Overexpression of EP300-interacting inhibitor of differentiation 3 predicts poor prognosis in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

EP300-interacting inhibitor of differentiation 3 (EID3) is a member of the IED family and has been associated with tumorigenesis and tumor development in different cancer types. However, the role of EID3 in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) prognosis is not clear. Whole transcriptome sequencing data of 249 and 149 GBM patients were collected from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database respectively. The correlation between EID3 expression and overall survival (OS)/clinical pathologic features of GBM patients was investigated. Based on the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, EID3 expression in GBM tissues was significantly lower than in normal brain tissues (P < 0.001), and significantly higher than in LGG (low-grade glioma) (P < 0.001).There was a significant correlation between high EID3 expression with poor OS in CGGA (P = 0.049) and TCGA data (P = 0.024). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) data analysis revealed a significant difference (FDR < 0.25, NOM p-value < 0.05) in the enrichment of MSigDB Collection (h.all.v6.2.symbols.gmt). A total of eight enriched pathways were identified in the high EID3 expression group, including Myc Targets V1, Kras signaling DN, and DNA repair pathways. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that high expression of EID3 correlated with poor OS (P = 0.032, HR = 1.41, CI: 1.03-1.90). We conclude that EID3 could serve as an independent factor for predicting the prognosis of patients with GBM. Moreover, it is associated with GBM development through the regulation of the Myc Targets, Kras signaling DN, and DNA repair pathways.

HIF-1α induces immune escape of prostate cancer by regulating NCR1/NKp46 signaling through miR-224.

BACKGROUND: Metastasis of prostate cancer (PCa) is largely affected by natural killer (NK) cells. This study aimed to clarify the mechanisms underlying tumor cells escaping from NK cells mediated by HIF-1α. METHODS: MiR-224 expression in lymphocytes and HIF-1α protein level in NK cells were determined by qRT-PCR and western blot, respectively. The amount of NKp46+ NK cells was detected with flow cytometry. The IFN-γ level was examined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). NK cells were tested for cytolytic activity with a Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay, and treated with oxygenglucose deprivation (OGD) for hypoxia simulation. Interaction between miR-224 and NCR1 was evaluated with dual luciferase reporter assay. RESULTS: MiR-224 was down-regulated in lymphocytes isolated from prostate cancer tissues (n = 10). Overexpression of miR-224 protected prostate cancer from NK cells. HIF-1α increased miR-224 to inhibit the killing capability of NK cells on prostate cancer. MiR-224 controlled the expression of NCR1. Overexpression of miR-224 protected prostate cancer from NK cells through NCR1/NKp46 signaling. Suppression of HIF-1α enhanced the cytotoxicity of NK cells on prostate cancer via miR-224/NCR1 pathway. CONCLUSION: HIF-1α inhibits NCR1/NKp46 pathway through up-regulating miR-224, which affects the killing capability of NK cells on prostate cancer, thus inducing immune escape of tumor cells.