Subject(s)
Liver Cirrhosis , Prothrombin , Thrombin , Humans , Prothrombin/metabolism , Liver Cirrhosis/blood , Thrombin/metabolism , Blood Coagulation , Antithrombin III Deficiency/blood , Antithrombin III Deficiency/complications , Antithrombin III Deficiency/diagnosis , Antithrombin III Deficiency/geneticsSubject(s)
Anticoagulants , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Drug Resistance , Heparin , Thrombosis , Humans , Heparin/therapeutic use , Heparin/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Adult , Hemostasis/drug effects , Perioperative Care , Critical CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thrombin generation (TG) in the presence of thrombomodulin (TG-TM) in the plasma of patients with cirrhosis (PWC) is tilted toward a hypercoagulable phenotype. Low protein C and elevated factor VIII levels play a role, but other determinants, such as the prothrombin/antithrombin pair, must also be studied. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were (i) to quantitatively assess the subprocesses (prothrombin conversion and thrombin decay) and (ii) to understand the underlying mechanism by studying TG dynamics after prothrombin and antithrombin plasma level correction in PWC. METHODS: We studied TG-TM in plasma samples of 36 healthy controls (HCs) and 41 PWC with prothrombin and antithrombin levels of <70% and after their correction. We initiated coagulation with an intermediate picomolar concentration of tissue factor. We determined the overall thrombin potential, prothrombin conversion, and thrombin decay. RESULTS: TG-TM was increased in PWC compared with HC due to impaired thrombin inhibition. Indeed, thrombin decay capacity (min-1) decreased from 0.37 (0.35-0.40) in HC to 0.33 (0.30-0.37) in the Child-Turcotte-Pugh A (CTP-A; P = .09), 0.27 (0.26-0.30) in the CTP-B (P < .001), and 0.20 (0.19-0.20) in the CTP-C (P < .001) group. Concomitant correction of prothrombin and antithrombin increased endogenous thrombin potential with prothrombin conversion surpassing thrombin decay. By contrast, when we corrected only antithrombin, TG-TM was normalized and even consistent with a hypocoagulable phenotype in the CTP-C group. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight that in PWC, hypercoagulability (evidenced in the presence of TM) is due to impaired thrombin decay, whereas low prothrombin levels do not translate into decreased prothrombin conversion, likely due to altered TM-activated protein C negative feedback.
Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation , Liver Cirrhosis , Prothrombin , Thrombin , Humans , Thrombin/metabolism , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Case-Control Studies , Liver Cirrhosis/blood , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Aged , Thrombomodulin/blood , Adult , Antithrombins/blood , Blood Coagulation Tests , Phenotype , Thromboplastin/metabolismABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Thrombotic risk assessment in antiphospholipid positive (aPL +) subjects is a major challenge, and the study of in vitro thrombin generation (thrombin generation assays (TGA)) could provide useful information. Activated protein C (APC) sensitivity is involved in thrombotic events in antiphospholipid syndrome patients. We summarized methods used to assess APC sensitivity with TGA and evaluated the prognostic role of APC resistance through literature search. RECENT FINDINGS: APC resistance induced by aPL is a complex pathway. Several cross-sectional studies assessed APC sensitivity to understand thrombotic event mechanisms in aPL + subjects. Only one prospective cohort had investigated the prognostic impact of APC resistance in aPL + subjects, with a positive and significant correlation between APC sensitivity and the risk of thrombosis during the follow up (hazard ratio, 6.07 [95% CI, 1.69-21.87]). APC resistance assessed with TGA could be associated with thrombotic events in aPL + subjects.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antiphospholipid , Antiphospholipid Syndrome , Thrombin , Thrombosis , Humans , Thrombosis/etiology , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/immunology , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/complications , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/diagnosis , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/blood , Risk Assessment/methods , Thrombin/metabolism , Antibodies, Antiphospholipid/blood , Antibodies, Antiphospholipid/immunology , Activated Protein C Resistance , Blood Coagulation Tests/methods , Precision Medicine/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin, administered during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to prevent thromboembolic events, largely depends on plasma antithrombin for its antithrombotic effects. Decreased heparin responsiveness seems frequent on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; however, its association with acquired antithrombin deficiency is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to describe longitudinal changes in plasma antithrombin levels during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and evaluate the association between antithrombin levels and heparin responsiveness. The hypothesis was that extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support would be associated with acquired antithrombin deficiency and related decreased heparin responsiveness. METHODS: Adults receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were prospectively included. All patients received continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin using a standardized protocol (target anti-Xa 0.3 to 0.5 IU/ml). For each patient, arterial blood was withdrawn into citrate-containing tubes at 11 time points (from hour 0 up to day 7). Anti-Xa (without dextran or antithrombin added) and antithrombin levels were measured. The primary outcome was the antithrombin plasma level. In the absence of consensus, antithrombin deficiency was defined as a time-weighted average of antithrombin less than or equal to 70%. Data regarding clinical management and heparin dosage were collected. RESULTS: Fifty patients, including 42% postcardiotomy, were included between April 2020 and May 2021, with a total of 447 samples. Median extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration was 7 (interquartile range, 4 to 12) days. Median antithrombin level was 48% (37 to 60%) at baseline. Antithrombin levels significantly increased throughout the follow-up. Time-weighted average of antithrombin levels was 63% (57 to 73%) and was less than or equal to 70% in 32 (64%) of patients. Overall, 45 (90%) patients had at least one antithrombin value less than 70%, and 35 (70%) had at least one antithrombin value less than 50%. Antithrombin levels were not significantly associated with heparin responsiveness evaluated by anti-Xa assay or heparin dosage. CONCLUSIONS: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was associated with a moderate acquired antithrombin deficiency, mainly during the first 72 h, that did not correlate with heparin responsiveness.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Antithrombins , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Heparin , Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Antithrombins/blood , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Heparin/administration & dosage , Heparin/pharmacology , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Male , Female , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a critical issue in the management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), particularly when immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) combined with dexamethasone therapy are being prescribed as first-line and relapse therapy. One possible explanation for the persistent high rates of VTE, is the use of inappropriate thromboprophylaxis strategies for patients starting antimyeloma treatment. To tackle the issue, the Intergroupe francophone du myélome (IFM) offered convenient guidance for VTE thromboprophylaxis in MM patients initiating systemic therapy. This guidance is mainly supported by the results of a large survey on the clinical habits regarding VTE of physicians who are substantially involved in daily care of MM patients. VTE prophylaxis should be considered for all patients treated with IMiDs in combination with dexamethasone, in the absence of significant comorbidities, such as renal failure or bleeding risk. Anticoagulant should be preferred to antiplatelet agents for thromboprophylaxis. Despite the absence of large randomized controlled trials comparing those attitudes/options, available data on direct oral anticoagulants, which are already used in daily management of MM patients, are consistent with their potential usefulness for VTE prophylaxis in such patients. However, in order to implement a personalized continuous improvement strategy, clinicians must to be organized to collect all the data regarding this management. In other situations, thromboprophylaxis should be evaluated by using risk models and after careful evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio.
Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/chemically induced , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Immunomodulating AgentsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In case of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), the switch to a non-heparin anticoagulant is mandatory, at a therapeutic dose. Such a treatment has limitations though, especially for patients with renal and/or hepatic failure. Candidate laboratory tests could detect the more coagulable HIT patients, for whom therapeutic anticoagulation would be the more justified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a monocentre observational prospective study in which 111 patients with suspected HIT were included. Nineteen were diagnosed with HIT (ELISA and platelet activation assay), among whom 10 were classified as HITT + when a thrombotic event was present at diagnosis or during the first following week. Two plasma prethrombotic biomarkers of in vivo activation of the haemostasis system, procoagulant phospholipids (ProcoagPPL) associated with extracellular vesicles and fibrin monomers (FM test), as well as in vitro thrombin potential (ST Genesia; low picomolar tissue factor) after heparin neutralization (heparinase), were studied. The results were primarily compared between HITT + and HITT- patients. RESULTS: Those HIT + patients with thrombotic events in acute phase or shortly after (referred as HITT+) had a more coagulable phenotype than HIT + patients without thrombotic events since: (i) clotting times related to plasma procoagulant phospholipids tended to be shorter; (ii) fibrin monomers levels were statistically significantly higher (p = 0.0483); (iii) thrombin potential values were statistically significantly higher (p = 0.0404). Of note, among all patients suspected of suffering from HIT, we did not evidence a hypercoagulable phenotype in patients diagnosed with HIT compared to patients for whom the diagnosis of HIT was ruled out. CONCLUSION: The three tests could help identify those HIT patients the most prone to thrombosis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The presence of dextran sulfate (DS) in reagents and the type of blood collection tube (citrate/citrated-theophylline-adenosine-dipyridamole [CTAD]) can lead to discrepancies between unfractionated heparin (UFH) anti-Xa levels. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the extent of the effect (1) of different reagents containing or not containing DS and (2) of the blood collection tubes, on UFH anti-Xa levels, in various clinical situations (NCT04700670). METHODS: We prospectively included patients from eight centers: group (G)1, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) after heparin neutralization (n = 39); G2, cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) after CPB (n = 35); G3, medical ICU (n = 53); G4, other medical inpatients (n = 38). Blood was collected into citrated and CTAD tubes. Chromogenic anti-Xa assays were centrally performed, using seven reagent/analyzer combinations including two without DS. The association between anti-Xa levels and covariates was tested using a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: We analyzed 4,546 anti-Xa values from 165 patients. Median anti-Xa levels were systematically higher with reagents containing DS, whatever the patient group, with the greatest effect observed in G1 (0.32 vs. 0.05 IU/mL). Anti-Xa levels were slightly higher in CTAD than in citrate samples, irrespective of the assay. The model showed: (1) a significant dextran-patient group interaction (p < 0.0001), the effect of DS on anti-Xa levels varying from 30.9% in G4 to 296% in G1, and (2) a significant effect of CTAD, varying between patient groups (p = 0.0302). CONCLUSION: The variability of anti-Xa levels with a great overestimation of the values, using a reagent containing DS, can lead to different treatment decisions, especially after heparin neutralization by protamine. Clinical consequences of these differences remain to be demonstrated.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Heparin , Humans , Heparin/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Critical Illness , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight , Citric Acid , Citrates/therapeutic use , Factor Xa Inhibitors , Partial Thromboplastin TimeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis are at high risk of thrombotic events, including portal vein thrombosis and venous thromboembolism. In such patients, hypercoagulability is not detected by conventional coagulation tests, but only by the thrombin generation assay (TGA) that integrates the role of pro- and anticoagulant factors. However, TGA use to predict clinical events depends on thrombin generation variability over time. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare TGA intraindividual variability over time in patients with cirrhosis and in healthy controls. METHODS: Blood samples were prospectively collected from 34 healthy controls and 52 patients with cirrhosis at week 0 (inclusion), 6, and 12. TGA was performed with the calibrated automated thrombogram method, tissue factor (5 pM), phospholipids, and with and without thrombomodulin (4 nM) or activated protein C (1 nM). RESULTS: When TGA was performed with thrombomodulin, endogenous thrombin potential in patients with cirrhosis was higher compared with controls and increased with cirrhosis severity. Stability over time of all thrombin generation parameters was excellent in healthy controls, good in Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP)-A patients, and poor in CTP-B/C patients (severe cirrhosis). In CTP-B/C patients, the phenotype was more variable because one-third of patients switched to normal or hypercoagulability during the 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: A study with longer monitoring is needed to correlate the hypercoagulable phenotype of patients with cirrhosis with the occurrence of thrombotic events.
Subject(s)
Thrombophilia , Thrombosis , Humans , Thrombin/metabolism , Thrombomodulin , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Blood Coagulation Tests/methodsABSTRACT
With the advent of new viscoelastometric hemostatic assay (VHA) devices, with ready-to-use cartridge reagents allowing for their use by people without special laboratory skills, the appreciation of the actual clinical value of VHAs in settings such as severe trauma, post-partum hemorrhage, cardiac surgery and liver transplantation still needs to be fully validated. While two of the newest versions remain based on a 'cup and pin' system (ROTEM® sigma, ClotPro®), two other new devices (TEG® 6s, Quantra®) rely on very different technologies: clotting blood is no longer in contact with the probe and challenged by oscillation of one of the components but explored with ultrasound exposure. A systematic literature search (including Sonoclot®) retrieved 20 observational studies (19 prospective). Most studies pointed to imperfect agreements, highlighting the non-interchangeability of devices. Only a few studies, often with a limited number of patients enrolled, used a clinical outcome. No study compared VHA results with conventional laboratory assays obtained through a rapid tests panel. Clinical evidence of the utility of the new VHAs largely remains to be proven through randomized clinical trials, with clinically relevant outcomes, and compared to rapid panel hemostasis testing. The availability of new, improved VHA devices provides an impetus and an opportunity to do so.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although a growing number of very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), multiple conditions, and polypharmacy receive direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), few studies specifically investigated both apixaban/rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in such patients. AIMS: To investigate: (1) DOAC concentration-time profiles; (2) thrombin generation (TG); and (3) clinical outcomes 6 months after inclusion in very elderly AF in-patients receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban. METHODS: Adage-NCT02464488 was an academic prospective exploratory multicenter study, enrolling AF in-patients aged ≥80 years, receiving DOAC for at least 4 days. Each patient had one to five blood samples at different time points over 20 days. DOAC concentrations were determined using chromogenic assays. TG was investigated using ST-Genesia (STG-ThromboScreen, STG-DrugScreen). RESULTS: We included 215 patients (women 71.1%, mean age: 87 ± 4 years), 104 rivaroxaban and 111 apixaban, and 79.5% receiving reduced-dose regimen. We observed important inter-individual variabilities (coefficient of variation) whatever the regimen, at C max [49-46%] and C min [75-61%] in 15 mg rivaroxaban and 2.5 mg apixaban patients, respectively. The dose regimen was associated with C max and C min plasma concentrations in apixaban (p = 0.0058 and p = 0.0222, respectively), but not in rivaroxaban samples (multivariate analysis). Moreover, substantial variability of thrombin peak height (STG-ThromboScreen) was noticed at a given plasma concentration for both xabans, suggesting an impact of the underlying coagulation status on TG in elderly in-patients. After 6-month follow-up, major bleeding/thromboembolic event/death rates were 6.7%/1.0%/17.3% in rivaroxaban and 5.4%/3.6%/18.9% in apixaban patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study provides original data in very elderly patients receiving DOAC in a real-life setting, showing great inter-individual variability in plasma concentrations and TG parameters. Further research is needed to understand the potential clinical impact of these findings.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Stroke , Aged , Humans , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Thrombin , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Pyridones/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Stroke/drug therapyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing requires normal pooled plasma (NPP) in performing mixing studies and can be used for normalized ratios of clotting times (CTs). The aims were to demonstrate whether significant differences in clotting times between two batches of a same commercial NPP (CRYOcheck™) directly affect NPP-based cut-off values. METHODS: Diluted Russell Viper venom time (DRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were used for LA testing. Screening, mixing and confirm tests were performed with Stago® instruments and reagents. Two batches of commercial NPP (A1291 and A1301 from CRYOcheck™; frozen) were compared in the determination of cut-off values. Cut-off values were defined as 99th percentile values of 60 healthy donors and compared with Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Cut-off values obtained with the two NPP batches were significantly different for DRVVT (screen normalized ratio: 1.09 vs. 1.24, screen mix: 41.9 s vs. 38.9 s; index of circulating anticoagulant: 5.0 vs. 8.4; all had p-value <.001). On the contrary, no significant differences were observed for aPTT (screen normalized ratio: 1.32 vs. 1.34; p-value = .4068, screen mix: 37.8 s vs. 38.1 s; p-value = .1153) except for index of circulating anticoagulant: 9.6 versus 10.4 (p-value <.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that differences between two commercial NPP batches produced by a same manufacturer influenced LA cut-off values used for mixing studies and normalized ratios. Adequate cut-off setting, taking into account NPP CTs, is important to provide accurate conclusion about the presence or absence of a LA and avoid potential clinical impact.
Subject(s)
Antiphospholipid Syndrome , Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor , Humans , Blood Coagulation Tests , Partial Thromboplastin Time , Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Prothrombin TimeABSTRACT
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are commonly used to prevent clotting of the hemodialysis extracorporeal circuit and optimize hemodialysis adequacy. There is no consensus on the optimal dosing for UFH and LMWHs during hemodialysis. In clinical practice, semiquantitative clotting scoring of the dialyzer and venous chamber may help to guide UFH and LMWH dose adjustment. Laboratory monitoring has not been shown to improve clinical outcomes and is therefore not routinely indicated in most hemodialysis patients. It might, however, be considered in select patients, such as those with extremes of body weight or history of repeated clotting or bleeding. Methods for laboratory monitoring include the activated partial thromboplastin time, activated clotting time, and antifactor Xa assays for UFH and antifactor Xa assay for LMWHs. Target ranges for anticoagulation in hemodialysis have been suggested but not clearly defined. When utilizing these tests, issues such as availability, standardization, interfering factors, and interpretation must be considered. In this narrative review, we discuss the rationale and methods of monitoring anticoagulation in hemodialysis.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Drug Monitoring , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight , Heparin , Renal Dialysis , Humans , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Heparin/therapeutic use , Heparin/administration & dosage , Drug Monitoring/methods , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Partial Thromboplastin Time , Blood Coagulation Tests/methods , Blood Coagulation/drug effectsABSTRACT
Background: Anti-Xa assays are used for unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring. Dextran sulfate (DS) is used in some assays to overcome the artifactual preanalytical release of platelet factor 4. However, the practical implications of this test modification have not been studied extensively. Objectives: To investigate the impact of the presence of DS in the anti-Xa assay for UFH laboratory monitoring. Methods: We studied factor Xa inhibition, using an assay without DS (Stago Liquid Anti-Xa), in normal pool plasma spiked with various concentrations of UFH (up to 1 IU/mL) in the presence of increasing concentrations of DS (up to 2560 µg/mL). We also investigated the effect of DS on FXa inhibition measured after the addition of UFH and heparin antagonists (protamine and Polybrene; Sigma Aldrich). Eventually, we compared the anti-Xa levels measured using the assay without DS to those measured with an assay containing DS (BIOPHEN Heparin LRT, Hyphen BioMed). Results: DS per se had a detectable anti-Xa effect. FXa inhibition in UFH-spiked plasma linearly increased with increasing concentrations of added DS, with a plateau at approximately 160 µg/mL DS, at which the apparent anti-Xa level had almost doubled. In the presence of heparin antagonists, the addition of DS increased anti-Xa levels, corresponding to the dissociation of the UFH-antagonists complexes in vitro. With the anti-Xa assay containing DS, UFH inhibition was not detected. Conclusion: In the presence of high concentrations of DS, FXa inhibition was much higher than that predicted from added UFH amounts, presumably related to the greater availability of UFH for interaction with antithrombin. While the relevance of measuring this "masked" heparin has not been demonstrated, the presence of DS renders the result inaccurate in the presence of protamine or Polybrene.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is currently no universal and standardized test available to phenotype plasma fibrinolytic system. AIMS: Our main aims were to evaluate the performances of the 'global fibrinolysis capacity' assay (GFC) performed with the Lysis Timer® instrument, and to study the influence of some preanalytical conditions. METHOD: Euglobulin clot lysis time (ECLT) and GFC were performed under several preanalytical conditions. RESULTS: GFC showed satisfactory intra- and inter-run precision. Frozen controls and reagents showed stability over the studied period. There was no statistically significant difference between GFC assessed in plasma samples processed at 4 °C or at 20 °C. GFC assessed with frozen-thawed plasma samples was prolonged when compared to fresh samples (p = 0.014). The centrifugation scheme had no influence on PAI-1 activity levels, GFC and ECLT. Reference interval for GFC ranges from 29.3 (C I90% = 26.9-31.9) to 49.5 (90% CI = 45.9-52.2) minutes. In addition, a preliminary study in 40 healthy volunteers and 43 adult patients referred for investigation of a bleeding disorder was conducted to compare GFC and ECLT assays in their ability to classify samples with shortened or prolonged clot lysis times. Disagreements between ECLT and GFC were observed for 23 samples (out of 83), most of them minor. CONCLUSION: GFC is suitable and convenient for a broad clinical use and can be performed with frozen-thawed plasma samples. Unlike ECLT, GFC is designed to take into account the balance between inhibitors and activators of the fibrinolytic system and could detect both hypo- and hyperfibrinolytic states. Whether it is as suitable as or even better than ECLT to detect a bleeding tendency due to a hyperactive fibrinolytic system deserves to be properly investigated.