Mind-body and art therapies impact on emotional regulation in patients with chronic diseases: a pragmatic mixed-methods randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective emotional regulation is recognized as essential to a good mental health of people with chronic diseases, and Mind-body and Art Therapies (MBATs) could have a positive effect on emotional regulation skills in this population. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effect of MBATs on emotional regulation as measured by the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) questionnaire. METHODS: A convergent mixed approach nested in a pragmatic superiority two arms parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted. French speaking adults with one or more chronic somatic illnesses and not suffering from a chronic psychiatric disorder unrelated to one of their chronic somatic illness were included. At inclusion, non-directive interviews were conducted, followed by an initial DERS assessment. The same combination of evaluation was implemented after 6 months of activity (T1). After inclusion, each participant was randomized within either the intervention group (G1) or the control group (G2) following a controlled wait-list design by use of a pregenerated randomization list. Staff and patient were blinded to this list until the initial evaluation was completed, after which the trial was conducted in an open-label fashion. Participants chose 2 mediations: one creativity-focused (art-therapy, writing workshop, theatre of life, vocal workshop) and one mind-body-focused (mindfulness meditation, Pilates, shiatsu, ayurvedic massages). G1 started their mediations immediately after inclusion, while G2 started 6 months later. Primary outcome was the change in means at 6 months in the overall DERS score compared between each group. Non-directive interviews were carried out at the inclusion and after 6 months of MBATs. A continuous inductive analysis was carried out on gathered material in G1 to explore the participants' experiences regarding their disease and their perceived changes associated to the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients was randomized (75 per groups) at the end of the study. At T1, 133 patients filled out the final questionnaire (67 in G1 vs 66 in G2) and 112 interviews were analysed (54 in G1 vs 58 in G2). All 150 patients were analysed (intention to treat) using a multiple imputation approach. The mean DERS score at T0 was equal to 82.8 ± 21.1 and 85.0 ± 20.2 in G1 and G2 respectively. On average, at T1, the score decreased in the G1 (Δ = -4.8, SD = 21.3) and in G2 (Δ = -0.11, SD = 17.8). The difference in decrease, however, was not statistically significant (p = 0.13). Qualitative analysis underlined some MBATs benefits on emotional regulation, especially on regulation strategies. No harms related to the intervention has been observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study only partially supports benefits on MBAT on emotional regulation skills enhancement in patients with chronic disease receiving MBATs, as measured by the DERS scale. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on Clinical Trials (NCT02911207).

Provision of information on transplantation to cystic fibrosis patients and their relatives: Overview of French practices and recommendations.

BACKGROUND: How health-care professionals inform cystic fibrosis patients and their relatives about transplantation is not well known. Such information may not be provided in a timely or satisfactory manner. We conducted a survey about patient information practices among professionals from all French cystic fibrosis centers and transplant centers, to determine how they might be improved. METHODS: This was a national, retrospective, multicenter, descriptive assessment of practices involving health-care professionals, transplant recipients and their relatives, and peer patients who are themselves transplant recipients. Questionnaires were developed by the French working group on cystic fibrosis patient education (GETHEM: Groupe éducation thérapeutique et mucoviscidose). At the end of the questionnaires, respondents were invited to suggest ways to improve the current process. RESULTS: In all, 216 professionals, 55 patients, 30 relatives of these patients, and 17 peer patients responded to the questionnaires, which addressed topics in chronological order, from neonatal screening or later diagnosis of the illness to the time of the transplant, if one was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings have allowed us to draft nine recommendations for professionals to improve patient information practices. A booklet now being prepared aims to facilitate the process for professionals, and e-learning modules are also forthcoming.

[Perceptions of cystic fibrosis patients, patient relatives and physicians: barriers or motivations to lung transplantation]. / Motivations et freins à la greffe chez patients, aidants et médecins dans la mucoviscidose.

INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study are to describe qualitatively the perceptions of three groups involved in the cystic fibrosis transplant decision, looking for similarities and differences between groups, and to identify those that act as motivations or barriers to transplantation. METHODS: Thirty patients, 26 patient relatives and 27 physicians were interviewed, and concept maps were constructed from those interviews. Their degree of transplant acceptance at the time of the interview was measured. RESULTS: There were motivations and barriers in the pre-, peri- and post-transplant period. Analysis revealed similar perceptions regarding the risks and benefits of transplantation, but also different perceptions in the specific concerns of each group. Patients and patient relatives expressed many questions and fears in their concept maps, and physicians expressed difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the value of better understanding the perceptions of patients, relatives and physicians, in order to remove some of the barriers to transplantation. It also demonstrates the benefits of education and support activities for patients and patient relatives prior to transplantation, and continuing education and supervision for physicians.

Factors influencing quality of life in patients with inherited ichthyosis: a qualitative study in adults using focus groups.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information regarding quality of life in patients with inherited ichthyosis. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors influencing quality of life in patients with inherited ichthyosis. METHODS: The study used focus groups and involved adult patients suffering from inherited ichthyosis from three French hospital centres. Group discussions were conducted by two facilitators and were continued until data saturation was reached. The verbatim transcripts were analysed independently by two investigators. Categories considered as key factors in the modulation of quality of life were negotiated until agreement was obtained. RESULTS: Data saturation was reached after the fifth group. A total of 25 patients affected by various forms of ichthyosis attended these focus groups. The identified factors influencing quality of life were related to physical health, daily life, relations with others or oneself. However, together with difficulties related to ichthyosis, patients also underlined some positive aspects of the disease and described specific measures used to improve their quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study investigating the different factors that could impact quality of life in patients with ichthyosis. This provides an essential framework from which physicians can develop strategies to improve patient care and quality of life and to develop a specific quality of life questionnaire.

Topical corticosteroid phobia in atopic dermatitis: a study of its nature, origins and frequency.

BACKGROUND: Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of atopic dermatitis therapy. Many atopic dermatitis therapeutic failures appear to be attributable to poor adherence to treatment due to topical corticosteroid phobia. OBJECTIVES: To assess the facets, origins and frequency of fear of topical corticosteroid use among patients with atopic dermatitis. METHODS: A questionnaire comprising 69 items, generated from information gathered during interviews with 21 patients and 15 health professionals, was given to consecutive patients consulting at the outpatient dermatology departments of five regional university hospitals or with 53 dermatologists in private practice. RESULTS: A total of 208 questionnaires were analysed (including 144 from parents and 87 from adult patients, 27 of whom were also parents); 80·7% of the respondents reported having fears about topical corticosteroids and 36% admitted nonadherence to treatment. A correlation was found between topical corticosteroid phobia and the need for reassurance, the belief that topical corticosteroids pass through the skin into the bloodstream, a prior adverse event, inconsistent information about the quantity of cream to apply, a desire to self-treat for the shortest time possible or poor treatment adherence. Topical corticosteroid phobia was not correlated with atopic dermatitis severity. CONCLUSION: Topical corticosteroid phobia is a genuine and complex phenomenon, common among French patients with atopic dermatitis, that has an important impact on treatment compliance.

[An evaluation of a patient education programme for children with asthma at a French teaching hospital ("l'espace du souffle", Nantes) (2002-2003)]. / Programme d'éducation thérapeutique collective pour l'enfant asthmatique à Nantes.

A program of patient education was set up at the CHU of Nantes, for groups of children with asthma in 1997. The aim of this study is to realize a formative evaluation to corelate with some effects. This study was proposed to 99 families with asthmatic children. A written questionnaire, was administered to the parents and children, exploring their satisfaction with the programme, their general knowledge and know-how, biomedical parameters. The observation focused on skills and day-to-day life with the illness. The study was completed by 21 families. The majority of the children, aged 7 to 11 years old, had asthma that needed treatment. All of the parents and children were satisfied with their visit to "l'espace du souffle". They all declared having increased their general knowledge and know-how and biomedical parameters did better. They did, however, feel that they did not know enough about how to recognise precursory symptoms of an attack, about how to practise a sport or how to use "corticoids". They also could not control their personal fear during an attack. During the oral questionnaire a general feeling of stress and worry was clearly noticeable in the parents feeling, that did not appear in the written questionnaire. This patient education program appears to be beneficial. Furthermore, this evaluation highlights some subjects that pass unseen during current individual consultations.