIPANTS: All children aged under 5â years, attending 2 GP-led UCCs over a 3-year period. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of care for the children including: primary diagnosis; registration status with a GP; destination following review within the UCC; and any medication prescribed. Comparison between GP-led UCC visit rates and routine general practices was also made. RESULTS: 3% (n=7747/282â 947) of all attenders at the GP-led UCCs were children aged under 5â years. The most common reason for attendance was a respiratory illness (27%), followed by infectious illness (17%). 18% (n=1428) were either upper respiratory tract infections or viral infections. The majority (91%) of children attending were registered with a GP, and over two-thirds of attendances were 'out of hours'. Overall 79% were seen and discharged home. Preschool children were more likely to attend their GP (47.0 per 100) than a GP-led UCC (9.4 per 100; 95% CI 8.9 to 10.0). CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of preschool children attending GP-led UCCs do so out of hours, despite the majority being registered with a GP. The case mix is comparable with those presenting to an ED setting, with the majority managed exclusively by the GPs in the UCC before discharge home. Further work is required to understand the benefits of a GP-led urgent system in influencing future use of services especially emergency care.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/organization & administration , Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , General Practitioners , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Linear Models , London , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The demand for urgent care is increasing, and the pressure on emergency departments is of significant concern. General practitioner (GP)-led urgent care centres are a new model of care developed to divert patients to more appropriate primary care environments. This study explores why patients with minor illness choose to attend an urban urgent care centre for their healthcare needs. METHODS: A self-completed questionnaire among patients aged 18â years or over (N=649) who were triaged with a 'minor illness' on arrival to an urgent care centre, colocated with an emergency department in London. RESULTS: Median participant age was 29â years. 58% (649/1112) of patients attending the centre with minor illness during the study period took part. 72% participants were registered with a GP; more women (59%) attended than men; and the majority of participants rated themselves as healthy (81%). Access to care (58%) was a key reason for using the service as was expectation of receiving prescription medication (69%). GP dissatisfaction influenced 10% of participants in their decision to attend. 68% did not contact their GP in the previous 24â h before attending. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the GP-led urgent care centre was similar to walk in centres in attracting healthy young adults, who were mostly registered with a GP and used services because of convenience and ease of access rather than satisfaction levels with their GP. This group may benefit from being seen as part of routine general practice care to provide opportunities for education and promotion of self-management.