Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Allergy ; 71(11): 1552-1560, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27015954

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In a previously reported CoFAR study, 55 subjects with egg allergy underwent randomized, placebo-controlled egg oral immunotherapy (eOIT). Active treatment induced desensitization in most and sustained unresponsiveness (SU) in a smaller subset. We hypothesized that component-resolved analysis of IgE, IgG4, IgA, IgA1, and IgA2 may identify potential biomarkers of SU in OIT subjects. METHODS: Longitudinal samples for 51 egg-allergic subjects (37 active and 14 placebo) were available. Egg white (EW)-, ovalbumin (OVA)-, and ovomucoid (OVM)-specific levels of IgA, IgA1, and IgA2 were quantified by ELISA. IgE and IgG4 to these antigens were quantified using ImmunoCAP® . Clinical responders achieved SU to egg; all others were considered nonresponders. Between-group comparisons were made among active and placebo, as well as responders and nonresponders. RESULTS: No placebo subjects achieved responder status. Through month 48, among the 37 active subjects, baseline IgE-OVM was lower in responders (median 3.97 kU/l, n = 19) than in nonresponders (10.9 kU/l, n = 18, P = 0.010). Logistic regression analysis revealed that lower baseline IgE-EW (P = 0.038), IgE-OVM (P = 0.032), and a higher IgG4/IgE-OVM ratio (P = 0.013) were associated with clinical response. Relative increases in IgG4-EW, IgA-EW, and IgA2-EW were observed in responders (P = 0.024, 0.024, and 0.029, respectively). IgG4/IgE, IgA/IgE, and IgA2/IgE ratios for EW and IgA/IgE ratio for OVA were found to be significantly elevated among responders (P = 0.004, 0.009, 0.028, and 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Increased IgG4-EW, IgA-EW, and IgA2-EW during eOIT are associated with clinical response to eOIT. Lower pretreatment IgE-EW and IgE-OVM are also associated with SU. Future studies are needed to evaluate and validate these potential biomarkers.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic , Egg Hypersensitivity/immunology , Egg Hypersensitivity/therapy , Eggs/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Administration, Oral , Allergens/administration & dosage , Biomarkers , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Male , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
2.
Neurology ; 70(19): 1688-90, 2008 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18057316

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Clinical Trials Group established the Clinical Research Collaboration (CRC) Project in 2005 to increase community-based physician involvement in NINDS-sponsored research. METHODS: We assessed a random sample of 112 of the more than 1,000 current NINDS-sponsored clinical research studies to determine which could involve community physicians in enrollment or follow-up. Scoring factors were based on the premise that participation is feasible for noninvasive studies with simple screening, and follow-up criteria and visit frequency consistent with usual care. Scored studies included 26 Phase III, 31 Phase I/II, and 55 nonclinical trials. RESULTS: Overall, 41% of the sampled research studies were considered conducive to community physician participation that exceeds referral only; 21% with participation in all study activities and 20% with ability to provide some follow-up. Specialized neuropsychological or neurologic scale testing was judged to exclude community physician participation in 16% of studies. CONCLUSION: Many National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke studies are available in which community-based physicians could participate. Involving community physicians may increase efficiency of completing clinical research and encourage application of research findings in community practices.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/trends , Community Health Centers/trends , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/trends , Neurology/trends , Physicians/trends , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Trials as Topic/trends , Community Health Centers/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Mass Screening , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/statistics & numerical data , Neurology/statistics & numerical data , Patient Selection , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Research Support as Topic/trends , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL