Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters








Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Protoc ; 4(3): e996, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38511393

ABSTRACT

The second-generation Drosophila traumatic brain injury (TBI) device dTBI2 improves Drosophila TBI administration by providing a moderate-throughput, tunable, head-specific injury. Our updated device design improves user-friendliness, eliminates inconsistencies in injury timing, and has an updated circuit design to extend the longevity of delicate electronic components. dTBI2 improves reproducibility across users and runs, and results in more consistent post-injury phenotypes. This protocol describes the construction, calibration, and use of the dTBI2 device, which uses an Arduino-controlled piezoelectric actuator to deliver a force that compresses a fly head against a metal collar. The duration and depth of head compression is tunable, allowing calibration of injury severity. All device components are commercially available, and the entire device can be constructed in under a week for less than $1000. The dTBI2 design will enable any lab to build a highly reliable, low-cost device for Drosophila TBI, facilitating increased adoption and ease of exploration of closed-head TBI in Drosophila for forward genetic screens. We describe below the three protocols necessary for constructing a dTBI2 device. © 2024 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Construction of the dTBI2 control device Basic Protocol 2: Construction of the piezoelectric actuator housing Basic Protocol 3: Administration of dTBI2 injuries.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Drosophila , Animals , Reproducibility of Results , Disease Models, Animal , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Pressure
2.
Neurosurg Rev ; 46(1): 178, 2023 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37466764

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic led to stringent guidelines to restrict the conduct of non-emergent surgical procedures. Consequently, neurosurgery departments experienced a decline in case volumes and greater educational time being spent on virtual research projects. In our report, we reveal how neurosurgical research has changed during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic phase. The WebOfScience database was searched for neurosurgical articles published between 2012-2019 (pre-pandemic) and 2020-2022 (pandemic). From this data, the keywords, terms, and countries were analyzed using networks formed by the VOS Viewer software. In addition, the analysis was repeated for neurosurgical articles specific to COVID-19. Network analyses of terms and keywords revealed an increased popularity of virtual research projects, including case reports, meta-analyses, reviews, surveys, and database studies. Additionally, there was increased interest in research pertaining to neurosurgical education during the post-pandemic era, including topics regarding virtual training modalities, mental health, and telemedicine. Our bibliometrics analysis suggests that the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on hospital systems affected neurosurgical training programs. Future investigations should explore the effects of the trainee experience during the COVID-19 pandemic on the outlook for neurosurgical education.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Neurosurgery , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Neurosurgery/education , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL