Thermal insulation does not hamper assessment of injuries in trauma CT scans.

PURPOSE: The use of thermal insulations reduces the risk of hypothermia, therefore decreases the risk of death in trauma victims. The aim of the study was to assess whether thermal insulations cause artifacts, which may hinder the diagnosis of injuries, and how the used thermo-systems alter the radiation dose in polytrauma computed tomography. METHODS: Computed tomography scans were made using the road accident victim body wrapped consecutively with 7 different covers. 14 injury areas were listed and evaluated by 22 radiologists. The radiation dose was measured using a dosimeter placed on the victim in the abdominal area. RESULTS: No significant artifacts in any of the tested covers were observed. The presence of few minor artifacts did not hinder the assessment of injuries. Certain materials increased (up to 19,1%) and some decreased (up to -30,3%) the absorbed radiation dose. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal insulation systems tested in this study do not cause significant artifacts hindering assessment of injuries in CT scans. Concern for artifacts and increased radiation dose should not be a reason to remove patients' thermal insulation during performing trauma CT-scanning.

Artifacts in fluoroscopy and changes in radiation dose caused by heating blankets and insulating covers during simulated endovascular treatment.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess whether insulating covers and warming systems cause artifacts in fluoroscopy, and whether they alter the radiation dose. METHODS: Eight insulating and warming systems were wrapped around the phantom in order to obtain images in fluoroscopy, and to measure the absorbed and scattered radiation dose. A dosimeter, endovascular catheters, and stents were placed into a phantom. The other dosimeter was placed outside of a C-arm table, at the operator's and anesthesiologist's locations. RESULTS: Most of the insulating covers did not cause artifacts in the fluoroscopy and led to a significant decrease in both the absorbed and scattered radiation dose. The highest decrease in the absorbed dose was observed with metalized foil (- 2.09%; p = 0.001) and in the scattered dose with Helios cover (- 55%; p < 0.001). Only one heating system (Ready Heat combined with Hypothermia Prevention and Management Kit cover) caused significant artifacts and increased radiation up to 99% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Thermal insulation may be maintained during X-ray-guided emergency endovascular procedures in trauma victims. Self-heating blankets should be replaced with another warming system.

Effect of Thermal Insulation on Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Polytrauma Computed Tomography.

PURPOSE: Unintentional drop in body temperature in trauma victims is an independent risk factor for mortality. We aimed to assess the impact of thermal insulation on image quality and radiation dose in polytrauma computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Thirteen different insulating covers were used to wrap CT phantoms. Images were assessed subjectively at a radiological workstation and analyzed digitally with dedicated software evaluating the noise intensity, spatial resolution, and image homogeneity. The radiation dose was measured using a dosimeter. RESULTS: Most materials did not cause significant artifacts apart from 2 heating pads. Although the radiation dose was increased by the majority of insulating covers (up to 64.66%), certain covers decreased the absorbed radiation (up to -7.35%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of insulating systems do not cause artifacts in CT scans. When using covers with self-heating warmers, removing the heating pad is suggested due to the risk of considerable artifacts appearing. Certain insulating covers may increase or decrease the radiation dose.