Analysing the efficacy and tolerability of dolutegravir plus either rilpivirine or lamivudine in a multicentre cohort of virologically suppressed PLWHIV.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy and safety of two dolutegravir-based two-drug regimens: dolutegravir + lamivudine versus dolutegravir + rilpivirine. METHODS: We analysed a cohort of people living with HIV (PLWHIV) switching to dolutegravir + lamivudine or dolutegravir + rilpivirine. We excluded from the analysis PLWHIV with no available pre-switch genotypic test or with a known resistance mutation to one of the study drugs. We evaluated incidence of virological failure (VF) and treatment discontinuation (TD), as well as changes in immunological and metabolic parameters. RESULTS: We enrolled 592 PLWHIV: 306 in the lamivudine group and 286 in the rilpivirine group. We observed nine VFs in the lamivudine group [1.4 VF per 100 patient-years of follow-up (PYFU)] and four VFs in the rilpivirine group (0.6 VF per 100 PYFU). Subsequent genotypic analysis showed no acquired resistance-associated mutations in those experiencing VF. Estimated probability of maintaining virological suppression at 144 and 240 weeks were 96.6% and 92.7%, respectively, in the lamivudine group and 98.7% and 98.7%, respectively, in the rilpivirine group (log-rank P = 0.172). The estimated probability of maintaining study regimen at Week 240 was 82.3% in the lamivudine group and 85.9% in the rilpivirine group (log-rank P = 0.018). We observed a significant improvement in CD4+ cell count at Week 240 in the lamivudine group (P = 0.012); in the rilpivirine group we registered a significant increase in CD4/CD8 ratio (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Both analysed strategies are effective and safe as switch strategies in clinical practice, with a low incidence of VF and a favourable immunological recovery, even in the long term.

Semen impairment and occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in semen after recovery from COVID-19.

STUDY QUESTION: How is the semen quality of sexually active men following recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection? SUMMARY ANSWER: Twenty-five percent of the men with recent SARS-Cov-2 infections and proven healing were oligo-crypto-azoospermic, despite the absence of virus RNA in semen. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in human semen and its role in virus contagion and semen quality after recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still unclear. So far, studies evaluating semen quality and the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in semen of infected or proven recovered men are scarce and included a limited number of participants. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective cross-sectional study on 43 sexually active men who were known to have recovered from SARS-CoV2 was performed. Four biological fluid samples, namely saliva, pre-ejaculation urine, semen, and post-ejaculation urine, were tested for the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Female partners were retested if any specimen was found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive. Routine semen analysis and quantification of semen leukocytes and interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels were performed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Questionnaires including International Index of Erectile Function and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Short Form were administered to all subjects. The occurrence of virus RNA was evaluated in all the biological fluids collected by RT-PCR. Semen parameters were evaluated according to the World Health Organization manual edition V. Semen IL-8 levels were evaluated by a two-step ELISA method. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After recovery from COVID-19, 25% of the men studied were oligo-crypto-azoospermic. Of the 11 men with semen impairment, 8 were azoospermic and 3 were oligospermic. A total of 33 patients (76.7%) showed pathological levels of IL-8 in semen. Oligo-crypto-azoospermia was significantly related to COVID-19 severity (P < 0.001). Three patients (7%) tested positive for at least one sample (one saliva; one pre-ejaculation urine; one semen and one post-ejaculation urine), so the next day new nasopharyngeal swabs were collected. The results from these three patients and their partners were all negative for SARS-CoV-2. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although crypto-azoospermia was found in a high percentage of men who had recovered from COVID-19, clearly exceeding the percentage found in the general population, the previous semen quality of these men was unknown nor is it known whether a recovery of testicular function was occurring. The low number of enrolled patients may limit the statistical power of study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in saliva, urine, and semen in a small percentage of men who recovered from COVID-19. One-quarter of men who recovered from COVID-19 demonstrated oligo-crypto-azoospermia indicating that an assessment of semen quality should be recommended for men of reproductive age who are affected by COVID-19. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Viro-immunological efficacy and tolerability of dolutegravir-based regimens compared to regimens based on other integrase strand inhibitors, protease inhibitors or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in patients with acute HIV-1 infection: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the tolerability and viro-immunological efficacy of dolutegravir-based regimens (DTG group) with regimens based on EVG, RAL, PI or NNRTI (NODTG group) in patients with acute HIV-1 infections (AHI). METHODS: All patients diagnosed with AHI and on antiretroviral therapy (ART) between January 2015 and December 2017 from five centers in Italy were included and followed-up to 30th April 2018. AHI was defined by the presence of the positive p24 antigen with negative or indeterminate western blot. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled: 20 in the DTG group, 23 in the NODTG group. Nine patients (20.9%; four in the DTG group, five in the NODTG group) were prescribed a four-drug regimen. In the cohort, 81.4% were Italian and 83.7% were male, with a median age of 41 years (interquartile range [IQR] 31-48). Median time between HIV diagnosis and ART initiation was 12 days (IQR 5-28). Seven patients harbored a virus with transmitted mutations at baseline (16.2%), all were in the DTG group (P=0.005). All patients had undetectable HIV-RNA at the end of follow-up except two patients, one of whom had 57 copies and one who was lost to follow-up. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, time to virological suppression was similar in the two groups (log rank: P= 0.7155). After achieving virological suppression, four patients stopped ART because of toxicity: two on DTG, two on EVG for neurological and gastrointestinal toxicity, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our setting, ART in AHI is started very early. DTG showed good viro-immunological efficacy even in the presence of NRTI-transmitted mutations. DTG interruptions were rare.

Prevalence and determinants of resistance mutations in HIV-1-infected patients exposed to integrase inhibitors in a large Italian cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyse the prevalence of integrase resistance mutations in integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-experienced HIV-1-infected patients and its predictors. METHODS: We selected HIV-1 integrase sequences from the Antiviral Response Cohort Analysis (ARCA) database, derived from INSTI-experienced patients between 2008 and 2017. Differences in the prevalence of resistance to raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG) and dolutegravir (DTG) were assessed by χ2 test and predictors of resistance were analysed by logistic regression. RESULTS: We included 462 genotypes from INSTI-exposed individuals: 356 'INSTI-failing' patients and 106 'previously INSTI-exposed' patients (obtained a median of 42 weeks after INSTI discontinuation [interquartile range (IQR) 17-110 weeks]). Overall, at least low-level resistance (LLR) to any INSTI (Stanford 8.5 algorithm) was detected in 198 (42.9%) cases. The most frequent INSTI resistance mutation was N155H, followed by Q148H/K/R, G140A/C/S, E138A/K/T and Y143C/H/R. Y143R and E138A were more prevalent in viral subtype B versus non-B [5.2 versus 1.5%, respectively (P = 0.04), and 3.1 versus 0%, respectively (P = 0.02)]. Overall, the Q148H/K/R plus G140A/C/S and/or E138A/K/T pattern, defining an intermediate level of resistance to DTG, was detected in 70 (15%) cases. Independent predictors of at least LLR to any INSTI were current use versus past use of INSTIs, a lower genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) for contemporary antiretroviral drugs used, and having an integrase sequence obtained in calendar year 2016 as compared to 2008-2009. CONCLUSIONS: The results support integrase resistance testing in INSTI-experienced patients. Emergence of INSTI resistance is facilitated by the reduced genetic barrier of the regimen as a consequence of resistance to companion drugs. However, INSTI resistance may become undetectable by standard population sequencing upon INSTI discontinuation.

Efficacy and safety of switching to dolutegravir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients in clinical practice: results from a multicentre, observational study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of switching antiretroviral therapy to dolutegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) with those of switching to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in clinical practice. METHODS: In a multicentre real-life observational study, we analysed data for HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral treatment with viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL switching to dolutegravir + emtricitabine/TDF (dolutegravir group) or elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF (elvitegravir group). Follow-up was censored at 48 weeks. RESULTS: The 48-week estimated proportion maintaining virological efficacy was 96.1% with dolutegravir (n = 123) and 95.4% with elvitegravir (n = 186; P = 0.941). Patients in the dolutegravir group showed more treatment discontinuations, but these were mainly as a result of simplification. The elvitegravir group showed more discontinuations because of renal adverse events (2.7% versus 0% with dolutegravir). Interestingly, no difference was observed between the two regimens in central nervous system toxicity-related discontinuations. Switching to dolutegravir was associated with a better blood lipid profile. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to dolutegravir + emtricitabine/TDF was associated with similar efficacy and tolerability to switching to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in virologically suppressed patients in clinical practice, although reasons for discontinuation showed differences between regimens. These results should be interpreted with caution, as this is a nonrandomized comparison.

Incidence of hypoglycaemia associated with transient loss of consciousness. A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To define the incidence of hypoglycaemia associated with transient loss of consciousness (TLoC). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using a nested case-control analysis. SETTING: Presentations to the emergency departments (EDs) of four general metropolitan hospitals in Azienda Sanitaria 10, Florence, Italy during 2012. PARTICIPANTS: The cohort consisted of 133,285 patients extracted from the database of ED presentations. All patients with TLoC were identified by nurse triage, and their levels of glycaemia were recorded. Clinical investigations were undertaken using patients' charts and witness statements. Patients were matched with controls according to year of birth, year of cohort entry and gender. RESULTS: Of the 133,285 patients, 3964 (2.9%) presented with TLoC, and 39 (1%) of the patients with TLoC had transient hypoglycaemia. Mean glycaemia in these 39 patients was 52 mg/dl (a level of 112 mg/dl was in controls). Symptoms associated with TLoC during hypoglycaemia differed from those characteristic of syncope. TLoC during hypoglycaemia mainly occurred in elderly patients with diabetes, who had relatively long disease duration, were receiving treatment, often also had renal failure and were experiencing symptoms as a result of lack of food intake. Together, these factors make it easier to diagnose hypoglycaemia associated with TLoC, and our results may prompt modification in medical practice. CONCLUSION: Correct diagnosis of hypoglycaemia associated with TLoC has economic benefits if a protracted and costly series of clinical investigations can be avoided. A diagnosis of hypoglycaemia might also facilitate the resolution of patients' symptoms through lifestyle changes and adjustment of therapy.